M. G. E. H. Lam

Yttrium-90 microsphere radioembolization for the treatment of liver malignancies: a structured meta-analysis

Radioembolization with yttrium-90 microspheres (90Y-RE), either glass- or resin-based, is increasingly applied in patients with unresectable liver malignancies. Clinical results are promising but overall response and survival are not yet known. Therefore a meta-analysis on tumor response and survival in patients who underwent 90Y-RE was conducted. Based on an extensive literature search, six groups were formed. Determinants were cancer type, microsphere type, chemotherapy protocol used, and stage (deployment in first-line or as salvage therapy). For colorectal liver metastases (mCRC), in a salvage setting, response was 79% for 90Y-RE combined with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV), and 79% when combined with 5-FU/LV/oxaliplatin or 5-FU/LV/irinotecan, and in a first-line setting 91% and 91%, respectively. For hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), response was 89% for resin microspheres and 78% for glass microspheres. No statistical method is available to assess median survival based on data presented in the literature. In mCRC, 90Y-RE delivers high response rates, especially if used neoadjuvant to chemotherapy. In HCC, 90Y-RE with resin microspheres is significantly more effective than 90Y-RE with glass microspheres. The impact on survival will become known only when the results of phase III studies are published.

Holmium-166 radioembolisation in patients with unresectable, chemorefractory liver metastases (HEPAR trial): a phase 1, dose-escalation study

BACKGROUND The efficacy of radioembolisation for the treatment of liver tumours depends on the selective distribution of radioactive microspheres to tumorous tissue. The distribution of holmium-166 ((166)Ho) poly(L-lactic acid) microspheres can be visualised in vivo by both single-photon-emission CT (SPECT) and MRI. In this phase 1 clinical trial, we aimed to assess the safety and the maximum tolerated radiation dose (MTRD) of (166)Ho-radioembolisation in patients with liver metastases. METHODS Between Nov 30, 2009, and Sept 19, 2011, patients with unresectable, chemorefractory liver metastases were enrolled in the Holmium Embolization Particles for Arterial Radiotherapy (HEPAR) trial. Patients were treated with intra-arterial (166)Ho-radioembolisation in cohorts of three patients, with escalating aimed whole-liver absorbed doses of 20, 40, 60, and 80 Gy. Cohorts were extended to a maximum of six patients if dose-limiting toxicity occurred. Patients were assigned a dose in the order of study entry, with dose escalation until dose-limiting toxicity was encountered in at least two patients of a dose cohort. Clinical or laboratory toxicities were scored according to the National Cancer Institutes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. The primary endpoint was the MTRD. Analyses were per protocol. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01031784. FINDINGS 15 patients underwent (166)Ho-radioembolisation at doses of 20 Gy (n=6), 40 Gy (n=3), 60 Gy (n=3), and 80 Gy (n=3). Mean estimated whole-liver absorbed doses were 18 Gy (SD 2) for the 20 Gy cohort, 35 Gy (SD 1) for the 40 Gy cohort, 58 Gy (SD 3) for the 60 Gy cohort, and 73 Gy (SD 4) for the 80 Gy cohort. The 20 Gy cohort was extended to six patients because of the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicity in one patient (pulmonary embolism). In the 80 Gy cohort, dose-limiting toxicity occurred in two patients: grade 4 thrombocytopenia, grade 3 leucopenia, and grade 3 hypoalbuminaemia in one patient, and grade 3 abdominal pain in another patient. The MTRD was identified as 60 Gy. The most frequently encountered laboratory toxicities (including grade 1) were lymphocytopenia, hypoalbuminaemia, raised alkaline phosphatase, raised aspartate aminotransferase, and raised gamma-glutamyltransferase, which were all noted in 12 of 15 patients. Stable disease or partial response regarding target lesions was achieved in 14 of 15 patients (93%, 95% CI 70-99) at 6 weeks and nine of 14 patients (64%, 95% CI 39-84) at 12 weeks after radioembolisation. Compared with baseline, the average global health status and quality of life scale score at 6 weeks after treatment had decreased by 13 points (p=0·053) and by 14 points at 12 weeks (p=0·048). In all patients, technetium-99m ((99m)Tc)-macro-aggregated albumin SPECT, (166)Ho scout dose SPECT, and (166)Ho treatment dose SPECT showed similar patterns of the presence or absence of extrahepatic deposition of activity. INTERPRETATION (166)Ho-radioembolisation is feasible and safe for the treatment of patients with unresectable and chemorefractory liver metastases and enables image-guided treatment. Clinical (166)Ho-radioembolisation should be done with an aimed whole-liver absorbed dose of 60 Gy.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2) are prognostic biomarkers for patients with resected colorectal cancer liver metastases.

Background:Resection of colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRCLM) with curative intent has long-term benefit in ∼40% of cases. Prognostic biomarkers are needed to improve clinical management and reduce futile surgeries. Expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2; also known as cyclooxygenase-2) has been associated with carcinogenesis and survival. We investigated the prognostic value of EGFR and PTGS2 expression in patients with resected CRCLM.Methods:Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded CRCLM tissue and corresponding primary tumour specimens from a multi-institutional cohort of patients who underwent liver resection between 1990 and 2010 were incorporated into tissue microarrays (TMAs). TMAs were stained for EGFR and PTGS2 by immunohistochemistry. The hazard rate ratio (HRR) for the association between expression in CRCLM and overall survival was calculated using a 500-fold cross-validation procedure.Results:EGFR and PTGS2 expression could be evaluated in 323 and 351 patients, respectively. EGFR expression in CRCLM was associated with poor prognosis (HRR 1.54; P<0.01) with a cross-validated HRR of 1.47 (P=0.03). PTGS2 expression was also associated with poor prognosis (HRR 1.60; P<0.01) with a cross-validated HRR of 1.63 (P<0.01). Expression of EGFR and PTGS2 remained prognostic after multivariate analysis with standard clinicopathological variables (cross-validated HRR 1.51; P=0.02 and cross-validated HRR 1.59; P=0.01, respectively). Stratification for the commonly applied systemic therapy regimens demonstrated prognostic value for EGFR and PTGS2 only in the subgroup of patients who were not treated with systemic therapy (HRR 1.78; P<0.01 and HRR 1.64; P=0.04, respectively), with worst prognosis when both EGFR and PTGS2 were highly expressed (HRR 3.08; P<0.01). Expression of PTGS2 in CRCLM was correlated to expression in patient-matched primary tumours (P=0.02, 69.2% concordance).Conclusions:EGFR and PTGS2 expressions are prognostic molecular biomarkers with added value to standard clinicopathological variables for patients with resectable CRCLM.

The role of (90)Y-radioembolization in downstaging primary and secondary hepatic malignancies: a systematic review.

Radioembolization (RE) is an emerging treatment strategy for patients with primary hepatic malignancies and metastatic liver disease. Though RE is primarily performed in the palliative setting, a shift toward the curative setting is seen. Currently, hepatic resection and in selected cases liver transplantation are the only curative options for patients with a hepatic malignancy. Unfortunately, at diagnosis most patients are not eligible for liver surgery due to the imbalance between the necessary liver resection and the remaining liver remnant. However, in borderline resectable cases, tumor volume reduction and/or increasing the future liver remnant can lead to a resectable situation. The combination of selective tumor treatment, the induction of hypertrophy of untreated liver segments, and its favourable toxicity profile make RE an appealing strategy for downstaging. The present review discusses the possibilities for RE in the preoperative setting as a downstaging tool or as a bridge to liver transplantation.

No Need for Prophylactic Abdominal Ice Packing During Radioembolization

Prophylactic coil embolization (‘skeletonization’) of all arteries with the potential to cause extrahepatic depositions of activity was recommended in the early days of radioembolization treatments [1]. In recent years, however, a more distal injection position is preferred over skeletonization without increasing the risk of extrahepatic depositions [2, 3]. Because of its more distal origin, the hepatic falciform artery (HFA) is subject to discussion. Should it be coiled? And if not, should the peri-umbilical area be cooled prophylactically to prevent radiation-induced dermatitis? Based on a study by Wang et al. [4], ice packing of the abdomen in patients with a patent HFA has become an unwritten rule. Theoretically, cooling of the abdomen may lead to vasoconstriction and possibly reducing blood flow in the HFA. Subsequently, microsphere depositions in the HFA may be reduced or avoided. This practice may be questioned. Development of radiation dermatitis or related abdominal pain is very rare, and two and four cases were reported in the literature, respectively, in over ten thousand patients treated with radioembolization worldwide [5–10]. Ahmadzadehfar et al. concluded from his series that there seems to be no need to either prophylactically coil embolize the HFA or to reduce the planned activity [7]. In his study, accumulation of technetium-99m-macroaggregated albumin (Tc-MAA) in the abdominal wall was observed in approximately 9.3%, in line with another report by Kao et al. [11]. In just one out of 17 patients, the HFA was found and coil embolized [7]. All other 16 patients were treated without yttrium-90 (Y) activity reduction. Nine patients showed Y deposition along the HFA on the post-treatment Bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT [7], and one patient experienced abdominal discomfort without radiation dermatitis [7]. To investigate the need for prophylactic ice packing of the abdominal wall, we retrospectively reviewed all patients treated with either Y or holmium-166 (Ho) radioembolization in our center, including all corresponding preand post-treatment imaging: Tc-MAA SPECT/ CT, Y Bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT, Y PET/CT and Ho SPECT/CT imaging. If depositions aren’t seen on preor post-treatment imaging, activity depositions in the HFA will be too low to actually cause a complication (e.g., radiation dermatitis). Need for informed consent was waived by the IRB. In total 410 treatments were reviewed (whole liver 74.4%, right lobar 16.3%, left lobar 0.3%, segmental 4.9%, superselective 2.2%) and none of the patients received ice packing prior or after radioembolization. The HFA was mentioned twice in the actual angiography report, but was not coil embolized. Both patients had no HFA deposition on either pre-treatment Tc-MAA SPECT/CT or post-treatment Y PET/CT. Activity deposition in the HFA on preand post-treatment imaging was seen in three (\1%) and 16 treatments (4%), respectively. One patient had a HFA deposition on TcMAA SPECT/CT, but did not receive treatment due to rapid interval progressive disease and hyperbilirubinemia. Fourteen HFA depositions were visible only on posttreatment imaging, one on pre-treatment Tc-MAA and & A. J. A. T. Braat a.j.a.t.braat@umcutrecht.nl

Preoperative image-guided identification of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer (PRIDE): a multicenter observational study

BackgroundNearly one third of patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for locally advanced esophageal cancer have a pathologic complete response (pCR) of the primary tumor upon histopathological evaluation of the resection specimen. The primary aim of this study is to develop a model that predicts the probability of pCR to nCRT in esophageal cancer, based on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (18F-FDG PET-CT). Accurate response prediction could lead to a patient-tailored approach with omission of surgery in the future in case of predicted pCR or additional neoadjuvant treatment in case of non-pCR.MethodsThe PRIDE study is a prospective, single arm, observational multicenter study designed to develop a multimodal prediction model for histopathological response to nCRT for esophageal cancer. A total of 200 patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer - of which at least 130 patients with adenocarcinoma and at least 61 patients with squamous cell carcinoma - scheduled to receive nCRT followed by esophagectomy will be included. The primary modalities to be incorporated in the prediction model are quantitative parameters derived from MRI and 18F-FDG PET-CT scans, which will be acquired at fixed intervals before, during and after nCRT. Secondary modalities include blood samples for analysis of the presence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) at 3 time-points (before, during and after nCRT), and an endoscopy with (random) bite-on-bite biopsies of the primary tumor site and other suspected lesions in the esophagus as well as an endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with fine needle aspiration of suspected lymph nodes after finishing nCRT. The main study endpoint is the performance of the model for pCR prediction. Secondary endpoints include progression-free and overall survival.DiscussionIf the multimodal PRIDE concept provides high predictive performance for pCR, the results of this study will play an important role in accurate identification of esophageal cancer patients with a pCR to nCRT. These patients might benefit from a patient-tailored approach with omission of surgery in the future. Vice versa, patients with non-pCR might benefit from additional neoadjuvant treatment, or ineffective therapy could be stopped.Trial registrationThe article reports on a health care intervention on human participants and was prospectively registered on March 22, 2018 under ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03474341.

18F-FDG PET as novel imaging biomarker for disease progression after ablation therapy in colorectal liver metastases

PurposeRecurrent disease following thermal ablation therapy is a frequently reported problem. Preoperative identification of patients with high risk of recurrent disease might enable individualized treatment based on patients’ risk profile. The aim of the present work was to investigate the role of metabolic parameters derived from the pre-ablation 18F-FDG PET/CT as imaging biomarkers for recurrent disease in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM).MethodsIncluded in this retrospective study were all consecutive patients with CLM treated with percutaneous or open thermal ablation therapy who had a pre-treatment baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT available. Multivariable cox regression for survival analysis was performed using different models for the metabolic parameters (SULpeak, SULmean, SULmax, partial volume corrected SULmean (cSULmean), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG)) corrected for tumour and procedure characteristics. The study endpoints were defined as local tumour progression free survival (LTP-FS), new intrahepatic recurrence free survival (NHR-FS) and extrahepatic recurrence free survival (EHR-FS). Clinical and imaging follow-up data was used as the reference standard.ResultsFifty-four patients with 90 lesions were selected. Univariable cox regression analysis resulted in eight models. Multivariable analysis revealed that after adjusting for lesion size and the approach of the procedure, none of the metabolic parameters were associated with LTP-FS or EHR-FS. Percutaneous approach was significantly associated with a shorter LTP-FS. It was demonstrated that lower values of SULpeak, SULmax, SULmean , and cSULmean are associated with a significant better NHR-FS, independent of the lesion size and number and prior chemotherapy.ConclusionWe found no association between the metabolic parameters on pre-ablation 18F-FDG PET/CT and the LTP-FS. However, low values of the metabolic parameters were significantly associated with improved NHR-FS. The clinical implication of these findings might be the identification of high-risk patients who might benefit most from adjuvant or combined treatment strategies.