M.P.P. van Herk-Sukel
Utrecht University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by M.P.P. van Herk-Sukel.
British Journal of Cancer | 2015
M.M.J. Zanders; M.P.P. van Herk-Sukel; Pauline A. J. Vissers; R.M.C. Herings; Harm R. Haak; L.V. van de Poll-Franse
Background:Metformin, statin and aspirin use seem associated with decreased mortality in cancer patients, though, without adjusting for one another. Independent associations of these drugs with overall mortality after colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis within glucose-lowering drugs (GLDs) users were assessed.Methods:Patients starting GLDs before CRC diagnosis (1998–2011) were selected from the Eindhoven Cancer Registry linked with the PHARMO Database Network. The Cox regression model, with time since CRC diagnosis, included time-dependent variables of cumulative exposure to metformin, statins and aspirin after cancer diagnosis and time-dependent ever-never terms for drug exposure.Results:A total of 1043 patients used GLDs before CRC diagnosis; 666 (64%) used metformin, 639 (61%) used statins and 490 (47%) used aspirin after CRC diagnosis. Multivariable analyses revealed that longer cumulative exposure to metformin was not associated with overall mortality (HRCumulative exposure/6 months 1.02; 95% CI 0.97–1.07), whereas the favourable effect of statins increased with cumulative exposure (HRCumulative exposure/6 months 0.93; 95% CI 0.89–0.98). No association between aspirin use and overall mortality was seen (HRCumulative exposure/6 months 0.98; 95% CI 0.93–1.03).Conclusions:No independent association between cumulative exposure to metformin, aspirin and overall mortality was found. Cumulative exposure to statins after CRC diagnosis was associated with lower overall mortality, supporting a drug effect of statins among GLDs users.
Value in Health | 2015
Jg Kuiper; M.P.P. van Herk-Sukel; Y.R.B.M. van Gestel; Adri C. Voogd; Valery Lemmens; S. Siesling
Background: This study aimed to provide information on timing, anatomical location, and predictors for metachronous metastases of colorectal cancer based on a large consecutive series of non-selected patients. Methods: All patients operated on with curative intent for colorectal cancer (TanyNanyM0) between 2003 and 2008 in the Dutch Eindhoven Cancer Registry were included (N = 5671). By means of active followup by the Cancer Registry staff within ten hospitals, data on development of metastatic disease were collected. Median follow-up was 5.0 years. Results: Of the 5671 colorectal cancer patients, 1042 (18%) were diagnosed with metachronous metastases. Most common affected sites were the liver (60%), lungs (39%), extra-regional lymph nodes (22%), and peritoneum (19%). 86% of all metastases was diagnosed within three years and the median time to diagnosis was 17 months (interquartile range 10–29 months). Male gender (HR = 1.2, 95%CI 1.03–1.32), an advanced primary T-stage (T4 vs. T3 HR = 1.6, 95%CI 1.32–1.90) and N-stage (N1 vs. N0 HR = 2.8, 95%CI 2.42–3.30 and N2 vs. N0 HR = 4.5, 95%CI 3.72–5.42), high-grade tumour differentiation (HR = 1.4, 95%CI 1.17–1.62), and a positive (HR = 2.1, 95%CI 1.68–2.71) and unknown (HR = 1.7, 95%CI 1.34–2.22) resection margin were predictors for metachronous metastases. Conclusions: Different patterns of metastatic spread were observed for colon and rectal cancer patients and differences in time to diagnosis were found. Knowledge on these patterns and predictors for metachronous metastases may enhance tailor-made follow-up schemes leading to earlier detection of metastasized disease and increased curative treatment options. 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Value in Health | 2017
Elisabeth Smits; Eline Houben; Ja Overbeek; P.A.G.M. de Smet; M.P.P. van Herk-Sukel; R.M.C. Herings; Martina Teichert
(SR) was conducted using MEDLINE and EMBASE (1996-2017). Key terms included a combination of neurogenic bladder, treatment patterns and epidemiological study. The inclusion criteria for studies were: 1) published in English; 2) conducted in human subjects; 4) reporting the treatment patterns/use in NGB (any neurogenic condition listed in the EAU guidelines); 5) conducted in a real world setting. Articles were reviewed for inclusion by an independent reviewer (AJ) and 10% were cross examined by a second independent reviewer (FF). A narrative synthesis of results was conducted and percentage of treatment use was reported in ranges. Results: A total of eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Study designs, setting, and patient groups were notably heterogeneous and all data was collected before 2008. This SR found that the most commonly used management method amongst NGB patients was reflex voiding (RV) methods and catheterisation (CIC and IndUC). Data and commentary from three studies show that a notable amount of patients switched treatments. The most popular oral pharmacotherapies were alpha-blockers and antimuscarinics used for neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) and detrusor sphincter dyssynergia (DSD). One study which focused on spina bifida reported that the majority of patients underwent surgery. ConClusions: With passing time, clinicians have moved away from techniques associated with higher rates of complications and mortality. This has meant that in recent years, the survival chances of patients with NGB have increased. This suggests that current treatment patterns will be different from what was uncovered in this review. Epidemiological studies using electronic healthcare records (EHRs) are necessary to advance our understanding in how NGB patients are managed in current practice, and how well patterns relate to practice guidelines.
Diabetes & Metabolism | 2017
M.M.J. Zanders; Harm R. Haak; M.P.P. van Herk-Sukel; R.M.C. Herings; L.V. van de Poll-Franse; J. A. Johnson
AIM This study explores the changes in glucose-lowering drug (GLD) use before and after cancer diagnosis among patients with diabetes. METHODS New GLD users (1998-2011) living in the Dutch ECR-PHARMO catchment area were selected from the PHARMO Database Network (n=52,228). Those with a primary cancer diagnosis were considered cases (n=3281) and matched with eligible controls (n=12,891) without cancer during follow-up. Conditional logistic regression analysis was used to assess changes in GLD use, such as treatment add-ons, treatments drops and initiation of insulin, for cases compared with controls associated with specific cancer types in four time windows (6-3 and 0-3months before cancer diagnosis; 0-3 and 3-6months after cancer diagnosis). RESULTS In the 3months before cancer diagnosis, patients with upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancers (oesophageal, stomach, pancreatic, liver cancers) had higher odds of initiating insulin (OR: 9.3; 95% CI: 3.6-24.1); to a lesser extent, this was also observed in the 3months prior to that (at 6months, OR: 3.9; 95% CI: 1.3-12.1). Diagnosis of colorectal (OR: 3.4; 95% CI: 1.4-8.4), pulmonary (OR: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.1-5.4) and upper GI (OR: 13.6; 95% CI: 5.0-36.9) cancers was associated with increased odds of initiating insulin in the 3months after cancer diagnosis. During all study time windows, the odds of treatment drops were higher for patients with upper GI cancers whereas, for most other cancers, these odds were higher only after a diagnosis of cancer. CONCLUSION The greater odds of initiating insulin during the 6months prior to diagnosis of upper GI cancers suggest reverse causation. After cancer diagnosis, drops in use of GLDs was commonly seen.
Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics | 2016
F.N. van Erning; M.M.J. Zanders; Jg Kuiper; M.P.P. van Herk-Sukel; Huub A.A.M. Maas; R. Vingerhoets; D. Zimmerman; E. de Feyter; M. van de Poll; Valery Lemmens
The concomitant use of multiple drugs is common among the general population of elderly. The aim of this study was to provide an overview of which drugs are dispensed to elderly in the year before colon cancer diagnosis and to compare this with cancer‐free controls.
European Journal of Cancer | 2017
R.G.P.J. de Jong; Andrea M. Burden; S. de Kort; M.P.P. van Herk-Sukel; Pauline A. J. Vissers; P.K.C. Janssen; Harm R. Haak; Ad Masclee; F. de Vries; Maryska L.G. Janssen-Heijnen
European Journal of Cancer | 2017
M.A. Frouws; E. Rademaker; E. Bastiaannet; M.P.P. van Herk-Sukel; Valery Lemmens; C.J.H. van de Velde; J.E.A. Portielje; G.J. Liefers
Value in Health | 2014
Eline Houben; H.G.M. van Haalen; W. Sparreboom; J.A. Overbeek; N.P.M. Ezendam; H. Pijnenborg; M.P.P. van Herk-Sukel
Value in Health | 2017
Eline Houben; Elisabeth Smits; Jetty A. Overbeek; R.M.C. Herings; M.P.P. van Herk-Sukel; Martina Teichert; P.A.G.M. de Smet
Value in Health | 2017
Jetty A. Overbeek; M Bakker; Aa van der Heijden; M.P.P. van Herk-Sukel; R.M.C. Herings; G. Nijpels