M.-J. Le Bris

Detection of an unexpected subtelomeric 15q26.2 qter deletion in a little girl: Clinical and cytogenetic studies

Unlike the small proximal 15q deletions causing Prader‐Willi and/or Angelman syndrome, distal deletions of the terminal long arm of chromosome 15 have rarely been described. To the best of our knowledge, only four patients with a pure terminal 15q deletion have been documented in the literature. We report here on an unexpected abnormal hybridization pattern for the 15q specific subtelomeric control probe (clone 154P1) of the commercial SNRPN probe in a girl referred for suspicion of Angelman syndrome. Investigation by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) using bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones defined a partial monosomy 15q26.2 → 15qter for a minimal critical region of approximately 5.7 Mb, which is the most distal de novo 15qter deletion reported to date. All the de novo 15qter deletion cases, including ours, presented with pre‐ and post‐natal growth retardation related to the loss of one copy of the IGF1R gene. Based on the comparaison with the previous published cases and owing to the clinical phenotype of our patient, we define a new subtelomeric 15qter syndrome which would be characterized by intrauterine growth retardation and global post‐natal growth failure, variable mental retardation, facial anomalies including relative micrognathia and triangular facies and minor malformations of the extremities including proximally placed thumbs, cubitus valgus, and brachydactyly with tappering of the digits.

Aneuploidy and DNA Fragmentation in Sperm of Carriers of a Constitutional Chromosomal Abnormality

Among various causes responsible for infertility, it has been admitted for a long time that male infertility can be due to impaired spermatogenesis and/or balanced structural chromosomal abnormalities. Sperm DNA fragmentation is also considered as another cause of infertility. Most of the studies on male infertility have concerned either aneuploidy in the sperm of carriers of constitutional chromosomal abnormalities or sperm DNA fragmentation. This review is aimed at analyzing these 2 parameters in the same patients. Furthermore, we present work on the study of these 2 parameters in the same gametes of 4 carriers of a balanced chromosomal abnormality. Meiotic segregation was analyzed by fluorescent in situ hybridization and DNA fragmentation was detected by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling assay. It was shown that aneuploidy and DNA fragmentation were increased in the sperm of carriers of a balanced chromosomal abnormality. For all 4 carriers of a balanced structural abnormality, there was a 2–5 times higher proportion of spermatozoa with unbalanced chromosomal content and fragmented DNA than among those with normal/balanced content. Moreover, we found a non-random distribution with more gametes with DNA fragmentation when these arose from a particular segregation mode. The mechanism which would tend to explain our results is abortive apoptosis. In conclusion, both meiotic segregation and DNA fragmentation studies should be integrated in the genetic exploration of male carriers of a chromosomal structural abnormality.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization characterization of ider(20q) in myelodysplastic syndrome

Isochromosome of the long arm of chromosome 20 with loss of interstitial material [ider(20q)] is a variant of deletion of chromosome 20q and a rare abnormality in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). We studied seven cases with an ider(20q) in MDS. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) studies showed all proximal breakpoints to be consistently located in 20q11.21 band whereas distal breakpoints were variable. Amplification of HCK, TNFRSF6B and DIDO1 genes included in retained regions associated with loss of tumour suppressor genes in deleted regions could explain cell tumour progression and possibly the less favourable prognosis of ider(20q) compared with del(20q).

18p trisomy : A case of direct 18p duplication characterized by molecular cytogenetic analysis

H. Marical, M.J. Le Bris, N. Douet-Guilbert, P. Parent, J.P. Descourt, F. Morel, and M. De Braekeleer* Service de Cytogénétique, Cytologie et Biologie de la Reproduction, CHU Morvan, Brest, France Laboratoire d’Histologie, Embryologie et Cytogénétique, Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France Service de Pédiatrie et Génétique Médicale, CHU Morvan, Brest, France Service de Pédiatrie, Clinique Kéraudren, Brest, France

A study of meiotic segregation of chromosomes in spermatozoa of translocation carriers using fluorescent in situ hybridisation

In the infertile male population, there is a 2–20‐time higher probability of having a structural chromosomal abnormality than in general population. Generally, these men have a normal phenotype but they can have sperm abnormalities. As they can produce a variable proportion of unbalanced gametes, it is important to evaluate the percentage of unbalanced chromosomal spermatozoa to assess the risk of injecting a chromosomally unbalanced gamete during ICSI procedure. We report here the meiotic segregation analysis of chromosomes in spermatozoa of 12 men with a balanced reciprocal translocation and 4 men with a Robertsonian translocation using a fluorescent in situ hybridisation analysis. The frequencies of normal or balanced spermatozoa ranged from 34.4% to 49.1% in balanced reciprocal translocation carriers. For Robertsonian translocation, the frequencies of normal or balanced spermatozoa ranged from 78.4% to 91.2%. These analyses allow us to define the orientation of genetic counselling according to the results of meiotic segregation obtained. As a last resort, it could then be discussed of the possibility of having recourse to donor spermatozoa or adoption.

Molecular characterization of deletions of the long arm of chromosome 5 (del(5q)) in 94 MDS/AML patients

Molecular characterization of deletions of the long arm of chromosome 5 (del(5q)) in 94 MDS/AML patients

Molecular cytogenetics of IGH rearrangements in non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma.

Rearrangements involving the IGH gene have been identified in about 50% of non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphomas (NHLs) and correlated to clinically relevant subgroups. However, the detection rate largely varied with the technique used. We analyzed the incidence of IGH rearrangements using several fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) techniques on metaphases obtained from 96 patients with nodal NHL. An IGH rearrangement was identified in 71 cases (74%). A t(14;18)(q32;q21) was found in 37 of the 42 follicular lymphomas (88.1%) studied and a t(11;14)(q13;q32) in 12 of the 14 mantle cell lymphomas (85.7%). IGH rearrangements were identified in 21 of the 40 diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (52.5%), including seven t(14;18)(q32;q21) and four t(3;14)(q27;q32). Conventional cytogenetics was uninformative in several cases. However, the complemented analysis using 24-color FISH, chromosomal whole paints, telomeric probes and locus specific identifiers enabled us to characterize complex and/or masked IGH translocations in follicular lymphomas and mantle cell lymphomas and to identify all the chromosomal partners involved in IGH rearrangements in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. This study shows the interest of using metaphase FISH in addition to conventional cytogenetics. Following banding techniques, FISH with the IGH dual color probe can be the first approach in NHL, after which chromosome painting and 24-color FISH can be used to identify the chromosomal partners involved in IGH rearrangements. The identification of these genes is of utmost importance for a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in the genesis of lymphoma.

Molecular cytogenetic characterization of two small chromosome 8 derived supernumerary mosaic markers

Two small supernumerary mosaic marker chromosomes (SMC) were identified by conventional cytogenetics, one prenatally, the other postnatally. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) techniques, including 24‐color FISH, were applied to identify both SMCs and better characterize their constitution. Patient 1: a 29 year‐old man, whose wife had a spontaneous abortion, was found to have a small ring of the pericentromeric region of chromosome 8 (47,XY,+r(8)(p11q11)/46,XY). Patient 2: a 37 year‐old woman had amniocentesis. The fetus was found to have a SMC; its presence was confirmed postnatally. Several FISH techniques (24‐color, whole chromosome paints, centromeres, telomeres, band 8p22) led to the identification of a small analphoid marker. The marker was an inversion–duplication for part of the short arm of chromosome 8 (47,XY,+inv dup (8)(p23pter)/46,XY). The 24‐color FISH allowed us to conclude that both markers originated exclusively from chromosome 8. However, the structure and content of the markers were elucidated using other molecular cytogenetic techniques, showing their complementarity.

Characterisation of supernumerary chromosomal markers: a study of 13 cases

Marker chromosomes are defined as ‘structurally abnormal chromosomes in which no part can be identified’ (ISCN 1995). Supernumerary marker chromosomes (SMC) are ‘additional markers’ whose origin and composition cannot be determined by conventional cytogenetics. Molecular cytogenetic methods are necessary to identify these additional chromosomal markers. In one third, the SMCs are clinically well-defined in the literature, the remaining two thirds present a major problem for genetic counselling in prenatal diagnosis. At present, different molecular cytogenetic methods are used to determine the origin of SMCs. In this work, we studied 13 SMCs detected by RHG-banding, completed by C-banding and/or NOR-staining. 24-color FISH was used as the primary technique when the chromosomal origin was unknown. Targeted FISH procedures with specific probes (whole chromosome painting, centromeric probe, locus-specific identifier, BAC, etc.) were then performed to confirm and/or specify the chromosomal material present in the SMC. Seven SMCs were found to be associated with phenotypic abnormalities. Five derived from autosomes and two from gonosomes; these are: der(12)t(4;12), dic(15), i(18p), r(19), der(22)t(11;22), r(X), and der(Y). Two markers, r(8) and idic(15), were identified during investigations of infertile couples. Three cases seemed to be phenotypically normal. Four were discovered prenatally: r(2) and r(19) referred for elevated maternal serum markers, der(13/21) referred for advanced maternal age. The fourth SMC, der(14/22), was found during familial investigation following the identification of the same marker in an infertile son. The precise characterisation of the SMCs is of utmost importance for genetic counselling, especially in prenatal diagnosis.

Balanced complex chromosome rearrangement in male infertility: case report and literature review

Complex chromosome rearrangements (CCRs) are structural rearrangements involving at least three chromosomes and three or more chromosome breakpoints. Generally, balanced CCR carriers have a normal phenotype but they are at a higher reproductive risk. Azoospermia was discovered in the male partner of a couple with primary infertility. Conventional cytogenetics identified a CCR refined by fluorescent in situ hybridisation. The CCR involved three chromosomes, four breakpoints and an insertion. A literature search identified 43 phenotypically normal males referred for reproductive problems presenting a CCR. More males were ascertained because of spermatogenesis failure or disturbances than because of repeated abortions and/or birth of a malformed child. Male carriers of CCR produce a high frequency of chromosomally abnormal spermatozoa due to the aberrant segregation of the rearranged chromosomes. The number of chromosomes and breakpoints involved in the rearrangement, the position of breakpoints, the relative size of the resultant chromosomes and the presence or absence of recombination inside the paired‐rearranged segments are presumed to affect the fertility of the carrier. Testicular biopsy should not be performed in males with azoospermia. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection should not be proposed as a procedure for treating the infertility of CCR male carriers as a successful result is unlikely.