Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where M R Brickley is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by M R Brickley.


British Dental Journal | 1999

FACTORS INFLUENCING NERVE DAMAGE DURING LOWER THIRD MOLAR SURGERY

C R Brann; M R Brickley; Jonathan Shepherd

OBJECTIVE To investigate relationships between pathology, eruption status, age, anaesthetic modality and nerve damage during lower third molar surgery. DESIGN Single centre prospective study. SETTING Oral surgery out-patient clinics. SUBJECTS 367 patients unselected for age, gender or social class, scheduled for lower third molar removal. At 1 week, any evidence of iatrogenic nerve damage was recorded. Patients with altered lingual and/or labial sensation were followed up for 6 months. RESULTS 718 lower third molars were removed from 250 males and 117 females. 96 removals (13.4%) were associated with altered lingual, labial or buccal sensation. There were no significant associations between nerve damage and eruption status, age and pre-operative pathology. There was a highly significant difference in the incidence of nerve damage between LA removal (3%) and GA removal (18%) (chi-squared = 17.18; f = 2; P < 0.01) but no significant associations between surgical difficulty and nerve damage within each of the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Lingual and inferior alveolar nerve damage was five times more frequent when lower third molars were removed under general anaesthesia rather than local anaesthesia. This could not be explained in terms of surgical difficulty, pre-operative pathology, age or anatomical position.


Injury-international Journal of The Care of The Injured | 1995

The relationship between alcohol intoxication, injury severity and Glasgow Coma Score in assault patients

M R Brickley; Jonathan Shepherd

To assess the effect of alcohol intoxication on injury severity and head injury assessment, blood alcohol concentrations (BAC) were related to the severity of injuries (Injury Severity Score and Assault Trauma Score) and Glasgow Coma Scores (GCS) in 242 consecutive victims of weekend, night-time assault, none of whom had head injuries. No correlation was found between degree of intoxication and severity of injury. There was a highly significant correlation between BAC and GCS. However, high BACs (greater than 240 mg/100 ml) were associated with only a 2-3 point reduction in GCS. The median BAC in patients with a normal GCS was 115 mg/100 ml. Neurological assessments need to take account of the highly variable, depressive effects of alcohol.


British Dental Journal | 1999

Oral surgery: Factors influencing nerve damage during lower third molar surgery

C R Brann; M R Brickley; Jonathan Shepherd

Objective To investigate relationships between pathology, eruption status, age, anaesthetic modality and nerve damage during lower third molar surgery.Design Single centre prospective study.Setting Oral surgery out-patient clinics.Subjects 367 patients unselected for age, gender or social class, scheduled for lower third molar removal. At 1 week, any evidence of iatrogenic nerve damage was recorded. Patients with altered lingual and/or labial sensation were followed up for 6 months.Results 718 lower third molars were removed from 250 males and 117 females. 96 removals (13.4%) were associated with altered lingual, labial or buccal sensation. There were no significant associations between nerve damage and eruption status, age and pre-operative pathology. There was a highly significant difference in the incidence of nerve damage between LA removal (3%) and GA removal (18%) (chi-squared = 17.18; f = 2; P < 0.01) but no significant associations between surgical difficulty and nerve damage within each of the two groups.Conclusions Lingual and inferior alveolar nerve damage was five times more frequent when lower third molars were removed under general anaesthesia rather than local anaesthesia. This could not be explained in terms of surgical difficulty, pre-operative pathology, age or anatomical position.


Injury-international Journal of The Care of The Injured | 1994

Risk of occupational glass injury in bar staff.

Jonathan Shepherd; M R Brickley; D. Gallaghar; R. V. Walker

One hundred and twenty-six bar staff (median length of service 2.7 years) working in 42 randomly selected public houses in South Glamorgan were interviewed and examined in the workplace to investigate the incidence, characteristics and treatment of lacerations from bar glassware. 41 per cent reported previous injury, 13 per cent on five or more separate occasions. All injuries but one were of the hand. After 13 per cent of incidents, treatment had been sought in an A & E department, but 58 per cent of incidents causing hand lacerations were not treated. Straight-sided (nonik) one pint (0.6 l) capacity glasses were responsible for two-thirds of injuries, usually during stacking and washing of used glasses. Of bar-workers familiar with toughened glassware, 86 per cent favoured its use on safety grounds. It was concluded that the incidence of sharps (glass) injury was unacceptably high and that this was also a potential cause of cross-infection in this group of workers.


Archive | 1996

Factors affecting choice of anaesthetic modality for third molar surgery

D. J. Evans; M. J. Edwards; M R Brickley; Jonathan Shepherd

Aaron, J.E., 358, 359 Abdi, M., 469 Abiden, F., 190 Abour, M.A.B., 378 Aboush, Y.E.Y., 6, 132, 284, 370, 380 Absi, E.G., 528, 529 Abu-Hammad, O.A., 192, 302, 303 Adams, M., 194 Adams, R., 223 Addy, M., 159, 161, 486, 487, 492, 493, 494, 495, 496, 497 Adulyanon, S., 29 Aduse-Opoku, J., 109, 110 Agalamanyi, E.A., 314 Agerholm, D.M., 254 Ahlberg, K., 46 Ahluwalia, M.H., 430 Ahmady, K., 60 Ahmed, I.A., 403, 404, 405 Aitchison, T., 13, 14, 247 Al-Asady, A., 500 Al-Hindi, A., 186 Al-Ismaily, M., 269 Al-Khateeb, T., 89 Al-Sharkawi, M., 224 Al Wahadni, A.M., 438 Al-Zubi, B.N., 227 Alavi, A.L., 99 Alavi, A.M., 114 Alexander, M., 91 Allaker, R.P., 38, 109 Allen, A.O., 87 Allison, R., 505 Allsopp, J.F., 35 Almas, K., 483 Almohammadi, S., 267 Alpaslan, C., 537 Alpaslan, G., 531, 537 Amaechi, B.T., 424 Amess, T.R., 1 Anderson, L.C., 256, 257 Anderson, P., 238, 354, 355, 356, 578, 579, 584 Andi, K., 500 Andrews, L.P., 552 Ansari, G., 90 Anseau, M.R., 50 Anstice, H.M., 377, 379, 385 Appleton, J., 348 Appleyard, K., 397 Arch, L., 401 Armstrong, J., 243, 244 Armstrong, R.A., 525 Amett, T., 195 Ashley, F.P., 88, 253, 254, 255, 446 Ashley, P., 418 Ashraff, Z., 92 Ashwood, R.A., 25 Assinder, S.J., 454, 455 Atack, N.E., 566, 568, 569 Atkin, P., 511 Atkinson, M., 574 Atwal, G.S., 175 Awad, M.A., 367 Awotile, A.O., 145


British Dental Journal | 2000

treatment planning: A controlled trial of three referral methods for patients with third molars.

Rebecca D. Goodey; M R Brickley; C M Hill; Jonathan Shepherd

Aim To evaluate the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of three primary to secondary care referral strategies.Method Thirty two primary care dental practitioners (GDPs) were randomly allocated one of three referral strategies: current practice (control strategy); a neural network embedded within a computer program and a paper-based clinical algorithm. One hundred and seven patients were assessed for lower third molar treatment: 47, 30 and 30 in each group, respectively. Clinical details were assessed by a panel of experts against a gold standard for third molar removal (the National Institutes of Health criteria). The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated for each strategy.Results The referral decisions made by the GDPs in the control group displayed greater accuracy and sensitivity but poorer specificity (0.83; 0.97; 0.22) compared with the neural network (0.67; 0.56; 0.79) and clinical algorithm (0.73; 0.56; 0.93).Conclusions It was concluded that incorporation of the clinical algorithm into primary care was the most appropriate option. The computer neural network performed less well than either current practice or the clinical algorithm.


British Dental Journal | 1999

The cost, effectiveness and cost effectiveness of removal and retention of asymptomatic, disease free third molars.

Michelle J Edwards; M R Brickley; Rebecca D. Goodey; Jonathan Shepherd


Journal of Dentistry | 1998

Neural networks: a new technique for development of decision support systems in dentistry

M R Brickley; Jonathan Shepherd; Rosemary A. Armstrong


British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery | 1998

Choice of anaesthetic and healthcare facility for third molar surgery

D.J. Edwards; M R Brickley; M.J. Edwards; Jonathan Shepherd; J. Horton


British Dental Journal | 2001

Comparison of decisions regarding prophylactic removal of mandibular third molars in Sweden and Wales

Kerstin Knutsson; Leif Lysell; Madeleine Rohlin; M R Brickley; Jonathan Shepherd

Collaboration


Dive into the M R Brickley's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge