M. De Laurentiis

c-erb B2 overexpression decreases the benefit of adjuvant tamoxifen in early-stage breast cancer without axillary lymph node metastases.

PURPOSE We studied retrospectively the interaction between c-erbB2 overexpression and adjuvant tomoxifen in node-negative breast cancer patients enrolled in the Gruppo Universitario Napoletano 1 (GUN-1) trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS c-erbB2, evaluated by immunohistochemistry in 145 of 173 patients randomly assigned to 2-year adjuvant tamoxifen or no further therapy, was considered overexpressed if greater than 10% of the cells showed specific membrane staining. The role of each prognostic variable and their independent effect were studied using the Cox model. Disease-free (DFS) and overall (OAS) survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS As of November 30, 1994, the median follow-up period was 12 years. c-erbB2 was overexpressed in 43 of 145 patients (29.7%), which directly correlated with tumor size and inversely with estrogen receptor (ER) level. At univariate analysis, overexpression of c-erbB2 did not affect either DFS or OAS; tamoxifen had a greater effect on reducing the risk of recurrence than of death. Addition of c-erbB2 to a multivariate Cox model that contained menopausal status, tumor size, nuclear grade, and treatment as covariates did not affect the significance of the model for DSF or OAS, whereas addition of the first-order interaction between c-erbB2 and tamoxifen was statistically significant both for DFS and OAS. The same result was obtained when the model contained ER status and ER-tamoxifen interaction. Indeed, adjuvant tamoxifen significantly prolonged DFS and OAS in c-erbB2-negative cases, whereas it had no effect on DFS and OAS in c-erbB2-positive patients. CONCLUSION In early-stage breast cancer patients, overexpression of c-erbB2 is a marker of lack of efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen.

Phase II study of gefitinib in combination with docetaxel as first-line therapy in metastatic breast cancer.

We have evaluated the activity and safety of gefitinib, a small-molecule epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in combination with docetaxel as first-line treatment of women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In total, 41 patients with MBC were enrolled in a first-line combination therapy study with oral gefitinib (250 mg day−1) and intravenous docetaxel (75 mg m−2, the first 14 patients; or 100 mg m−2, the following 27 patients, on day 1 of a 3-week cycle). Out of 41 patients, 38 received at least one cycle of therapy. There were no differences in activity or tolerability between the two docetaxel doses. G3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (49%), diarrhoea (10%), acne-like rash (5%), and anaemia (2%). Complete plus partial responses (CR+PR) were observed in 22 out of 41 patients with a 54% response rate (95% confidence interval (CI) 45–75%). The 22 patients that achieved a response following six cycles of docetaxel plus gefitinib continued gefitinib monotherapy (median duration, 24 weeks; range, 2–108+ weeks). Two patients with PR following combination therapy achieved a CR during gefitinib monotherapy. Complete plus partial responses correlated with oestrogen receptor (ER) status, since they occurred in 19 out of 27 (70%) patients with ER-positive tumours as compared to three out of 14 (21%) patients with ER-negative tumours (P=0.01).

Circulating tumor cells in immunohistochemical subtypes of metastatic breast cancer: lack of prediction in HER2-positive disease treated with targeted therapy

BACKGROUND Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are associated with inferior prognosis in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We hypothesized that the relationship between CTCs and disease subtype would provide a better understanding of the clinical and biologic behavior of MBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 517 MBC patients treated at a single institution. Subtypes of primary tumors were analyzed by immunohistochemical (IHC) or fluorescent in situ hybridization analyses and CTCs were enumerated by CellSearch® at starting a new therapy. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival durations for each IHC subtype were determined. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 24.6 months, 276 of 517 (53%) patients had died. The median OS for patients with <5 and ≥5 CTCs were 32.4 and 18.3 months, respectively (P < 0.001). Except in HER2+ patients, the prognostic value of CTCs was independent of disease subtype and disease site. CONCLUSIONS In this large retrospective study, CTCs were strongly predictive of survival in all MBC subtypes except HER2+ patients who had been treated with targeted therapy. Our results clearly demonstrate the value of enumerating CTCs in MBC and strongly suggest an interesting biological implication in the HER2+ subset of patients that need to be further explored.BACKGROUND Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are associated with inferior prognosis in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We hypothesized that the relationship between CTCs and disease subtype would provide a better understanding of the clinical and biologic behavior of MBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 517 MBC patients treated at a single institution. Subtypes of primary tumors were analyzed by immunohistochemical (IHC) or fluorescent in situ hybridization analyses and CTCs were enumerated by CellSearch(®) at starting a new therapy. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival durations for each IHC subtype were determined. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 24.6 months, 276 of 517 (53%) patients had died. The median OS for patients with <5 and ≥ 5 CTCs were 32.4 and 18.3 months, respectively (P < 0.001). Except in HER2+ patients, the prognostic value of CTCs was independent of disease subtype and disease site. CONCLUSIONS In this large retrospective study, CTCs were strongly predictive of survival in all MBC subtypes except HER2+ patients who had been treated with targeted therapy. Our results clearly demonstrate the value of enumerating CTCs in MBC and strongly suggest an interesting biological implication in the HER2+ subset of patients that need to be further explored.

