M. Ghiani

Megestrol acetate in neoplastic anorexia/cachexia: clinical evaluation and comparison with cytokine levels in patients with head and neck carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

SummaryThe aim of our study (clinical phase II open pilot study) was to evaluate the toxicity of megestrol acetate and its ability to increase appetite and body weigth in patients with advanced-stage (III–IV) primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant (primary) chemotherapy. Serum levels of interleukin-1α and β, interleukin-2 and 6, tumor necrosis factor-α, and the soluble receptor for interleukin-2 were evaluated before and after megestrol acetate treatment. The same cytokines and soluble interleukin-2 receptor were also measured in culture medium of peripheral blood lymphocytes from the same patients after stimulation with phytohemagglutinin. From April 1993 to February 1994, 11 male patients were enrolled in our study: their mean age was 57.8 years (range 43–69 years). Megestrol acetate was administered at a dose of 320 mg/day in the interval between chemotherapeutic cycles for a total of three consecutive cycles; 9 of the 11 patients could be evaluated (81.8%). Except for the performance status according to Karnofsky, all parameters were increased after megestrol acetate treatment. The average weight increased by 6.3 kg (13.2%), appetite by a score of 2.4 (38.6%) and the Spitzer’s quality of life index by a score of 2.4 (36.2%). The performance status according to Karnofsky decreased in only 1 patient, remained the same in most patients, and in 2 patients was slightly improved. No significant side effects were observed during treatment. Serum levels of interleukin-1α and β, interleukin-2 and 6, tumor necrosis factor-α, and soluble interleukin-2 receptor were significantly higher than in normal subjects, prior to treatment with megestrol acetate. These levels dropped after megestrol acetate treatment with a statistically significant decrease for interleukin-1α and β and tumor necrosis factor-α. There were no significant differences in the production of cytokines by peripheral blood lymphocytes stimulated with phytohemagglutinin from patients before megestrol acetate treatment and normal subjects, with the exception of interleukin-6 (higher in patients) and of soluble interleukin-2 receptor (lower in patients). There was no significant difference in the cytokines and soluble interleukin-2 receptor produced in culture before and after megestrol acetate treatment, except for interleukin-6 which decreased after treatment.

Comparison of granisetron, ondansetron, and tropisetron in the prophylaxis of acute nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatin for the treatment of head and neck cancer: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND A single-institution, prospective, randomized, open controlled trial was carried out on head and neck cancer patients to compare granisetron (GRA), ondansetron (OND), and tropisetron (TRO) in the prevention of cisplatin-induced acute nausea and vomiting. All patients were chemotherapy-naive and treated with cisplatin on Day 1 (80 to 100 mg/m2). METHODS One hundred seventeen patients were treated for a total of 463 cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy and randomized to receive 24 mg of OND intravenously (i.v.), 3 mg of GRA i.v., or 5 mg of TRO i.v. for the control of acute nausea and emesis. RESULTS In the GRA group, complete response (CR) was obtained in 119 of 165 cycles (72.1%), major response (MR) in 32 cycles (19.4%), minor response (MiR) in 5 cycles (3%), and a failure (F) in 9 cycles (5.5%). In the OND group, CR was obtained in 110 of 150 cycles (73.3%), MR in 31 cycles (20.7%), MiR in 2 cycles (1.3%), and F in 7 cycles (4.7%). In the TRO group, CR was obtained in 100 of 148 cycles (67.6%), MR in 26 cycles (17.6%), MiR in 15 cycles (10.1%), and F in 7 cycles (4.7%). Major efficacy (CR + MR) was obtained in 151 of 165 cycles (91.5%) for GRA, in 141 of 150 cycles (94.0%) for OND, and in 126 of 148 cycles (85.2%) for TRO. The difference in major efficacy between OND and TRO was statistically significant. When comparing MiR, both GRA and OND were more effective than TRO. No other significant differences were observed among the three antiemetic agents. CONCLUSIONS Although our results were achieved in an open trial, they show that GRA and OND are equally effective antiemetic agents in the prevention of cisplatin induced acute nausea and vomiting. TRO provides almost the same protection but is not as effective as OND for major efficacy. All three antiemetics can be administered safely to patients undergoing chemotherapy with cisplatin at doses of 80 mg/m2 or more.

