M. Raphael Pfeffer

Linear accelerator radiosurgery for meningiomas in and around the cavernous sinus.

OBJECTIVE A retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and side effects of linear accelerator radiosurgery in the treatment of cavernous sinus meningiomas. METHODS Between 1993 and 2001, 42 patients with meningiomas involving the cavernous sinus underwent linear accelerator radiosurgery at our institution. A mean radiation dose of 14 Gy was delivered to the tumor margin. The median tumor volume was 8.2 cm3 (mean, 8.4 cm3). Median follow-up was 36 months (mean, 38 mo). RESULTS Control of tumor growth was achieved in 97.5% of the patients. There was no mortality or permanent extraocular motor or pituitary dysfunction. Treatment-related complications included new trigeminal neuropathy in 4.7% and a new visual field defect in 2.8%. Two patients required shunt placement after developing hydrocephalus. One patient with symptomatic temporal lobe edema underwent partial excision of the tumor. Improvement of existing cranial neuropathies was noted in 29% of affected trigeminal nerves, in 22% of oculomotor nerves, and in 13% of Cranial Nerves IV and VI. CONCLUSION This study indicates that linear accelerator radiosurgery can achieve a high control rate of meningiomas involving the cavernous sinus with no mortality and a low incidence of morbidity.

Quality of life of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients

Quality of life (QOL) issues in patients with head and neck carcinoma are of importance beyond the incidence of these tumors because of the impact of the disease and its treatment on external appearance and function of the upper aerodigestive tract. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients comprise a unique subgroup in whom, to our knowledge, QOL has not been studied directly.

A phase I-II trial of cisplatin, hyperthermia and radiation in patients with locally advanced malignancies

A Phase I-II trial testing the addition of systemic cisplatin (CDDP) to local hyperthermia and radiation was conducted to determine the dose of cisplatin that is tolerable once weekly for 6 weeks and to estimate the therapeutic potential of this trimodality combination in patients with locally advanced malignancies. Cisplatin at 20 mg/m2 (4 patients), 30 mg/m2 (8 patients), and 40 mg/m2 (12 patients) was given rapidly (over 5-10 min) i.v. after prehydration with 1 liter of normal saline. After approximately two-thirds of the cisplatin dose had been delivered, microwave hyperthermia was begun and continued for 60 min; the target minimum tumor temperature was 43 degrees C. Following hyperthermia, a 400 cGy fraction of radiation was delivered to the tumor. On other days during the treatment weeks, additional 200 cGy fractions were given to total doses of 6,000-6600 cGy in patients with full radiation tolerance or 2400-3600 cGy in patients with limited radiation tolerance. The 24 patients in this trial had a median age of 57 years and the predominant sites/tumor types were head and neck/squamous cell carcinoma (9) and chest wall/breast adenocarcinoma (9). Seventeen of the 24 treated tumors (70%) had previously been irradiated. Eighteen patients (75%) had received prior chemotherapy and nine patients (38%) had previously been treated with cisplatin. Bone marrow suppression was dose limiting in patients heavily pretreated with chemotherapy and chest wall radiation. No significant toxicities were observed at the 20 and 30 mg/m2 dose levels, but 5 of the 12 patients (42%) treated at 40 mg/m2 required modification of the cisplatin dose because of blood count suppression in four patients and mild renal dysfunction in one patient. Each of the patients with bone marrow suppression, however, had been heavily pretreated except for one patient with thrombocytopenia due to hypersplenism. Nausea and vomiting were mild with use of a standard, multiagent antiemetic regimen. Twelve patients (50%) attained a complete regression (CR) and 12 patients (50%) a partial regression (PR). Complete regression appeared to correlate with small tumor volumes (115 cc for CR versus 199 cc for PR patients) and higher tumor temperatures (4.6 average minimum equivalent minutes at 43 degrees C in CR versus 2.0 min in PR patients). Local toxicities included second degree burns in 12 patients (50%) and third degree burns in 6 (25%), but all burns healed in 4-12 weeks without surgical intervention.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

The Role of Irradiation of the Internal Mammary Lymph Nodes in High-Risk Stage II to IIIA Breast Cancer Patients After High-Dose Chemotherapy: A Prospective Sequential Nonrandomized Study

PURPOSE This phase II single-institution prospective, nonrandomized trial investigates high-dose adjuvant chemotherapy and locoregional radiotherapy in patients with breast cancer. We compared the outcome of patients in this study treated with radiotherapy fields including the internal mammary nodes (IMN) to a group of patients who did not receive IMN irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS 100 patients with high-risk stage II-III breast cancer received doxorubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy, stem-cell support, and locoregional radiotherapy. The radiotherapy included electron-beam irradiation to the IMN. For 20 months during the study, no electron-beam facility was available and we were unable to deliver the IMN irradiation as planned to 33 patients. The remaining 67 patients (32 treated before and 35 treated after this period) received IMN irradiation. Patients with receptor-positive tumors received tamoxifen for 5 years. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 77 months for all of the patients, disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly prolonged in patients receiving IMN radiation compared to those without IMN radiation (73% v 52%; P =.02). A trend was seen for overall survival (OS; 78% v 64%; P =.08). Cox regression multivariate analysis found IMN radiotherapy to be significant both for DFS and OS. Estrogen receptor positivity was also significant for DFS. There was no treatment related mortality. CONCLUSION In patients with high-risk stage II to III breast cancer, the inclusion of the IMN in the radiotherapy field was associated with a statistically significant increase in DFS and a borderline increase in OS.

Pain experienced by patients with terminal head and neck carcinoma

Pain is one of the most feared consequences of cancer and is experienced by up to 80% of patients with head and neck carcinoma (HNC). Pain in terminal HNC patients is common and often defined as severe. This study evaluated the effectiveness of the World Health Organization (WHO) analgesic ladder in the treatment of a cohort of terminal HNC patients.

Pain in the Neck after Neck Dissection

BACKGROUND: Reports of disability after neck dissection have been directed toward shoulder dysfunction and pain. We could find no report addressing the issue of pain localized to the actual operative site. We have conducted a combined prospective and retrospective study of pain in patients undergoing neck dissection. METHODS: Eighty-eight disease-free patients were evaluated in 3 groups for neck pain. One group was followed up prospectively for 1 to 8 months after surgery, and 2 retrospective groups were followed up for more than 2 years or for 6 months to 2 years. Pain was assessed by a body map and visual analog scale. RESULTS: None of 31 patients followed up for more than 2 years reported neck pain. Four of 27 patients followed up for 6 to 24 months had pain, with a mean visual analog scale score of 3.7. Seventy percent of the prospective group of 30 patients had pain during the first postoperative week, and only 1 patient had pain persisting for more than 2 months. Shoulder pain and disability after radical neck dissection were encountered in all groups, comparable with the incidence reported in the literature. No postoperative neuromas were found. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic pain localized to the operative site is an uncommon occurrence even after radical neck dissection. Chronic pain in the shoulder region may follow radical neck dissection, whereas modified neck dissection is usually a painless procedure.

Successful chemotherapy of recurrent intracranial germinoma with spinal metastases

A recurrent CNS germinoma with subependymal and spinal metastases was treated by combination of cis-platinum, bleomycin, and vinblastine, resulting in disappearance of intracranial and spinal tumor. Second intracranial relapse responded again to the same combination chemotherapy. Response of spinal metastases to this combination chemotherapy has not been reported previously.

The interaction of cisplatin plus etoposide with radiation ± hyperthermia☆☆☆

The addition of concurrent etoposide and cisplatin to radiation +/- hyperthermia was evaluated in the murine FSaIIC fibrosarcoma tumor system. Tumor growth delay (TGD) demonstrated that when the drugs were tested with radiation (3 Gy daily X 5) plus (43 degrees X 30 min) local hyperthermia, cisplatin/hyperthermia/radiation (TGD approximately 25 days) was significantly more effective than etoposide/hyperthermia/radiation (TGD approximately 14 days). The addition of etoposide to cisplatin/hyperthermia/radiation, however, yielded a significantly longer growth delay (approximately 34 days). Tumor cell survival studies demonstrated that hyperthermia (43 degrees C, 30 minutes) was dose modifying for etoposide cytotoxicity (dose modifying factor approximately 2.0 as determined by comparisons of the slopes of the curves). The addition of etoposide to cisplatin modified cisplatin killing only slightly at 37 degrees C or 43 degrees C. Considerable additional cell kill was observed over a range of radiation doses with cisplatin, hyperthermia, and etoposide added singly or in combination, especially at the lowest radiation dose tested (5 Gy), but essentially no dose modification was observed. Evaluation of Hoechst 33342 dye-selected tumor subpopulations demonstrated that cisplatin, etoposide, radiation (10 Gy), etoposide plus radiation, and cisplatin plus radiation killed significantly fewer dim (presumably hypoxic) cells than bright (presumably normally oxygenated) cells. Hyperthermia killed more dim than bright cells. The combination of hyperthermia with cisplatin and radiation, however, resulted in approximately 5-fold lesser kill in dim cells, and the addition of etoposide increased this differential to 6.4-fold. These results indicate that etoposide adds small but measurable antitumor effects when used with cisplatin alone or with cisplatin in combination with radiation +/- hyperthermia (especially at lower radiation fraction sizes).

Lymph node ratio predicts the benefit of post-operative radiotherapy in oral cavity cancer.

BACKGROUND The standard treatment for non-metastatic oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) is surgical resection followed by post-operative radiotherapy (PORT) with/without chemotherapy in high risk patients. Given the substantial toxicity of PORT we assessed lymph node ratio (LNR) as a predictor of PORT benefit. DESIGN By using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, we analyzed all node positive OCSCC patients diagnosed between 1988 and 2007 who underwent neck dissection. LNR was categorized into three groups: < 6%, 6-12.5% and > 12.5%. RESULTS In 3091 subjects identified, median survival was 32, 25 and 16 months for LNR Groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. On multivariate analysis, survival was associated with age, race, grade, tumor size, nodal stage, extra-capsular extension, use of PORT and LNR. When stratified by LNR group, PORT was associated with a survival benefit only in Group 3 (LNR > 12.5%): 2 year survival 25% vs 37%. No benefit to PORT was seen when the LNR ≤ 12.5%: 2 year survival 51% vs 54%. CONCLUSION A low LNR is associated with extended survival in LN positive OCSCC. The survival benefit associated with PORT in this disease appears to be limited to those with a LNR > 12.5%. Validation is required prior to the clinical implementation of our findings.

Limited use of complementary and alternative medicine in Israeli head and neck cancer patients.

Hypothesis/Objective: The use of complementary or alternative medicine (CAM) is growing among cancer patients. A Medline search failed to reveal any dedicated report of CAM use specifically in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC).