M. Marx

Factors Affecting Auditory Performance of Postlinguistically Deaf Adults Using Cochlear Implants: An Update with 2251 Patients

Objective: To update a 15-year-old study of 800 postlinguistically deaf adult patients showing how duration of severe to profound hearing loss, age at cochlear implantation (CI), age at onset of severe to profound hearing loss, etiology and CI experience affected CI outcome. Study Design: Retrospective multicenter study. Methods: Data from 2251 adult patients implanted since 2003 in 15 international centers were collected and speech scores in quiet were converted to percentile ranks to remove differences between centers. Results: The negative effect of long duration of severe to profound hearing loss was less important in the new data than in 1996; the effects of age at CI and age at onset of severe to profound hearing loss were delayed until older ages; etiology had a smaller effect, and the effect of CI experience was greater with a steeper learning curve. Patients with longer durations of severe to profound hearing loss were less likely to improve with CI experience than patients with shorter duration of severe to profound hearing loss. Conclusions: The factors that were relevant in 1996 were still relevant in 2011, although their relative importance had changed. Relaxed patient selection criteria, improved clinical management of hearing loss, modifications of surgical practice, and improved devices may explain the differences.

Improvement of cognitive function after cochlear implantation in elderly patients

IMPORTANCE The association between hearing impairment and cognitive decline has been established; however, the effect of cochlear implantation on cognition in profoundly deaf elderly patients is not known. OBJECTIVE To analyze the relationship between cognitive function and hearing restoration with a cochlear implant in elderly patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Prospective longitudinal study performed in 10 tertiary referral centers between September 1, 2006, and June 30, 2009. The participants included 94 patients aged 65 to 85 years with profound, postlingual hearing loss who were evaluated before, 6 months after, and 12 months after cochlear implantation. INTERVENTIONS Cochlear implantation and aural rehabilitation program. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Speech perception was measured using disyllabic word recognition tests in quiet and in noise settings. Cognitive function was assessed using a battery of 6 tests evaluating attention, memory, orientation, executive function, mental flexibility, and fluency (Mini-Mental State Examination, 5-word test, clock-drawing test, verbal fluency test, d2 test of attention, and Trail Making test parts A and B). Quality of life and depression were evaluated using the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire and the Geriatric Depression Scale-4. RESULTS Cochlear implantation led to improvements in speech perception in quiet and in noise (at 6 months: in quiet, 42% score increase [95% CI, 35%-49%; P < .001]; in noise, at signal to noise ratio [SNR] +15 dB, 44% [95% CI, 36%-52%, P < .001], at SNR +10 dB, 37% [95% CI 30%-44%; P < .001], and at SNR +5 dB, 27% [95% CI, 20%-33%; P < .001]), quality of life, and Geriatric Depression Scale-4 scores (76% of patients gave responses indicating no depression at 12 months after implantation vs 59% before implantation; P = .02). Before cochlear implantation, 44% of the patients (40 of 91) had abnormal scores on 2 or 3 of 6 cognition tests. One year after implant, 81% of the subgroup (30 of 37) showed improved global cognitive function (no or 1 abnormal test score). Improved mean scores in all cognitive domains were observed as early as 6 months after cochlear implantation. Cognitive performance remained stable in the remaining 19% of the participants (7 of 37). Among patients with the best cognitive performance before implantation (ie, no or 1 abnormal cognitive test score), 24% (12 of 50) displayed a slight decline in cognitive performance. Multivariate analysis to examine the association between cognitive abilities before implantation and the variability in cochlear implant outcomes demonstrated a significant effect only between long-term memory and speech perception in noise at 12 months (SNR +15 dB, P = .01; SNR +10 dB, P < .001; and SNR +5 dB, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Rehabilitation of hearing communication through cochlear implantation in elderly patients results in improvements in speech perception and cognitive abilities and positively influences their social activity and quality of life. Further research is needed to assess the long-term effect of cochlear implantation on cognitive decline.

Morphologic examination of the temporal bone by cone beam computed tomography: Comparison with multislice helical computed tomography

INTRODUCTION High-resolution CT imaging is essential to diagnosis and follow-up of temporal bone pathology. Morphologically, CT is the reference examination. The requirement of long-term follow-up thus exposes patients to cumulative radiation doses. Limiting exposure to ionizing radiation is an increasing concern of public health authorities. The principal advantage of Cone Beam CT (CBCT) lies in a significant reduction in radiation dose. The main objective of the present study was to assess the morphologic concordance between CBCT and Multislice Helical Computed Tomography (MSCT) on 20 anatomic landmarks corresponding to regions of interest in clinical practice. The secondary objectives were to compare the two techniques qualitatively in stapes and footplate assessment and measurement of footplate thickness, and quantitatively in terms of dosimetry. MATERIAL AND METHODS An experimental anatomical study was performed on 12 temporal bones from fresh human cadavers of unknown clinical history. Each underwent CBCT and MSCT. RESULTS There was no significant difference in morphologic assessment of the temporal bones on the two techniques. Exploration of the stapes, incudostapedial joint, anterior stapediovestibular joint and footplate was qualitatively more precise on CBCT, and footplate thickness showed less overestimation than on MSCT. CBCT delivered 22 times less radiation than MSCT under the present experimental conditions. CONCLUSION CBCT provides reliable morphologic assessment of temporal bone, thanks to higher spatial resolution than on MSCT, with significantly reduced radiation dose.

Reliability of cone beam computed tomography in scalar localization of the electrode array: a radio histological study

Postoperative imaging plays a growing role in clinical studies concerning prognostic factors in cochlear implantation. Indeed, intracochlear position of the cochlear implant has recently been identified as a contributor in functional outcomes and radiological tools must be accurate enough to determine the final placement of the electrode array. The aim of our study was to validate cone beam computed tomography as a reliable technique for scalar localization of the electrode array. We performed therefore a temporal bone study on ten specimens that were implanted with a perimodiolar implant prototype. Cone beam reconstructions were performed and images were analyzed by two physicians both experienced in cochlear implant imaging, who determined the scalar localization of the implant. Temporal bones then underwent histological control to document this scalar localization and hypothetical intracochlear lesions. In four cases, a dislocation from scala tympani to scala vestibuli was suspected on cone beam reconstructions of the ascending part of the basal turn. In three of these four specimens, dislocation in pars ascendens was confirmed histologically. In the remaining temporal bone, histological analysis revealed an elevation with rupture of the basilar membrane. Histological assessment revealed spiral ligament tearing in another bone. We conclude that cone beam is a reliable tool to assess scalar localization of the selectrode array and may be used in future clinical studies.

Correlations between CT scan findings and hearing thresholds in otosclerosis

Abstract Conclusion: High-resolution computed tomography (CT) scan may reveal an isolated fenestral form of otosclerosis, and an extensive form, which involves multiple foci around the otic capsule. Pre- and postoperative hearing thresholds are poorer in patients with extensive otosclerosis and their chance of overclosure is reduced by 90%. Objectives: To evaluate the relationship between CT scan extension of otosclerotic foci and hearing thresholds in the operated ear, before and after stapedotomy. Methods: A preoperative CT scan was performed in 200 patients suspected of having otosclerosis. CT scan findings were categorized as negative, isolated fenestral otosclerosis, and extensive otosclerosis. Preoperative and 2 months postoperative air-conduction (AC) and bone-conduction (BC) thresholds were collected. Results: In the operated ear, 150 CT scans (75%) revealed an isolated fenestral otosclerosis; 35 (17.5%) were classified as extensive otosclerosis. Mean preoperative BC was significantly poorer in extensive otosclerosis (30.3 dB) than in isolated fenestral otosclerosis (24.6 dB). Mean postoperative BC remained lower in extensive otosclerosis (30.3 dB) than in isolated fenestral otosclerosis (21.2 dB). An overclosure greater than 10 dB was found in 20% of isolated fenestral otoscleroses and in 2.85% of extensive otoscleroses (chi-square: 5.5; p = 0.02).

Development and evaluation of the modiolar research array – multi-centre collaborative study in human temporal bones

Abstract Objective Multi-centre collaborative study to develop and refine the design of a prototype thin perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode array and to assess feasibility for use in human subjects. Study Design Multi-centre temporal bone insertion studies. Materials and Methods The modiolar research array (MRA) is a thin pre-curved electrode that is held straight for initial insertion with an external sheath rather than an internal stylet. Between November 2006 and February 2009, six iterations of electrode design were studied in 21 separate insertion studies in which 140 electrode insertions were performed in 85 human temporal bones by 12 surgeons. These studies aimed at addressing four fundamental questions related to the electrode concept, being: (1) Could a sheath result in additional intra-cochlear trauma? (2) Could a sheath accommodate variations in cochlea size and anatomies? (3) Could a sheath be inserted via the round window? and (4) Could a sheath be safely removed once the electrode had been inserted? These questions were investigated within these studies using a number of evaluation techniques, including X-ray and microfluoroscopy, acrylic fixation and temporal bone histologic sectioning, temporal bone microdissection of cochlear structures with electrode visualization, rotational tomography, and insertion force analysis. Results Frequent examples of electrode rotation and tip fold-over were demonstrated with the initial designs. This was typically caused by excessive curvature of the electrode tip, and also difficulty in handling of the electrode and sheath. The degree of tip curvature was progressively relaxed in subsequent versions with a corresponding reduction in the frequency of tip fold-over. Modifications to the sheath facilitated electrode insertion and sheath removal. Insertion studies with the final MRA design demonstrated minimal trauma, excellent perimodiolar placement, and very small electrode dimensions within scala tympani. Force measurements in temporal bones demonstrated negligible force on cochlear structures with angular insertion depths of between 390 and 450°. Conclusion The MRA is a novel, very thin perimodiolar prototype electrode array that has been developed using a systematic collaborative approach. The different evaluation techniques employed by the investigators contributed to the early identification of issues and generation of solutions. Regarding the four fundamental questions related to the electrode concept, the studies demonstrated that (1) the sheath did not result in additional intra-cochlear trauma; (2) the sheath could accommodate variations in cochlea size and anatomies; (3) the sheath was more successfully inserted via a cochleostomy than via the round window; and (4) the sheath could be safely removed once the electrode had been inserted.

Very far-advanced otosclerosis: stapedotomy or cochlear implantation.

Conclusion. Every patient with severe or profound hearing loss must have a temporal bone high-resolution computed tomography (CT) scan. Stapedotomy is a simple, safe and low-cost procedure compared with cochlear implantation and can provide very good results. This can justify our decision to propose stapedotomy at the initial treatment in patients with very far-advanced otosclerosis. In cases of hearing failure after stapes surgery, cochlear implantation is an option. Objective. This study aimed to find the best first intention treatment of very far-advanced otosclerosis. Materials and methods. This was a retrospective study and included 14 patients with non-measurable preoperative bone and air conduction thresholds and otosclerosis on temporal bone high-resolution CT scan. Stapes surgery followed by a well fitted hearing aid was the initial treatment in 11 patients and cochlear implantation in 7 patients, including 4 patients who had poor results after stapedotomy. Objective and subjective audiometric results were studied and compared between stapedotomy and cochlear implantation groups. Results. Objective and subjective results were statistically better in the cochlear implant group than in the stapedotomy group. However, four patients in the stapedotomy group had comparable results to the patients with cochlear implants.

Identification and evaluation of cochlear implant candidates with asymmetrical hearing loss

Objective: Recommendation for cochlear implant (CI) treatment for individuals with severe to profound single-sided deafness (SSD) and asymmetrical hearing loss (AHL) is on the rise. This raises the need for greater consistency in the definition of CI candidacy for these cases and in the assessment methods of patient-related benefits to permit effective comparison and interpretation of the outcomes with both conventional and implantable options across studies. Method: During a dedicated seminar on implant treatment in AHL patients, the panellists of the closing round table reviewed the clinical experience presented with the aim to define clear audiometric characteristics for both AHL and SSD cases, as well as a common data set enabling consistent evaluation of hearing benefits in this population. Conclusions: The panellists agreed on a clear differentiation between AHL and SSD CI candidates, defining average pure-tone thresholds up to 4 kHz for better and poorer ears. Agreement was reached on a minimum set of assessment procedures, and included the necessity of trials with conventional CROS/BICROS hearing aids and bone conduction devices before considering CI treatment. Objective assessment of sound localisation abilities was identified as the most relevant criterion to quantify performance before and after treatment. In parallel, subjective assessment of overall hearing ability was recommended via the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of hearing questionnaire. Longitudinal follow-up of these parameters and the hours of daily use were considered essential to reflect the potential treatment benefits for this population. The consistency in the data collection and its report will further support health authorities in their decision on acceptable gains from available hearing loss treatment options.

Speech prosody perception in cochlear implant users with and without residual hearing.

Objectives: The detection of fundamental frequency (F0) variations plays a prominent role in the perception of intonation. Cochlear implant (CI) users with residual hearing might have access to these F0 cues. The objective was to study if and how residual hearing facilitates speech prosody perception in CI users. Design: The authors compared F0 difference limen (F0DL) and question/statement discrimination performance for 15 normal-hearing subjects (NHS) and two distinct groups of CI subjects, according to the presence or absence of acoustic residual hearing: one “combined group” (n = 11) with residual hearing and one CI-only group (n = 10) without any residual hearing. To assess the relative contribution of the different acoustic cues for intonation perception, the sensitivity index d’ was calculated for three distinct auditory conditions: one condition with original recordings, one condition with a constant F0, and one with equalized duration and amplitude. Results: In the original condition, combined subjects showed better question/statement discrimination than CI-only subjects, d’ 2.44 (SE 0.3) and 0.91 (SE 0.25), respectively. Mean d’ score of NHS was 3.3 (SE 0.06). When F0 variations were removed, the scores decreased significantly for combined subjects (d’ = 0.66, SE 0.51) and NHS (d’ = 0.4, SE 0.09). Duration and amplitude equalization affected the scores of CI-only subjects (mean d’ = 0.34, SE 0.28) but did not influence the scores of combined subjects (d’ = 2.7, SE 0.02) or NHS (d’ = 3.3, SE 0.33). Mean F0DL was poorer in CI-only subjects (34%, SE 15) compared with combined subjects (8.8%, SE 1.4) and NHS (2.4%, SE 0.05). In CI subjects with residual hearing, intonation d’ score was correlated with mean residual hearing level (r = −0.86, n = 11, p < 0.001) and mean F0DL (r = 0.84, n = 11, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Where CI subjects with residual hearing had thresholds better than 60 dB HL in the low frequencies, they displayed near-normal question/statement discrimination abilities. Normal listeners mainly relied on F0 variations which were the most effective prosodic cue. In comparison, CI subjects without any residual hearing had poorer F0 discrimination and showed a strong deficit in speech prosody perception. However, this CI-only group appeared to be able to make some use of amplitude and duration cues for statement/question discrimination.

Quality of Life and Auditory Performance in Adults with Asymmetric Hearing Loss

We evaluated the relationship between binaural hearing deficits and quality of life. The study included 49 adults with asymmetric hearing loss (AHL), and 11 adult normal-hearing listeners (NHL) served as controls. Speech reception thresholds (SRT) were assessed with the French Matrix Test. Quality of life was evaluated with the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and the Glasgow Health Status Inventory. Speech recognition in noise was significantly poorer for AHL subjects [-0.12 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in dichotic (with speech presented to the poorer ear and noise to the better ear), -1.72 dB in diotic and -6.84 dB in reverse-dichotic conditions] compared to NHL (-4.98 dB in diotic and -9.58 dB in dichotic conditions). Scores for quality-of-life questionnaires were significantly below norms. Significant correlations were found between the SRT for the dichotic condition and the SSQ total score (r = -0.38, p = 0.01), and pure-tone average thresholds for both groups.