M. Delannes

Laparoscopic pelvic exenteration for gynaecological malignancy: Is there any advantage?

INTRODUCTION Pelvic exenteration (PE) remains one of the most mutilating surgical procedures with important postoperative morbidity. Laparoscopic approach has emerged in an attempt to reduce postoperative complications. The aim of the present study was to compare outcomes between laparoscopic pelvic exenteration combined with a vaginal or perineal approach, versus classical approach. METHODS A cohort study was performed by identifying patients who underwent laparoscopic pelvic exenteration, and retrospectively comparing data with open cases from the same period of time, from 2000 to 2008. RESULTS Fourteen patients underwent laparoscopic PE and 29 patients underwent an open exenterative procedure. All patients except one (97.6%) had received prior radiotherapy. Eighteen patients (41.9%) underwent total PE, 17 anterior PE (39.5%), and 8 posterior PE (18.6%). Urinary diversion (UD) technique consisted of 24 Miami pouch (68.6%), 9 Bricker diversion (25.7%), 1 Kock pouch (2.9%), and 1 ureterostomy (2.9%). Most frequent postoperative complications were related to the urinary diversion (45%) and bowel reconstruction (27.9%). Median estimated blood loss for the laparoscopy and laparotomy group was 400 ml (range 200-700 ml) and 875 ml (range 200-1600 ml), respectively. Transfusion rate was also significantly higher in the laparotomy group. Operative time, margin status, length of hospital stay, operative and postoperative morbidity, and disease and overall survival were not significantly different between both groups. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic PE is feasible with curative intent to selected patients. Potential postoperative advantages of laparoscopic approach when compared to classical approach, oncological safety of the procedure, and QOL considerations need to be further investigated.

Orgasme après curiethérapie de prostate par implants permanents d’iode 125 pour cancer localisé de la prostate

OBJECTIVES Orgasm is a domain of male sexuality that remains underreported in literature. Our aim was to realize the first detailed analysis of orgasm in patients treated by 125 I permanent prostate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS In a series of 270 sexually active men treated by prostate brachytherapy (125I permanent implantation), 241 (89%), mean age of 65 (43-80), participated in a mailed survey about sexual function after a mean time of 36 months (9-70). Erectile and ejaculatory functions and orgasm were explored using a mailed questionnaire. Two questions focused on orgasm. The first was about quality of orgasm (fast/intense/late, difficult/weak/absent) and the second about the presence of painful orgasm and its frequency (always/sometimes/often). RESULTS After prostate brachytherapy, 81.3% of sexually active men conserved ejaculation and 90% orgasm. There was a significant deterioration of the quality of orgasm (P=0.0001). More than 50% of the patients had an altered orgasm (weak, difficult, absent) after brachytherapy, vs 16% before implantation (P=0.001). Men with a diminished ejaculation volume often had a weak/difficult orgasm (P=0.007). Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy did not seem to impact the quality of orgasm or the frequency of painful ejaculation. Patients who had an IIEF-5 score higher than 12 had frequently intense orgasm (26.7% vs 2.7%; P<0.001) after brachytherapy. Sixty patients (30.3%) experienced often/sometimes painful ejaculation 12.9% (n=31) before implantation (P=0.0001). CONCLUSION Most of the patients treated by prostate brachytherapy conserved orgasm after treatment. However, most of the patients described a deterioration of the quality of orgasm.

Phase I study of irinotecan and cisplatin in combination with pelvic radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer: A GINECO trial.

PURPOSE To define the recommended dose of the association of weekly irinotecan (Iri) and cisplatin (CP) with pelvic radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Stage IB2-IV cervix cancer patients were treated with escalating doses of Iri starting from 30 mg/m(2) and a fixed dose of CP at 20 mg/m(2), both weekly concomitantly with a 45-Gy pelvic irradiation. RESULTS Fifteen patients entered the study, 6 at level 1 (Iri 30 mg/m(2)), 3 at level 2 (Iri 40 mg/m(2)) and 6 at intermediate dose (Iri 35 mg/m(2)). Median age was 47 years (34-72), FIGO stage IB (n=1), IIB (n=7), III (n=6), IVA (n=1). The recommended dose was weekly Iri 35 mg/m(2) and CP 20 mg/m(2). Dose limiting toxicities (grades 3-4) were diarrhea, abdominal pain, febrile neutropenia and fatigue. CONCLUSION In cervix cancer patients, radiosensitization with weekly cisplatin and irinotecan is feasible, and the recommended doses are cisplatin 20 mg/m(2)/week and irinotecan 35 mg/m(2)/week for future phase II studies.

Role of radiation therapy in the conservative management of sarcoma within an irradiated field.

PURPOSE To report on clinical outcome and toxicity profile after combined treatment that included radiation therapy (RT) in patients with localized sarcoma within an irradiated field. PATIENTS AND METHODS Individual clinical data from all consecutive patients diagnosed and treated for a localized SIF between January 2000 and October 2011 at the Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France, were retrospectively reviewed. Outcomes of patients with SIF who underwent adjuvant or definitive radiotherapy were compared with patients who did not receive further RT. RESULTS Of the 27 patients eligible for this study: surgery alone (S), surgery followed by RT (S + RT) or definitive RT (RT) was performed in 16, 8 and 2 cases respectively. The rate of unresectable, gross or microscopically positive margin disease among the 10 re-irradiated patients was significantly higher than the non re-irradiated group (90% vs. 12% p < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 3.8 years, there was a trend toward longer survival and better local control in the subgroup of patients who received adjuvant or definitive RT compared to the rest of the cohort with an acceptable toxicity profile. The 4-year relapse free survival rates of patients treated with and without RT were 53% and 27% respectively (p = 0.09). CONCLUSION SIF complete surgical resection is often difficult to achieve, enhancing the risk of relapse. RT should be discussed in case of unresectable tumor or after suboptimal surgery as part of intensified local management that has a curative intent.

Curiethérapie des cancers de la verge

Malignant tumours of the penis are a rare entity. They are mostly squamous cell carcinomas and arise from the glands or the coronal sulcus. Glans brachytherapy has been developed to avoid mutilating surgery and allow organ preservation. Indications of brachytherapy are tumours less than 4 cm with no invasion of the uretra or corpora cavernosa. Local control is equivalent after brachytherapy and surgery. This article describes the indications, the technique, outcome and toxicity of penile brachytherapy.

Radiothérapie stéréotaxique des méningiomes intracrâniens

Meningiomas are the most common non-malignant tumours of the brain. Gross-total resection remains the preferred treatment, if achievable without morbidity. Radiation therapy is advocated for inoperable, incompletely resected, or recurrent grade 1 tumours, if there is a progressive, symptomatic lesion, or in case of functional impairment. Postoperative radiation therapy is recommended for grade 2 or 3 lesions. Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery are high precision techniques, allowing good sparing of surrounding tissues. Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery give comparable results, with excellent 5-year tumour control rates of more than 90% for benign meningiomas. Toxicity is low and seems equivalent, despite a biased use of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for larger meningiomas, close to critical structures. Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy seems to be of special interest in the treatment of cavernous sinus or optic pathways meningiomas. The different therapeutic modalities should be discussed by a multidisciplinary team.

Prise en charge des sarcomes des tissus mous des membres par radiothérapie externe

Soft tissue sarcomas are rare tumours. Conservative surgery followed by postoperative radiation therapy represents the gold standard in the majority of cases. Postoperative radiotherapy improves local control without affecting survival. Besides the quality of surgical excision, which remains the major prognostic factor, the importance of the irradiation volume and particularly margins used in external beam radiotherapy were also found to influence local control of the disease. In this study, we propose to conduct a literature review on the present state of our knowledge on this subject in the form of an articulated controversy: in favour or opposed to large margins in external radiotherapy.

Curiethérapie des sarcomes des tissus mous des membres

The standard of care of local treatment for extremities soft tissue sarcomas relies on conservative surgery combined with external beam radiotherapy. Brachytherapy can be realized instead of external beam radiotherapy in selected cases, or more often used as a boost dose on a limited volume on the area at major risk of relapse, especially if a microscopic positive resection is expected. In these cases, this combination allows to obtain the best local control rates published. Close interaction and communication between radiation oncologist and surgeon are mandatory at the time of implantation to limit the risk of side effects. Long-term results are available for low-dose rate brachytherapy. Nowadays, pulsed dose rate is more often used. More limited experience has been reported for high dose rate.

Place de la radiothérapie dans le traitement conservateur des sarcomes en territoire irradié

PURPOSE To describe long-term outcome after combined-modality treatment including radiation therapy in patients with localized sarcoma within irradiated field. PATIENTS AND METHODS Individual clinical data from all consecutive patients diagnosed and treated for a localized sarcoma within irradiated field between January 2000 and October 2011 at the Institut Claudius-Regaud, Toulouse, France, were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS Twenty-seven patients were eligible for this study. Ten patients were re-irradiated with a rate of unresectable, gross or microscopically positive margins disease significantly higher than the rest of the cohort (90% vs. 12%; P<0.001). After a median follow-up of 3.8 years, there is a non-significant trend toward longer 4-year relapse free survival in the subgroup of patients who received adjuvant or definitive radiation therapy compared to the rest of the cohort (53% vs. 27%; P=0.09) with an acceptable toxicity profile allowing conservative management. CONCLUSION The complete surgical resection sarcoma within irradiated field is often difficult to achieve enhancing the risk of relapse. Radiation therapy should be discussed when faced with an unresectable tumour or after suboptimal surgery as part of intensified local management with a curative intent.

Curiethérapie des carcinomes cutanés et de la lèvre

Cutaneous basal or squamous cell carcinomas are frequent lesions, their prognosis being associated to local control. Surgery remains the standard of treatment, if a complete resection can be realized without impairment of cosmesis or function. Brachytherapy can be used in the other cases, and is especially well adapted to periorificial lesions of the face. It is mostly realized with low dose rate iridium wires, but can be done with high dose rate if outpatient treatment is preferred. It allows high local control rates with very few late complications. The indication has to be discussed as first line treatment, according to the patients age and general condition, the characteristics of the lesion, and the risk of late cosmetic or functional side-effects of the different therapeutic options.