Abstract S6-01: PIK3CA status in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) predicts efficacy of buparlisib (BUP) plus fulvestrant (FULV) in postmenopausal women with endocrine-resistant HR+/HER2– advanced breast cancer (BC): First results from the randomized, phase III BELLE-2 trial

Background: PI3K pathway activation is a hallmark of hormone receptor-positive (HR+) BC cells resistant to endocrine therapy (ET). Preclinical and early clinical data suggest that combining the pan-PI3K inhibitor BUP (BKM120) with ET may provide clinical benefits in this setting. BELLE-2 (NCT01610284) is the first randomized Phase III trial to assess the efficacy and safety of a PI3K inhibitor combined with FULV in HR+ advanced BC, including a prospective analysis of whether PI3K pathway activation status measured in archival tumor tissue and ctDNA is predictive of clinical benefit. Methods: Postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2– locally advanced or metastatic BC refractory to aromatase inhibitor therapy were enrolled. After a 14-day run-in with FULV (500 mg), patients (pts) were randomized (1:1) to receive oral BUP (100 mg/day) or placebo (PBO) with FULV (500 mg per standard of care). Randomization of all pts was stratified by PI3K pathway status measured in archival tumor tissue (PIK3CA mutation or PTEN loss; activated, non-activated, unknown) and visceral disease status (present, absent). Baseline PIK3CA mutation status in ctDNA was assessed in a subset of 587 pts at trial entry. The primary endpoint was locally-assessed progression-free survival (PFS; RECIST v1.1) in the full population and PI3K pathway-activated group. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, safety, overall response rate (ORR), and clinical benefit rate (CBR). Results: 1147 pts received FULV with BUP or PBO, with 187 (16%) ongoing at data cut-off. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two arms: median age was 62 years, 98% had ECOG performance status of 0/1, 61% had visceral disease, 69% were sensitive to prior ET, 28% had received prior chemotherapy for metastatic BC. BELLE-2 met its primary endpoint in the full population (Table). In pts with PI3K pathway-activated tumor tissue, PFS increase for BUP+FULV vs PBO+FULV did not meet the planned endpoint. Among pts with PIK3CA status measured in ctDNA, median PFS, ORR, and CBR were significantly improved for BUP+FULV vs PBO+FULV in pts with PIK3CA-mutant tumors but not pts without. The most common Grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs; ≥5% of pts; BUP+FULV vs PBO+FULV) in all pts were increased alanine aminotransferase (26 vs 1%), increased aspartate aminotransferase (18 vs 3%), hyperglycemia (15 vs 0.2%), and rash (8 vs 0%). The most common reasons for treatment discontinuation were disease progression (54 vs 73%) and AEs (13 vs 2%). Conclusions: BELLE-2 met its primary endpoint in the full population. Prespecified analyses showed that characterizing PIK3CA mutation in ctDNA at trial entry identifies pts with endocrine- resistant HR+/HER2–advanced BC, for whom BUP+FULV results in meaningful clinical benefits. Citation Format: Baselga J, Im S-A, Iwata H, Clemons M, Ito Y, Awada A, Chia S, Jagiello-Gruszfeld A, Pistilli B, Tseng L-M, Hurvitz S, Masuda N, Cortes J, De Laurentiis M, Arteaga CL, Jiang Z, Jonat W, Hachemi S, Le Mouhaer S, Di Tomaso E, Urban P, Massacesi C, Campone M. PIK3CA status in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) predicts efficacy of buparlisib (BUP) plus fulvestrant (FULV) in postmenopausal women with endocrine-resistant HR+/HER2– advanced breast cancer (BC): First results from the randomized, phase III BELLE-2 trial. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr S6-01.

Expression of biomarkers modulating prostate cancer progression: implications in the treatment of the disease

Objectives: To determine whether COX-2, bcl-2 and neoangiogenesis are related to human prostate cancer relapse after definitive surgical treatment and progression toward androgen independence and to evaluate the association between the patterns of these tumoral biomarkers and other standard clinico-pathological parameters (such as Gleason score, PSA, TNM stage).Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the records on 126 prostate cancer samples from patients treated at our University Hospital from 1995 to 2002. The 72 patients with clinically localized disease (group 1) had undergone radical prostatectomy. Another 54 patients (group 2) had metastatic androgen-independent disease. Archived material relating to the subjects was then immunostained for bcl-2, COX-2 and CD-31, using an anti-bcl-2 monoclonal primary antibody, an anti-COX-2 polyclonal rabbit antibody and an anti-CD-31 monoclonal mouse antibody to evaluate neoangiogenesis (MVD, microvessel density).Results: We found that bcl-2, COX-2 and MVD expression increased from group 1 to group 2. The intergroup difference was significant only for high MVD (P<0.05). On the other hand, high MVD, high bcl-2 and high COX-2 expression was correlated with a higher PSA level (P<0.01), whereas only a high MVD was also related with Gleason score (P<0.05). We used univariate analysis to evaluate the prognostic impact of biologic and clinico-pathologic parameters on the disease-free-survival of 72 patients treated by radical prostatectomy. A total of 30 patients (41.6%) experienced biochemical relapse; bcl-2, COX-2 and MVD significantly correlated with disease relapse in these patients. In fact, we observed disease relapse in 24/45 (53%) with high bcl-2 expression, in 15/21 (71%) with a high MVD count and finally, in 30/58 (52%) with high COX-2 expression. Finally, PSA value and Gleason score were the only two biologic markers significantly associated to disease relapse in a multivariate analysis.Conclusions: Our results strongly support a role for bcl-2, COX-2 and angiogenesis in the development and progression of prostate cancer. Of course, we are aware of the small sample size considered in our study. Further investigations would better clarify the prognostic and therapeutic implications of these findings.

CMF vs alternating CMF/EV in the adjuvant treatment of operable breast cancer. A single centre randomised clinical trial (Naples GUN-3 study).

The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis of Goldie and Coldman that the use of non-cross-resistant regimens of chemotherapy could lead to maximal anti-tumour effect. We compared standard CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil) with alternating CMF/EV (epirubicin, vincristine) in the adjuvant therapy of early breast cancer. Stage II premenopausal node-positive or post-menopausal node-positive oestrogen receptor-negative and stage III breast cancer patients were eligible for the study. From January 1985 to December 1990, 220 patients were randomised (115 to CMF and 105 to CMF/EV). Toxicity was mild; neurotoxicity, vomiting and hair loss were more frequent in the CMF/EV group, while permanent amenorrhoea, diarrhoea, stomach ache and minor infections occurred more often in the CMF arm. At a follow-up of 48 months, 113 patients (51.4%) had had recurrence (62 on CMF and 51 on CMF/EV) and 54 (24.5%) had died (30 on CMF and 24 on CMF/EV). There was no significant difference in disease-free and overall survival between the two arms. After adjusting for menopausal status and stage, the relative risk (RR) of recurrence for CMF/EV patients was 0.93 (95% CL 0.64-1.35), while the RR of death was 0.85 (95% CL 0.49-1.47). In conclusion, the Goldie-Coldman model of alternating therapy is not confirmed in this trial of adjuvant therapy of early breast cancer, although in view of its design a difference of less than 20% in 3 year disease-free survival could not be excluded.

A predictive index of axillary nodal involvement in operable breast cancer

We investigated the association between pathological characteristics of primary breast cancer and degree of axillary nodal involvement and obtained a predictive index of the latter from the former. In 2076 cases, 17 histological features, including primary tumour and local invasion variables, were recorded. The whole sample was randomly split in a training (75% of cases) and a test sample. Simple and multiple correspondence analysis were used to select the variables to enter in a multinomial logit model to build an index predictive of the degree of nodal involvement. The response variable was axillary nodal status coded in four classes (N0, N1-3, N4-9, N > or = 10). The predictive index was then evaluated by testing goodness-of-fit and classification accuracy. Covariates significantly associated with nodal status were tumour size (P < 0.0001), tumour type (P < 0.0001), type of border (P = 0.048), multicentricity (P = 0.003), invasion of lymphatic and blood vessels (P < 0.0001) and nipple invasion (P = 0.006). Goodness-of-fit was validated by high concordance between observed and expected number of cases in each decile of predicted probability in both training and test samples. Classification accuracy analysis showed that true node-positive cases were well recognised (84.5%), but there was no clear distinction among the classes of node-positive cases. However, 10 year survival analysis showed a superimposible prognostic behaviour between predicted and observed nodal classes. Moreover, misclassified node-negative patients (i.e. those who are predicted positive) showed an outcome closer to patients with 1-3 metastatic nodes than to node-negative ones. In conclusion, the index cannot completely substitute for axillary node information, but it is a predictor of prognosis as accurate as nodal involvement and identifies a subgroup of node-negative patients with unfavourable prognosis.

A randomised factorial trial of sequential doxorubicin and CMF vs CMF and chemotherapy alone vs chemotherapy followed by goserelin plus tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment of node-positive breast cancer.

The sequential doxorubicin → CMF (CMF=cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil) regimen has never been compared to CMF in a randomised trial. The role of adding goserelin and tamoxifen after chemotherapy is unclear. In all, 466 premenopausal node-positive patients were randomised to: (a) CMF × 6 cycles (CMF); (b) doxorubicin × 4 cycles followed by CMF × 6 cycles (A → CMF); (c) CMF × 6 cycles followed by goserelin plus tamoxifen × 2 years (CMF → GT); and (d) doxorubicin × 4 cycles followed by CMF × 6 cycles followed by goserelin plus tamoxifen × 2 years (A → CMF → GT). The study used a 2 × 2 factorial experimental design to assess: (1) the effect of the chemotherapy regimens (CMF vs A → CMF or arms a+c vs b+d) and (2) the effect of adding GT after chemotherapy (arms a+b vs c+d). At a median follow-up of 72 months, A → CMF as compared to CMF significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) with a multivariate hazard ratio (HR)=0.740 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.556–0.986; P=0.040) and produced a nonsignificant improvement of overall survival (OS) (HR=0.764; 95% CI: 0.489–1.193). The addition of GT after chemotherapy significantly improved DFS (HR=0.74; 95% CI: 0.555–0.987; P=0.040), with a nonsignificant improvement of OS (HR=0.84; 95% CI: 0.54–1.32). A → CMF is superior to CMF. Adding GT after chemotherapy is beneficial for premenopausal node-positive patients.

Selecting High-risk Early Breast Cancer Patients: What to Add to the Number of Metastatic Nodes?

High-risk early breast cancer patients are usually identified by the number of metastatic axillary nodes. To study whether other easily and inexpensively detectable morphological factors are able to detect high-risk patients, we performed a retrospective analysis of tumor size, and skin/fascia and nipple invasion. The data consisted of 941 node-positive cases registered between 1978 and 1991. Tumour size, and skin/fascia and nipple invasion were closely associated with the number of metastatic nodes (chi 2 test). The number of metastatic nodes, tumour size, skin/fascia and nipple invasion significantly affected disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) at univariate analysis. These results were confirmed by multivariate analysis with a model containing the number of metastatic nodes, tumour diameter categories, skin/fascia invasion, nipple invasion and adjuvant therapy as covariates: all variables significantly and independently affected risk of relapse and of death. All the variables studied were prognostic, within individual nodal categories, for both DFS and OS. In conclusion, the number of metastatic nodes is not the only prognostic tool with which to select high-risk patients for new intensive adjuvant programmes. Tumour size, and skin/fascia invasion or nipple invasion, taken singly or combined, are valuable prognostic factors that can identify patients with few metastatic nodes and poor outcome. On the basis of our data, we believe that a reconsideration of the pT4 category within the pTNM classification is in order, that is, chest wall invasion should be substituted by fascia invasion, and combined skin/fascia invasion could be a subcategory of each class defined by tumour size.

Surgery of the primary tumor in de novo metastatic breast cancer: To do or not to do?

Approximately five percent of all breast cancer patients in developed countries present with distant metastases at initial diagnosis. Due to its incurability, metastatic breast cancer is generally treated with systemic therapies to achieve disease control and reduce tumor-related symptoms. Primary treatments for metastatic breast cancer are chemotherapy, endocrine- and biologic therapy, whereas surgery with or without radiotherapy is usually performed to treat impending wound issues. Since 2002, several retrospective non-randomized clinical studies have shown that extirpation of the primary tumor correlates with a significantly improved survival in patients with primary metastatic breast cancer. Others have argued that this survival benefit associated with surgery may be due to selection biases. Therefore, in the absence of published results from randomized controlled trials carried out in India and Turkey and completion of a trial in the United States, there is no clear conclusion on whether surgical excision of the primary breast cancer translates into a survival benefit for patients with de novo metastatic disease. Furthermore, timing and type of surgical procedure, as well as selection of patients who could benefit the most from this approach, represent additional points of uncertainty. Despite the epidemiological burden of this condition, there are no guidelines on how to manage breast cancer patients presenting with de novo metastatic breast cancer; and decisions are often left to provider and patient preferences. Here, we present a critical overview of the literature focusing on the rationale and potential role of primary tumour excision in patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer.