M. Cribier
Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by M. Cribier.
Physical Review Letters | 2011
M. Cribier; M. Fechner; T. Lasserre; A. Letourneau; D. Lhuillier; G. Mention; D. Franco; Vasily Kornoukhov; S. Schönert
Several observed anomalies in neutrino oscillation data can be explained by a hypothetical fourth neutrino separated from the three standard neutrinos by a squared mass difference of a few eV(2). We show that this hypothesis can be tested with a PBq (ten kilocurie scale) (144)Ce or (106)Ru antineutrino beta source deployed at the center of a large low background liquid scintillator detector. In particular, the compact size of such a source could yield an energy-dependent oscillating pattern in event spatial distribution that would unambiguously determine neutrino mass differences and mixing angles.
Physical Review D | 2015
J. Gaffiot; T. Lasserre; G. Mention; M. Vivier; M. Cribier; M. Durero; V. Fischer; A. Letourneau; E. Dumonteil; Ivan Saldikov; G. V. Tikhomirov
The standard three-neutrino oscillation paradigm, associated with small squared mass splittings Δm 2 ≪ 0.1 eV 2 , has been successfully built up over the last 15 years using solar, atmospheric, long baseline accelerator and reactor neutrino experiments. However, this well-established picture might suffer from anomalous results reported at very short baselines in some of these experiments. If not experimental artifacts, such results could possibly be interpreted as the existence of at least an additional fourth sterile neutrino species, mixing with the known active flavors with an associated mass splitting Δm 2 new ≫ 0.01 eV 2 and being insensitive to standard weak interactions. Precision measurements at very short baselines (5–15 m) with intense MeV ¯ ν e emitters can be used to probe these anomalies. In this article, the expected ¯ ν e signal and backgrounds of a generic experiment which consists of deploying an intense β − radioactive source inside or in the vicinity of a large liquid scintillator detector are studied. The technical challenges to perform such an experiment are identified, along with quantifying the possible source-and detector-induced systematics and their impact on the sensitivity to the observation of neutrino oscillations at short baselines.
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics | 2015
V. Fischer; T. Chirac; T. Lasserre; C. Volpe; M. Cribier; M. Durero; J. Gaffiot; T. Houdy; A. Letourneau; G. Mention; M. Pequignot; V. Sibille; M. Vivier
Core-collapse supernovae produce an intense burst of electron antineutrinos in the few-tens-of-MeV range. Several Large Liquid Scintillator-based Detectors (LLSD) are currently operated worldwide, being very effective for low energy antineutrino detection through the Inverse Beta Decay (IBD) process. In this article, we develop a procedure for the prompt extraction of the supernova location by revisiting the details of IBD kinematics over the broad energy range of supernova neutrinos. Combining all current scintillator-based detector, we show that one can locate a canonical supernova at 10 kpc with an accuracy of 45 degrees (68% C.L.). After the addition of the next generation of scintillator-based detectors, the accuracy could reach 12 degrees (68% C.L.), therefore reaching the performances of the large water Cerenkov neutrino detectors. We also discuss a possible improvement of the SuperNova Early Warning System (SNEWS) inter-experiment network with the implementation of a directionality information in each experiment. Finally, we discuss the possibility to constrain the neutrino energy spectrum as well as the mass of the newly born neutron star with the LLSD data
arXiv: Nuclear Experiment | 2011
M. Cribier
The fundamental knowledge on neutrinos acquired in the recent years open the possibility of applied neutrino physics. Among it the automatic and non intrusive monitoring of nuclear reactor by its antineutrino signal could be very valuable to IAEA in charge of the control of nuclear power plants. Several efforts worldwide have already started.
Physical Review D | 2016
G. Boireau; A. Cucoanes; L. Giot; M. Pequignot; R. Granelli; T. Milleto; T-A. Nghiem; L. Scola; A. Porta; V.M. Bui; L. Latron; N. Peuvrel; A. P. Collin; C. Buck; V. Durand; J. Gaffiot; J. Pelzer; S. Bouvier; P. Legou; T. Lasserre; E. Dumonteil; D. Lhuillier; M. Vivier; G. Mercier; C. Varignon; G. Prono; H. Deschamp; Y. Piret; Y. Kato; N. Gerard Castaing
arXiv: Instrumentation and Detectors | 2013
A. Gando; I. Shimizu; Yu. G. Kolomensky; A. Kozlov; T. O'Donnell; K. Ueshima; F. Suekane; Y. Mei; L. Scola; T. Mitsui; D.M. Markoff; T. Banks; J. Gaffiot; S. Hayashida; K. Tamae; M. Koga; K. Inoue; R. Milincic; H. Ikeda; B.K. Fujikawa; D. Lhuillier; A. Suzuki; S. Yamada; M. Vivier; A. Detwiler; S. Matsuda; Y. Gando; P. Decowski; S. Matsuno; K. Ishidoshiro
arXiv: High Energy Physics - Experiment | 2016
T. Lasserre; M. Cribier; Alexander Merle; S. Mertens; K. Altenmueller; M. Vivier
arXiv: Nuclear Experiment | 2010
T. Lasserre; M. Fechner; G. Mention; M. Cribier; A. Letourneau; D. Lhuillier
arXiv: High Energy Physics - Experiment | 2013
A. Gando; I. Shimizu; Yu. G. Kolomensky; A. Kozlov; T. O'Donnell; K. Ueshima; F. Suekane; L. Scola; T. Mitsui; D. M. Markoff; T. I. Banks; J. Gaffiot; S. Hayashida; K. Tamae; M. Koga; Koji Inoue; R. Milincic; H. Ikeda; B. K. Fujikawa; Akira Suzuki; Sumio Yamada; M. Vivier; J. A. Detwiler; S. Matsuda; Y. Gando; P. Decowski; S. Matsuno; Hiroshi Yoshida; S. Yoshida; K. Nakamura
Archive | 2015
K. Altenmueller; M. Agostini; S. Appel; G. Bellini; J. Benziger; N. Berton; D. Bick; G. Bonfini; D. Bravo; B. Caccianiga; F. Calaprice; A. Caminata; P. Cavalcante; A. Chepurnov; K. Choi; M. Cribier; S. Davini; A. Derbin; L. Di Noto; M. Durero; A. Empl; A. Etenko; G. Fiorentini; K. Fomenko; D. Franco; F. Gabriele; J. Gaffiot; C. Galbiati; C. Ghiano; M. Giammarchi