Tumor‐associated lympho‐monocytes from neoplastic effusions are immunologically defective in comparison with patient autologous PBMCs but are capable of releasing high amounts of various cytokines

We studied several in vitro activities of tumor‐associated lympho‐monocytes (TALMs) and the concentrations of interleukin (IL)‐1α, IL‐1β, IL‐2, IL‐4, IL‐6, IL‐10, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α, interferon (IFN)γ and soluble IL‐2 receptor (sIL‐2R) in neoplastic effusions and in the serum of advanced stage cancer patients. Comparisons were made with autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Autologous PBMCs were compared with PBMCs from normal subjects used as controls. TALMs were collected from 13 peritoneal and 18 pleural neoplastic effusions, secondary to primary tumors of different sites. After PHA stimulation, concentrations of IL‐1α, IL‐1β and TNFα in culture media of TALMs both from peritoneal and pleural effusions were lower than those of autologous PBMCs and, similarly, concentrations of IL‐4 and IL‐10 in culture media of TALMs from peritoneal effusions were lower than those of autologous PBMCs, whereas concentrations of IL‐4 and IL‐10 in culture media of TALMs from pleural effusions were in the same range as those of autologous PBMCs. On the contrary, IL‐2, IL‐6 and IFNγ amounts (only from pleural effusions) were significantly higher. IL‐1α, IL‐1β, IL‐2, IL‐6 and TNFα production from patient PBMCs was lower than that of control PBMCs, whereas production of IL‐4, IL‐10 and IFNγ was higher than that of control PBMCs. Both in peritoneal and in pleural effusions concentrations of IL‐1α, IL‐1β and IL‐4 were not different from those measured in autologous serum, whereas those of IL‐6, IL‐10, TNFα, IFNγ and sIL‐2R were significantly higher. The amounts of IL‐2 in pleural effusions were not different from those of autologous serum, but in peritoneal effusions they were higher than those of autologous serum. The amounts of IL‐1α, IL‐1β, IL‐2, IL‐6, TNFα and sIL‐2R were higher in patient than in control sera, whereas those of IL‐4, IL‐10 and IFNγ were in the same range in patient and in control sera. Cell cycle analysis of cultured TALMs and PBMCs (from 3 patients) showed a significant accumulation of TALMs in the non‐cycling G0/G1 cell population compared with autologous PBMCs.Int. J. Cancer 71:724‐731, 1997.

Neo-adjuvant chemo-(immuno-)therapy of advanced squamous-cell head and neck carcinoma: a multicenter, phase III, randomized study comparing cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with cisplatin + 5-FU + recombinant interleukin 2

Abstract We carried out an open, randomized, phase III, multicenter clinical trial to compare, in neo-adjuvant setting, the clinical response and toxicity of the combination chemotherapy cisplatin + 5-FU with the same combination plus s.c. recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) in patients with advanced (stage III–IV) head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Regimen A was the classical Al Sarraf treatment: 100 mg/m2 cisplatin i.v. on day 1 plus 1000 mg m−2 day−1 5-FU on days 1–5 as a continuous infusion. Regimen B was the same as regimen A plus 4.5 MIU/day rIL-2 s.c. on days 8–12 and 15–19. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks for three cycles. A total of 33 patients were enrolled in the study; 30 were evaluable for toxicity and 28 for response. Seventeen patients were assigned to group A and 16 were assigned to group B. Three patients (20%) of group A and 4 (31%) of group B had a complete response, 9 patients (60%) of group A and 6 (46%) of group B had a partial response, with an overall response rate of 12 patients (80%) for group A and 10 patients (77%) for group B. Two patients (13%) of group A and 3 patients (23%) group B had stable disease; 1 patient (7%) of group A had progressive disease. Thus, there was not a statistically significant difference in response rate between the two groups and therefore there was no benefit from the addition of immunotherapy with rIL-2 to the standard chemotherapy. Both regimens were well tolerated. There were 2 toxic deaths (6.7%), 1 from hematological causes in group A and 1 from cardiac causes in group B. Myelosuppression and gastrointestinal toxicity, mainly nausea/vomiting and stomatitis, were the most frequent toxicities. The calculated number of patients for the sample has not yet been reached; however, the projection of our present results suggests that it is highly improbable that a clinically significant difference between the two treatment groups will be observed even if the calculated patient sample size is achieved.

Tumor-associated lymphocytes (TAL) are competent to produce higher levels of cytokines in neoplastic pleural and peritoneal effusions than those found in sera and are able to release into culture higher levels of IL-2 and IL-6 than those released by PBMC

This work was designed to study the proliferative response of tumor-associated lymphocytes (TAL) from neoplastic effusions against autologous tumor cells and the immunophenotype pattern of TAL from neoplastic effusions and that of PBMC of the same patients. We also compared the serum levels of the cytokines interleukin (IL) 1β, 2 and 6, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα) and soluble IL-2 receptor (sIL-2R) with those present in neoplastic effusions of the same patients. Moreover, we examined the ability of TAL and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) to produce and release the cytokines and sIL-2R and to express membrane CD25 following their stimulation with phytohemagglutinin (PHA) in vitro. Finally, we compared the cytokines/sIL-2R production and membrane CD25 expression by PHA-stimulated PBMC of the patients with neoplastic effusions with a series of 90 cancer patients without neoplastic effusions and 20 normal healthy subjects. Thirteen neoplastic pleural and eight peritoneal effusions were collected from 11 patients with primary lung cancer, 7 with primary epithelial ovarian cancer, 1 with breast cancer, 1 with pleural mesothelioma, and 1 with pancreatic cancer. The proliferative response of TAL from neoplastic effusions against autologous tumor cells was lower than the response to PHA, IL-2, and anti-CD3, but significant. The percentage distribution of CD3+ and CD8+ lymphocyte subpopulations was higher in peritoneal than in pleural effusions, while the CD16+ subset was higher in pleural than in peritoneal effusions. The percentage distribution of CD16+ was significantly lower in pleural effusions than in PBMC of patients with pleural effusions. The CD39 antigen was higher on TAL from peritoneal effusions than on PBMC of the same patients. The levels of IL-1β and sIL-2R in peritoneal effusions did not differ from those measured in the sera of the same patients, while the levels of IL-2, IL-6, and TNFα were higher in the peritoneal effusions. The levels of IL-2, IL-6, TNFα, and sIL-2R, but not IL-1β, in pleural effusions were significantly higher than those found in the sera of the same patients. The amounts of IL-2 and IL-6 produced by TAL were generally higher than those released by PBMC. The secretion of cytokines IL-1α, IL-2, and sIL2R by PHA-stimulated PBMC was lower, but IL-1β and IL-6 secretion was higher in cancer patients with neoplastic effusions than in either cancer patients without neoplastic effusions or normal subjects. The CD25 expression on PHA-stimulated PBMC derived from cancer patients with neoplastic effusions was in the same range as that of cancer patients without neoplastic effusions and normal subjects. These findings suggest that TAL may be able to produce cytokines and may be amenable to immune manipulation.

Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy ± immunotherapy with s.c. IL 2 in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A pilot study

We carried out a pilot nonrandomized phase II study to compare the neo-adjuvant chemotherapic regimen with cisplatin, 5-FU and vinorelbine with the same combination plus s.c. IL 2 in advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The primary goals of the trial were to evaluate the feasibility and response rates of the two regimens. The study design consisted of a patients assignment to either of the two following arms: Arm A: Cisplatin 80 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1; 5-FU 600 mg/m2 i.v. on days 2–5; and vinorelbine 20 mg/m2 i.v. on days 2 and 8, Arm B: the same chemotherapic regimen plus recombinant IL 2 (Proleukin, Eurocetus) 9 MIU s.c. daily from day 9 to 13 and from day 16 to 20 for every cycle. From March 1993 to November 1993 twenty three patients with Stage III–IV HNSCC were enrolled in the study. Patients could be evaluated for response to treatment if they had received at least 2 complete cycles of therapy. The overall response rate (ORR) was 63% in Arm A and 100% in Arm B. The differences for ORR and CR rates were statistically significant in favor of Arm B. The analysis for each of the three drugs included in the chemotherapy schedule shows that both the actually received average dose-intensity and the actually delivered average cumulative doses/patient were higher for Arm B (chemo- plus IL 2 therapy) (approximately 80% of programmed dose-intensity) than for Arm A (approximately 70% of programmed dose-intensity). Both the actually received average dose-intensity and the actually delivered average cumulative doses/patient for IL 2 were more than 80%. In both arms the most frequent side effects were myelosuppression, phlebitis and electrolyte disturbances. There were 2 toxic deaths, 1 in Arm A and 1 in Arm B, both for hematologic toxicity. Our “pilot” study suggests that the combination of cisplatin, 5-FU, vinorelbine plus IL 2 is a highly active, but rather toxic, neo-adjuvant treatment in advanced HNSCC with very high ORR and CR rates.

Membrane-bound/soluble IL-2 receptor (IL-2R) and levels of IL-1α, IL-2, and IL-6 in the serum and in the PBMC culture supernatants from 17 patients with hematological malignancies

The present study investigated the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) blastic responses to PHA, PHA plus recombinant IL-2 (rIL-2) and rIL-2 alone; the expression of membrane-bound IL-2R on PHA-stimulated PBMC; and the levels of IL-1α, IL-2, IL-6, and sIL-2R in serum and in culture supernatants from PHA-stimulated PBMC in 17 patients with hematological malignancies (mean age 58.5 yr, range 22–82): 6 with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL), 4 with Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL), 5 with Hairy cell leukemia, 1 with chronic myelogenous leukemia, and 1 with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. The patients with HL and NHL with active disease (AD) were separated from those in clinical remission. The patients with AD were studied at diagnosis (obviously before therapy) and the patients in clinical remission were out of therapy since at least 6 mo. The lymphocyte blastogenic response to PHA was significantly lower in patients with HL and NHL with AD than in the control group. The response to rIL-2 alone was in the same range in the control group and in HL and NHL AD patients. By adding rIL-2 to PHA there was an increase of the blastogenic response of the same patients. The percentage of CD25 expressed on PHA-stimulated lymphocytes from patients with HL and NHL AD and from normal subjects is in the same range. Serum levels of IL-2, IL-6, and sIL-2R were significantly higher in HL and NHL AD patients than in controls as well as in all other hematological malignancies. Supernatants derived from PHA-stimulated PBMC were assessed for the presence of cytokines and sIL-2R by ELISA. The levels of IL-2, IL-6, and sIL-2R were significantly lower in HL and NHL AD patients than in controls as well as in all other hematological malignancies.

Neo-adjuvant (primary) organ-preserving chemotherapy in the management of locally advanced laryngeal carcinoma

We designed an open, non-randomized, phase II clinical study to assess as the first endpoint the feasibility of sparing surgery and of preserving organ/function by using neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) laryngeal cancer patients, and, as the second endpoint, the clinical response to this treatment approach and its duration. 32 patients with primary laryngeal cancer (stage III-IV) were enrolled in the study and were assigned to either the classical Al-Sarrafs regimen (20 patients) or to a regimen consisting of cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1, 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) on days 2-5 and vinorelbine 20 mg/m(2) on days 2 and 8 (12 patients). The patients were divided into 2 groups: A) those requiring total laryngectomy (TL) and B) those not requiring TL, i.e. patients eligible for conservative for conservative surgery. The 32 patients were all evaluable for response to NAC and 31 were evaluable for The complete remission rate was 50% (16/32) and the partial remission rate was 46.9% (15/32) with an overall response rate of 96.9%. The median follow-up duration was 20.2 months. Overall, 23 patients required TL (group A) and 8 patients a conservative laryngectomy (group B). 7/23 (30.5%) patients of group A did not undergo surgery (score 4) and 6/23 (26%) achieved a partial larynx preservation (3/23 score 3, 1/23 score 2, 2/23 score 1), while 10/23 (43.5%) received the previously planned TL (score 0). 5/8 (62.5%) patients of group B did not undergo surgery, whereas 3/8 (37.5%) received the previously planned surgery (score 0). Therefore, 12/31 patients (38.7%) completely avoided surgery and 6/31 (19.4%) achieved a reduction in the extent of planned surgical resection, that is 18/31 patients (58.1%) achieved a reduction in the extent of previously planned surgery attributable to NAG. Moreover, 3/31 patients underwent the previously planned conservative surgery consisting of H-SGL/HG. Altogether 21/31 (67.7%) patients preserved function. The most relevant contributions offered by our study are represented by i) a scale aimed at measuring as precisely as possible the reduction of surgical resection made possible by NAC compared to surgery planned before NAC and ii) by an attempt to support the results with an assessment of patients treatment outcome. Although the scale provided by us is an arbitrary one, it must be emphasized that our goal was to address the issue of quality of life in cancer patients by a more precise quantification of organ/function preservation.