M. Conde
University of Alaska Fairbanks
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by M. Conde.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2014
M. Zettergren; K. A. Lynch; D. L. Hampton; M. J. Nicolls; B. Wright; M. Conde; J. Moen; M. Lessard; R. J. Miceli; S. P. Powell
Auroral ionospheric F region density depletions observed by PFISR (Poker Flat Incoherent Scatter Radar) during the MICA (Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Coupling in the Alfven Resonator) sounding rocket campaign are critically examined alongside complementary numerical simulations. Particular processes of interest include cavity formation due to intense frictional heating and Pedersen drifts, evolution in the presence of structured precipitation, and refilling due to impact ionization and downflows. Our analysis uses an ionospheric fluid model which solves conservation of mass, momentum, and energy equations for all major ionospheric species. These fluid equations are coupled to an electrostatic current continuity equation to self-consistently describe auroral electric fields. Energetic electron precipitation inputs for the model are specified by inverting optical data, and electric field boundary conditions are obtained from direct PFISR measurements. Thus, the model is driven in as realistic a manner as possible. Both incoherent scatter radar (ISR) data and simulations indicate that the conversion of the F region plasma to molecular ions and subsequent recombination is the dominant process contributing to the formation of the observed cavities, all of which occur in conjunction with electric fields exceeding ∼90 mV/m. Furthermore, the cavities often persist several minutes past the point when the frictional heating stops. Impact ionization and field-aligned plasma flows modulate the cavity depth in a significant way but are of secondary importance to the molecular generation process. Informal comparisons of the ISR density and temperature fits to the model verify that the simulations reproduce most of the observed cavity features to a reasonable level of detail.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2015
L. R. Liuzzo; Aaron J. Ridley; N. J. Perlongo; E. J. Mitchell; M. Conde; D. L. Hampton; W. A. Bristow; M. J. Nicolls
Winds in the thermosphere are highly important for transporting mass, momentum, and energy over the globe. In the high-latitude region, observations show that ion and neutral motions are strongly coupled when the aurora is present but the coupling is less evident when there is no aurora. In this study, we investigate the ability of the Global Ionosphere-Thermosphere Model (GITM) to simulate the mesoscale wind structure over Alaska during a substorm. Thirteen distinct numerical simulations of a substorm event that occurred between 02:00 and 17:00 Universal Time on 24 November 2012 have been performed. Distinct drivers considered include the Weimer and SuperDARN potential patterns and the OVATION Prime and OVATION-SME auroral models. The effects of the boundary between the neutral wind dynamo calculation and the high-latitude imposed electric potential were also considered. Neutral wind velocities and thermospheric temperatures measured by the Scanning Doppler Imager instruments located at three locations in Alaska were compared to GITM simulation results, and electron densities within GITM were compared to data from the Poker Flat Incoherent Scatter Radar. It was found that the different drivers used between multiple simulations lead to various amounts of momentum coupling within the simulation, affecting the accuracy of the modeled neutral and ion flow patterns and the strength of electron precipitation at high latitudes. This affirms that better observations of auroral precipitation and electric fields are required to accurately understand and consistently reproduce the mesoscale neutral wind flow patterns and temperature structure in the high-latitude thermosphere.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2010
M. Conde; M. J. Nicolls
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2012
M. J. Nicolls; Sharon L. Vadas; J. W. Meriwether; M. Conde; D. L. Hampton
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2012
C. Anderson; M. Conde; Matthew G. McHarg
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2006
H. C. Stenbaek-Nielsen; M. Conde; M. F. Larsen; D. Lummerzheim
Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics | 2013
C. Anderson; M. J. Kosch; M. J. Nicolls; M. Conde
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2012
C. Anderson; M. Conde; Matthew G. McHarg
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2012
C. Anderson; M. Conde; Matthew G. McHarg
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2015
M. S. Dhadly; J. W. Meriwether; M. Conde; D. L. Hampton