Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where M. Pilar Laguna is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by M. Pilar Laguna.


European Urology | 2011

Treatment of Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma

Hendrik Van Poppel; Frank Becker; Jeffrey A. Cadeddu; Inderbir S. Gill; G. Janetschek; Michael A.S. Jewett; M. Pilar Laguna; M. Marberger; Francesco Montorsi; Thomas J. Polascik; Osamu Ukimura; Gang Zhu

CONTEXT The increasing incidence of localised renal cell carcinoma (RCC) over the last 3 decades and controversy over mortality rates have prompted reassessment of current treatment. OBJECTIVE To critically review the recent data on the management of localised RCC to arrive at a general consensus. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A Medline search was performed from January 1, 2004, to May 3, 2011, using renal cell carcinoma, nephrectomy (Medical Subject Heading [MeSH] major topic), surgical procedures, minimally invasive (MeSH major topic), nephron-sparing surgery, cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation, surveillance, and watchful waiting. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Initial active surveillance (AS) should be a first treatment option for small renal masses (SRMs) <4 cm in unfit patients or those with limited life expectancy. SRMs that show fast growth or reach 4 cm in diameter while on AS should be considered for treatment. Partial nephrectomy (PN) is the established treatment for T1a tumours (<4 cm) and an emerging standard treatment for T1b tumours (4-7 cm) provided that the operation is technically feasible and the tumour can be completely removed. Radical nephrectomy (RN) should be limited to those cases where the tumour is not amenable to nephron-sparing surgery (NSS). Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) has benefits over open RN in terms of morbidity and should be the standard of care for T1 and T2 tumours, provided that it is performed in an advanced laparoscopic centre and NSS is not applicable. Open PN, not LRN, should be performed if minimally invasive expertise is not available. At this time, there is insufficient long-term data available to adequately compare ablative techniques with surgical options. Therefore ablative therapies should be reserved for carefully selected high surgical risk patients with SRMs <4 cm. CONCLUSIONS The choice of treatment for the patient with localised RCC needs to be individualised. Preservation of renal function without compromising the oncologic outcome should be the most important goal in the decision-making process.


European Urology | 2008

Laparoscopic Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection: Does It Still Have a Role in the Management of Clinical Stage I Nonseminomatous Testis Cancer? A European Perspective

Jens Rassweiler; Walter Scheitlin; Axel Heidenreich; M. Pilar Laguna; Günter Janetschek

CONTEXT Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (L-RPLND) is not recommended as standard tool in European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines. OBJECTIVE To update the role of L-RPLND in patients with clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumour (NSGCT) compared to open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (O-RPLND). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic literature search from 1992 to 2008 was performed in Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane. The largest series from each group was considered. Comparative analysis was based on raw data of series published in 2000 and later. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Results of >800 patients treated by L-RPLND reported in 34 articles were analyzed. Lymph node dissection (LND) was based on modified templates, removing an average of 16 (5-36) lymph nodes. At experienced centres, complication rates were 15.6% (9.4-25.7), including 2% (0-5) retrograde ejaculation and 1.7% (0-6) reintervention. Operating room times are longer compared to O-RPLND (204 vs 186min). Five publications with a follow-up of 63 (36-89) mo include 557 patients. One hundred twenty-six of 140 (90%) patients with positive nodes (25%, range: 17-38) received adjuvant chemotherapy, resulting in a local relapse rate of 1.4% (0.7-2.3) with no in-field recurrence; rate of distant relapses was 3.3% (1.8-4.6), including one port-site metastasis; and rate of biochemical failure was 0.9% (0.7-2.3). Two of 14 patients with positive nodes (pN1) who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy relapsed, both 8 mo after surgery, and were salvaged by chemotherapy. Compared with O-RPLND, there was no difference in relapse rates, percentage of patients receiving chemotherapy (29% vs 31%), chemotherapy (CTx) cycles per cohort (0.6), rate of salvage surgery (1.2% vs 1.5%), and patients with no evidence of disease (NED; 100% vs 99.7%). CONCLUSIONS L-RPLND offers similar staging accuracy and long-term outcome to O-RPLND. In a late series of experienced L-RPLND centres, there was a trend towards fewer complications. L-RPLND represents a valuable tool for experienced laparoscopic surgeons. Further studies must focus on the curative potential of the procedure in pathologic stage IIA.


The Journal of Urology | 2001

THE ENDOSCOPIC APPROACH TO THE DISTAL URETER IN NEPHROURETERECTOMY FOR UPPER URINARY TRACT TUMOR

M. Pilar Laguna; Jean de la Rosette

PURPOSE We reviewed the current status of the endoscopic distal ureteral approach to nephroureterectomy for transitional upper urinary tract cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS We reviewed the English, French and Spanish literature using a PubMed and MEDLINE search, and compared the stripping and pluck techniques. Statistical analysis was done using Fishers exact test. Individual case reports are discussed but they were not included in the statistical analysis. RESULTS The mean rate of bladder carcinoma recurrence after ureteral resection and detachment is 19.3% for the stripping and 24% for the pluck technique. This difference is not statistically significant. In 3.1% of cases invasive bladder cancer has been noted but only after distal ureteral resection using the pluck technique. CONCLUSIONS The endoscopic approach to the distal ureter during nephroureterectomy is feasible. Bladder cancer recurrence was similar after each technique. However, isolated case reports illustrate the need for cautious selection of surgical candidates.


European Urology | 2009

Perioperative Morbidity of Laparoscopic Cryoablation of Small Renal Masses with Ultrathin Probes: A European Multicentre Experience

M. Pilar Laguna; Patricia Beemster; Patricia Kumar; H. Christoph Klingler; S. Wyler; Chris Anderson; Francis X. Keeley; Alexander Bachmann; Jorge Rioja; Charalampos Mamoulakis; M. Marberger; Jean de la Rosette

BACKGROUND Low morbidity has been advocated for cryoablation of small renal masses. OBJECTIVES To assess negative perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic renal cryoablation (LRC) with ultrathin cryoprobes and patient, tumour, and operative risk factors for their development. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Prospective collection of data on LRC in five centres. INTERVENTION LRC. MEASUREMENTS Preoperative morbidity was assessed clinically and the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score was assigned prospectively. Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and Charlson-Age Comorbidity Index (CACI) scores were retrospectively assigned. Negative outcomes were prospectively recorded and defined as any undesired event during the perioperative period, including complications, with the latter classed according to the Clavien system. Patient, tumour, and operative variables were tested in univariate analysis as risk factors for occurrence of negative outcomes. Significant variables (p<0.05) were entered in a step-forward multivariate logistic regression model to identify independent risk factors for one or more perioperative negative outcomes. The confidence interval was settled at 95%. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS There were 148 procedures in 144 patients. Median age and tumour size were 70.5 yr (range: 32-87) and 2.6 cm (range: 1.0-5.6), respectively. A laparoscopic approach was used in 145 cases (98%). Median ASA, CCI, and CACI scores were 2 (range: 1-3), 2 (range: 0-7), and 4 (range: 0-11), respectively. Comorbidities were present in 79% of patients. Thirty negative outcomes and 28 complications occurred in 25 (17%) and 23 (15.5%) cases, respectively. Only 20% of all complications were Clavien grade > or = 3. Multivariate analysis showed that tumour size in centimetres, the presence of cardiac conditions, and female gender were independent predictors of negative perioperative outcomes occurrence. Receiver operator characteristic curve confirmed the tumour size cut-off of 3.4 cm as an adequate predictor of negative outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Perioperative negative outcomes and complications occur in 17% and 15.5%, respectively, of cases treated by LRC with multiple ultrathin needles. Most of the complications are Clavien grade 1 or 2. The presence of cardiac conditions, female gender, and tumour size are independent prognostic factors for the occurrence of a perioperative negative outcome.


BJUI | 2012

Differentiation between normal renal tissue and renal tumours using functional optical coherence tomography: a phase I in vivo human study.

Kurdo Barwari; Daniel M. de Bruin; Dirk J. Faber; Ton G. van Leeuwen; Jean de la Rosette; M. Pilar Laguna

Whats known on the subject? and What does the study add?


Journal of Endourology | 2003

Transurethral Microwave Thermotherapy: The Gold Standard for Minimally Invasive Therapies for Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia?

Jean de la Rosette; M. Pilar Laguna; Stavros Gravas; Michel J.A.M. de Wildt

From all available minimally invasive methods for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) has gained a firm position as the most attractive option. Recent research has produced innovations in high-energy TUMT, including new treatment protocols, refined selection criteria, and monitoring of intraprostatic temperature. Furthermore, long-term results from randomized studies comparing TUMT with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or medical treatment are now available. All these data indicate that more durable clinical outcomes and less morbidity can be achieved with TUMT, strengthening its position as a standard treatment for BPH. This paper describes the status of TUMT in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms related to BPH, focusing on variations in the outcomes with different devices, the durability of treatment outcomes, morbidity, selection criteria, and cost. The relation of TUMT to medical management and TURP also is addressed.


Journal of Endourology | 2003

Interstitial laser coagulation treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: Is it to be recommended?

M. Pilar Laguna; Gerasimos Alivizatos; Jean de la Rosette

PURPOSE To update the clinical data on the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) by interstitial laser coagulation (ILC). MATERIAL AND METHODS In addition to recent review articles, original papers published during the last 2 years were surveyed. The focus was on prospective, particularly randomized, trials and on those with long-term follow-up. RESULTS Interstitial laser coagulation is feasible, although considerable variability is observed in the results. Operative complications are minimal, but the postoperative catheterization time is relatively long. Irritative symptoms can last for a long time, and the rate of urinary infections is as high as 35%. There also is significant variability in the urodynamic results. The technique seems to be more effective in patients with mild bladder outlet obstruction at baseline. The retreatment rate at 1 year is as high as 15%, and higher rates, as much as 40%, are described at 3 years. When compared in a randomized fashion with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), the postoperative period is shorter after TURP and the retreatment rate (early and late) is higher after ILC. CONCLUSIONS Interstitial laser coagulation is superior to TURP in terms of operative morbidity, but postoperative morbidity is higher after ILC. Long-term durability has not been properly documented, and randomized studies show a higher retreatment rate after ILC than after TURP. The technique is recommended for those patients with bleeding disorders necessitating an interventional therapy.


Current Opinion in Urology | 2009

Biopsy of a renal mass: where are we now?

M. Pilar Laguna; Intan P.E.D. Kümmerlin; Jorge Rioja; Jean de la Rosette

Purpose of review To review the most recent literature concerning renal mass biopsy with special consideration to three points: variation in results related to the standard used as comparison, biopsy in small renal masses (up to 4 cm in diameter) and the case for nondiagnostic biopsy. Recent findings The overall rate of failed and indeterminate biopsies shows a trend for improvement. However, selection bias and the lack of a uniform index test for comparison preclude a definitive statement. Fine-needle aspiration may equal results of core biopsy, but its role in the diagnostic algorithm is not yet defined. In-vivo accuracy decreases in small renal masses with the same limitations exposed for the overall literature on renal mass biopsy. When nondiagnostic biopsies are considered, there is a need for standardization of the nomenclature in order to compare results. Re-biopsies or surgery after a nondiagnostic biopsy shows malignancy in up to 75% of the cases of renal cell carcinoma. Summary There is a trend in increasing interest and accuracy on the subject of percutaneous biopsy of renal masses as well as a decreasing trend in the rate of nondiagnostic biopsies. In the small renal masses, most likely to be benign, a diagnostic percutaneous biopsy may have a definitive role. However, the higher rate of nondiagnostic results in this population calls for prospective studies with standard definitions and when possible homogenous index test to properly assess the diagnostic performance of the biopsy.


BJUI | 2011

Training in ureteroscopy: a critical appraisal of the literature

Andreas Skolarikos; Stavros Gravas; M. Pilar Laguna; O. Traxer; Glenn M. Preminger; Jean de la Rosette

What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add?


Journal of Endourology | 2011

Advanced diagnostics in renal mass using optical coherence tomography: a preliminary report

Kurdo Barwari; Daniel M. de Bruin; Evelyne C. C. Cauberg; Dirk J. Faber; Ton G. van Leeuwen; Hessel Wijkstra; Jean de la Rosette; M. Pilar Laguna

OBJECTIVE To avoid unnecessary surgical treatment of small renal masses (≤ 4 cm), a more accurate diagnostic method would be desirable since radiological differentiation between malignant and benign is difficult and nondiagnostic biopsies account from 9% to 37%. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) measures backscattered light versus depth, with an attenuation coefficient (μ(t)) that may vary among different histological types. We hypothesize that quantitative measurements of μ(t) using OCT can differentiate between normal renal parenchyma and renal cell carcinoma (RCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Both normal and tumor renal tissues (RCC) were harvested after partial or radical nephrectomy. Analysis of μ(t) was based on difference of (1) μ(t) between normal and tumor tissue across all patients and (2) μ(t) between normal and tumor tissue within individual patients. RESULTS Tissue samples of 18 patients were measured, of which 4 were excluded (urothelial carcinoma, oncocytoma, and benign lesion without normal tissue available). Of the remaining 14 patients, 8 contributed with both normal and RCC tissue and 6 with only normal or RCC tissue. Independent observation showed a significant difference between the median μ(t) of normal renal tissue (4.95 mm⁻¹) and the median μ(t) of RCC (8.86 mm⁻¹). No statistically significant difference was found when comparing the difference in μ(t) between normal renal parenchyma and RCC within individual patients. CONCLUSION There is a significant difference in μ(t) between normal and RCC tissue across all patients. These results overpower the lack of significant difference within individuals, encouraging further research and suggesting a possible role for OCT in the diagnostic work-up of renal masses.

Collaboration


Dive into the M. Pilar Laguna's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

F.M.J. Debruyne

Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ferran Algaba

Autonomous University of Barcelona

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge