M. Millhouse
Montana State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by M. Millhouse.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2013
Lucas Tarr; D. W. Longcope; M. Millhouse
It is well known that photospheric flux emergence is an important process for stressing coronal fields and storing magnetic free energy, which may then be released during a flare. The Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) on board the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) captured the entire emergence of NOAA AR 11158. This region emerged as two distinct bipoles, possibly connected underneath the photosphere, yet characterized by different photospheric field evolutions and fluxes. The combined active region complex produced 15 GOES C-class, two M-class, and the X2.2 Valentines Day Flare during the four days after initial emergence on 2011 February 12. The M and X class flares are of particular interest because they are nonhomologous, involving different subregions of the active region. We use a Magnetic Charge Topology together with the Minimum Current Corona model of the coronal field to model field evolution of the complex. Combining this with observations of flare ribbons in the 1600 A channel of the Atmospheric Imaging Assembly on board SDO, we propose a minimization algorithm for estimating the amount of reconnected flux and resulting drop in magnetic free energy during a flare. For the M6.6, M2.2, and X2.2 flares, we find a flux exchange of 4.2 × 1020 Mx, 2.0 × 1020 Mx, and 21.0 × 1020 Mx, respectively, resulting in free energy drops of 3.89 × 1030 erg, 2.62 × 1030 erg, and 1.68 × 1032 erg.
Physical Review D | 2017
Katerina Chatziioannou; J. A. Clark; Andreas Bauswein; M. Millhouse; T. B. Littenberg; Neil J. Cornish
We present a robust method to characterize the gravitational wave emission from the remnant of a neutron star coalescence. Our approach makes only minimal assumptions about the morphology of the signal and provides a full posterior probability distribution of the underlying waveform. We apply our method on simulated data from a network of advanced ground-based detectors and demonstrate the gravitational wave signal reconstruction. We study the reconstruction quality for different binary configurations and equations of state for the colliding neutron stars. We show how our method can be used to constrain the yet-uncertain equation of state of neutron star matter. The constraints on the equation of state we derive are complimentary to measurements of the tidal deformation of the colliding neutron stars during the late inspiral phase. In the case of a non-detection of a post-merger signal following a binary neutron star inspiral we show that we can place upper limits on the energy emitted.
Physical Review D | 2016
T. B. Littenberg; J. B. Kanner; Neil J. Cornish; M. Millhouse
Extracting astrophysical information from gravitational-wave detections is a well-posed problem and thoroughly studied when detailed models for the waveforms are available. However, one motivation for the field of gravitational-wave astronomy is the potential for new discoveries. Recognizing and characterizing unanticipated signals requires data analysis techniques which do not depend on theoretical predictions for the gravitational waveform. Past searches for short-duration unmodeled gravitational-wave signals have been hampered by transient noise artifacts, or “glitches,” in the detectors. We have put forth the BayesWave algorithm to differentiate between generic gravitational-wave transients and glitches, and to provide robust waveform reconstruction and characterization of the astrophysical signals. Here we study BayesWave’s capabilities for rejecting glitches while assigning high confidence to detection candidates through analytic approximations to the Bayesian evidence. Analytic results are tested with numerical experiments by adding simulated gravitational-wave transient signals to LIGO data collected between 2009 and 2010 and found to be in good agreement.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2017
Bence Bécsy; P. Raffai; Neil J. Cornish; R. C. Essick; J. B. Kanner; E. Katsavounidis; T. B. Littenberg; M. Millhouse; Salvatore Vitale
We provide a comprehensive multi-aspect study of the performance of a pipeline used by the LIGO-Virgo Collaboration for estimating parameters of gravitational-wave bursts. We add simulated signals with four different morphologies (sine-Gaussians (SGs), Gaussians, white-noise bursts, and binary black hole signals) to simulated noise samples representing noise of the two Advanced LIGO detectors during their first observing run. We recover them with the BayesWave (BW) pipeline to study its accuracy in sky localization, waveform reconstruction, and estimation of model-independent waveform parameters. BW localizes sources with a level of accuracy comparable for all four morphologies, with the median separation of actual and estimated sky locations ranging from 25°.1 to 30°.3. This is a reasonable accuracy in the two-detector case, and is comparable to accuracies of other localization methods studied previously. As BW reconstructs generic transient signals with SG wavelets, it is unsurprising that BW performs best in reconstructing SG and Gaussian waveforms. The BW accuracy in waveform reconstruction increases steeply with the network signal-to-noise ratio (S/Nnet), reaching a 85% and 95% match between the reconstructed and actual waveform below S/Nnet ≈ 20 and S/Nnet ≈ 50, respectively, for all morphologies. The BW accuracy in estimating central moments of waveforms is only limited by statistical errors in the frequency domain, and is also affected by systematic errors in the time domain as BW cannot reconstruct low-amplitude parts of signals that are overwhelmed by noise. The figures of merit we introduce can be used in future characterizations of parameter estimation pipelines.
Physical Review D | 2017
C. Biwer; D. Barker; J. C. Batch; J. Betzwieser; Rebecca Fisher; E. Goetz; S. Kandhasamy; S. Karki; J. S. Kissel; A. P. Lundgren; D. M. Macleod; A. Mullavey; K. Riles; J. G. Rollins; K. A. Thorne; E. Thrane; T. D. Abbott; B. Allen; D. A. Brown; P. Charlton; S. G. Crowder; P. Fritschel; J. B. Kanner; M. Landry; C. Lazzaro; M. Millhouse; M. Pitkin; R. Savage; P. Shawhan; D. H. Shoemaker
Bulletin of the American Physical Society | 2018
M. Millhouse; Neil J. Cornish; T. B. Littenberg
Bulletin of the American Physical Society | 2017
Neil J. Cornish; M. Millhouse
Bulletin of the American Physical Society | 2016
M. Millhouse; T. B. Littenberg; Neil J. Cornish; J. B. Kanner
Bulletin of the American Physical Society | 2015
M. Millhouse; Neil J. Cornish; T. B. Littenberg