M. Lundin

Distal Pulse Palpation: Is It Reliable?

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of distal pulse palpation. The dorsalis pedis and the tibialis posterior arteries of 25 patients with suspected lower limb arterial disease were independently palpated by three vascular surgeons and three medical students in the outpatient clinic and by two vascular nurses and one physician in the vascular laboratory. The palpation findings were compared to the ankle/brachial index (ABI). Palpable and unpalpable pulses were best separated with ABI 0.76 as the cutoff point. The degree of misdiagnosis was unacceptably high, with an underdiagnosis of more than 30%. The agreement was highest (kappa 0. 68, good) among the vascular laboratory personnel in the peaceful vascular laboratory and lowest (kappa 0.38, fair) among the vascular surgeons in the busy outpatient clinic. The poor agreement and the high proportion of misdiagnosis obtained in the outpatient clinic argue against the use of pulse palpation as a single diagnostic method. Palpable pulses with low ABIs clearly state the need for more objective measurements whenever ischemia is suspected. Yet, by carefully palpating both pedal arteries under good, nonhurried conditions the reproducibility and accuracy of pulse palpation can be tolerable.

Omission of Histologic Grading From Clinical Decision Making May Result in Overuse of Adjuvant Therapies in Breast Cancer: Results From a Nationwide Study

PURPOSEnTo investigate the influence of routinely performed histologic grading on breast cancer outcome prediction and patient selection for adjuvant therapy.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnThe analysis is based on a cohort of 2,842 women diagnosed with breast cancer and comprising 91% of all breast cancers diagnosed in five defined geographical regions in Finland in 1991 through 1992. Data on clinicopathologic factors and follow-up were collected from hospital case records and national registries. Histologic grade assessed at diagnosis and other clinicopathologic data were available for 1,554 operable unilateral invasive carcinomas. The relative value of grade with respect to competing prognostic factors was estimated with the Cox proportional hazards model and logistic regression. Interactions and nonlinearity of factors were accounted for by using an artificial neural network.nnnRESULTSnHistologic grade was correlated strongly with survival in the entire series and in all subgroups studied. Women with well-differentiated node-negative cancer had a 97% 5-year distant disease-free survival rate as compared with 78% for women with poorly differentiated cancer. Grade was an independent prognostic factor in multivariate models and increased the predictive accuracy of a neural network model. Inclusion of grade data in a Cox multivariate model based on tumor size and hormone receptor status in node-negative cancer increased the proportion of patients with 5% or less risk for distant recurrence at 5 years from 15% to 54%.nnnCONCLUSIONnEven when assessed by pathologists who have no special training in breast cancer pathology, histologic grade has substantial and independent prognostic value in breast cancer. Omission of grading from clinical decision making may result in considerable overuse of adjuvant therapies.

Expression and prognostic value of transcription factor PROX1 in colorectal cancer.

Background:PROX1 is a specific target of the β-catenin/TCF pathway in the intestinal epithelium. It acts as a regulator of progression from a benign to a highly dysplastic phenotype in colorectal tumours. However, the clinical significance of PROX1 expression is not known.Methods:We studied the prognostic value of immunohistochemical expression of PROX1 in a series of 517 patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).Results:The majority of the tumour samples expressed PROX1 (91%, 471 out of 517). High PROX1 expression was associated with a poor grade of tumour differentiation (P<0.0001). In the subgroup of patients with colon cancer, high PROX1 expression was associated with unfavourable colorectal cancer-specific survival (CCSS) as compared with low PROX1 expression (CCSS 47% vs 62%; P=0.045; RR 1.47). The association between high PROX1 and poor outcome was further strengthened in female colon cancer patients (CCSS 38% vs 63%; P=0.007; RR 2.02). Nonetheless, in multivariate survival analysis PROX1 expression was not retained as an independent prognostic factor.Conclusion:High PROX1 expression is associated with a poor grade of tumour differentiation, and, in colon cancer patients, also with less favourable patient outcome. Our results strengthen the previous preclinical observations that PROX1 has a role in tumour progression in CRC.

Decreased xanthine oxidoreductase is a predictor of poor prognosis in early‐stage gastric cancer

Background: Xanthine oxidoreductase (XOR) is a key enzyme in the degradation of DNA, RNA and high-energy phosphates. About half of the patients with breast cancer have a decrease in XOR expression. Patients with breast cancer with unfavourable prognosis are independently identified by the loss of XOR. Aim: To assess the clinical relevance of XOR expression in gastric cancer. Methods: XOR levels were studied by immunohistochemistry in tissue microarray specimens of 337 patients with gastric cancer and the relation between XOR expression and a series of clinicopathological variables, as well as disease-specific survival, was assessed. Results: XOR was moderately decreased in 41% and was undetectable in another 14% of the tumours compared with the corresponding normal tissue. Decreased XOR was associated with advanced stage, deep tumour penetration, diffusely spread tumour location, positive lymph node status, large tumour size, non-curative disease, cellular aneuploidy, high S-phase fraction and high cyclooxygenase-2 expression, but not with p53 expression or Borrmann classification. Down regulation of XOR was associated with unfavourable outcome, and the cumulative 5-year gastric cancer-specific survival in patients with strong XOR expression was 47%, compared with 22% in those with moderate to negative expression (p<0.001). This was also true in patients with stage I–II (pu200a=u200a0.01) and lymph node-negative (pu200a=u200a0.02) disease, as well as in patients with smaller (⩽5 cm) tumours (pu200a=u200a0.02). Conclusion: XOR expression in gastric cancer may be a new marker for a more aggressive gastric cancer biology, similar to that previously reported for breast cancer.

Epithelial Syndecan-1 Expression Is Associated with Stage and Grade in Colorectal Cancer

Objectives: Loss of epithelial heparan sulfate proteoglycan syndecan-1 has been associated with a more aggressive behavior in various cancer forms, but the prognostic significance of syndecan-1 expression in colorectal cancer is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of immunohistochemical syndecan-1 expression in a series of 237 patients with colorectal cancer. Methods: Paraffin-embedded formalin-fixed specimens were stained with a syndecan-1-specific monoclonal antibody, and both the epithelial and stromal expression were analyzed. Results: Epithelial expression of syndecan-1 was seen in 222 tumors (94%), and it was associated with low stage of disease (p = 0.002) and low histological differentiation grade (p = 0.048). The cumulative 5-year survival of patients with weak and strong syndecan-1 expression was 49 and 54 %, respectively (p = 0.234). Syndecan-1 stromal immunoreactivity was observed in 138 tumors (58%), but lacked prognostic significance. Staining pattern and distribution can be viewed from digitized representative microscope slides (virtual slides) at http://www.webmicroscope.net/supplements/syndecan. Conclusions: The results are in line with previous reports in that low epithelial syndecan-1 expression was associated with a higher histological grade and a more advanced clinical stage of the patients. This study shows that syndecan-1 is expressed also in stromal tissue of colorectal cancer, but it does not support the proposed role of stromal syndecan-1 expression as a marker of poor clinical outcome.

Virtual Microscopy in Prostate Histopathology: Simultaneous Viewing of Biopsies Stained Sequentially With Hematoxylin and Eosin, and α-Methylacyl-Coenzyme A Racemase/p63 Immunohistochemistry

PURPOSEnHistopathological diagnosis of small focus carcinomas in prostatic needle biopsies is often assisted by IHC. To make a definitive diagnosis the pathologist must compare IHC findings with hematoxylin and eosin stained tissue morphology. We introduce what is to our knowledge a new application of virtual microscopy, in which hematoxylin and eosin, and IHC stains done sequentially on the same microscope slide can be simultaneously displayed and compared on a computer screen.nnnMATERIALS AND METHODSnA total of 30 hematoxylin and eosin stained prostatic needle biopsies were scanned with a computer controlled microscope. The slides were destained and then immunostained with a cocktail of AMACR and p63 antibodies, which labels the nuclei of nonmalignant basal cells (p63) and the cytoplasm of neoplastic glandular cells suspicious for malignancy (AMACR). The slides were then scanned again and the pairs of virtual slides were aligned for synchronized viewing.nnnRESULTSnThe presented technique was found helpful when suspicious lesions were small and when examining the immunoprofile of specimens was warranted, in addition to examining hematoxylin and eosin stained tissue morphology. The usefulness of our approach based on virtual microscopy can be evaluated on the website , which also serves as an educational tool for self-learning the correlation between hematoxylin and eosin stained tissue morphology, and AMACR/p63 IHC in prostate biopsies.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe technology for simultaneously viewing sequentially hematoxylin and eosin and IHC stained prostate biopsies can be readily used for educational purposes, as exemplified by our website, and along with the availability of rapid virtual slide scanners it can also be used for clinical diagnostics.

Sialyl Tn Is a Frequently Expressed Antigen in Colorectal Cancer: No Correlation with Patient Prognosis

Immunohistochemical expression of sialyl Tn antigen (STn), previously claimed to be a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer, was evaluated in 239 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens were stained with the monoclonal antibody C1282. STn immunoreactivity was seen in 189 of 239 tumors (79%). There was no significant correlation between STn immunoreactivity and Dukes stage, tumor location, histological type or gender. However, STn was significantly more often expressed in younger patients. There was so significant difference in survival between STn-negative patients (median survival 68 months) and STn-positive patients (median survival 79 months). In a Cox multivariate analysis, Dukes stage was the strongest predictor of outcome, followed by the age of the patient, whereas STn did not provide any prognostic information.

A web-based prognostic tool for extremity and trunk wall soft tissue sarcomas and its external validation

Background:We developed a web-based, prognostic tool for extremity and trunk wall soft tissue sarcoma to predict 10-year sarcoma-specific survival. External validation was performed.Methods:Patients referred during 1987–2002 to Helsinki University Central Hospital are included. External validation was obtained from the Lund University Hospital register. Cox proportional hazards models were fitted with the Helsinki data. The previously described model (SIN) includes size, necrosis, and vascular invasion. The extended model (SAM) includes the SIN factors and in addition depth, location, grade, and size on a continuous scale. Models were statistically compared according to accuracy (area under the ROC curve=AUC) of 10-year sarcoma-specific survival prediction.Results:The AUC of the SAM model in10-year survival prediction in the Helsinki patient series was 0.81 as compared with 0.74 for the SIN model (P=0.0007). The corresponding AUCs in the external validation series were 0.77 for the SAM model and 0.73 for the SIN model (P=0.03). A web-based calculator for the SAM model is available at http://www.prognomics.org/sam.Conclusion:Addition of grade, depth, and location as well as tumour size on a continuous scale significantly improved the accuracy of the prognostic model when compared with a model that includes only size, necrosis, and vascular invasion.

Tenascin-C Expression and Its Prognostic Significance in Colorectal Cancer

Objective: The extracellular matrix glycoprotein tenascin-C has been proposed as a tumor marker with prognostic significance in many cancer forms, but in colorectal cancer, reported results have been controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of immunohistochemical tenascin-C expression in a series of 231 patients with colorectal cancer. Methods: Paraffin-embedded formalin-fixed specimens were stained with a tenascin-C-specific monoclonal antibody, and the stromal staining intensity and pattern were analyzed. Results: Tenascin-C immunoreactivity was observed in all 231 specimens, with a pattern of staining that was diffuse and interstitial. The staining was occasional in 39 (17%), moderate in 106 (46%) and strong in 86 specimens (37%). There was no statistically significant association between tenascin-C immunoreactivity and any of the other clinicopathological variables. The cumulative 5-year survival rates of patients with occasional and weak staining were similar (56.8 and 54.9%, respectively), while the patients with strong tenascin-C staining had a lower survival rate (46.1%). This difference in survival was not significant (p = 0.23). The staining pattern and distribution can be viewed from digitized representative microscope slides (virtual slides) at http://www.webmicroscope.net/supplements/tenascin. Conclusions: Our results indicate that immunohistochemical expression of tenascin-C is not of prognostic significance in colorectal cancer.