Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where M. Paraskeva is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by M. Paraskeva.


American Journal of Transplantation | 2011

Cytomegalovirus replication within the lung allograft is associated with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome

M. Paraskeva; Michael Bailey; B. Levvey; Anne P. Griffiths; Tom Kotsimbos; Trevor Williams; Gregory I. Snell; Glen P. Westall

Early studies reported cytomegalovirus (CMV) pneumonitis as a risk factor for development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) following lung transplantation. While improvements in antiviral prophylaxis have resulted in a decreased incidence of CMV pneumonitis, molecular diagnostic techniques allow diagnosis of subclinical CMV replication in the allograft. We hypothesized that this subclinical CMV replication was associated with development of BOS. We retrospectively evaluated 192 lung transplant recipients (LTR) from a single center between 2001 and 2009. Quantitative (PCR) analysis of CMV viral load and histological evidence of CMV pneumonitis and acute cellular rejection was determined on 1749 bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) specimens and 1536 transbronchial biopsies. CMV was detected in the BAL of 41% of LTR and was significantly associated with the development of BOS (HR 1.8 [1.1–2.8], p = 0.02). This association persisted when CMV was considered more accurately as a time‐dependent variable (HR 2.1 [1.3–3.3], p = 0.003) and after adjustment for significant covariates in a multivariate model. CMV replication in the lung allograft is common following lung transplantation and is associated with increased risk of BOS. As antiviral prophylaxis adequately suppresses CMV longer prophylactic strategies may improve long‐term outcome in lung transplantation.


American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine | 2013

Acute Fibrinoid Organizing Pneumonia after Lung Transplantation

M. Paraskeva; Catriona McLean; Samantha Ellis; Michael Bailey; Trevor Williams; B. Levvey; Gregory I. Snell; Glen P. Westall

RATIONALE The barrier to long-term success after lung transplantation is the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction. As the experience with lung transplantation accrues, it has become increasingly apparent that not all chronic allograft dysfunction is consistent with the traditionally recognized small-airway histological process of obliterative bronchiolitis (OB). OBJECTIVES To identify and describe chronic allograft dysfunction that is not consistent with the well-described bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome and to further characterize a novel histopathological process, acute fibrinoid organizing pneumonia (AFOP), that has led invariably to respiratory decline and death after lung transplantation. METHODS We evaluated 194 bilateral lung transplant recipients, identifying 87 individuals who developed chronic allograft dysfunction. They were then classified according to features on spirometry, chest imaging, and histopathological specimens. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Two main phenotypes of chronic allograft dysfunction were identified; 39 (45%) recipients were categorized as having developed OB and 22 (25%) as having AFOP. Survival in those who developed AFOP was significantly worse than in those who developed OB (median time to death 101 vs. 294 d; P = 0.02), with all exhibiting a rapid decline in respiratory function leading to death. CONCLUSIONS AFOP is a novel form of chronic allograft dysfunction exhibiting spirometric, radiological, and histopathological characteristics that differentiate it from OB. The further characterization of chronic allograft dysfunction and its heterogeneous manifestations will allow the targeting of clinical and experimental efforts to prevent and treat chronic allograft dysfunction.


Transplant Immunology | 2014

Evolving experience of treating antibody-mediated rejection following lung transplantation.

Shinji Otani; Amanda K. Davis; Linda Cantwell; S. Ivulich; Alan Pham; M. Paraskeva; G. Snell; Glen P. Westall

BACKGROUND The importance of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) following lung transplantation remains contentious. In particular, the diagnostic criteria suggested to define AMR, namely the presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA), C4d immunoreactivity, histological features and allograft dysfunction are not always readily applicable or confirmatory in lung transplantation. METHODS In a retrospective single-center study of 255 lung transplant recipients (LTR), we identified 9 patients in whom a clinical diagnosis of AMR was made within 12months of transplant, and define the immunological, histological, clinical features, as well as the therapeutic response of this cohort. RESULTS Nine LTR with AMR underwent combination therapy with high-dose intravenous corticosteroid, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis and rituximab. Following therapy, while the total number of the original DSA dropped by 17%, and the median value of the mean fluorescence intensity (mfi) of the originally observed DSA decreased from 5292 (IQR 1319-12,754) to 2409 (IQR 920-6825) (p<0.001), clinical outcomes were variable with a number of patients progressing to either chronic lung allograft dysfunction or death within 12month. CONCLUSION AMR in lung transplantation remains both a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge, but when clinically suspected is associated with a variable response to therapy and poor long-term outcomes.


Drugs | 2013

Immunosuppression and Allograft Rejection Following Lung Transplantation: Evidence to Date

Gregory I. Snell; Glen P. Westall; M. Paraskeva

The enduring success of lung transplantation is built on the use of immunosuppressive drugs to stop the immune system from rejecting the newly transplanted lung allograft. Most patients receive a triple-drug maintenance immunosuppressive regimen consisting of a calcineurin inhibitor, an antiproliferative and corticosteroids. Induction therapy with either an antilymphocyte monoclonal or an interleukin-2 receptor antagonist are prescribed by many centres aiming to achieve rapid inhibition of recently activated and potentially alloreactive T lymphocytes. Despite this generic approach acute rejection episodes remain common, mandating further fine-tuning and augmentation of the immunosuppressive regimen. While there has been a trend away from cyclosporine and azathioprine towards a preference for tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil, this has not translated into significant protection from the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction, the main barrier to the long-term success of lung transplantation. This article reviews the problem of lung allograft rejection and the evidence for immunosuppressive regimens used both in the short- and long-term in patients undergoing lung transplantation.


American Journal of Transplantation | 2016

HLA Matching at the Eplet Level Protects Against Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction

D.C. Walton; Steven Hiho; Linda Cantwell; M.B. Diviney; Stephen T. Wright; G. Snell; M. Paraskeva; Glen P. Westall

Donor selection in lung transplantation (LTx) is historically based upon clinical urgency, ABO compatibility, and donor size. HLA matching is not routinely considered; however, the presence or later development of anti‐HLA antibodies is associated with poorer outcomes, particularly chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Using eplet mismatches, we aimed to determine whether donor/recipient HLA incompatibility was a significant predictor of CLAD. One hundred seventy‐five LTx undertaken at the Alfred Hospital between 2008 and 2012 met criteria. Post‐LTx monitoring was continued for at least 12 months, or until patient death. HLA typing was performed by sequence‐based typing and Luminex sequence‐specific oligonucleotide. Using HLAMatchmaker, eplet mismatches between each donor/recipient pairing were analyzed and correlated against incidences of CLAD. HLA‐DRB1/3/4/5+DQA/B eplet mismatch was a significant predictor of CLAD (hazard ratio [HR] 3.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.71–8.29 p < 0.001). When bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) and restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS) were analyzed independently, HLA‐DRB1/3/4/5 + DQA/B eplet mismatch was shown to significantly predict RAS (HR 8.3, 95% CI: 2.46–27.97 p < 0.001) but not BOS (HR 1.92, 95% CI: 0.64–5.72, p = 0.237). HLA‐A/B eplet mismatch was shown not to be a significant predictor when analyzed independently but did provide additional stratification of results. This study illustrates the importance of epitope immunogenicity in defining donor–recipient immune compatibility in LTx.


Pediatric Drugs | 2013

Managing bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) in children: what does the future hold?

Gregory I. Snell; M. Paraskeva; Glen P. Westall

The success of pediatric lung transplantation continues to be limited by long-term graft dysfunction. Historically this has been characterized as an obstructive spirometric defect in the form of the bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). It is recognized, however, that this does not reflect many of the other acknowledged etiologies of chronic lung dysfunction—noting it is the sum of the parts that contribute to respiratory morbidity and mortality after transplant. The term chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) has been coined to reflect these other entities and, in particular, a group of relatively recently described lung disorders called the restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS). RAS is characterized by a restrictive spirometric defect. Although these entities have not yet been studied in a pediatric setting their association with poor compliance, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), and post-infectious lung damage (particularly viral) warrants attention by pediatric lung transplant teams. Current therapy for the BOS subset of CLAD is otherwise limited to changing immunosuppressants and avoiding excessive infectious risk by avoiding over-immunosuppression. Long-term macrolide therapy in lung transplantation is not of proven efficacy. Reviewing previous BOS studies to explore restrictive spirometric cases and joint projects via groups like the International Pediatric Lung Transplant Collaborative will be the way forward to solve this pressing problem.


Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation | 2017

Outcomes of adolescent recipients after lung transplantation: An analysis of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Registry

M. Paraskeva; Leah B. Edwards; B. Levvey; Josef Stehlik; Samuel Goldfarb; Roger D. Yusen; Glen P. Westall; G. Snell

BACKGROUND Recipient adolescent age for non-lung solid-organ transplantation is associated with higher rates of rejection, graft loss and mortality. Although there have been no studies specifically examining adolescent outcomes after lung transplantation (LTx), limited data from the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) Registry suggest that a similar association may exist. Recently, adolescence has been defined as 10 to 24 years of age, taking into account the biologic and sociologic transitions that occur during this age interval. METHODS The ISHLT Registry was used to examine the survival outcomes of LTx recipients 10 to 24 years of age between 2005 and 2013. Given the developmental changes that occur in adolescence, survival outcomes for the tertiles of adolescence (10 to 14, 15 to 19 and 20 to 24 years old) were also examined. RESULTS Adolescents made up 9% (n = 2,319) of the 24,730 LTxs undertaken during the study period. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates at 3 years showed lower adolescent survival (65%) when compared with younger children (73%, p = 0.006) and adults 25 to 34 (75%, p < 0.00001) and 35 to 49 (71%, p < 0.00001) years of age, without a significant survival difference compared with those 50 to 65 years old. Critically, 15- to 19-year-old recipients had the poorest outcomes, with reduced 1-year survival (82%) compared with those 10 to 14 years old (88%, p = 0.02), and reduced 3-year survival (59%) compared with those 10 to 14 (73%, p < 0.00001) and 20 to 24 (66%, p < 0.0001) years old. CONCLUSIONS Adolescent LTx recipients have poorer overall survival when compared with younger children and adults, with those 15 to 19 years old having the highest risk of death. This survival disparity among age groups likely reflects the difficult period of adolescence and its biologic and social transitions, which may influence both immunologic function and adherence.


Medical mycology case reports | 2016

Invasive Scedosporium sternal osteomyelitis following lung transplant: Cured

Eve J. Denton; Olivia C. Smibert; Julian Gooi; C. O. Morrissey; G. Snell; David C. McGiffin; M. Paraskeva

Scedosporium is an important pathogen in cystic fibrosis (CF) and post-transplant but rarely causes invasive infection. Treatment remains challenging, particularly due to inherent resistance to multiple antifungal agents. We present a young man with CF who developed invasive sternal and rib infection 10-months following lung transplant. The infection has been clinically and radiologically cured with extensive surgery and triazole therapy. This case highlights the importance of adjunctive surgery in addition to prolonged triazole treatment to manage invasive Scedosporium infections in immunosuppressed patients.


Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation | 2015

Antibody-mediated rejection.

Glen P. Westall; M. Paraskeva; G. Snell

Purpose of reviewPulmonary antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) while contributing to acute and chronic allograft dysfunction remains a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. The diagnostic tenets upon which AMR is defined will be reviewed in the light of recent studies. Recent findingsThe introduction of solid phase assays such as the Luminex platform has provided a wealth of quantitative data on the presence of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Further studies are required to better define the relationship of circulating DSA and activation of proinflammatory immune pathways that result in allograft dysfunction. The limitations of C4d staining in defining AMR are highlighted from recent studies in lung transplantation and from the 2013 Banff meeting on renal transplantation. SummaryThe current challenge to the lung transplant community is to agree on a working definition of pulmonary AMR. Only then can we better appreciate the epidemiology, clinical phenotypes, and treatment of AMR.


American Journal of Transplantation | 2015

Donation After Circulatory Determination of Death Lung Transplantation for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Passing the Toughest Test.

B. Levvey; Helen Whitford; Trevor Williams; Glen P. Westall; M. Paraskeva; C. Manterfield; Trudi Miller; David C. McGiffin; Gregory I. Snell

Lung transplantation (LTx) is a therapeutic option for severe pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients failing optimal medical therapy. The use of donation after circulatory determination of death (DCDD) donor lungs for PAH LTx has rarely been reported, primarily reflecting concerns that DCDD lungs represent extended criteria donors, at risk of morbidity and mortality. A retrospective study of all Alfred Hospital DCDD and DNDD (donation after neurologic determination of death) PAH LTx was undertaken. Protocolized fluid/inotrope/ventilator and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) strategies were utilized. Since our first DCDD LTx in 2006, 512 LTx have been performed. Of 31 PAH recipients, 11 received DCDD lungs (11% of DCDD LTx) and 20 received DNDD lungs (5% of DNDD LTx) (p = 0.04). Only one PAH patient died on the LTx waiting list. Peri‐LTx ECMO was utilized in 3/11 (27%) DCDD and 6/20 (30%) DNDD PAH LTx (p = 0.68). Primary graft dysfunction, intensive care, and overall stay were the same in both groups. Survival at 1 and 8 years was 100% and 80% for DCDD versus 100% and 70% for DNDD LTx (p = 0.88), respectively. In conclusion, excellent results can be achieved for PAH LTx. DCDD donor lungs are not extended lungs per se having passed the toughest test.

Collaboration


Dive into the M. Paraskeva's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Trevor Williams

University of Colorado Denver

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Linda Cantwell

Australian Red Cross Blood Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge