M. Datar

Medication Adherence Among Recipients with Chronic Diseases Enrolled in a State Medicaid Program

Limited information is currently available about medication adherence for common chronic conditions among the Medicaid population. The primary objective of this study was to assess medication adherence among Medicaid recipients with depression, diabetes, epilepsy, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension. Factors influencing adherence were determined. The authors also assessed whether adherence influences the utilization of acute care services. The target population included nonelderly adult recipients (ages 21-64 years) who were continuously enrolled in the Mississippi (MS) Medicaid fee-for-service program from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2007. Recipients were identified who had a medical services claim with a diagnosis of depression, diabetes, epilepsy, hypercholesterolemia, or hypertension in calendar year 2006. Within each chronic disease sample, medication adherence was determined using calendar year 2007 data for recipients who met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Recipients with adherence ≥80% were classified as adherent. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine the factors that predict medication adherence and the effect of adherence on concurrent all-cause acute care service (ie, hospitalization, emergency room visit) utilization. Approximately 24% of recipients with depression, 35.9% with diabetes, 53.6% with epilepsy, 32% with hypercholesterolemia, and 42.2% with hypertension were adherent. Within each chronic disease sample, males and whites had higher adherence than females and blacks. After controlling for demographic and disease-related covariates, recipients who were adherent had lower concurrent acute care service utilization than nonadherent recipients. Given the inverse relationship between adherence and acute care service utilization, policy makers should consider implementing educational interventions aimed at improving adherence in this underprivileged population.

Risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality associated with concomitant use of clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors in elderly patients

Abstract Objective: To examine the effect of concomitant use of clopidogrel and PPIs in a national sample of elderly Medicare beneficiaries (age ≥65 years). Methods: A nested case–control design was employed. A cohort of Medicare beneficiaries who initiated clopidogrel and did not have any gap of ≥30 days between clopidogrel fills between July 1, 2006 and December 31, 2008 was identified from a 5% national sample of Medicare claims data. Within this cohort, cases (beneficiaries who experienced any major cardiovascular event [MCE] [acute myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary artery bypass graft, or percutaneous coronary intervention] or all-cause mortality) and controls (beneficiaries who did not experience any MCE or all-cause mortality) were identified from inpatient and outpatient claims. Cases and controls were matched on age and the time to first clopidogrel fill. Conditional logistic regression was performed on the matched sample to evaluate the association between concomitant use of clopidogrel and PPIs and adverse health outcomes (MCEs and all-cause mortality). Results: A total of 43,159 clopidogrel users were identified. Among them, 15,415 (35.7%) received clopidogrel and a PPI concomitantly at any time during the study period, 3502 (8.1%) experienced a MCE, 7306 (17.1%) died, and a total of 9908 (22.8%) experienced the primary composite outcome (any MCE or all-cause mortality) during follow-up. The odds ratio (OR) for the primary composite outcome was 1.26 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.18–1.35). Secondary analyses indicated that elderly patients using clopidogrel and a PPI concomitantly were more likely to experience all-cause mortality (OR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.29–1.53) as compared to those receiving clopidogrel only, but not MCEs (OR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.95–1.18). Conclusions: Concomitant use of clopidogrel and PPIs was associated with a slightly increased risk of all-cause mortality but not MCEs.

Inpatient burden of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the United States

The purpose of this study was to determine the inpatient burden among patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). The study assessed hospitalization rates of GISTs and compared hospital characteristics among patients with and without GISTs. Further, predictors of total charges and mortality among patients with GISTs were identified.The 2009 Healthcare Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) database was analyzed for this study. Inpatient burden among patients with GISTs (cases) was compared to that among patients without GISTs or any diagnosis of cancer (controls). Linear regression was used to determine the factors predicting total charges, and logistic regression was used to determine predictors of mortality. Analyses were performed using SAS version 9.2.In 2009, there were 14,562 hospitalizations among patients with GISTs at a rate of 44/100,000 admissions. Hospitalization rates among patients with GISTs varied by patient-, hospital-, and discharge-level characteristics. Patients with GISTs had longer length of stay (LOS), total charges, and mortality rate as compared to the control group. Total charges for hospitalizations among patients with GISTs varied by household income, hospital location and region, LOS, and number of diagnoses on record, respectively. When examining the predictors of mortality, household income, hospital region, and number of diagnoses on record emerged significant.By examining the inpatient burden among patients with GISTs, this study fills a critical gap in this area of research. Future studies could merge medical services claims data with cancer registry data to study in-depth the humanistic and economic burden associated with GISTs.