M.D. del Toro

Early prosthetic joint infection: outcomes with debridement and implant retention followed by antibiotic therapy

Recent expert reviews recommend a conservative surgical strategy - debridement and irrigation, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) - for most early post-surgical prosthetic joint infections (PJI). However, differences exist in published series regarding success rates with DAIR, and the size of most series is small. In this prospective multicenter cohort study of early PJI managed by DAIR, factors associated with failure of the DAIR were analyzed. Out of 139 early PJI, 117 cases managed with DAIR were studied For 67 patients (57.3%), infection was cured and the implant was salvaged with definite antimicrobial therapy. In 35 (29.9%) DAIR failed and removal of the prosthesis was necessary during follow-up. Finally, 15 patients (12.8%) needed chronic suppressive antimicrobial therapy due to suspected or confirmed persistent infection. Infections due to methicillin-resistant S. aureus (72.7% failed; p 0.05) and those treated at one of the hospitals (80.0% failed; p <0.05) had worse outcomes, but only this last variable was associated with treatment failure following multivariate analysis. Seventy-four per cent of patients who were successfully treated by DAIR and only 32.7% of the failures were able to walk without help or with one stick at the last follow-up visit (p <0.05). In conclusion, a substantial proportion of patients with an early PJI may be successfully treated with DAIR and definite antimicrobial therapy. In more than half of these, the infection can be cured. Since identification of factors associated with failure of DAIR is not simple, we recommend offering DAIR to most patients with early PJI.

Effect of appropriate combination therapy on mortality of patients with bloodstream infections due to carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (INCREMENT): a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND The best available treatment against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) is unknown. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of appropriate therapy and of appropriate combination therapy on mortality of patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to CPE. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, we included patients with clinically significant monomicrobial BSIs due to CPE from the INCREMENT cohort, recruited from 26 tertiary hospitals in ten countries. Exclusion criteria were missing key data, death sooner than 24 h after the index date, therapy with an active antibiotic for at least 2 days when blood cultures were taken, and subsequent episodes in the same patient. We compared 30 day all-cause mortality between patients receiving appropriate (including an active drug against the blood isolate and started in the first 5 days after infection) or inappropriate therapy, and for patients receiving appropriate therapy, between those receiving active monotherapy (only one active drug) or combination therapy (more than one). We used a propensity score for receiving combination therapy and a validated mortality score (INCREMENT-CPE mortality score) to control for confounders in Cox regression analyses. We stratified analyses of combination therapy according to INCREMENT-CPE mortality score (0-7 [low mortality score] vs 8-15 [high mortality score]). INCREMENT is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01764490. FINDINGS Between Jan 1, 2004, and Dec 31, 2013, 480 patients with BSIs due to CPE were enrolled in the INCREMENT cohort, of whom we included 437 (91%) in this study. 343 (78%) patients received appropriate therapy compared with 94 (22%) who received inappropriate therapy. The most frequent organism was Klebsiella pneumoniae (375 [86%] of 437; 291 [85%] of 343 patients receiving appropriate therapy vs 84 [89%] of 94 receiving inappropriate therapy) and the most frequent carbapenemase was K pneumoniae carbapenemase (329 [75%]; 253 [74%] vs 76 [81%]). Appropriate therapy was associated with lower mortality than was inappropriate therapy (132 [38·5%] of 343 patients died vs 57 [60·6%] of 94; absolute difference 22·1% [95% CI 11·0-33·3]; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·45 [95% CI 0·33-0·62]; p<0·0001). Among those receiving appropriate therapy, 135 (39%) received combination therapy and 208 (61%) received monotherapy. Overall mortality was not different between those receiving combination therapy or monotherapy (47 [35%] of 135 vs 85 [41%] of 208; adjusted HR 1·63 [95% CI 0·67-3·91]; p=0·28). However, combination therapy was associated with lower mortality than was monotherapy in the high-mortality-score stratum (30 [48%] of 63 vs 64 [62%] of 103; adjusted HR 0·56 [0·34-0·91]; p=0·02), but not in the low-mortality-score stratum (17 [24%] of 72 vs 21 [20%] of 105; adjusted odds ratio 1·21 [0·56-2·56]; p=0·62). INTERPRETATION Appropriate therapy was associated with a protective effect on mortality among patients with BSIs due to CPE. Combination therapy was associated with improved survival only in patients with a high mortality score. Patients with BSIs due to CPE should receive active therapy as soon as they are diagnosed, and monotherapy should be considered for those in the low-mortality-score stratum. FUNDING Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases, European Development Regional Fund, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, and Innovative Medicines Initiative.

Seroepidemiological study of Rickettsia felis, Rickettsia typhi, and Rickettsia conorii infection among the population of southern Spain

Rickettsia typhi and Rickettsia conorii, the etiologic agents of, respectively, murine typhus and Mediterranean spotted fever, are recognized as frequent causes of fever of intermediate duration in southern Spain; in addition, in recent years Rickettsia felis has been detected in potential vectors in this area. Nevertheless, limited data exist regarding the actual prevalence of past infection due to these three pathogens. In the present study, the prevalence of past infection due to R. felis, R. typhi, and R. conorii was determined in a representative population of southern Spain during 2002. In addition, the possible risk factors associated with exposure to these pathogens were investigated. An epidemiological survey was completed by all subjects included in the study. Serum samples were tested by indirect immunofluorescence assay. The prevalence of past infection due to R. felis, R. typhi, and R. conorii among the 504 total subjects was 6.5, 3.8 and 8.7%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, infection due to R. felis was independently associated with a high-risk occupation (one that required working outdoors in nature, close contact with domestic animals, or potential contact with rodents) (OR=5.8; 95%CI 2.1–15.6), while infection due to R. typhi was associated with older age (factor of 1.04 [95%CI 1.008–1.068]) and frequent insect bites (OR=10.3; 95%CI 2.3–45.5). Two factors were associated with infection due to R. conorii: a high-risk occupation (OR=9.3; 95%CI 3.7–23.2), and participation in outdoor activities (OR=7.2; 95%CI 1.4–38.5). The results confirm the widespread prevalence of past infection due to R. felis, R. typhi, and R. conorii in the population of southern Spain.

Acute haematogenous prosthetic joint infection: prospective evaluation of medical and surgical management

The optimum treatment for prosthetic joint infections has not been clearly defined. We report our experience of the management of acute haematogenous prosthetic joint infection (AHPJI) in patients during a 3-year prospective study in nine Spanish hospitals. Fifty patients, of whom 30 (60%) were female, with a median age of 76 years, were diagnosed with AHPJI. The median infection-free period following joint replacement was 4.9 years. Symptoms were acute in all cases. A distant previous infection and/or bacteraemia were identified in 48%. The aetiology was as follows: Staphylococcus aureus, 19; Streptococcus spp., 14; Gram-negative bacilli, 12; anaerobes, two; and mixed infections, three. Thirty-four (68%) patients were treated with a conservative surgical approach (CSA) with implant retention, and 16 had prosthesis removal. At 2-year follow-up, 24 (48%) were cured, seven (14%) had relapsed, seven (14%) had died, five (10%) had persistent infection, five had re-infection, and two had an unknown evolution. Overall, the treatment failure rates were 57.8% in staphylococcal infections and 14.3% in streptococcal infections. There were no failures in patients with Gram-negative bacillary. By multivariate analysis, CSA was the only factor independently associated with treatment failure (OR 11.6; 95% CI 1.29-104.8). We were unable to identify any factors predicting treatment failure in CSA patients, although a Gram-negative bacillary aetiology was a protective factor. These data suggest that although conservative surgery was the only factor independently associated with treatment failure, it could be the first therapeutic choice for the management of Gram-negative bacillary and streptococcal AHPJI, and for some cases with acute S. aureus infections.

Incidence and Distribution Pattern of Rickettsia felis in Peridomestic Fleas from Andalusia, Southeast Spain

Abstract:  The presence of Rickettsia felis was investigated in three species of pulicid fleas (Ctenocephalides felis, Ctenocephalides canis and Pulex irritans) collected in 38 locales in Andalusia (Spain) over the period 1999–2004. Amplification of a fragment of OmpB gene was positive in 54.17 % of lots of Ct. felis. The identity of the PCR bands was confirmed as R. felis by sequence data obtained directly from the PCR amplicon. No rickettsia was found in Ct. canis nor P. irritans.

Is reduced vancomycin susceptibility a factor associated with poor prognosis in MSSA bacteraemia

OBJECTIVES The known data about the influence of vancomycin MIC on Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia are contradictory. Our objective was to study the possible impact of vancomycin MIC ≥1.5 mg/L on short- and medium-term mortality. METHODS A prospective cohort study was carried out from March 2008 to January 2011 on adult patients with MSSA bacteraemia admitted to a tertiary hospital located in Seville (Spain). We studied the relationship between vancomycin MIC, accessory gene regulator (agr) type and absence of δ-haemolysin and poor prognosis. All isolates were genotyped by PFGE. Multivariate analysis, including a propensity score for having a vancomycin MIC of ≥1.5 mg/L, was performed by Cox regression. RESULTS One hundred and thirty-five episodes of bacteraemia due to MSSA were included in the analysis. Twenty-nine (21.5%) isolates had a vancomycin MIC of ≥1.5 mg/L by Etest. There were no differences in agr distribution or absence of δ-haemolysin between isolates with reduced vancomycin susceptibility (RVS) and those without. RVS was not more frequent in specific clones; RVS was not associated with higher 14 or 30 day crude mortality (relative risk = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.14-1.35; and relative risk = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.52-1.96) rates, and it did not show higher rates of complicated bacteraemia (14.2% versus 13.8%, P = 0.61). Cox regression analysis did not significantly modify the results for 14 day mortality (HR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.11-1.34) or 30 day mortality (HR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.39-2.04). CONCLUSIONS Contrary to previously published data, we did not find a relationship between RVS and higher mortality in patients with MSSA bacteraemia and we did not find a link with higher complicated bacteraemia rates.

Minimum requirements in infection control.

Infection control (IC) activities are facing new challenges, but the resources dedicated to IC are too frequently insufficient. Heterogeneity of resources among centres and countries is huge, a fact that at least partly explains the differences in the results obtained. In this article, we review and discuss the available recommendations for minimum requirements in IC related to organizational aspects, IC staffing and the training of these staff, ward staffing, structural issues, and microbiological support. A professional-based consensus on the minimum requirements for IC in European centres based on present challenges and societal demands is needed.

The methodology of surveillance for antimicrobial resistance and healthcare-associated infections in Europe (SUSPIRE): a systematic review of publicly available information

OBJECTIVES Surveillance is a key component of any control strategy for healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR), and public availability of methodologic aspects is crucial for the interpretation of the data. We sought to systematically review publicly available information for HAIs and/or AMR surveillance systems organized by public institutions or scientific societies in European countries. METHODS A systematic review of scientific and grey literature following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was performed. Information on HAIs and/or AMR surveillance systems published until 31 October 2016 were included. RESULTS A total of 112 surveillance systems were detected; 56 from 20 countries were finally included. Most exclusions were due to lack of publicly available information. Regarding AMR, the most frequent indicator was the proportion of resistant isolates (27 of 34 providing information, 79.42%); only 18 (52.9%) included incidence rates; the data were only laboratory based in 33 (78.5%) of the 42 providing this information. Regarding HAIs in intensive care units, all 22 of the systems providing data included central line-associated bloodstream infections, and 19 (86.3%) included ventilator-associated pneumonia and catheter-associated urinary tract infections; incidence density was the most frequent indicator. Regarding surgical site infections, the most frequent procedures included were hip prosthesis, colon surgery and caesarean section (21/22, 95.5%). CONCLUSIONS Publicly available information about the methods and indicators of the surveillance system is frequently lacking. Despite the efforts of European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (ECDC) and other organizations, wide heterogeneity in procedures and indicators still exists.

Surveillance Systems from Public Health Institutions and Scientific Societies for Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare-Associated Infections in Europe (SUSPIRE): protocol for a systematic review

Introduction The worldwide spread of antimicrobial resistance is now recognised as a global public health threat. Owing to the geographical heterogeneity, complexity and continuously evolving dynamics of resistant organisms and genes, surveillance is a key tool for understanding, measuring and informing actions in the fight against this problem. To date there is no harmonisation of key indicators or of methodologies used to obtain them. Methods and analysis The main objective of this project is to systematically review and analyse the current publicly available surveillance activities on antimicrobial resistance and healthcare-associated infections in Europe. Eligible activities are those endorsed by regional, national or transnational health organisations and scientific societies providing data on a periodic basis. Grey and peer-reviewed literature will be searched with no language restrictions. Three independent reviewers will perform a two-step selection process using a previously piloted, tailored electronic data extraction form. Descriptive summaries and tables of all relevant findings will be performed and reported according to PRISMA guidelines. Ethics and dissemination We did not seek ethical approval for this study because the data to be collected are not linked to individuals. Data will be presented at international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals. Trial registration number CRD42016033867.

Development and validation of baseline, perioperative and at-discharge predictive models for postsurgical prosthetic joint infection

OBJECTIVES To develop and validate baseline, perioperative and at-discharge risk-scoring systems for postsurgical prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients undergoing arthroplasty. METHODS A multicentre prospective cohort study of patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty was performed. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to a derivation cohort (DC) or a validation cohort (VC). Multivariable predictive models of PJI were constructed at baseline (preoperative period), perioperative (adding perioperative variables) and at-discharge (adding wound state at discharge). The predictive ability of the models and scores was evaluated by area under the receiving operating characteristic curves (AUROC). RESULTS The DC and VC included 2324 and 1245 patients, respectively. Baseline model included total hip arthroplasty (THA), revision arthroplasty (RA), Charlson index and obesity. The AUROC for the score was 0.75 and 0.78 in the DC and VC, respectively. Perioperative model included THA, RA, obesity, National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) index ≥2, significant wound bleeding and superficial surgical site infection; the AUROC was 0.81 and 0.77 in the DC and VC, respectively. The at-discharge model included THA, RA, obesity, NNIS index ≥2, superficial surgical site infection and high-risk wound; the AUROC was 0.82 and 0.84 in the DC and VC, respectively. A score ≥8 points provided 99% negative predictive values for all models. CONCLUSIONS Simple scores for predicting PJI at three different moments of care in patients undergoing arthroplasty were developed and validated. The scores allow early and accurate identification of high-risk individuals in whom enhanced preventive measures and follow-up may be needed. Further external validation is needed.