M.J. Sebastián
Mexican Social Security Institute
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by M.J. Sebastián.
Transplant International | 2017
A. Ríos; Ana López-Navas; José Antonio García; Gregorio Garrido; Marco Antonio Ayala-García; M.J. Sebastián; A.M. Hernández; P. Ramírez; Pascual Parrilla
The Latin American (LA) population resident in the USA is a growing subgroup of the population. To find out the structure of attitude towards organ donation in the LA population resident in Florida (USA). A sample was taken of LA residents in Florida, randomized and stratified by nationality, age and sex (n = 1524). Attitude was assessed using a validated questionnaire (PCID–DTO Rios) that was self‐completed anonymously. The survey completion rate was 95% (n = 1450). Attitude was favourable in 33% of respondents (n = 485), against in 40% (n = 575) and undecided in 27% (n = 390). The following variables were associated with a favourable attitude: country of origin (Dominican Republic; P = 0.038); sex (female; P < 0.001); marital status (married; P < 0.001); level of education (university; P < 0.001); previous experience of the subject (P < 0.001); considering the need for a transplant in the future (P < 0.001); understanding the concept of brain death (P = 0.003); attitude towards donating a family members organs (P < 0.001); having discussed organ donation and transplantation with ones family (P < 0.001) or with ones partner (P < 0.001); participation in pro‐social type activities (P < 0.001); the respondents religion (atheist–agnostic; P < 0.001); a respondents knowledge of the attitude of his or her religion towards organ donation (P < 0.001); no concern about mutilation after donation (P < 0.001); acceptance of cremation (P < 0.001); burial (P < 0.001); and an autopsy if one were needed (P < 0.001). The attitude towards donation of LA in Florida is worse than that reported in the native population and is associated with certain psychosocial factors.
International Journal of Artificial Organs | 2014
A. Ríos; Ana López-Navas; M.A. Ayala-García; M.J. Sebastián; Anselmo Abdo-Cuza; Jeannina Alán; L. Martínez-Alarcón; E.J. Ramírez; Gerardo Muñoz; Gerardo C. Palacios; Juliette Suárez-López; Ricardo Castellanos; Beatriz González; Miguel Angel Martínez; Ernesto Díaz; A. Nieto; Pablo Ramírez; Pascual Parrilla
Background The knowledge and acceptance of the concept of brain death (BD) among health care personnel is fundamental. Objective To analyze the level of understanding of the BD concept among personnel in Spanish and Latin American healthcare centers and to determine the factors affecting this attitude. Material and methods Data from 12 hospitals and 32 primary care centers in 4 countries within the International Collaborative Donor Project were selected (Spain, Mexico, Cuba and Costa Rica (n = 4378)). Results 62% of the personnel (n = 2714) understood BD and believed that this was the death of an individual. Of the rest, 30% (n = 1 333) did not understand it and the remaining 8% (n = 331) believed it did not mean the death of a patient. 83% (n = 931) of physicians understood BD, compared to 75% (n = 895) of nurses, 55% (n = 299) of healthcare assistants, 53% (n = 108) of non-healthcare university-educated personnel and 36% (n = 481) of those without a university education (p<0.001). 68% (n = 1084) of Mexicans understood BD compared to 66% (n = 134) of Cubans, 58% (n = 1411) of Spaniards, and 52% (n = 85) (p<0.001) of Costa Ricans. There were significant relationships between knowledge of the concept and the following: type of healthcare center (p<0.001), clinical service (p<0.001), having spoken about organ donation within the family (p<0.001) and ones partners attitude to the subject (p<0.001). A direct relationship has been found between understanding the concept and attitude toward deceased donation (p<0.001). Conclusions The understanding of BD by personnel from healthcare centers was not as good as expected. There were marked differences depending on job category.
Transplantation Proceedings | 2010
A. Ríos; L. Martínez-Alarcón; M.A. Ayala; M.J. Sebastián; A. Abdo-Cuza; J. Alán; A. López-Navas; A. López-López; E.J. Ramírez; G. Muñoz; A. Camacho; J. Suárez-López; R. Castellanos; R. Ramírez; J.S. Rodríguez; M.A. Martínez; A. Nieto; G. Ramis; P. Ramírez; Pascual Parrilla
OBJECTIVE To analyze the attitude of nursing personnel about organ donation and transplantation in hospitals in Spain and Latin America, and factors that affect this attitude. METHODS Data were selected from 12 hospitals and 32 primary care centers participating in an international study (Proyecto Donante, Murcia) in 4 countries including Spain (n = 650), Mexico (n = 428), Cuba (n = 89), and Costa Rica (n = 27). The sample was random and stratified by type of service among nursing personnel (n = 1194). Attitude was evaluated using a psychosocial questionnaire. RESULTS Of nursing personnel surveyed, 77% (n = 922) were in favor of organ donation. No differences were found according to whether they were directly involved in transplantation-related services (P < .05). Attitude in favor of organ donation varied between countries: 92% in Cuba, 85% in Costa Rica, 80% in Mexico, and 73% in Spain (P < .001) This attitude was also related to donation of a family members organs (P < .001), having discussed organ donation and transplantation within the family (P < .001), the concept of brain death (P < .001), fear of body mutilation (P < .001), and manipulation of the body after death (P = .001). CONCLUSION Attitude toward deceased organ donation among nurses varies between countries. There is a discrepancy between those in favor vs actual donation rates in countries and work centers. These fears may become worse when donation is seen as common in daily clinical practice.
Transplantation Proceedings | 2010
A. Ríos; L. Martínez-Alarcón; M.A. Ayala-García; M.J. Sebastián; A. Abdo-Cuza; A. López-Navas; A. López-López; E.J. Ramírez; G. Muñoz; A. Camacho; J. Suárez-López; R. Castellanos; J.S. Rodríguez; M.A. Martínez; A. Nieto; G. Ramis; P. Ramírez; Pascual Parrilla
INTRODUCTION Xenotransplantation is far from becoming a clinical reality. However, in vital organs it could be used as a bridge until a human organ becomes available, in an emergency situation. We analyzed the attitude toward xenotransplantation among personnel in transplant-related services in several hospitals in Spain and Latin America. METHODS A random sample stratified by type of service and job category (n = 738), in transplant-related services (procurement units, transplant units, and transplant patient follow-up units) was examined in eight hospital centers from three different countries: Spain (n = 349), Mexico (n = 269), and Cuba (n = 120). A self-administered validated questionnaire was completed anonymously. RESULTS Based on the assumption that all the results of xenotransplantation were similar to those achieved with human donors, most respondents [66% (n = 484)] would be in favor. The employees from Cuban centers had the most favorable attitudes (72% in favor), followed by the Spanish (64%) and the Mexicans (61%; P = .013). However, the differences were mainly determined by job category: Physicians showed the most favorable attitudes and auxiliary staff the least (67% vs 40%; P = .010). Attitudes were significantly related to beliefs about different types of human donation [deceased (P < .001) and living (P < .001)], the possibility of needing a transplant for oneself (P < .001), and a favorable attitude toward donating the organs of a deceased family member (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS Currently, a third of health care employees working in transplant-related services are not in favor of xenotransplantation. More information should be provided about the subject, especially in centers with preclinical xenotransplantation programs.
Transplantation Proceedings | 2010
A. Ríos; A. López-Navas; M.A. Ayala-García; M.J. Sebastián; A. Abdo-Cuza; L. Martínez-Alarcón; Beatriz González; E.J. Ramírez; G. Muñoz; A. Camacho; J. Suárez-López; R. Castellanos; J.S. Rodríguez; M.A. Martínez; A. Nieto; G. Ramis; P. Ramírez; Pascual Parrilla
BACKGROUND Transplantation hospitals have played a key role in developing deceased organ donation and transplantation (ODT). To reduce the number of deaths on the transplant waiting list, it is essential to encourage living liver donation (LLD). Involvement of personnel in these hospitals is crucial. PURPOSE We analyzed the attitudes toward LLD among hospital personnel in Spain, Mexico, and Cuba. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data were obtained from 5 transplant hospitals in Spain, Mexico, and Cuba. The sample was stratified according to job category and type of service (n=2273). A validated questionnaire about living donation was used as the instrument. RESULTS Most respondents (82%) were in favor of related LLD. If the LLD was not related, acceptance fell to 21%. A total of 85% of physicians, 79% of nursing personnel, 74% of nursing assistants, and 83% of auxiliary staff were in favor (p<.001). A favorable attitude toward LLD was associated (P<.05) with age (37±10 y vs 39±10 y), a favorable attitude toward deceased donation, a belief that a possible transplant is needed, acceptance of LLD if necessary, a favorable attitude toward living kidney donation, family discussion about ODT, a partners favorable attitude toward ODT, an intention to participate in prosocial activities, being a Catholic, and a belief that ones religion is in favor of ODT. CONCLUSIONS Personnel from Spanish, Mexican, and Cuban transplantation hospitals have favorable attitudes toward LLD. This suggests that there may be an increase in LLD in the future, provided that there is the necessary sociopolitical and economic support.
Transplantation Proceedings | 2015
A. Ríos; L. Martínez-Alarcón; A.I. López-Navas; M.A. Ayala-García; M.J. Sebastián; A. Abdo-Cuza; Beatriz González; P. Ramírez; G. Ramis; Pascual Parrilla
INTRODUCTION Medical advances and improvements in surgical techniques have transformed transplantation into an ever safer therapeutic option. However, its main limitation is the shortage of available organs. Therefore, it is necessary to join forces to achieve optimal deceased donation and prevent the loss of potential donors. We sought to analyze the acceptance of deceased organ donation (OD) among hospital personnel in surgical units in hospitals in Spain and Latin America. METHOD A random sample (n = 554) was taken was stratified according to surgical services and job category in 12 hospitals-4 in Spain (n = 294 participants), 5 in Mexico (n = 202), 2 in Cuba (n = 41), and 1 in Costa Rica (n = 17). Attitude was assessed using a questionnaire validated, which was completed anonymously and self-administered. The χ(2) test, Student t test, and a logistic regression analysis were used. RESULTS Overall, 75% of respondents (n = 417) were in favor of deceased OD and 25% were against it (n = 137). Regarding the respondents country, there was a favorable attitude among 88% of Cubans, 85% of Mexicans, 82% of Costa Ricans, and 67% of Spaniards (P < .001). The physicians were most in favor of OD with 87% supporting it (n = 149), followed by nurses (n = 182) and ancillary personnel (n = 28) both at 74%, and the health care assistants at 59% (n = 58; P < .001). The following factors affect attitude toward OD: young age (37 ± 10 years; P = .001), being a male (P = .018), having an unstable job situation (P = .009), a belief that one might need a future transplant (P = .036), having a favorable attitude toward living donation (P < .001), being in favor of donating a family members organs (P < .001), having had a family discussion about OD (P < .001), and a partners favorable attitude (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Attitude toward OD among surgeons in hospitals in Spain and Latin America was not as favorable as we might have expected.
Transplantation Proceedings | 2018
A. Ríos; A. López-Navas; Juan Flores-Medina; M.A. Ayala; Gregorio Garrido; M.J. Sebastián; Álvaro Sánchez; Laura Martínez; G. Ramis; A.M. Hernández; Pablo Ramírez; Pascual Parrilla
Xenotransplantation carries many social and cultural implications. The immigrant population in countries with xenotransplantation programs, such as Spain and the United States, will play an important role in accepting such therapy. The objective of the study is to analyze the attitude toward xenotransplantation among the Dominican population residing in the United States and Spain. METHODS The study population was born in the Dominican Republic and resides in the southeastern United States and Spain. A sample population older than 15 years was obtained randomly and stratified by age and sex. Attitude was assessed using a validated questionnaire on psychosocial aspects toward xenotransplantation (PCID-XENOTx-Ríos). A random selection of people to be surveyed was carried out. Assistance from immigration support associations was needed to advise on the location of potential respondents. RESULTS A total of 123 respondents were included in the study: A sample was taken of residents of the population from the Dominican Republic residing in Florida, United States (n = 66), and in Spain (n = 57). If it was assumed that xenotransplanted organs functioned as well as human ones, 30% would be in favor. If the results were worse, only 7% would be in favor. This favorable attitude was related to the following variables (P < .05): level of education, an attitude in favor of deceased and living organ donation, and having spoken about donation and transplantation within the family. CONCLUSIONS The attitude toward xenotransplantation among the population from the Dominican Republic who are residing in the southeastern United States and Spain is unfavorable.
Renal Failure | 2014
A. Ríos; Ana López-Navas; Marco Antonio Ayala-García; M.J. Sebastián; Anselmo Abdo-Cuza; L. Martínez-Alarcón; E.J. Ramírez; Gerardo Muñoz; Gerardo C. Palacios; Juliette Suárez-López; Ricardo Castellanos; Beatriz González; Miguel Angel Martínez; Ernesto Díaz; P. Ramírez; Pascual Parrilla
Abstract Background: Living kidney donation (LKD) is becoming increasingly necessary as a treatment option for reducing the deficit in transplant organs. Hospital personnel in services related to donation and transplantation play a key role in promoting this kind of donation. Objective: To analyze the attitude toward LKD among hospital workers in services related to donation and transplantation in Spain and Latin America. Methods: Eight hospitals in the “International Collaborative Donor Project” were selected (Spain–Mexico–Cuba). A random sample was taken which was stratified according to the type of service and job category, in transplant-related services. Results: Of the 878 respondents, 90% were in favor of related LKD, and 28% were in favor if the LKD was not related. Attitude was more favorable among Latin Americans workers compared to the Spanish (p = 0.014). Other factors associated to attitude included: age (p = 0.004); an attitude in favor of deceased donation and living liver donation (p < 0.001); and acceptance of a kidney from a donor (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The attitude toward related LKD was very favorable among hospital personnel in units related to the donation and transplantation process in Spain and Latin America, which means that they could contribute to its promotion particularly at the current time when living kidney donation needs to be expanded.
Actas Urologicas Espanolas | 2014
A. Ríos; A. López-Navas; M.A. Ayala-García; M.J. Sebastián; A. Abdo-Cuza; L. Martínez-Alarcón; E.J. Ramírez; Gerardo Muñoz; J. Suárez-López; R. Castellanos; R. Ramírez; Beatriz González; M.A. Martínez; Ernesto Díaz; P. Ramírez; Pascual Parrilla
INTRODUCTION Ancillary hospital personnel represent an important body of opinion because as they work in a hospital their opinion has more credibility for the general public as a result of their activity in hospitals. However, in most cases they do not have any health care training which means that their attitude could be based on a lack of knowledge or unfounded fears. OBJECTIVE To analyze the attitude toward living kidney donation (LKD) among ancillary personnel in Spanish and Latin-American hospitals and to analyze the variables that might influence such attitude. PATIENTS AND METHOD from «International Collaborative Donor Project» a random sample was taken among ancillary personnel in Spain, Mexico and Cuba hospitals. Attitude towards LKD was evaluated using a validated, anonymously filled and self-administered survey. RESULTS 951 professionals were surveyed (Spain: 277, Mexico: 632, Cuba: 42). 89% (n=850) are in favor of related kidney donation, lowering to 31% (n=289) in non-related donation. Of the rest, 8% (n=78) are not in favor and the 3% (n=23) are unsure. By country, Cubans (98%) and Mexicans (91%) are more in favour than Spanish (84%) (P=.001). The following variables are related to favourable attitude towards LKD: female sex (P=.017), university degree (P=.010), work in health services (P=.035), labour stability (P=.016), personal experience in donation and transplantation (P=.001), positive attitude toward cadaveric donation (P<.001), belief that he or she might need a transplant in the future (P<.001), positive attitude towards living liver donation (P<.001), a willingness to receive a donated living liver if needed (P<.001), having discussed the subject of organ donation and transplantation within the family (P<.001), partners positive attitude towards the subject (P<.001), participation in voluntary type pro-social activities (P=.002) and not being concerned about possible mutilation after donation (P<.001) CONCLUSIONS: The attitude toward living related kidney donation is favourable among ancillary personnel in Spanish and Latin-Americans hospitals. Because living donation is a better source of organs than cadaveric ones, this favourable predisposition can be used as promoting agent of living donation in order to develop it in Spanish-speaking countries.
Cirugia Espanola | 2014
Antonio Ríos; Ana López-Navas; Marco Antonio Ayala-García; M.J. Sebastián; Anselmo Abdo-Cuza; Jeannina Alán; L. Martínez-Alarcón; E.J. Ramírez; Gerardo Muñoz; Juliette Suárez-López; Roberto Castellanos; Ricardo Ramírez; Beatriz González; Miguel Angel Martínez; Ernesto Díaz; Pablo Ramírez; Pascual Parrilla