M. Michaud
Cross Cancer Institute
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by M. Michaud.
Cancer | 1988
Eduardo Bruera; Carleen Brenneis; M. Michaud; R. Bacovsky; S. Chadwick; A. Emeno; Neil MacDonald
From February 1985 until January 1987, 108 consecutive patients with pain due to advanced cancer requiring parenteral narcotics were treated with a subcutaneous infusion of morphine (62 patients) or hydromorphone (46 patients). Mean maximal daily dose of morphine and hydromorphone was 305 mg (range, 80–3000 mg) and 310 mg (range, 40–4024 mg), respectively. The infusion was maintained for a mean of 31 ± 16 days (range, 2–156). Seventy patients were treated with a portable pump. Of these patients, 33 (45%) were discharge home for a mean of 29 ± 20 days. Eighty‐six of one hundred eight (86/108, 80%) patients experienced adequate pain control (less than two extra doses of analgesics per day). The duration of the site of the infusion was 7 days (range, 2–31). The mean daily increase in those was 2.4 ± 1.6% of the initial dose (only 15% of patients needed an increase more than or equal to 5% per day). Systemic toxicity consisted of respiratory depression in two patients, severe sedation in six, and confusion in three; all patients improved upon reduction of the daily dose of narcotics. Local toxicity consisted in infection in two patients, bleeding in one, and chemical irritation in six. Cost analysis shows that subcutaneous infusion reduced costs by either allowing home discharges, or replacing intravenous infusion. The authors conclude that this method is safe and effective in patients admitted and at home, and should be considered the first choice when parenteral analgesia is required.
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management | 2003
Karin Olson; John Hanson; M. Michaud
This trial compared pain, quality of life, and analgesic use in a sample of patients with cancer pain (n=24) who received either standard opioid management plus rest (Arm A) or standard opioid management plus Reiki (Arm B). Participants either rested for 1.5 hr on Days 1 and 4 or received two Reiki treatments (Days 1 and 4) one hour after their first afternoon analgesic dose. Visual analogue scale (VAS) pain ratings, blood pressure, heart rate, and respirations were obtained before and after each treatment/rest period. Analgesic use and VAS pain scores were reported for 7 days. Quality of life was assessed on Days 1 and 7. Participants in Arm B experienced improved pain control on Days 1 and 4 following treatment, compared to Arm A, and improved quality of life, but no overall reduction in opioid use. Future research will determine the extent to which the benefits attributed to Reiki in this study may have been due to touch.
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management | 1989
Eduardo Bruera; Carleen Brenneis; M. Michaud; Jennifer Rafter; Annette Magnan; Angela Tennant; John Hanson; R. Neil MacDonald
Sixty-four consecutive patients with advanced breast cancer were included in a study designed to determine the prevalence of asthenia and its association with other clinical features. The Asthenia Score (AS, the average of four tests designed by our group to assess asthenia) was 59 +/- 9 for patients versus 88 +/- 7 for a group of 68 normal controls (p less than 0.001). Twenty-six patients (41%) scored below the tenth percentile of normal controls and were considered asthenics. AS was correlated with depression and the general severity index of the SCL-90 R test. No association was found between AS and nutritional status, lean body mass, tumor mass, anemia, or type of treatment. We conclude that asthenia is a frequent symptom in patients with advanced breast cancer, which, in our series, showed independent correlations only with psychological distress.
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management | 1989
Eduardo Bruera; Carleen Brenneis; M. Michaud; R. Neil MacDonald
To assess the influence of a pain and symptom control team on the pattern of prescription of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments for cancer pain, we reviewed the charts of 100 consecutive patients admitted to the Cross Cancer Institute during 1987 and 100 patients admitted during 1984. The average daily dose of parenteral morphine per patient was 44 +/- 26 mg in 1987 versus 34 +/- 38 mg in 1984 (p less than 0.05). In 1987 and 1984, only 31 and 22% of the analgesics were ordered around the clock respectively (P:NS). Approximately half of the patients in 1987 and 1984 were prescribed antiemetics and two-thirds of the patients were prescribed laxatives. Parenteral narcotics were prescribed subcutaneously in 0/52 cases in 1984 versus 21/63 cases in 1987 (33%, p less than 0.01). The pattern of prescription of narcotics by residents changed significantly during the last four weeks of rotation as compared to the first four weeks. We conclude that there have been some changes in the modality of treatment of pain that are probably due to changes in the pattern of prescription by the residents and continued improvement in assessment of pain by nurses. However, in several areas of treatment the impact of a pain and symptom control team remains minimal.
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management | 1988
Eduardo Bruera; M. Michaud; Janet Partington; Carleen Brenneis; Alexander H. G. Paterson; R. Neil MacDonald
Abstract This study evaluated the antiemetic effect of a subcutaneous infusion of metoclopramide (MCP) in 24 patients receiving chemotherapy. All patients had received at least one course of chemotherapy and had described their emesis as severe before being admitted to the study. During their first course in this study all patients received chemotherapy plus intravenous antiemetics (MCP 20 to 70 mg plus dexamethasone 10 mg, both 15 minutes before and one hour after treatment) and oral MCP (10 mg) or dimenhydrinate (50 mg) every four hours for the next 24 hours. During their second course, patients received the same type and dose of chemotherapy and intravenous antiemetics plus a subcutaneous infusion of MCP (240 and 120 mg in patients receiving chemotherapy including and excluding cisplatin, respectively). MCP was administered using a portable disposable infusor. The number of vomiting episodes and intensity of nausea were 13 ± 9 and 5.4 ± 1, respectively, during the first course ν 5 ± 7 (P
Archive | 1987
Eduardo Bruera; Carleen Brenneis; M. Michaud; John Hanson; Alexander H. G. Paterson; R. N. MacDonald
Autonomic insufficiency is a clinical syndrome including cardiovascular manifestations (postural hypotension, syncope, fixed heart rate) and gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, anorexia, constipation, or diarrhea [1–4]). This syndrome has been found most commonly in neurologic disorders, chronic renal disease, and diabetes mellitus [1]. Although isolated reports have suggested the presence of autonomic insufficiency in advanced cancer patients [5,6,7], no prospective studies have focused on the incidence of this syndrome in cancer patients.
Supportive Care in Cancer | 2001
Eduardo Bruera; M. Michaud; A. Vigano; C. M. Neumann; Sharon Watanabe; John Hanson
Journal of the National Cancer Institute | 1988
Eduardo Bruera; Carleen Brenneis; M. Michaud; Karen Macmillan; John Hanson; R. Neil Macdonald
Cancer treatment reports | 1987
E. Bruera; Carleen Brenneis; M. Michaud; S. Chadwick; R. N. MacDonald
Journal of the National Cancer Institute | 1988
Eduardo Bruera; Carleen Brenneis; M. Michaud; P. I. Jackson; R. N. MacDonald