M.S. Laman
Leiden University Medical Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by M.S. Laman.
Gynecologic Oncology | 2014
E.C. Rijkmans; Remi A. Nout; I.H.H.M. Rutten; M. Ketelaars; K.J. Neelis; M.S. Laman; V.L.M.A. Coen; Katja N. Gaarenstroom; J.R. Kroep; Carien L. Creutzberg
OBJECTIVE Since the Group Européen de Curiethérapie and the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (GEC-ESTRO) published recommendations for 3D MRI-based image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGBT) in the treatment of cervical cancer, many institutions have implemented this technique and favourable results were documented. We investigated if introduction of IGBT in our centre indeed improved treatment outcomes and reduced toxicity compared to conventional brachytherapy (CBT). METHODS A retrospective analysis was done of outcomes of patients with stage IB-IVA cervical cancer treated with primary radiation therapy with curative intent between 2000 and 2012. Outcome measures were overall and disease-free survival, pelvic control, distant metastasis and treatment related adverse events (AE). RESULTS 126 patients were analysed; 43 had been treated with CBT between 2000-2007, and 83 with IGBT between 2007-2012. External beam radiation (mean; 46.6Gy) was combined with concurrent weekly cisplatin (51.6%), or hyperthermia (24.6%); radiation alone was used in 23.8%. Median follow-up was 121.8months for CBT patients, vs. 42.3months for IGBT. Complete remission was achieved in 83.7% of patients in the CBT group and in 98.8% of IGBT patients (p<0.01). Overall survival at 3years was 51% and 86%, respectively (p=0.001). Pelvic recurrence was found in 32% vs. 7% (p<0.001). Most patients had low grade adverse events. High grade (3-4) AE occurred in 15.4% vs. 8.4% at 3years (p=0.06). CONCLUSION Introduction of IGBT for cervical cancer has led to significantly increased 3-year locoregional control and survival rates, whilst reducing late morbidity.
Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2018
E.C. Rijkmans; B. Van Triest; Remi A. Nout; E.M. Kerkhof; J. Buijsen; Tom Rozema; J.H. Franssen; L.A. Velema; M.S. Laman; Annemieke Cats; Corrie A.M. Marijnen
INTRODUCTION The HERBERT study evaluated a high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy boost (HDREBT) after EBRT in medically inoperable/elderly patients with rectal cancer. The response-rates are promising but not without risk of toxicity. The current analysis provides a comprehensive overview of patient reported, physician reported and endoscopically observed toxicity. MATERIAL AND METHODS A brachytherapy dose finding study was performed in 38 inoperable/elderly patients with T2-T4N0-1 rectal cancer. Patients received EBRT (13 × 3 Gy) followed by three weekly HDREBT applications (5-8 Gy). Toxicity was assessed via three methods: patient and physician (CTCAEv3) reported rectal symptoms and endoscopically. Wilcoxons signed rank test, paired t-test and Spearmans correlation were used. RESULTS Patient reported bowel symptoms showed a marked increase at the end of EBRT and two weeks after HDREBT. Acute grade 2 and 3 proctitis occurred in 68.4% and 13.2% respectively while late grade 2 and ≥3 proctitis occurred in 48% and 40%. Endoscopic evaluation mainly showed erythema and telangiectasia. In three patients frank haemorrhage or ulceration occurred. Most severe toxicity was observed 12-18 months after treatment. CONCLUSION For elderly patients with rectal cancer, definitive radiotherapy can provide good tumour response but has a substantial risk of toxicity. The potential benefit and risks of a HDREBT boost above EBRT alone must be further evaluated.
British Journal of Ophthalmology | 2017
Marina Marinkovic; Nanda Horeweg; M.S. Laman; Jaco C. Bleeker; M. Ketelaars; Femke P. Peters; Gre P. M.. Luyten; Carien L. Creutzberg
Background and purpose To evaluate ruthenium-106 (Ru106) brachytherapy as eye-conserving treatment of iris melanomas (IMs) and iridociliary melanomas (ICMs). Materials and methods Eighty-eight patients received Ru106 brachytherapy between 2006 and 2016. Primary outcome was local control, and secondary outcomes were metastasis, survival, eye preservation, complications and visual acuity (VA). Results Overall median follow-up was 36 months. Of 88 patients, 58 (65.9%) had IM and 30 (34.1%) had ICM. ICM were on average larger and more advanced than IM. Local failure-free survival at 3years was 98.9% (SE 1.2%). Metastasis-free survival was 98.2% (SE 1.8%) at 3years; no deaths due to melanoma occurred during follow-up. Eye preservation rate was 97.7%. Treatment-related toxicities were mostly mild and observed in 80.7% of the patients. Common toxicities were worsening of pre-existing or new cataract (51.1%), dry eyes (29.5%) and glaucoma (20.5%). VA was not affected by Ru106 brachytherapy, with only 2.3% having VA <0.33 (low vision) at follow-up. Conclusions Ru106 for IM and ICM yielded excellent local control (98.9%) and eye preservation (97.7%). Toxicities were common, but mostly mild and transient. Moreover, Ru106 did not affect visual acuity.
European Journal of Cancer | 2016
Marina Marinkovic; Nanda Horeweg; Marta Fiocco; Femke P. Peters; Linda W. Sommers; M.S. Laman; Jaco C. Bleeker; M. Ketelaars; Gre P. M.. Luyten; Carien L. Creutzberg
Supportive Care in Cancer | 2017
Rinske M. Bakker; Jan Willem M. Mens; H.E. de Groot; Charlotte C. Tuijnman-Raasveld; C. Braat; W. C. P. Hompus; J. G. M. Poelman; M.S. Laman; L.A. Velema; C.D. de Kroon; H. C. van Doorn; Carien L. Creutzberg; M.M. ter Kuile
Brachytherapy | 2017
Roy P.J. van den Ende; E.C. Rijkmans; E.M. Kerkhof; Remi A. Nout; M. Ketelaars; M.S. Laman; Corrie A.M. Marijnen; Uulke A. van der Heide
Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2018
N. Horeweg; Carien L. Creutzberg; E.C. Rijkmans; M.S. Laman; L.A. Velema; V.L.M.A. Coen; T.C. Stam; E.M. Kerkhof; J.R. Kroep; C.D. De Kroon; Remi A. Nout
Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2018
E.C. Rijkmans; Remi A. Nout; E.M. Kerkhof; Annemieke Cats; B. Van Triest; A. Inderson; R.P.J. Van den Ende; M.S. Laman; M. Ketelaars; Corrie A.M. Marijnen
Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2017
F.P. Peters; M. Marinkovic; N. Horeweg; M.S. Laman; J.C. Bleeker; M. Ketelaars; G.P.M. Luyten; Carien L. Creutzberg
Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2017
E.C. Rijkmans; Remi A. Nout; E.M. Kerkhof; Annemieke Cats; B. Van Triest; A. Inderson; R.P.J. Van den Ende; M.S. Laman; M. Ketelaars; Corrie A.M. Marijnen