M. Corradini

Experimental evidence of antiproton reflection by a solid surface

We report here experimental evidence of the reflection of a large fraction of a beam of low energy antiprotons by an aluminum wall. This derives from the analysis of a set of annihilations of antiprotons that come to rest in rarefied helium gas after hitting the end wall of the apparatus. A Monte Carlo simulation of the antiproton path in aluminum indicates that the observed reflection occurs primarily via a multiple Rutherford-style scattering on Al nuclei, at least in the energy range

Thorotrast: analysis of the time evolution of its α activity concentration, in the 70 years following the chemical purification of Thorium.

1char21{}10phantom{rule{0.3em}{0ex}}mathrm{keV}

Measurement of the antiproton-nucleus annihilation cross section at 5.3 MeV

where the phenomenon is most visible in the analyzed data. These results contradict the common belief according to which the interactions between matter and antimatter are dominated by the reciprocally destructive phenomenon of annihilation.

Experimental apparatus for annihilation cross-section measurements of low energy antiprotons

We simulate the α-activity of the Thorium series elements present in the contrast medium named Thorotrast, used until 1960 and cause of certified deaths until today. Assuming, as active components at t=0, (232)Th and (228)Th in the same relative concentration they have in nature, α-activity oscillates for some decades before reaching a stationary value that in absence of biological depletion would be AST =24000Bq/g. Our Montecarlo code generates the nuclear decays of the Thorium series with and without in-vivo biological depletion, arriving to three kinds of results for the activity: 1) Theoretical activity concentration (no biological depletion). Our result is fitted by: A(t)=A(ST).{[1-exp(-t/10)]+[exp(-t/tB)(1-0.8exp(-t/tA))]}, with t in years, tA=1.07.10(-2) years, and tB=2.38 years. 2) Weak biological depletion (228Ra/232 Th equilibrium activity ratio 0.6, 224Ra/228Ra e.a.r 0.9, 10% excretion for 220Rn). The ratio of the activity concentration to the theoretical activity concentration is fitted by: A weak (t)/A(t)=0.61+0.29 exp[-(t/15)2] (t in years). 3) Strong biological depletion (228Ra/232Th e.a.r 0.4, 224Ra/228Ra e.a.r. 0.8, 10% excretion for 220Rn). The ratio of the activity concentration to the theoretical activity concentration is fitted by A(strong)(t)/A(t)=0.44+0.4 exp[-(t/13)2](t in years). We also report fluctuation calculation for two cases where standard statistical behavior is not expected.