Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where M.S. Laman is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by M.S. Laman.


Gynecologic Oncology | 2014

Improved survival of patients with cervical cancer treated with image-guided brachytherapy compared with conventional brachytherapy.

E.C. Rijkmans; Remi A. Nout; I.H.H.M. Rutten; M. Ketelaars; K.J. Neelis; M.S. Laman; V.L.M.A. Coen; Katja N. Gaarenstroom; J.R. Kroep; Carien L. Creutzberg

OBJECTIVE Since the Group Européen de Curiethérapie and the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (GEC-ESTRO) published recommendations for 3D MRI-based image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGBT) in the treatment of cervical cancer, many institutions have implemented this technique and favourable results were documented. We investigated if introduction of IGBT in our centre indeed improved treatment outcomes and reduced toxicity compared to conventional brachytherapy (CBT). METHODS A retrospective analysis was done of outcomes of patients with stage IB-IVA cervical cancer treated with primary radiation therapy with curative intent between 2000 and 2012. Outcome measures were overall and disease-free survival, pelvic control, distant metastasis and treatment related adverse events (AE). RESULTS 126 patients were analysed; 43 had been treated with CBT between 2000-2007, and 83 with IGBT between 2007-2012. External beam radiation (mean; 46.6Gy) was combined with concurrent weekly cisplatin (51.6%), or hyperthermia (24.6%); radiation alone was used in 23.8%. Median follow-up was 121.8months for CBT patients, vs. 42.3months for IGBT. Complete remission was achieved in 83.7% of patients in the CBT group and in 98.8% of IGBT patients (p<0.01). Overall survival at 3years was 51% and 86%, respectively (p=0.001). Pelvic recurrence was found in 32% vs. 7% (p<0.001). Most patients had low grade adverse events. High grade (3-4) AE occurred in 15.4% vs. 8.4% at 3years (p=0.06). CONCLUSION Introduction of IGBT for cervical cancer has led to significantly increased 3-year locoregional control and survival rates, whilst reducing late morbidity.


Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2018

Evaluation of clinical and endoscopic toxicity after external beam radiotherapy and endorectal brachytherapy in elderly patients with rectal cancer treated in the HERBERT study

E.C. Rijkmans; B. Van Triest; Remi A. Nout; E.M. Kerkhof; J. Buijsen; Tom Rozema; J.H. Franssen; L.A. Velema; M.S. Laman; Annemieke Cats; Corrie A.M. Marijnen

INTRODUCTION The HERBERT study evaluated a high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy boost (HDREBT) after EBRT in medically inoperable/elderly patients with rectal cancer. The response-rates are promising but not without risk of toxicity. The current analysis provides a comprehensive overview of patient reported, physician reported and endoscopically observed toxicity. MATERIAL AND METHODS A brachytherapy dose finding study was performed in 38 inoperable/elderly patients with T2-T4N0-1 rectal cancer. Patients received EBRT (13 × 3 Gy) followed by three weekly HDREBT applications (5-8 Gy). Toxicity was assessed via three methods: patient and physician (CTCAEv3) reported rectal symptoms and endoscopically. Wilcoxons signed rank test, paired t-test and Spearmans correlation were used. RESULTS Patient reported bowel symptoms showed a marked increase at the end of EBRT and two weeks after HDREBT. Acute grade 2 and 3 proctitis occurred in 68.4% and 13.2% respectively while late grade 2 and ≥3 proctitis occurred in 48% and 40%. Endoscopic evaluation mainly showed erythema and telangiectasia. In three patients frank haemorrhage or ulceration occurred. Most severe toxicity was observed 12-18 months after treatment. CONCLUSION For elderly patients with rectal cancer, definitive radiotherapy can provide good tumour response but has a substantial risk of toxicity. The potential benefit and risks of a HDREBT boost above EBRT alone must be further evaluated.


British Journal of Ophthalmology | 2017

Ruthenium-106 brachytherapy for iris and iridociliary melanomas

Marina Marinkovic; Nanda Horeweg; M.S. Laman; Jaco C. Bleeker; M. Ketelaars; Femke P. Peters; Gre P. M.. Luyten; Carien L. Creutzberg

Background and purpose To evaluate ruthenium-106 (Ru106) brachytherapy as eye-conserving treatment of iris melanomas (IMs) and iridociliary melanomas (ICMs). Materials and methods Eighty-eight patients received Ru106 brachytherapy between 2006 and 2016. Primary outcome was local control, and secondary outcomes were metastasis, survival, eye preservation, complications and visual acuity (VA). Results Overall median follow-up was 36 months. Of 88 patients, 58 (65.9%) had IM and 30 (34.1%) had ICM. ICM were on average larger and more advanced than IM. Local failure-free survival at 3years was 98.9% (SE 1.2%). Metastasis-free survival was 98.2% (SE 1.8%) at 3years; no deaths due to melanoma occurred during follow-up. Eye preservation rate was 97.7%. Treatment-related toxicities were mostly mild and observed in 80.7% of the patients. Common toxicities were worsening of pre-existing or new cataract (51.1%), dry eyes (29.5%) and glaucoma (20.5%). VA was not affected by Ru106 brachytherapy, with only 2.3% having VA <0.33 (low vision) at follow-up. Conclusions Ru106 for IM and ICM yielded excellent local control (98.9%) and eye preservation (97.7%). Toxicities were common, but mostly mild and transient. Moreover, Ru106 did not affect visual acuity.


European Journal of Cancer | 2016

Ruthenium-106 brachytherapy for choroidal melanoma without transpupillary thermotherapy: Similar efficacy with improved visual outcome

Marina Marinkovic; Nanda Horeweg; Marta Fiocco; Femke P. Peters; Linda W. Sommers; M.S. Laman; Jaco C. Bleeker; M. Ketelaars; Gre P. M.. Luyten; Carien L. Creutzberg


Supportive Care in Cancer | 2017

A nurse-led sexual rehabilitation intervention after radiotherapy for gynecological cancer

Rinske M. Bakker; Jan Willem M. Mens; H.E. de Groot; Charlotte C. Tuijnman-Raasveld; C. Braat; W. C. P. Hompus; J. G. M. Poelman; M.S. Laman; L.A. Velema; C.D. de Kroon; H. C. van Doorn; Carien L. Creutzberg; M.M. ter Kuile


Brachytherapy | 2017

Benefit of adaptive CT-based treatment planning in high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy for rectal cancer

Roy P.J. van den Ende; E.C. Rijkmans; E.M. Kerkhof; Remi A. Nout; M. Ketelaars; M.S. Laman; Corrie A.M. Marijnen; Uulke A. van der Heide


Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2018

PO-0808: Efficacy and toxicity of chemoradiation with brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer

N. Horeweg; Carien L. Creutzberg; E.C. Rijkmans; M.S. Laman; L.A. Velema; V.L.M.A. Coen; T.C. Stam; E.M. Kerkhof; J.R. Kroep; C.D. De Kroon; Remi A. Nout


Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2018

OC-0280: Proctitis after brachytherapy for rectal cancer: clinical and dosimetric factors - The HERBERT study

E.C. Rijkmans; Remi A. Nout; E.M. Kerkhof; Annemieke Cats; B. Van Triest; A. Inderson; R.P.J. Van den Ende; M.S. Laman; M. Ketelaars; Corrie A.M. Marijnen


Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2017

OC-0363: Ruthenium-106 brachytherapy for iris and choroidal body melanomas

F.P. Peters; M. Marinkovic; N. Horeweg; M.S. Laman; J.C. Bleeker; M. Ketelaars; G.P.M. Luyten; Carien L. Creutzberg


Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2017

PV-0328: Factors associated with complete response after brachytherapy for rectal cancer; the HERBERT study

E.C. Rijkmans; Remi A. Nout; E.M. Kerkhof; Annemieke Cats; B. Van Triest; A. Inderson; R.P.J. Van den Ende; M.S. Laman; M. Ketelaars; Corrie A.M. Marijnen

Collaboration


Dive into the M.S. Laman's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M. Ketelaars

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Remi A. Nout

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Carien L. Creutzberg

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

E.C. Rijkmans

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Corrie A.M. Marijnen

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

E.M. Kerkhof

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Annemieke Cats

Netherlands Cancer Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

B. Van Triest

Netherlands Cancer Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

L.A. Velema

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Femke P. Peters

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge