Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where M. Medici is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by M. Medici.


Trials | 2017

Evaluation of the clinical benefit of an electromagnetic navigation system for CT-guided interventional radiology procedures in the thoraco-abdominal region compared with conventional CT guidance (CTNAV II): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

R.C. Rouchy; A. Moreau-Gaudry; E. Chipon; S. Aubry; Lionel Pazart; B. Lapuyade; M. Durand; Mostafa El Hajjam; S. Pottier; B. Renard; R. Logier; X. Orry; A. Cherifi; E. Quehen; G. Kervio; O. Favelle; F. Patat; E. De Kerviler; C. Hughes; M. Medici; J. Ghelfi; A. Mounier; I. Bricault

BackgroundInterventional radiology includes a range of minimally invasive image-guided diagnostic and therapeutic procedures that have become routine clinical practice. Each procedure involves a percutaneous needle insertion, often guided using computed tomography (CT) because of its availability and usability. However, procedures remain complicated, in particular when an obstacle must be avoided, meaning that an oblique trajectory is required. Navigation systems track the operator’s instruments, meaning the position and progression of the instruments are visualised in real time on the patient’s images. A novel electromagnetic navigation system for CT-guided interventional procedures (IMACTIS-CT®) has been developed, and a previous clinical trial demonstrated improved needle placement accuracy in navigation-assisted procedures. In the present trial, we are evaluating the clinical benefit of the navigation system during the needle insertion step of CT-guided procedures in the thoraco-abdominal region.Methods/designThis study is designed as an open, multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled interventional clinical trial and is structured as a standard two-arm, parallel-design, individually randomised trial. A maximum of 500 patients will be enrolled. In the experimental arm (navigation system), the procedures are carried out using navigation assistance, and in the active comparator arm (CT), the procedures are carried out with conventional CT guidance. The randomisation is stratified by centre and by the expected difficulty of the procedure. The primary outcome of the trial is a combined criterion to assess the safety (number of serious adverse events), efficacy (number of targets reached) and performance (number of control scans acquired) of navigation-assisted, CT-guided procedures as evaluated by a blinded radiologist and confirmed by an expert committee in case of discordance. The secondary outcomes are (1) the duration of the procedure, (2) the satisfaction of the operator and (3) the irradiation dose delivered, with (4) subgroup analysis according to the expected difficulty of the procedure, as well as an evaluation of (5) the usability of the device.DiscussionThis trial addresses the lack of published high-level evidence studies in which navigation-assisted CT-guided interventional procedures are evaluated. This trial is important because it addresses the problems associated with conventional CT guidance and is particularly relevant because the number of interventional radiology procedures carried out in routine clinical practice is increasing.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01896219. Registered on 5 July 2013.


Nature | 2017

Measurement of the multi-TeV neutrino interaction cross-section with IceCube using Earth absorption

M. G. Aartsen; G. C. Hill; A. Kyriacou; S. Robertson; A. Wallace; B. J. Whelan; M. Ackermann; E. Bernardini; Stijn Blot; F. Bradascio; H.-P. Bretz; J. Brostean-Kaiser; A. Franckowiak; E. Jacobi; T. Karg; T. Kintscher; S. Kunwar; R. Nahnhauer; K. Satalecka; C. Spiering; J. Stachurska; A. Stasik; N. L. Strotjohann; A. Terliuk; M. Usner; Van Santen J; J. Adams; H. Bagherpour; J. A. Aguilar; I. Ansseau

Neutrinos interact only very weakly, so they are extremely penetrating. The theoretical neutrino–nucleon interaction cross-section, however, increases with increasing neutrino energy, and neutrinos with energies above 40 teraelectronvolts (TeV) are expected to be absorbed as they pass through the Earth. Experimentally, the cross-section has been determined only at the relatively low energies (below 0.4 TeV) that are available at neutrino beams from accelerators. Here we report a measurement of neutrino absorption by the Earth using a sample of 10,784 energetic upward-going neutrino-induced muons. The flux of high-energy neutrinos transiting long paths through the Earth is attenuated compared to a reference sample that follows shorter trajectories. Using a fit to the two-dimensional distribution of muon energy and zenith angle, we determine the neutrino–nucleon interaction cross-section for neutrino energies 6.3–980 TeV, more than an order of magnitude higher than previous measurements. The measured cross-section is about 1.3 times the prediction of the standard model, consistent with the expectations for charged- and neutral-current interactions. We do not observe a large increase in the cross-section with neutrino energy, in contrast with the predictions of some theoretical models, including those invoking more compact spatial dimensions or the production of leptoquarks. This cross-section measurement can be used to set limits on the existence of some hypothesized beyond-standard-model particles, including leptoquarks.


Osteoarthritis and Cartilage | 2017

Qualitative and quantitative assessment of cartilage degeneration using full-field optical coherence tomography ex vivo

R. Pailhe; A. Mounier; B. Boisson; R.C. Rouchy; S. Voros; E. Chipon; I. Boudry; M. Medici; C. Hughes; A. Moreau-Gaudry

Collaboration


Dive into the M. Medici's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. Kyriacou

University of Adelaide

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. Wallace

University of Adelaide

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

G. C. Hill

University of Adelaide

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. Terliuk

Queen's University Belfast

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

E. Bernardini

Queen's University Belfast

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

E. Jacobi

Queen's University Belfast

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

H.-P. Bretz

Queen's University Belfast

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge