Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by M. Soares.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine | 2013
Andrés Esteban; Fernando Frutos-Vivar; Alfonso Muriel; Niall D. Ferguson; Oscar Peñuelas; Víctor Abraira; Konstantinos Raymondos; Fernando Rios; Nicolás Nin; Carlos Apezteguía; Damian A. Violi; Arnaud W. Thille; Laurent Brochard; Marco González; Asisclo J. Villagomez; Javier Hurtado; Andrew Ross Davies; Bin Du; Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore; Paolo Pelosi; Luis Soto; Vinko Tomicic; Gabriel D’Empaire; Dimitrios Matamis; Fekri Abroug; Rui Moreno; M. Soares; Yaseen Arabi; Freddy Sandi; Manuel Jibaja
RATIONALE Baseline characteristics and management have changed over time in patients requiring mechanical ventilation; however, the impact of these changes on patient outcomes is unclear. OBJECTIVES To estimate whether mortality in mechanically ventilated patients has changed over time. METHODS Prospective cohort studies conducted in 1998, 2004, and 2010, including patients receiving mechanical ventilation for more than 12 hours in a 1-month period, from 927 units in 40 countries. To examine effects over time on mortality in intensive care units, we performed generalized estimating equation models. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS We included 18,302 patients. The reasons for initiating mechanical ventilation varied significantly among cohorts. Ventilatory management changed over time (P < 0.001), with increased use of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (5% in 1998 to 14% in 2010), a decrease in tidal volume (mean 8.8 ml/kg actual body weight [SD = 2.1] in 1998 to 6.9 ml/kg [SD = 1.9] in 2010), and an increase in applied positive end-expiratory pressure (mean 4.2 cm H2O [SD = 3.8] in 1998 to 7.0 cm of H2O [SD = 3.0] in 2010). Crude mortality in the intensive care unit decreased in 2010 compared with 1998 (28 versus 31%; odds ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.94), despite a similar complication rate. Hospital mortality decreased similarly. After adjusting for baseline and management variables, this difference remained significant (odds ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.92). CONCLUSIONS Patient characteristics and ventilation practices have changed over time, and outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients have improved. Clinical trials registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01093482).
Critical Care | 2015
Yuda Sutherasan; Oscar Peñuelas; Alfonso Muriel; Maria Vargas; Fernando Frutos-Vivar; Iole Brunetti; Konstantinos Raymondos; Davide D’Antini; Niklas Nielsen; Niall D. Ferguson; Bernd W. Böttiger; Arnaud W. Thille; Andrew Ross Davies; Javier Hurtado; Fernando Rios; Carlos Apezteguia; Damian A. Violi; Nahit Çakar; Marco González; Bin Du; Michael A. Kuiper; M. Soares; Younsuck Koh; Rui Moreno; Pravin Amin; Vinko Tomicic; Luis Soto; Hans-Henrik Bülow; Antonio Anzueto; Andrés Esteban
IntroductionThe aim of this study was to describe and compare the changes in ventilator management and complications over time, as well as variables associated with 28-day hospital mortality in patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV) after cardiac arrest.MethodsWe performed a secondary analysis of three prospective, observational multicenter studies conducted in 1998, 2004 and 2010 in 927 ICUs from 40 countries. We screened 18,302 patients receiving MV for more than 12 hours during a one-month-period. We included 812 patients receiving MV after cardiac arrest. We collected data on demographics, daily ventilator settings, complications during ventilation and outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate odds ratios, determining which variables within 24 hours of hospital admission were associated with 28-day hospital mortality and occurrence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and pneumonia acquired during ICU stay at 48 hours after admission.ResultsAmong 812 patients, 100 were included from 1998, 239 from 2004 and 473 from 2010. Ventilatory management changed over time, with decreased tidal volumes (VT) (1998: mean 8.9 (standard deviation (SD) 2) ml/kg actual body weight (ABW), 2010: 6.7 (SD 2) ml/kg ABW; 2004: 9 (SD 2.3) ml/kg predicted body weight (PBW), 2010: 7.95 (SD 1.7) ml/kg PBW) and increased positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (1998: mean 3.5 (SD 3), 2010: 6.5 (SD 3); P <0.001). Patients included from 2010 had more sepsis, cardiovascular dysfunction and neurological failure, but 28-day hospital mortality was similar over time (52% in 1998, 57% in 2004 and 52% in 2010). Variables independently associated with 28-day hospital mortality were: older age, PaO2 <60 mmHg, cardiovascular dysfunction and less use of sedative agents. Higher VT, and plateau pressure with lower PEEP were associated with occurrence of ARDS and pneumonia acquired during ICU stay.ConclusionsProtective mechanical ventilation with lower VT and higher PEEP is more commonly used after cardiac arrest. The incidence of pulmonary complications decreased, while other non-respiratory organ failures increased with time. The application of protective mechanical ventilation and the prevention of single and multiple organ failure may be considered to improve outcome in patients after cardiac arrest.
