M. Gobikrushanth
University of Alberta
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by M. Gobikrushanth.
Applied and Environmental Microbiology | 2015
Soo Jin Jeon; A. Vieira-Neto; M. Gobikrushanth; R. Daetz; Rodolfo D. Mingoti; Ana Carolina Brigolin Parize; Sabrina Lucas Ribeiro de Freitas; Antônio Nelson Lima da Costa; R.C. Bicalho; Svetlana F. Lima; K. Casey Jeong; K.N. Galvão
ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to evaluate the progression of the uterine microbiota from calving until establishment of metritis. Uterine swabs (n = 72) collected at 0, 2, and 6 ± 2 days postpartum (dpp) from 12 metritic and 12 healthy cows were used for metagenomic sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene on the Illumina MiSeq platform. A heat map showed that uterine microbiota was established at calving. The microbiota changed rapidly from 0 to 6 ± 2 dpp, with a decrease in the abundance of Proteobacteria and an increase in the abundance of Bacteroidetes and Fusobacteria, which were dominant in metritic cows. Uterine microbiota composition was shared; however, metritic and healthy cows could be discriminated using relative abundance of bacterial genera at 0, 2, and 6 ± 2 dpp. Bacteroides was the main genus associated with metritis because it was the only genus that showed significantly greater abundance in cows with metritis. As the abundance of Bacteroides organisms increased, the uterine discharge score, a measure of uterine health, worsened. Fusobacterium was also an important genus associated with metritis because Fusobacterium abundance increased as Bacteroides abundance increased and the uterine discharge score worsened as the abundance increased. The correlation with uterine discharge score and the correlation with Bacteroides or Fusobacterium showed that other bacteria, such as Helcoccocus, Filifactor, and Porphyromonas, were also associated with metritis. There were also bacteria associated with uterine health, such as “Candidatus Blochmannia,” Escherichia, Sneathia, and Pedobacter.
Journal of Dairy Science | 2014
J.H.J. Bittar; P. J. Pinedo; C.A. Risco; J.E.P. Santos; W.W. Thatcher; K.E. Hencken; S. Croyle; M. Gobikrushanth; C.C. Barbosa; A. Vieira-Neto; K.N. Galvão
The objective of the current study was to evaluate the effect of GnRH early postpartum on induction of ovulation, uterine health, and fertility in dairy cows. Holstein cows without a corpus luteum (CL) at 17 ± 3 DIM were assigned randomly to receive i.m. GnRH (n = 245) at 17 ± 3 and 20 ± 3 DIM or remain as controls (n = 245). Ovaries were scanned by ultrasonography twice weekly totaling 4 examinations. Ovulation was characterized by the appearance of a CL ≥ 20 mm at any ultrasound or CL <20mm in 2 consecutive examinations. Clinical and cytological endometritis were diagnosed at 35 DIM. Compared with control, GnRH increased ovulation up to 3.5d after the last treatment (78.7 vs. 45.0%) and did not affect the prevalence of clinical endometritis (23.9 vs. 18.6%) or cytological endometritis (30.9 vs. 32.8%). Prevalence of clinical endometritis increased in cows that had calving problems (32.6 vs. 15.9%) and metritis (40.6 vs. 15.8%). Metritis increased prevalence of cytological endometritis (50.7 vs. 23.5%). Treatment with GnRH did not affect pregnancy per artificial insemination at 32 (37.6 vs. 38.6%) or 74 d after artificial insemination (35.0 vs. 31.5%), but reduced pregnancy loss (6.8 vs. 18.1%). No overall effect of GnRH treatment on hazard of pregnancy was observed; however, an interaction between GnRH treatment and ovulation showed that GnRH-treated cows that ovulated had increased hazard of pregnancy by 300 DIM compared with GnRH-treated and control cows that did not ovulate (hazard ratio=2.0 and 1.3, respectively), but similar to control cows that ovulated (hazard ratio=1.1). Gonadotropin-releasing hormone early postpartum induced ovulation without affecting uterine health, but failed to improve pregnancy per artificial insemination or time to pregnancy, although it reduced pregnancy loss.
Journal of Dairy Science | 2014
M. Gobikrushanth; A. De Vries; J.E.P. Santos; C.A. Risco; K.N. Galvão
The objective of this retrospective observational cohort study, combined with simulation, was to evaluate the effect of extending the voluntary waiting period (VWP) during the summer on profitability on a Florida dairy farm. Data from Holstein cows (n=1,416) that calved between June and September of 2007 and 2008 were used. Cows that calved between June 1 and July 21 (regular group; REG; n=719) were artificially inseminated (AI) for the first time upon estrus detection (ED) after the second PGF₂α of the Presynch protocol administered between 57 and 63 d in milk (DIM), or underwent timed AI using the Ovsynch protocol (TAI) if not detected in estrus. Cows that calved between July 22 and September 18 (extended group; EXT; n=697) underwent AI for the first time after the first or second PGF₂α starting November 14 or November 21 or underwent TAI if not detected in estrus. For second and subsequent AI, all cows underwent AI upon ED or enrolled on TAI after nonpregnancy diagnosis. Following these schemes, average VWP in the REG group and EXT group were 60 and 83 d, respectively. Overall profitability for both experimental and subsequent parities were calculated by subtracting the costs existing of feeding costs (
Reproduction, Fertility and Development | 2017
Reza Salehi; M.G. Colazo; M. Gobikrushanth; Urmila Basu; D.J. Ambrose
0.30/kg lactating cow diet;
Journal of Dairy Science | 2016
E. Subramaniam; M.G. Colazo; M. Gobikrushanth; Y. Sun; A.L. Ruiz-Sanchez; P. Ponce-Barajas; M. Oba; D.J. Ambrose
0.25/kg dry cow diet), breeding costs (
Journal of Dairy Science | 2018
M. Gobikrushanth; D.C. Purfield; M.G. Colazo; S.T. Butler; Z. Wang; D.J. Ambrose
2.65/dose PGF₂α;
Journal of Dairy Science | 2017
M. Gobikrushanth; P. A. Dutra; T. C. Bruinjé; M.G. Colazo; S.T. Butler; D.J. Ambrose
2.40/dose GnRH;
Journal of Dairy Science | 2018
M. Gobikrushanth; D.C. Purfield; M.G. Colazo; Z. Wang; S.T. Butler; D.J. Ambrose
0.25/injection administration;
Journal of Dairy Science | 2018
T. C. Bruinjé; M.G. Colazo; E.S. Ribeiro; M. Gobikrushanth; D.J. Ambrose
10/semen straw;
Journal of Dairy Science | 2017
M. Gobikrushanth; T. C. Bruinjé; M.G. Colazo; S.T. Butler; D.J. Ambrose
5/AI;