M. Loeffler

International Consensus Conference on High-Dose Therapy With Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas: Report of the Jury

In theintervening years, a number of randomized studies havebeen completed that address important questions regardingthe role of high-dose therapy with stem-cell support (HDT)in the aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas (NHLs). Forthis reason, the original consensus conference organizersconvened a second International Consensus Conference onHigh-DoseTherapywithHematopoieticStemCellTransplan-tation in Aggressive Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphomas in April1998 and charged a jury with the task of evaluating availabledata on when and how to perform HDT in these diseases(Table 1). The jury operated under standard consensusconference guidelines. For each question regarding HDT inaggressive NHLs, the jury made a positive or negativerecommendation or indicated that there were insufficientdata to make a recommendation (Table 1). The quality of theevidence supporting each recommendation was also evalu-ated according to standard accepted criteria (Table 2).

Meta-analysis of chemotherapy versus combined modality treatment trials in Hodgkin's disease. International Database on Hodgkin's Disease Overview Study Group.

DESIGN To perform a meta-analysis of all randomized trials that compared chemotherapy (CT) alone versus combined modality treatment (CT + radiotherapy [RT]) for which individual patient data could be made available. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data on 1,740 patients treated on 14 different trials that included 16 relevant comparisons have been analysed. Eight comparisons were designed to evaluate the benefit of additional RT after the same CT (CT1 v CT1 + RT; additional RT design). Eight comparisons were designed to evaluate whether RT in a combined modality setting can be substituted by CT using either more cycles of the same CT or regimens that contain additional drugs (CT1 + CT2 v CT1 + RT or CT1 v CT2 + RT; parallel RT/CT design). RESULTS Additional RT showed an 11% overall improvement in tumor control rate after 10 years (P = .0001; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4% to 18%). No difference could be detected with respect to overall survival (P = .57; 95% CI, -10% to 4%). In contrast, when combined modality treatment was compared with CT alone in the parallel-design trials, no difference could be detected in tumor control rates (P = .43; 95% CI, -6% to 9%), but overall survival was significantly better after 10 years in the group that did not receive RT (P = .045; 8% difference; 95% CI, 1% to 15%). There were significantly fewer fatal events among patients in continuous complete remission (relative risk [RR], 1.73; 95% CI, 1.17 to 2.53; P = .005) if no RT was given. CONCLUSION Combined modality treatment in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkins disease overall has a significantly inferior long-term survival outcome than CT alone if CT is given over an appropriate number of cycles. The role of RT in this setting is limited to specific indications.

Structural aberrations affecting the MYC locus indicate a poor prognosis independent of clinical risk factors in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas treated within randomized trials of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL)

Recent retrospective studies of heterogeneously treated patients have suggested that chromosomal aberrations of the MYC gene locus indicate an unfavorable prognosis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Here, we investigated the prognostic impact of MYC aberrations analyzed by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization in 177 patients with de novo DLBCL treated within the two prospective, randomized trials non-Hodgkins lymphoma NHL-B1 and NHL-B2. MYC aberrations were detected in 14 DLBCL (7.9%). In a univariate analysis compared with MYC-negative DLBCL, MYC-positive cases showed a significantly shorter overall survival (OS) (P=0.047) and relevantly, though not significantly, shorter event-free survival (EFS) (P=0.062). In a Cox model adjusted for the international prognostic index, the presence of a MYC gene rearrangement was the strongest statistically independent predictor of OS (relative risk 3.4, P=0.004) and EFS (relative risk 2.5, P=0.015), and this also held true when the cell-of-origin signature detected by immunohistochemistry was included in the model.

BEACOPP: An intensified chemotherapy regimen in advanced Hodgkin's disease

PURPOSE At present, treatment results for patients with advanced-stage Hodgkins disease remain unsatisfactory. Standard chemotherapy M(C)OPP (nitrogen mustard (cyclophosphamide). vincristine, procabazine, and prednisone). ABVD (adriamycine, bleomycine, vinblastine, and dacarbacine) or M(C)OPP/ABVD +/- radiotherapy fail to achieve long-term complete remission in 35% to 50% of these patients. The BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, adriamycine, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone) regimen was developed to improve treatment results by dose intensification achieved by reduced duration of treatment (time intensification) and addition of etoposide. PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty untreated patients with advanced Hodgkins disease stage IIB IV according to the Ann Arbor classification were treated with the time intensified BEACOPP regimen. Each patient was scheduled to receive eight cycles of chemotherapy with consolidating radiotherapy to sites of initial bulk disease and to residual tumor remaining after chemotherapy. RESULTS All patients were evaluable for assessment of toxicity, treatment response, freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) and survival (SV). Of 30 treated patients, 29 patients received the intended eight cycles of BEACOPP. One patient in clinical CR, terminated the chemotherapy at his own request after six cycles and is at this time, 48 months after the end of treatment, in complete remission. Toxicity was tolerable with WHO grade 3/4 leucopenia in 28% of chemotherapy cycles and one severe (WHO grade 3) infection. No treatment-related death occurred. Cycles could generally be given on schedule. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in all but two patients (93%). At present, only one patient has relapsed. At a median follow-up of 40 months, FFTF-rate is 89% (lower confidence limit: 80%). One patient died due to progressive disease. CONCLUSION The BEACOPP regimen is feasible at moderate hematopoeitic toxicity. With a FFTF-rate of 89% at a median follow-up of 40 months, the treatment results are very encouraging. A prospective randomised trial has been initiated to compare the BEACOPP regimen with the standard COPP/ABVD regimen in advanced-stage Hodgkins disease.

Pathway activation patterns in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas.

Deregulation of cell signaling pathways controlling cell growth and cell survival is a common feature of all cancers. Although a core repertoire of oncogenic mechanisms is widely conserved between various malignancies, the constellation of pathway activities can vary even in patients with the same malignant disease. Modern molecularly targeted cancer drugs intervene in cell signaling compensating for pathway deregulation. Hence characterizing tumors with respect to pathway activation will become crucial for treatment decisions. Here we have used semi-supervised machine learning methodology to generate signatures of eight oncogene-inducible pathways, which are conserved across epithelial and lymphoid tissues. We combined them to patterns of pathway activity called PAPs for pathway activation patterns and searched for them in 220 morphologically, immunohistochemically and genetically well-characterized mature aggressive B-cell lymphomas including 134 cases with clinical data available. Besides Burkitt lymphoma, which was characterized by a unique pattern, the PAPs identified four distinct groups of mature aggressive B-cell lymphomas across independent gene expression studies with distinct biological characteristics, genetic aberrations and prognosis. We confirmed our findings through cross-platform analysis in an independent data set of 303 mature aggressive B-cell lymphomas.

Acute hematologic toxicity and practicability of dose-intensified BEACOPP chemotherapy for advanced stage Hodgkin's disease

BACKGROUND Evidence is recently accumulating that the novel BEACOPP (bleomycin (B), etoposide (E), adriamycin (A), cyclophosphamide (C), vincristine (O), procarbazine (P), prednisone (P)) chemotherapy is a highly effective treatment for advanced stage Hodgkins disease. Two dose variants of BEACOPP are currently tested in a phase III randomized multicenter trial of the GHSG. To enable more extensive testing of BEACOPP we characterized its practicability regarding schedule adherence, acute hematotoxicity and need for supportive treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data of 858 patients (6592 therapy cycles) from 184 participating institutions were evaluated. Planned total drug doses of the baseline variant (arm 1) were 80, 2400, 200, 5200, 11.2, 5600 and 4480 mg/m2 for B, E, A, C, O, P and P, respectively. Compared to arm 1, the doses of E, A and C in the dose-intensified variant (arm 2) were escalated by factor 2.0, 1.4, 1.92, respectively, using G-CSF assistance. Stepwise dose reductions were specified in case of dose-limiting toxicities. Both variants are given in eight three-weekly courses. RESULTS Median dose adherence (dose actually given relative to planned arm 1 dose) in arm 1 was 1.0 for all drugs. Relative dose escalation of E, A, and C actually maintained in arm 2 was 1.83, 1.37 and 1.77 (medians), respectively, and 70% of patients maintained elevated dose levels throughout the entire treatment. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in 25% of cycles in arm 2, most frequently due to leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia. Time courses of leukocytes in arm 2 showed more severe but not more prolonged leukocytopenia compared with arm 1. WHO grades 3-4 infections were documented in 2.1% (arm 1) and 3.1% (arm 2) of all cycles. Erythrocytes were transfused in 61% (arm 1) and 28% (arm 2), platelets in < 1% (arm 1) and 6% (arm 2) of all cycles. CONCLUSIONS Both BEACOPP schemes are practicable in a large multicenter setting. Despite increased hematotoxicity, moderate dose escalation is safe for the majority of the patients with G-CSF assistance and standard supportive treatment.

Dose escalation of cytotoxic drugs using haematopoietic growth factors: A randomized trial to determine the magnitude of increase provided by GM-CSF

BACKGROUND The magnitude of chemotherapy dose escalation made possible by the use of recombinant haematopoietic growth factors has not been quantified in a randomized trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with refractory or relapsing Hodgkins disease were randomized to receive the Dexa-BEAM regimen with escalating etoposide doses supported by placebo or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). Using an adaptive sampling method independently in both arms, the etoposide dose was escalated until the maximal tolerated dose for the first cycle was reached. RESULTS Thirty patients were randomized to GM-CSF and thirty to placebo. The etoposide dose could be escalated considerably in both treatment arms. Maximal etoposide dose for the first cycle was 1920 mg/m2 for patients receiving GM-CSF and 1160 mg/m2 for patients receiving placebo (P = 0.045 one-sided), corresponding to a 65% higher etoposide dose and a 13% higher dose intensity with GM-CSF. Dose-limiting events were similar in both arms, consisting mainly of prolonged neutropenia and consecutive infections. Treatment efficacy was not different in the two treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS While GM-CSF permits a somewhat higher dose escalation than placebo, the increase in dose intensity provided by GM-CSF is small. The use of CSF for interval reduction rather than dose escalation is the more effective strategy for dose intensification.

Excellent outcome of young adults with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas treated with CHOP-like regimens

Excellent outcome of young adults with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas treated with CHOP-like regimens

Relevance of ID3-TCF3-CCND3 pathway mutations in pediatric aggressive B-cell lymphoma treated according to the non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster protocols

Mature B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma is the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in childhood and adolescence. B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas are further classified into histological subtypes, with Burkitt lymphoma and Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma being the most common subgroups in pediatric patients. Translocations involving the MYC oncogene are known as relevant but not sufficient for Burkitt lymphoma pathogenesis. Recently published large-scale next-generation sequencing studies unveiled sets of additional recurrently mutated genes in samples of pediatric and adult B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients. ID3, TCF3 and CCND3 are potential drivers of Burkitt lymphomagenesis. In the study herein, frequency and clinical relevance of mutations in ID3, TCF3 and CCND3 were analyzed within a well-defined cohort of 84 uniformly diagnosed and treated pediatric B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients of the Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster group. Mutation frequency was 78% (ID3), 13% (TCF3) and 36% (CCND3) in Burkitt lymphoma (including Burkitt leukemia). ID3 and CCND3 mutations were associated with more advanced stages of the disease in MYC rearrangement positive Burkitt lymphoma. In conclusion, ID3-TCF3-CCND3 pathway genes are mutated in more than 88% of MYC-rearranged pediatric B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and the pathway may represent a highly relevant second hit of Burkitt lymphoma pathogenesis, especially in children and adolescents.

Publisher Correction: Molecular subtypes of diffuse large B cell lymphoma are associated with distinct pathogenic mechanisms and outcomes

In the version of this article originally published, some text above the “Tri–nucleotide sequence motifs” label in Fig. 2a appeared incorrectly. The text was garbled and should have appeared as nucleotide codes.Additionally, the labels on the bars in Fig. 2c were not italicized in the original publication. These are gene symbols, and they should have been italicized.The colored labels above the graphs in Fig. 4b were also erroneously not italicized. These labels represent gene names and loci, and they should have been italicized.