M. Elizabeth Barnes
Arizona State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by M. Elizabeth Barnes.
CBE- Life Sciences Education | 2016
M. Elizabeth Barnes; Sara E. Brownell
From 32 interviews with college instructors who teach evolution, we found that the majority do not consider student acceptance of evolution as a goal when they teach evolution. Further, instructors cited a number of barriers to addressing the perceived conflict between religion and evolution in their classrooms.
CBE- Life Sciences Education | 2017
M. Elizabeth Barnes; Sara E. Brownell
To consider differences between the secular culture of many college instructors and the religious culture of many students, it may be beneficial to use a lens of cultural competence to create effective evolution education. This could be achieved within a new framework: Religious Cultural Competence in Evolution Education, or ReCCEE.
CBE- Life Sciences Education | 2017
M. Elizabeth Barnes; Jasmine M. Truong; Sara E. Brownell
From 28 interviews with religious students in biology classes, the authors find that students from Judeo-Christian backgrounds report subtle negative experiences in biology classes that could influence their sense of belonging and subsequent persistence in biology.
Evolution: Education and Outreach | 2017
M. Elizabeth Barnes; E. Margaret Evans; Ashley Hazel; Sara E. Brownell; Randolph M. Nesse
BackgroundHow acceptance of evolution relates to understanding of evolution remains controversial despite decades of research. It even remains unclear whether cultural/attitudinal factors or cognitive factors have a greater impact on student ability to learn evolutionary biology. This study examined the influence of cultural/attitudinal factors (religiosity, acceptance of evolution, and parents’ attitudes towards evolution) and cognitive factors (teleological reasoning and prior understanding of natural selection) on students’ learning of natural selection over a semester-long undergraduate course in evolutionary medicine.MethodPre-post course surveys measured cognitive factors, including teleological reasoning and prior understanding of natural selection, and also cultural/attitudinal factors, including acceptance of evolution, parent attitudes towards evolution, and religiosity. We analyzed how these measures influenced increased understanding of natural selection over the semester.ResultsAfter controlling for other related variables, parent attitude towards evolution and religiosity predicted students’ acceptance of evolution, but did not predict students’ learning gains of natural selection over the semester. Conversely, lower levels of teleological reasoning predicted learning gains in understanding natural selection over the course, but did not predict students’ acceptance of evolution.ConclusionsAcceptance of evolution did not predict students’ ability to learn natural selection over a semester in an evolutionary medicine course. However, teleological reasoning did impact students’ ability to learn natural selection.
Science Education | 2018
M. Elizabeth Barnes; Sara E. Brownell
Abstract Students’ religious beliefs and religious cultures have been shown to be the main factors predicting whether they will accept evolution, yet college biology instructors teaching evolution at public institutions often have religious beliefs and cultures that are different from their religious students. This difference in religious beliefs and cultures may be a barrier to effective evolution education. To explore when evolution instructors have similar religious cultures and beliefs as their students, we interviewed 32 evolution instructors at Christian universities nationwide about their practices and experiences teaching evolution. Christian university instructors emphasized teaching for acceptance of evolution while holding an inclusive teaching philosophy that they perceived led to a safe environment for students. Additionally, almost all instructors reported using practices that have been shown to increase student acceptance of evolution and reduce student conflict between evolution and religion. Further, we found that these instructors perceived that their own religious backgrounds have guided their decisions to teach evolution to their students in a culturally competent way. We discuss how these data, combined with past research literature on public college instructors, indicate that cultural competence could be a useful new framework for promoting effective evolution education in higher education institutions.
PLOS ONE | 2018
Katelyn M. Cooper; Taija Hendrix; Michelle D. Stephens; Jacqueline M. Cala; Kali Mahrer; Anna Krieg; Ashley C. M. Agloro; Giovani V. Badini; M. Elizabeth Barnes; Bradley Eledge; Roxann Jones; Edmond C. Lemon; Nicholas C. Massimo; Annette Martin; Thomas Ruberto; Kailey Simonson; Emily A. Webb; Joseph Weaver; Yi Zheng; Sara E. Brownell
For over 50 years instructor humor has been recognized as a way to positively impact student cognitive and affective learning. However, no study has explored humor exclusively in the context of college science courses, which have the reputation of being difficult and boring. The majority of studies that explore humor have assumed that students perceive instructor humor to be funny, yet students likely perceive some instructor humor as unfunny or offensive. Further, evidence suggests that women perceive certain subjects to be more offensive than men, yet we do not know what impact this may have on the experience of women in the classroom. To address these gaps in the literature, we surveyed students across 25 different college science courses about their perceptions of instructor humor in college science classes, which yielded 1637 student responses. Open-coding methods were used to analyze student responses to a question about why students appreciate humor. Multinomial regression was used to identify whether there are gender differences in the extent to which funny, unfunny, and offensive humor influenced student attention to course content, instructor relatability, and student sense of belonging. Logistic regression was used to examine gender differences in what subjects students find funny and offensive when joked about by college science instructors. Nearly 99% of students reported that they appreciate instructor humor and reported that it positively changes the classroom atmosphere, improves student experiences during class, and enhances the student-instructor relationship. We found that funny humor tends to increase student attention to course content, instructor relatability, and student sense of belonging. Conversely, offensive humor tends to decrease instructor relatability and student sense of belonging. Lastly, we identified subjects that males were more likely to find funny and females were more likely to find offensive if a college science instructor were to joke about them.
Evolution, medicine, and public health | 2018
Daniel Z. Grunspan; Randolph M. Nesse; M. Elizabeth Barnes; Sara E. Brownell
This study analyzed survey responses from 46 experts to create a consensus list of 14 Core Principles for Evolutionary Medicine. These principles illustrate the wide range of evolutionary applications in medicine, including seeking evolutionary explanations for vulnerability to disease. Focusing instruction on these principles will advance evolutionary understanding in medicine.
American Biology Teacher | 2017
M. Elizabeth Barnes; James J. Elser; Sara E. Brownell
American Biology Teacher | 2018
Jasmine M. Truong; M. Elizabeth Barnes; Sara E. Brownell
Archive | 2014
M. Elizabeth Barnes