M Glanemann

Venous complications after orthotopic liver transplantation

Complications involving the portal vein or the vena cava, are rare after orthotopic liver transplantation. We report on the incidence and treatment of venous complications following 1000 orthotopic liver transplantations in 911 patients. Twenty‐six of the adult patients (2.7%) suffered from portal complications after transplantation, whereas complications of the vena cava were observed in only 17 patients (1.8%). Technical problems or recurrence of the underlying disease (e.g. Budd–Chiari syndrome) accounted for the majority of complications of the vena cava, whereas alteration of the vessel wall or splenectomy during transplantation could be identified as important risk factors for portal vein complications. In patients undergoing modification of the standard end‐to‐end veno‐venous anastomosis of the portal vein due to pathological changes of the vessel wall, complications occurred in 8.3%, whereas only 2.4% of patients who received a standard anastomosis of the portal vein experienced complications of the portal vein. Furthermore, splenectomy during transplantation was also associated with an increased incidence of portal vein complications (10.5 vs. 2.2% in patients without splenectomy). Treatment was dependent on the signs and symptoms of the patients, and varied considerably between patients with portal vein complications and patients suffering from complications of the vena cava. Complications of the vena cava led to retransplantation in about one‐third of the patients, whereas in patients with occlusion of the portal vein, retransplantation was necessary in only 15%, and more than half of the patients suffering from portal vein complications did not require any treatment at all. Usually, treatment of patients with portal vein complications only became necessary when additional complications such as arterial occlusion or bile duct injuries occurred.

Ischemic preconditioning protects from hepatic ischemia/reperfusion-injury by preservation of microcirculation and mitochondrial redox-state

BACKGROUND/AIMS Ischemic preconditioning (IP) is known to protect hepatic tissue from ischemia-reperfusion injury. However, the mechanisms involved are not fully understood yet. METHODS Using intravital multifluorescence microscopy in the rat liver, we studied whether IP exerts its beneficial effect by modulating postischemic Kupffer cell activation, leukocyte-endothelial cell interaction, microvascular no-reflow, mitochondrial redox state, and, thus, tissue oxygenation. RESULTS Portal triad cross-clamping (45 min) followed by reperfusion induced Kupffer cell activation, microvascular leukocyte adherence, sinusoidal perfusion failure (no-reflow) and alteration of mitochondrial redox state (tissue hypoxia) (P<0.05). This resulted in liver dysfunction and parenchymal injury, as indicated by decreased bile flow and increased serum glutamate dehydrogenase (GLDH) levels (P<0.05). IP (5 min ischemia and 30 min intermittent reperfusion) was capable to significantly reduce Kupffer cell activation (P<0.05), which was associated with a slight attenuation of leukocyte adherence. Further, IP markedly ameliorated sinusoidal perfusion failure (P<0.05), and, thereby, preserved adequate mitochondrial redox state (P<0.05). As a consequence, IP prevented the decrease of bile flow (P<0.05) and the increase in serum GLDH levels (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS IP may exert its beneficial effects on hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury by preserving mitochondrial redox state, which is guaranteed by the prevention of reperfusion-associated Kupffer cell activation and sinusoidal perfusion failure.

Postoperative tracheal extubation after orthotopic liver transplantation

Background: The duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation and its influence on pulmonary function in liver transplant recipients is still debated controversially.

Prospective Randomized Comparison between a New Mattress Technique and Cattell (duct-to-mucosa) Pancreaticojejunostomy for Pancreatic Resection

The majority of lethal complications after pancreatic head resection are due to septic complications after leakage from the pancreatojejunostomy. Especially the smooth pancreatic remnant is prone to develop parenchymal leaks from shear forces applied during tying of the sutures. We developed a new mattress technique that avoids such shear forces, and we compared this method to the standard Cattell (duct-to-mucosa) technique. A total of 113 patients undergoing standard pancreatic head resection were prospectively randomized to receive either the standard Cattell anastomosis (n = 56) or the new mattress technique (n = 57). All patients were evaluated for surgical and medical complications until discharge. Primary diagnosis and further demographic data compared well between the groups. The time to perform the mattress anastomosis was significantly shorter (15 vs. 22 minutes; p < 0.0001). The incidence of complications at the pancreatojejunostomy, and the length of hospital stay and survival were not significantly different between the two groups; however, a trend toward more reoperations was noted in the Cattell group (10 vs. 5; p < 0.097). The new mattress technique is simple, and our data show that the two techniques yield similar incidences of complications. Therefore the mattress technique for pancreatojejunostomy seems to be safe and is, in our opinion, well suitable for training schedules in pancreatic surgery.

Clinical Implications of Hepatic Preservation Injury After Adult Liver Transplantation

Several advances in organ preservation have allowed for improved results after liver transplantation; however, little information is available regarding the clinical impact of preservation injury on the postoperative course. The medical records of 889 liver transplants were retrospectively reviewed. Preservation injury was classified according to postoperative aspartate aminotransferase values as minor (<1000 U/L), moderate (1000–5000 U/L), or severe (>5000 U/L). The following criteria were analyzed and compared according to the extent of preservation injury: patient and graft survival, retransplantation rate, duration of hospitalization and postoperative ventilation, as well as incidence of rejection, infection, and hemodialysis. The majority of patients received a liver with minor preservation injury (75.9%), whereas 22.7% and 1.3% of grafts showed moderate or severe injury. Graft survival was significantly lower in patients with severe preservation injury, when compared to minor or moderate injury. The relative risk for initial nonfunction was 39.36‐fold increased (95% confidence interval (ci): 10.3–150.2), as it was increased for duration of postoperative ventilation (6.92‐fold; 95%ci: 2.1–22.3) and hemodialysis (6.13‐fold; 95%ci: 1.9–19.3). Since the incidence of retransplantation was significantly increased (50%), patient survival remained comparable between all groups. Severe preservation injury had a tremendous impact on the postoperative clinical course, requiring the maximum medical effort to achieve adequate patient survival.

Liver transplantation for alcoholic cirrhosis.

Abstract Because of the donor shortage, there are concerns for liver transplantation in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis. We therefore analyzed patients transplanted for alcoholic cirrhosis at our center with respect to patient and graft survival, recurrence of disease, and postoperative complications. Out of 1000 liver transplantations performed in 911 patients, 167 patients were transplanted for alcoholic cirrhosis; 91 patients received CsA‐ and 76 patients FK506‐based immunosuppression. Recurrence was diagnosed by patients or relatives declaration, blood alcohol determination, and delirium. Diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic rejection was performed as previously described. One‐ (96.8 % versus 91.3 %) and 9‐year patient survival (83.3 % versus 80%) compared well with other indications. Five of 15 patients died due to disease recurrence. Recurrence of disease was significantly related to the duration of alcohol abstinence prior to transplantation. In patients who were abstinent for less than 6 months (17.1 %), recurrence rate was 65 %, including four of the five patients who died of recurrence. Recurrence rate decreased to 11.8%, when abstinence time was 6‐12 months and to 5.5%, when the abstinence times was > 2 years. Next to duration of abstinence, alcohol relapse was significantly related to sex, social environment, and psychological stability. The incidence of acute rejection compared well with other indications (38.1%); CsA: 40.1% versus 33.3% in FK506 patients. In all, 18.2% of CsA patients experienced steroid‐resistant rejection compared with 2.6 % of FK506 patients. Seven patients (7.6%) in the CsA group and one patient (1.3%) in the FK506 group developed chronic rejection. A total of 57.1% developed infections; 5.7% were life‐threatening. CMV infections were observed in 14.3% (versus 25% for other indications). New onset of insulin‐dependent diabetes was observed in 8.6% and hypertension in 32.4%. In conclusion, alcoholic cirrhosis is a good indication for liver transplantation with respect to graft and patient survival and development of postoperative complications. FK506 therapy was favourable to CsA treatment. Patient selection is a major issue and established criteria should be strictly adhered to. Patients with alcohol abstinence times shorter than 6 months should be excluded, since recurrence and death due to recurrence was markedly increased in this group of patients.

Mycophenolate mofetil in combination with tacrolimus versus neoral after liver transplantation

MYCOPHENOLATE mofetil (MMF) is an accepted immunosuppressive agent after kidney transplantation. Possible indications for MMF after liver transplantation include: (1) rejection therapy; (2) reduction of cyclosporine or tacrolimus dosage in patients with nephro-, neuro-, or hepatotoxicity; and (3) early steroid withdrawal. The potential role of additive MMF therapy in patients with HCV cirrhosis has been explored; however, data concerning MMF induction or maintenance therapy are limited.

Perioperative factors influencing patient outcome after liver transplantation

Abstract We have previously shown that the development of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) after liver transplantation significantly reduced patient survival. Therefore, the question arises of which are the most prominent perioperative donor and recipient factors leading to MODS after transplantation. In total, 634 patients with 700 liver transplants were analyzed. Donor factors included age, increase in transaminases, sex mismatch, requirement for catecholamines, intensive care time, histology, and macroscopic graft appearence. Recipient factors included Child classification, preoperative gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, mechanical ventilation, hemodialysis, and requirement for catecholamines. MODS was defined by more than two severe organ dysfunctions. The cumulative 2 to 9‐year patient survival was 90.9 % in patients developing less than 3 severe organ dysfunctions following transplantation. Survival decreased to 60.3 % in patients with MODS. Neither any of the donor factors nor the duration of cold ischemia (CIT) was associated with an increase in MODS or decrease in survival. On the other hand, duration of warm ischemia, amount of blood loss, requirement for red packed blood cells, and reoperation had an influence on the development of MODS (40%‐56%) and decreased patient survival to 58%‐69%. Preoperative therapy with catecholamines, GI bleeding, mechanical ventilation, and hemodialysis were associated with the development of MODS in 54 %‐88 %. Patient survival following MODS decreased to 50%‐74%. Initial graft function had a slight influence on the development of MODS, but no influence on the long‐term patient survival. In conclusion, patient survival was significantly influenced by the development of postoperative MODS. The most prominent factors in this were recipient and intraoperative ones. No major influence was observed for donor factors, CIT, and initial graft function. Prevention of MODS will further improve the outcome after liver transplantation.

Incidence and indications for reintubation during postoperative care following orthotopic liver transplantation

STUDY OBJECTIVE To analyze the incidence and indications for reintubation during postoperative care following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). DESIGN Retrospective chart review. SETTING Large metropolitan teaching hospital. PATIENTS 546 adult liver transplant recipients. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The medical charts of 546 patients who underwent OLT at our institution between January 1992 and September 1996 were reviewed for the incidence and indications of reintubation throughout primary hospitalization. Eighty-one of 546 patients (14.8%) required one or more episodes of reintubation after OLT. In the majority of cases, reintubation was performed for pulmonary complications (44.6%), followed by cerebral (19.1%) and surgical (14.5%) complications. Cardiac (9.1%) and peripheral neurologic (2.7%) complications were less frequent reasons for reintubation. Overall patient survival, according to the Kaplan-Meier estimates, was 89.9%, 87.5%, 86.5%, and 82.2% after 1, 2, 3, and 5 years, respectively. In patients with one or more episodes of reintubation, overall survival decreased to 62.5% after 1, 2, and 3 years, and to 56.4% after 5 years (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The main indications for reintubation after OLT were pulmonary, cerebral, and surgical complications. These reintubation events had a considerable influence on the patients postoperative recovery, and were associated with a significantly higher rate of mortality, than for OLT patients who did not undo reintubation.

Methylprednisolon minimiert im Rattenmodel die Ischämie/Reperfusionsschädigung der Leber durch Reduktion von Apoptose und Inflammation

Introduction During hepatectomy, temporary hilar occlusion is sometimes necessary to reduce the risk of intraoperative bleeding. Hereafter, the associated ischemia/reperfusion (IR) injury may lead to hepatocellular damage, which might result in postoperative organ dysfunction and organ failure. The aim of our study was to evaluate the protective efficacy of steroid administration prior to hepatic ischemia, and the potential underlying mechanisms.