M.-F. Poirier

Leptin and Ghrelin Levels in Patients With Schizophrenia During Different Antipsychotics Treatment: A Review

Energy homeostasis is achieved by the integration of peripheral metabolic signals by the neural circuits involving specific hypothalamic nuclei and brain stem regions. These neural circuits mediate many of the effects of the adipocyte-derived hormone leptin and gut-derived hormone ghrelin. The former is strongly anorexigenic while the latter is the only orexigenic agent active when administered by a peripheral route. Abnormal regulation of these 2 antagonistic regulatory peptides in patients with schizophrenia could play a role in the impairment in the regulation of food intake and energy balance. This bibliographical analysis aims to compare 27 prospective and cross-sectional studies published on circulating leptin and ghrelin levels during acute and chronic administration of antipsychotics treatment, especially atypical ones. Fasting morning leptin levels of schizophrenic patients increase rapidly in the first 2 weeks after atypical antipsychotic (AAP) treatment (mostly olanzapine and clozapine) and remain somehow elevated after that period up to several months. On the contrary, conventional antipsychotics (such as haloperidol) do not interfere with leptin levels. In contrast to leptin, fasting morning ghrelin levels decrease during the first few weeks after the beginning of AAPs treatment while they increase in the longer run. Surprisingly, body weight gain and correlations between the variation of these 2 peptides and adiposity and metabolism-related parameters such as the body mass index and abdominal perimeter were not systematically considered. Finally, an objective evaluation of feeding behavior during antipsychotic treatment remains to be determined.

Balneotherapy versus paroxetine in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder

INTRODUCTION Preliminary studies have suggested that balneotherapy (BT) is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and psychotropic medication withdrawal syndrome. We carried out a study in 4 spa resorts to assess the efficacy of BT in GAD. METHOD We compared BT to paroxetine in terms of efficacy and safety in a randomized multicentre study lasting 8 weeks. Patients meeting the diagnostic criteria of GAD (DSM-IV) were recruited. Assessments were conducted using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) and other scales, by a specifically trained and independent physician. The primary outcome measure was the change in the total HAM-A score between baseline and week 8. RESULTS A total of 237 outpatients were enrolled in four centres; 117 were assigned randomly to BT and 120 to paroxetine. The mean change in HAM-A scores showed an improvement in both groups with a significant advantage of BT compared to paroxetine (-12.0 vs -8.7; p<0.001). Remission and sustained response rates were also significantly higher in the BT group (respectively 19% vs 7% and 51% vs 28%). CONCLUSION BT is an interesting way of treating GAD. Due to its safety profile it could also be tested in resistant forms of generalized anxiety and in patients who do not tolerate or are reluctant to use pharmacotherapies.