Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where M. Hafez is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by M. Hafez.


AIAA Journal | 1978

Artificial compressibility methods for numerical solutions of transonic full potential equation

M. Hafez; E. Murman; J. South

New methods for transonic flow computations based on the full potential equation in conservation form are presented. The idea is to modify slightly the density (due to the artificial viscosity in the supersonic region), and solve the resulting elliptic-like problem iteratively. It is shown that standard discretization techniques (central differencing) as well as some standard iterative procedures (SOR, ADI, and explicit methods) are applicable to the modified transonic mixed-type equation. Calculations of transonic flows around cylinders and airfoils are discussed with special emphasis on the explicit methods that are suitable for vector processing on the STAR 100 computer.


Archive | 2010

Computational Fluid Dynamics Review 2010

M. Hafez; K. Oshima; Dochan Kwak

This volume contains 25 review articles by experts which provide up-to-date information about the recent progress in computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Due to the multidisciplinary nature of CFD, it is difficult to keep up with all the important developments in related areas. CFD Review 2010 would therefore be useful to researchers by covering the state-of-the-art in this fast-developing field.


Mathematics of Computation | 1985

Entropy Condition Satisfying Approximations for the Full Potential Equation of Transonic Flow

Stanley Osher; M. Hafez; Woodrow Whitlow

A class of conservative difference approximations for the steady full potential equation was presented. They are, in general, easier to program than the usual density biasing algorithms, and in fact, differ only slightly from them. Rigorous proof indicated that these new schemes satisfied a new discrete entropy inequality, which ruled out expansion shocks, and that they have sharp, steady, discrete shocks. A key tool in the analysis is the construction of a new entropy inequality for the full potential equation itself. Results of some numerical experiments using the new schemes are presented.


AIAA Journal | 1981

Numerical solution of transonic stream function equation

M. Hafez; D. Lovell

The stream function equation, in conservation form, looks similar to the full potential equation and existing methods (e.g. artificial compressibility) can be readily applied. Rotational flows can be calculated once the vorticity (due to shocks or nonuniformity) is evaluated. There are, however, two main difficulties: First, the density is not uniquely determined in terms of the flux (there are two solutions; the subsonic and the supersonic branch with a square root singularity at the sonic point). Methods to overcome this difficulty are studied and results are presented with some remarks on inviscid separation and closed stream lines. Second, the need of two stream functions for three dimensional calculations is briefly discussed.


Acta Mechanica | 1999

Nonuniqueness of transonic flows

M. Hafez; W. Guo

SummaryThe objective of this paper is to present nonunique (numerical) solutions of potential, Euler and Navier-Stokes equations for steady transonic flows over the same airfoil at the same Mach number. It seems, therefore, that the nonuniqueness is associated with the common inherent nonlinearity of the different models.


AIAA Journal | 1982

Finite Element Solutions of Transonic Flow Problems

Wagdi G. Habashi; M. Hafez

The artificial compressibility method is briefly reviewed and the effect of different forms of the artificial viscosity are studied. Successful finite element solutions of transonic airfoil problems are presented. Iterative procedures including VLSOR, Zebroid, fast solver, firstand second-degree methods, and variable acceleration parameters such as preconditioned steepest descent and conjugate gradient are discussed and necessary modifications for transonic flow computations by finite elements are implemented leading to fast, reliable, and efficient calculations.


Journal of Applied Mechanics | 2009

Time-Derivative Preconditioning Methods for Multicomponent Flows—Part I: Riemann Problems

Jeffrey A. Housman; Cetin Kiris; M. Hafez

A time-derivative preconditioned system of equations suitable for the numerical simulation of inviscid multicomponent and multiphase flows at all speeds is described. The system is shown to be hyperbolic in time and remains well conditioned in the incompressible limit, allowing time marching numerical methods to remain an efficient solution strategy. It is well known that the application of conservative numerical methods to multicomponent flows containing sharp fluid interfaces will generate nonphysical pressure and velocity oscillations across the component interface. These oscillations may lead to stability problems when the interface separates fluids with large density ratio, such as water and air. The effect of which may lead to the requirement of small physical time steps and slow subiteration convergence for implicit time marching numerical methods. At low speeds the use of nonconservative methods may be considered. In this paper a characteristic-based preconditioned nonconservative method is described. This method preserves pressure and velocity equilibrium across fluid interfaces, obtains density ratio independent stability and convergence, and remains well conditioned in the incompressible limit of the equations. To extend the method to transonic and supersonic flows containing shocks, a hybrid formulation is described, which combines a conservative preconditioned Roe method with the nonconservative preconditioned characteristic-based method. The hybrid method retains the pressure and velocity equilibrium at component interfaces and converges to the physically correct weak solution. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the nonconservative and hybrid approaches, a series of one-dimensional multicomponent Riemann problems is solved with each of the methods. The solutions are compared with the exact solution to the Riemann problem, and stability of the numerical methods are discussed.


Journal of Applied Mechanics | 2009

Time-Derivative Preconditioning Methods for Multicomponent Flows—Part II: Two-Dimensional Applications

Jeffrey A. Housman; Cetin Kiris; M. Hafez

A time-derivative preconditioned system of equations suitable for the numerical simulation of multicomponent/multiphase inviscid flows at all speeds was described in Part I of this paper. The system was shown to be hyperbolic in time and remain well conditioned in the incompressible limit, allowing time marching numerical methods to remain an efficient solution strategy. Application of conservative numerical methods to multicomponent flows containing sharp fluid interfaces was shown to generate nonphysical pressure and velocity oscillations across the contact surface, which separates the fluid components. It was demonstrated using the one-dimensional Riemann problem that these oscillations may lead to stability problems when the interface separates fluids with large density ratios, such as water and air. The effect of which leads to the requirement of small physical time steps and slow subiteration convergence for the implicit time marching numerical method. Alternatively, the nonconservative and hybrid formulations developed by the present authors were shown to eliminate this nonphysical behavior. While the nonconservative method did not converge to the correct weak solution for flow containing shocks, the hybrid method was able to capture the physically correct entropy solution and converge to the exact solution of the Riemann problem as the grid is refined. In Part II of this paper, the conservative, nonconservative, and hybrid formulations described in Part I are implemented within a two-dimensional structured body-fitted overset grid solver, and a study of two unsteady flow applications is reported. In the first application, a multiphase cavitating flow around a NACA0015 hydrofoil contained in a channel is solved, and sensitivity to the cavitation number and the spatial order of accuracy of the discretization are discussed. Next, the interaction of a shock moving in air with a cylindrical bubble of another fluid is analyzed. In the first case, the cylindrical bubble is filled with helium gas, and both the conservative and hybrid approaches perform similarly. In the second case, the bubble is filled with water and the conservative method fails to maintain numerical stability. The performance of the hybrid method is shown to be unchanged when the gas is replaced with a liquid, demonstrating the robustness and accuracy of the hybrid approach.


Archive | 1984

Transonic Small Disturbance Calculations Including Entropy Corrections

M. Hafez; D. Lovell

Murman’s fully conservative mixed type finite-difference operators are first modified. A special sonic point operator with an iterative damping term is introduced which helps the convergence and does not affect the spatial conservative differences. Reliable calculations with second order supersonic schemes are obtained using two sonic operators, the regular sonic point operator followed by a first order supersonic scheme. Also, shock point operator is shown to be equivalent to fitting a locally normal shock terminating the supersonic region.


Journal of Fluids and Structures | 1987

An entropy correction method for unsteady full potential flows with strong shocks

W. Whitlow; M. Hafez; Stanley Osher

An entropy correction method for the unsteady full potential equation is presented. The unsteady potential equation is modified to account for entropy jumps across shock waves. The conservative form of the modified equation is solved in generalized coordinates using an implicit, approximate factorization method. A flux-biasing differencing method, which generates the proper amounts of artificial viscosity in supersonic regions, is used to discretize the flow equations in space. Comparisons between the present method and solutions of the Euler equations and the transonic small disturbance potential equation are presented. Comparisons with experimental data are also presented. The comparisons show that the present method more accurately models solutions of the Euler equations and experiment than does the isentropic potential formulation.

Collaboration


Dive into the M. Hafez's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Essam Wahba

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

W. Guo

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. Lovell

George Washington University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. Kinney

University of California

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge