M. Jesús Nambo

The role of surgery in primary gastric lymphoma: results of a controlled clinical trial.

Objective:We began a controlled clinical trial to assess efficacy and toxicity of surgery (S), surgery + radiotherapy (SRT), surgery + chemotherapy (SCT), and chemotherapy (CT) in the treatment of primary gastric diffuse large cell lymphoma in early stages: IE and II1. Summary Background Data:Management of primary gastric lymphoma remains controversial. No controlled clinical trials have evaluated the different therapeutic schedules, and prognostic factors have not been identified in a uniform population. Patients and Methods:Five hundred eighty-nine patients were randomized to be treated with S (148 patients), SR (138 patients), SCT (153 patients), and CT (150 patients). Radiotherapy was delivered at doses of 40 Gy; chemotherapy was CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) at standard doses. International Prognostic Index (IPI) and modified IPI (MIPI) were assessed to determine outcome. Results:Complete response rates were similar in the 4 arms. Actuarial curves at 10 years of event-free survival (EFS) were as follows: S: 28% (95% confidence interval [CI], 22% to 41%); SRT: 23% (95% CI, 16% to 29%); that were statistically significant when compared with SCT: 82% (95% CI, 73% to 89%); and CT: 92% (95% CI, 84% to 99%) (P < 0.001). Actuarial curves at 10 years showed that overall survivals (OS) were as follows: S: 54% (95% CI, 46% to 64%); SRT: 53% (95% CI, 45% to 68%); that were statistically significant to SCT: 91% (95% CI, 85% to 99%); CT: 96% (95% CI, 90% to 103%)(P < 0.001). Late toxicity was more frequent and severe in patients who undergoing surgery. IPI and MIPI were not useful in determining outcome and multivariate analysis failed to identify other prognostic factors. Conclusion:In patients with primary gastric diffuse large cell lymphoma and aggressive histology, diffuse large cell lymphoma in early stage SCT achieved good results, but surgery was associated with some cases of lethal complications. Thus it appears that CT should be considered the treatment of choice in this patient setting. Current clinical classifications of risk are not useful in defining treatment.

Primary breast lymphoma: results of a controlled clinical trial.

Objectives: To assess the efficacy and toxicity of the most employed therapeutic approaches in the treatment of primary breast lymphoma (PBL). Methods: Ninety-six patients with PBL in the early stage (I or II) were enrolled to receive radiotherapy (45 Gy); chemotherapy (six cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP), every 21 days), or combined therapy. Results: Complete response was achieved in 20 of 30 patients treated with radiotherapy, 19 of 32 who were treated with chemotherapy and 30 of 34 in the combined arm (p < 0.01). Actuarial curves at 10 years showed that event-free survival was 50, 57 and 83%, respectively (p < 0.01). Actuarial curves for overall survival were 50, 50 and 76% (p < 0.01), respectively. The most common site of relapse was the central nervous system. Acute toxicity was mild. Until now, no second neoplasm or acute leukemia has been observed. Conclusions: In our study combined therapy is the best treatment in this special setting of patients; with improvement in event-free survival and overall survival without acute or severe late side effects. Prophylaxis to the central nervous system will be considered in the initial treatment to improve outcome.

Adjuvant radiotherapy to sites of previous bulky disease in patients stage IV diffuse large cell lymphoma.

PURPOSE To evaluate the usefulness of adjuvant radiotherapy to sites of previous bulky disease in patients with advanced diffuse large cell lymphoma (DLCL) who were in complete remission after chemotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIAL Two-hundred and eighteen patients were initially treated with combined chemotherapy CEOP-bleo (cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, vincristine, prednisone, bleomycin) alternating with DAC (dexamethasone, cytosine arabinoside, and cisplatinum). One hundred and fifty-five patients achieved complete remission. Eighty-eight patients with initial bulky disease were randomly assigned to either received (43 patients) or not received radiotherapy (45 patients). Dose ranged from 40-50 Gy. RESULTS The median time to treatment failure has not been reached in patients who received radiotherapy. At 5 years 72% of the patients treated with the combined therapy remain alive disease in free compared to only 35% in the control group. Projected survival at 5 years was better in the patients with adjuvant radiotherapy: 81% compared to 55% in the patients who received no radiotherapy. Toxicity was mild and manageable. No lethal toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION This treatment sequence produced durable control disease in patients with disseminated DLCL and bulky disease with acceptable toxicity. The role of radiation therapy in patients with disseminated DLCL will be confirmed in large clinical trials, but we felt that this sequence of treatment could be useful in patients with this clinical condition.

Late cardiac toxicity secondary to treatment in Hodgkin's disease. A study comparing doxorubicin, epirubicin and mitoxantrone in combined therapy

Anthracyclines are a group of drugs that are useful in the treatment of Hodgkins disease, but have been associated with severe, and in some cases lethal, cardiac toxicity. Apparently, cardiac toxicity is more frequent after 10 years of anthracycline therapy, but no longer studies of cardiac toxicity have been reported. Four hundred and seventy-six patients with Hodgkins disease, stages III and IV, were randomly assigned to receive ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine) compared with EBVD (epirubicin instead of doxorubicin) and MBVD (mitoxantrone instead of doxorubicin) at standard doses. The endpoint was the presence of a clinical cardiac event (CCE) or abnormalities in equilibrium radionuclide angiocardiography (ERNA) and echocardiogram. The patients did not receive radiation therapy and when relapsed they were censored from cardiac toxicity. The median follow-up was 11.5 years (range 7.5 - 14.8 years). CCE was observed in 17% in the MBVD arm, 9% in the ABVD arm and 6% in the EBVD arm (P < 0.001). Mortality associated with CCE was 12% with MBVD, 7% with ABVD and 2% with EBVD. Abnormalities in ERNA and echocardiogram were observed 6 - 36 months before the presence of a CCE. An excess in the standard mortality ratio was observed with the 3 regimens when compared with the general population: 19.4 for EBVD, 46.0 for ABVD and 67.8 for MBVD, which was confirmed with an increase in absolute excess risk/10,000 person-years of 15.6, 39.0 and 58.7, respectively. Overall survival was better in patients treated with EBVD because less cardiac events were observed. The use of mitoxantrone was associated with a high rate of relapse and cardiac events. Thus, we would not recommend use of the drug in Hodgkins disease. ERNA and echocardiogram are early detection tests for cardiac toxicity and can be employed in surveillance studies.

Retracted: Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Stage IV Diffuse Large Cell Lymphoma Improve Outcome

RETRACTED

Nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma with disseminated disease treated with aggressive combined therapy

Thirty-two patients with nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma and disseminated disease (lung, skin, and bone marrow) were treated with an intensive combined therapy that consisted of three cycles of CMED (cyclophosphamide 2 g/m2, metothrexate 200 mg/m2, etoposide 600 mg/m2, and dexamethasone 80 mg/m2 with leucovorin rescue administered 24 h after) every 14 d, following high-dose radiotherapy: 55 Gy in 20 sesions to centrofacial region and three cycles more of the same chemotherapy regimen. To ameliorate the presence of severe granulocytopenia, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, 5 µg/kg, daily for 14 d, begun on d 2 after chemotherapy, was administered. Complete response was achieved in 21 cases (65%); failure or progression was observed in 11 cases (35%). With a median follow-up of 69.1 mo, relapse has not been observed; thus, actuarial curves at 5 yr showed that event-free survival (EFS) is 100% in 21 patients and overall survival (OS) is 65%. Granulocytopenia grade IV was observed in 15% cycles, Nonhematological toxicity was mild and well tolerated. Radiotherapy was well tolerated; only mild mucositis was observed. Nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma is an rare presentation of maligant lymphoma (<1% of all cases) with a worse prognosis; less than 5% patients are alive free of disease at 1 yr. The use of intensive more specific chemotherapy and high dose of local radiotherapy, appear to be an excellent therapeutic approach with improvement in EFS and OS.

Residual disease after chemotherapy in aggressive malignant lymphoma: the role of radiotherapy.

Residual disease in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after intensive chemotherapy remains a problem. Radiotherapy has been used in some retrospective studies without definitive conclusions. We report the first controlled clinical trial to define the role of radiotherapy in this setting of patients. One hundred and sixty-six patients with diagnosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, high- or high-intermediate clinical risk, with residual disease (defined as tumor mass <5 cm) were randomly assigned to received radiotherapy at the involved field, with 30 Gy delivered in 20 sessions or no radiation (control group). Median follow-up was 135 mo; patients who received radiotherapy have an better outcome. Actuarial curves at 10 yr showed that progressive-free disease was 86% and overall survival was 89%; those were statistical significant when compared to patients who did no received radiotherapy: 32% and 58% respectively, (p<0.001). Toxicity was mild and well tolerated. We concluded that presence of residual mass after chemotherapy in patients with aggressive malignant lymphoma has a worse prognosis, and salvage radiotherapy improves outcome with mild toxicity. We feel that radiotherapy will be considered as necessary treatment in this special group of patients.

Addition of a Short Course of Chemotherapy Did Not Improve Outcome in Patients with Localized Marginal B-Cell Lymphoma of the Orbit

Objectives: Primary orbital malignant lymphoma (POML) is a rare malignancy, thus treatment remains to be defined. The present study was designed to define if the use of radiotherapy is sufficient in these patients or if the use of adjuvant chemotherapy would improve the outcome. Methods: Between 1983 and 1995, 98 previously untreated patients diagnosed with POML, stage IE, were randomly allocated to receive either radiotherapy (34–40 Gy) or the same radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy including anthracycline. The median follow-up was 11.4 years (range 9.8–10.8 years). Results: Complete response was similar in both arms: 98% (95% confidence interval, CI: 89–100%) in the radiotherapy arm, and 100% (95% CI: 89–100%) in the combined therapy group. At a median follow-up of 16.4 years, event-free survival was 94% (95% CI: 87–100%) and 85% (95% CI: 88–100%), respectively. Overall survivals were: 96% (95% CI: 89–99%) and 91% (95% CI: 83–98%). No statistical differences were found. Acute and late toxicities were mild. Conclusions: The addition of chemotherapy is of no further benefit, since the results did not differ, thus, radiotherapy will be considered as the treatment of choice in POML patients.

Effect of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Patients with Diffuse Large Cell Lymphoma Treated with Intensive Chemotherapy

We investigated whether Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) could prevent myelotoxicity or accelerate hematopoietic recovery after intensive chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with diffuse large cell lymphoma (DLCL). Forty-two patients were included in a prospective clinical trial in which alternating chemotherapy ESAP (etoposide, Solu-Medrol, cytosine arabinoside, cis-platinum), m-BECOD (low doses methotrexate, bleomycin, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, dexamethasone), MVPP-Bleo (mitoxantrone, vincristine, prednisone, procarbazine, bleomycin) were administered by 9 cycles. Each cycle was followed by 10 days of G-CSF (5 micrograms/kg/day) started five days after chemotherapy compared to a control group which received chemotherapy without G-CSF support. Leucocytes and granulocytes were significantly higher in patients receiving G-CSF compared to the control group. The total number of days of leukopenia (WBC counts below 2.0 x 10(9)/L and absolute granulocytes below 1.0 x 10(9)/L) were longer in the patients without G-CSF compared to those who received G-CSF (14.1 days versus 1.9 days). Delays in treatment were most frequent in the control group: 38% versus 4% in all cycles. Infection episodes occurred in 41 out of 168 cycles (25%) in the control group compared to 7 out of 172 (4%) in the G-CSF arm. Complete response was achieved in 12 out of 22 (54%) in the control group compared to 16 out 20 (80%) in the patients who received G-CSF. Toxicity secondary to G-CSF was mild. G-CSF can be administered safely to patients with DLCL and results in improved hematologic recovery after intensive chemotherapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma primary of lung

Abstract Primary lung lymphoma (PLL) and diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a rare entity and the biological features, clinical presentation, prognosis markers and treatment have not been well defined. We present 82 cases of PLL‐DLBCL in a uniform population and treated with conventional chemotherapy: CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin vincristine and prednisone). To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest series with long term follow reported. We also performed immunohistochemical studies to determine if the cell of origin [germinal center (GC) and non‐GC] have a prognostic significance. All patients were at an early stage and low‐clinical risk without bulk disease and normal levels of lactic dehydrogenase and beta 2 microglobulin. Complete response was achieved in 77 cases (94%), actuarial curves at 10 years showed that event‐free survival (EFS) was 90% and overall survival was 92%. Fifty‐nine patients were of GC phenotype and 23 of non‐GC phenotype. Complete response (93% versus 91%), EFS (91% versus 80%) and overall survival (89% versus 78%) respectively, were not statistically different. Treatment was well tolerated, and second late events have not been seen. We conclude that PLL‐DLBCL is an extranodal lymphoma with a good prognosis event in patients of non‐GC phenotype.