Journal of Critical Care | 2017
Eva Tejerina; Paolo Pelosi; Alfonso Muriel; Oscar Peñuelas; Yuda Sutherasan; Fernando Frutos-Vivar; Nicolás Nin; Andrew Ross Davies; Fernando Rios; Damian A. Violi; Konstantinos Raymondos; Javier Hurtado; Marco González; Bin Du; Pravin Amin; Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore; Arnaud W. Thille; M. Soares; Manuel Jibaja; Asisclo J. Villagomez; Michael A. Kuiper; Younsuck Koh; Rui Moreno; Amine Ali Zeggwagh; Dimitrios Matamis; Antonio Anzueto; Niall D. Ferguson; Andrés Esteban
Purpose: In neurologically critically ill patients with mechanical ventilation (MV), the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality, but the role of ventilatory management has been scarcely evaluated. We evaluate the association of tidal volume, level of PEEP and driving pressure with the development of ARDS in a population of patients with brain injury. Materials and methods: We performed a secondary analysis of a prospective, observational study on mechanical ventilation. Results: We included 986 patients mechanically ventilated due to an acute brain injury (hemorrhagic stroke, ischemic stroke or brain trauma). Incidence of ARDS in this cohort was 3%. Multivariate analysis suggested that driving pressure could be associated with the development of ARDS (odds ratio for unit increment of driving pressure 1.12; confidence interval for 95%: 1.01 to 1.23) whereas we did not observe association for tidal volume (in ml per kg of predicted body weight) or level of PEEP. ARDS was associated with an increase in mortality, longer duration of mechanical ventilation, and longer ICU length of stay. Conclusions: In a cohort of brain‐injured patients the development of ARDS was not common. Driving pressure was associated with the development of this disease. HighlightsThe role of ventilatory management has been scarcely evaluated in neurologically ill patients.A high driving pressure was associated to a higher probability for ARDS in patients with critical neurologic illnesses.In a cohort of brain‐injured patients the development of ARDS was not common.ARDS was associated with an increase in mortality, longer duration of mechanical ventilation, and longer ICU length of stay.
The New England Journal of Medicine | 2004
Andrés Esteban; Fernando Frutos-Vivar; Niall D. Ferguson; Yaseen Arabi; Carlos Apezteguía; Marco González; Scott K. Epstein; Nicholas S. Hill; Stefano Nava; M. Soares; Gabriel D'Empaire; Inmaculada Alía; Antonio Anzueto
Intensive Care Medicine | 2017
Nicolás Nin; Alfonso Muriel; Oscar Peñuelas; Laurent Brochard; José A. Lorente; Niall D. Ferguson; Konstantinos Raymondos; Fernando Rios; Damian A. Violi; Arnaud W. Thille; Marco González; Asisclo J. Villagomez; Javier Hurtado; Andrew Ross Davies; Bin Du; Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore; Luis Soto; Gabriel D’Empaire; Dimitrios Matamis; Fekri Abroug; Rui Moreno; M. Soares; Yaseen Arabi; Freddy Sandi; Manuel Jibaja; Pravin Amin; Younsuck Koh; Michael A. Kuiper; Hans Henrik Bülow; Amine Ali Zeggwagh
Intensive Care Medicine | 2015
Alfonso Muriel; Oscar Peñuelas; Fernando Frutos-Vivar; Alejandro C. Arroliga; Víctor Abraira; Arnaud W. Thille; Laurent Brochard; Nicolás Nin; Andrew Ross Davies; Pravin Amin; Bin Du; Konstantinos Raymondos; Fernando Rios; Damian A. Violi; Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore; M. Soares; Marco González; Fekri Abroug; Hans Henrik Bülow; Javier Hurtado; Michael A. Kuiper; Rui Moreno; Amine Ali Zeggwagh; Asisclo J. Villagomez; Manuel Jibaja; Luis Soto; Gabriel D’Empaire; Dimitrios Matamis; Younsuck Koh; Antonio Anzueto
american thoracic society international conference | 2012
Alejandro C. Arroliga; Fernando Frutos-Vivar; Antonio Anzueto; Oscar Peñuelas; Neil D. Ferguson; Fernando Rios; Pravin Amin; M. Soares; Hans-Henrik Bülow; Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore; Arnaud W. Thille; Konstantinos Raymondos; Marco González; Du Bin; Javier Hurtado; Andrés Esteban
Archive | 2011
Molitoris Ba; Shabana W. Sepsis-related; Tolba Ya; James A. Russell; Maccariello E; M. Soares; Valente C; Nogueira L; Abdullah Al-Shimemeri; Maram Sakkijha; Samir Haddad; Yaseen Arabi
Collaboration
Dive into the M. Soares's collaboration.
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputs