M. Sponchiado
University of São Paulo
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by M. Sponchiado.
PLOS ONE | 2015
A. M. Gonella-Diaza; Sónia Cristina da Silva Andrade; M. Sponchiado; G. Pugliesi; F. S. Mesquita; Veerle Van Hoeck; R. F. Strefezzi; Gustavo R. Gasparin; L. L. Coutinho; M. Binelli
In cattle, molecular control of oviduct receptivity to the embryo is poorly understood. Here, we used a bovine model for receptivity based on size of the pre-ovulatory follicle to compare oviductal global and candidate gene transcript abundance on day 4 of the estrous cycle. Growth of the pre-ovulatory follicle (POF) of Nelore (Bos indicus) cows was manipulated to produce two groups: large POF large corpus luteum (CL) group (LF-LCL; greater receptivity) and small POF-small CL group (SF-SCL). Oviductal samples were collected four days after GnRH-induced ovulation. Ampulla and isthmus transcriptome was obtained by RNA-seq, regional gene expression was assessed by qPCR, and PGR and ERa protein distribution was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. There was a greater abundance of PGR and ERa in the oviduct of LF-LCL animals thus indicating a greater availability of receptors and possibly sex steroids stimulated signaling in both regions. Transcriptomic profiles indicated a series of genes associated with functional characteristics of the oviduct that are regulated by the periovulatory sex steroid milieu and that potentially affect oviductal receptivity and early embryo development. They include tissue morphology changes (extra cellular matrix remodeling), cellular changes (proliferation), and secretion changes (growth factors, ions and metal transporters), and were enriched for the genes with increased expression in the LF-LCL group. In conclusion, differences in the periovulatory sex steroid milieu lead to different oviductal gene expression profiles that could modify the oviductal environment to affect embryo survival and development.
PLOS ONE | 2017
M. Sponchiado; N. S. Gomes; P. K. Fontes; Thiago de Castro Martins; Maite del Collado; Athos de Assumpção Pastore; G. Pugliesi; Marcelo Fábio Gouveia Nogueira; Mario Binelli; Eric Asselin
The bovine pre-implantation embryo secretes bioactive molecules from early development stages, but effects on endometrial function are reported to start only after elongation. Here, we interrogated spatially defined regions of the endometrium transcriptome for responses to a day 7 embryo in vivo. We hypothesize that exposure to an embryo changes the abundance of specific transcripts in the cranial region of the pregnant uterine horn. Endometrium was collected from the uterotubal junction (UTJ), anterior (IA), medial (IM) and posterior (IP) regions of the uterine horn ipsilateral to the CL 7 days after estrus from sham-inseminated (Con) or artificially inseminated, confirmed pregnant (Preg) cows. Abundance of 86 transcripts was evaluated by qPCR using a microfluidic platform. Abundance of 12 transcripts was modulated in the Preg endometrium, including classical interferon-stimulated genes (ISG15, MX1, MX2 and OAS1Y), prostaglandin biosynthesis genes (PTGES, HPGD and AKR1C4), water channel (AQP4) and a solute transporter (SLC1A4) and this was in the UTJ and IA mainly. Additionally, for 71 transcripts, abundance varied according to region of the reproductive tract. Regulation included downregulation of genes associated with proliferation (IGF1, IGF2, IGF1R and IGF2R) and extracellular matrix remodeling (MMP14, MMP19 and MMP2) and upregulation of anti-adhesive genes (MUC1) in the cranial regions of uterine horn. Physical proximity to the embryo provides paracrine regulation of endometrial function. Embryo-independent regulation of the endometrial transcriptome may support subsequent stages of embryo development, such as elongation and implantation. We speculate that successful early embryo-dependent and -independent programming fine-tune endometrial functions that are important for maintenance of pregnancy in cattle.
Reproduction, Fertility and Development | 2016
Estela R. Araújo; M. Sponchiado; G. Pugliesi; Veerle Van Hoeck; Fernando Silveira Mesquita; Claudia Maria Bertan Membrive; M. Binelli
In cattle, pro-oestrous oestradiol and dioestrous progesterone concentrations modulate endometrial gene expression and fertility. The aim was to compare the effects of different periovulatory endocrine profiles on the expression of progesterone receptor (PGR), oestrogen receptor 2 (ESR2), oxytocin receptor (OXTR), member C4 of aldo-keto reductase family 1 (AKR1C4), lipoprotein lipase (LPL), solute carrier family 2, member 1 (SLC2A1) and serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade A member 14 (SERPINA14): (1) between uterine horns ipsi- and contralateral to the corpus luteum (CL), (2) between regions of the ipsilateral horn and (3) in the vagina. Endometrium and vagina tissue samples were collected from cows that ovulated a larger (large follicle-large CL, LF-LCL; n=6) or smaller follicle (small follicle-small CL, SF-SCL; n=6) 7 days after oestrus. Cows in the LF-LCL group had a greater abundance of transcripts encoding ESR2, AKR1C4, LPL, SLC2A1 and SERPINA14, but a reduced expression of PGR and OXTR in the endometrium versus the SF-SCL group (PPGR and OXTR was greater in the contralateral compared with the ipsilateral horn (PPGR, ESR2, LPL, SLC2A1 and SERPINA14 (P<0.05). Different periovulatory endocrine profiles, i.e. LF-LCL or SF-SCL, did not influence gene expression in the vagina and had no interaction with inter- or intra-uterine horn gene expression. In conclusion, inter- and intra-uterine horn variations in gene expression indicate that the expression of specific genes in the bovine reproductive tract is location dependent. However, spatial distribution of transcripts was not influenced by distinct periovulatory sex-steroid environments.
Animal reproduction | 2014
M. Binelli; G. Pugliesi; Veerle Van Hoeck; M. Sponchiado; R. S. Ramos; M. L. Oliveira; M. R. França; Fabio L. D'Alexandri; F. S. Mesquita; C. M. B. Membrive
Theriogenology | 2017
Thiago de Castro Martins; J.P. Talamoni; M. Sponchiado; J.R.G. Maio; Guilherme de Paula Nogueira; G. Pugliesi; M. Binelli
Journal of animal science and biotechnology | 2018
Thiago de Castro Martins; G. Pugliesi; M. Sponchiado; A. M. Gonella-Diaza; Oscar A. Ojeda-Rojas; Frederich D. Rodriguez; R. S. Ramos; Andrea C. Basso; Mario Binelli
Revista Brasileira de Reprodução Animal | 2017
M. Binelli; G. Pugliesi; Emiliana de Oliveira Santana Batista; Thiago de Castro Martins; Everton Lopes; M. Sponchiado; A. M. Gonella-Diaza; Milena Oliveira; M. R. França; B. Cardoso; B. P. Mello; N. S. Gomes; Lais Latorraca; F. D. C. Cuadros
Journal of animal science and biotechnology | 2017
Manoel Francisco de Sá Filho; A. M. Gonella-Diaza; M. Sponchiado; M.F. Mendanha; G. Pugliesi; R. S. Ramos; Sónia C.S. Andrade; G. Gasparin; Luiz Lehmann Coutinho; Marcelo Demarchi Goissis; F. S. Mesquita; P. S. Baruselli; M. Binelli
Resumos | 2016
Emiliana de Oliveira Santana Batista; B. Cardoso; M. L. Oliveira; F. D. C. Cuadros; Lorena G Zapata; M. I. S. Silva; B. P. Mello; M. Sponchiado; Diego Kenji Codá Miyai; G. Pugliesi; Mario Binelli
Animal reproduction | 2016
T. Martins; G. Pugliesi; M. Sponchiado; F. D. Rodriguez; R. Ramos; Â. M. Gonella-Diazza; A. O. Rojas; A. C. Basso; J. C. B. Silva; P. Fantinato Neto; M. Binelli