M. Sue Marty

Developmental Neurotoxicity Study of Dietary Bisphenol A in Sprague-Dawley Rats

This study was conducted to determine the potential of bisphenol A (BPA) to induce functional and/or morphological effects to the nervous system of F1 offspring from dietary exposure during gestation and lactation according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency guidelines for the study of developmental neurotoxicity. BPA was offered to female Sprague-Dawley Crl:CD (SD) rats (24 per dose group) and their litters at dietary concentrations of 0 (control), 0.15, 1.5, 75, 750, and 2250 ppm daily from gestation day 0 through lactation day 21. F1 offspring were evaluated using the following tests: detailed clinical observations (postnatal days [PNDs] 4, 11, 21, 35, 45, and 60), auditory startle (PNDs 20 and 60), motor activity (PNDs 13, 17, 21, and 61), learning and memory using the Biel water maze (PNDs 22 and 62), and brain and nervous system neuropathology and brain morphometry (PNDs 21 and 72). For F1 offspring, there were no treatment-related neurobehavioral effects, nor was there evidence of neuropathology or effects on brain morphometry. Based on maternal and offspring body weight reductions, the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) for systemic toxicity was 75 ppm (5.85 and 13.1 mg/kg/day during gestation and lactation, respectively), with no treatment-related effects at lower doses or nonmonotonic dose responses observed for any parameter. There was no evidence that BPA is a developmental neurotoxicant in rats, and the NOAEL for developmental neurotoxicity was 2250 ppm, the highest dose tested (164 and 410 mg/kg/day during gestation and lactation, respectively).

Evaluation of Tier I screening approaches for detecting endocrine-active compounds (EACs).

In 1996, Congress passed legislation requiring the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to implement screening/testing strategies for endocrine-active compounds (EACs). In response, EPA convened the Endocrine Disruptor Screening and Testing Advisory Committee (EDSTAC) to advise the agency on a strategy to screen and test xenobiotics for endocrine disruption. EDSTAC completed their charter in 1998 by recommending a tiered screening and testing scheme to evaluate compounds for their potential to act as agonists or antagonists to the estrogen or androgen receptors, steroid biosynthesis inhibitors, or their ability to alter thyroid function. For Tier I, the EDSTAC-recommended screening battery comprised eight different assays, but EDSTAC also proposed two alternative batteries that were deemed worthy of further evaluation. The challenge currently confronting EPA is to choose among the Tier I screening options and then to standardize protocols, validate the assays, and determine the criteria for judging a compound as positive or negative in the battery. The purpose of the current review is to: (1) provide an overview of the three EDSTAC options, (2) evaluate the data currently available for the individual assays of the three EDSTAC options and discuss the strengths and limitations of each, and (3) provide a final recommendation for a Tier I screen based on the experiences of the authors who have used all of the individual assays under consideration by EDSTAC. The goal of this report is not to provide an exhaustive historical review of each assay, but rather to summarize some of the more relevant data from available published reports as it relates to current proposed study designs for those particular assays. Based on the current data, a Tier I screening battery consisting of in vitro receptor binding assays, a 3-day uterotrophic assay, and a 15-day intact male assay are recommended as the preferred approach on which future validation efforts should be focused. This screening approach is a mode-of-action screen that will identify specific types of endocrine activity. Because it utilizes many endpoints from the same test animals (i.e., it integrates), it is the most cost-effective and efficient option in terms of animal usage. The mode-of-action screening approach advances scientific understanding and is preferred over other options based on apical tests, as these essentially are reproductive effects screens that are not necessarily specific for endocrine activity. Because Tier II tests include the critical apical endpoints used in the pubertal models, a mode-of-action approach provides complementary rather than redundant data. By identifying the potential mode of action, critical endpoints can be included in Tier II studies that will be used to define dose-response curves and no observed adverse effect levels (NOAELs)/no observed effect levels (NOELs) for the compound.

Assessment of diurnal systemic dose of agrochemicals in regulatory toxicity testing--an integrated approach without additional animal use.

Integrated toxicokinetics (TK) data provide information on the rate, extent and duration of systemic exposure across doses, species, strains, gender, and life stages within a toxicology program. While routine for pharmaceuticals, TK assessments of non-pharmaceuticals are still relatively rare, and have never before been included in a full range of guideline studies for a new agrochemical. In order to better understand the relationship between diurnal systemic dose (AUC(24h)) and toxicity of agrochemicals, TK analyses in the study animals is now included in all short- (excluding acute), medium- and long-term guideline mammalian toxicity studies including reproduction/developmental tests. This paper describes a detailed procedure for the implementation of TK in short-, medium- and long-term regulatory toxicity studies, without the use of satellite animals, conducted on three agrochemicals (X11422208, 2,4-D and X574175). In these studies, kinetically-derived maximum doses (KMD) from short-term studies instead of, or along with, maximum tolerated doses (MTD) were used for the selection of the high dose in subsequent longer-term studies. In addition to leveraging TK data to guide dose level selection, the integrated program was also used to select the most appropriate method of oral administration (i.e., gavage versus dietary) of test materials for rat and rabbit developmental toxicity studies. The integrated TK data obtained across toxicity studies (without the use of additional/satellite animals) provided data critical to understanding differences in response across doses, species, strains, sexes, and life stages. Such data should also be useful in mode of action studies and to improve human risk assessments.

Developing scientific confidence in HTS-derived prediction models: lessons learned from an endocrine case study.

High throughput (HTS) and high content (HCS) screening methods show great promise in changing how hazard and risk assessments are undertaken, but scientific confidence in such methods and associated prediction models needs to be established prior to regulatory use. Using a case study of HTS-derived models for predicting in vivo androgen (A), estrogen (E), thyroid (T) and steroidogenesis (S) endpoints in endocrine screening assays, we compare classification (fitting) models to cross validation (prediction) models. The more robust cross validation models (based on a set of endocrine ToxCast™ assays and guideline in vivo endocrine screening studies) have balanced accuracies from 79% to 85% for A and E, but only 23% to 50% for T and S. Thus, for E and A, HTS results appear promising for initial use in setting priorities for endocrine screening. However, continued research is needed to expand the domain of applicability and to develop more robust HTS/HCS-based prediction models prior to their use in other regulatory applications. Based on the lessons learned, we propose a framework for documenting scientific confidence in HTS assays and the prediction models derived therefrom. The documentation, transparency and the scientific rigor involved in addressing the elements in the proposed Scientific Confidence Framework could aid in discussions and decisions about the prediction accuracy needed for different applications.

Chlorpyrifos: weight of evidence evaluation of potential interaction with the estrogen, androgen, or thyroid pathways.

Chlorpyrifos was selected for EPAs Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) based on widespread use and potential for human and environmental exposures. The purpose of the program is to screen chemicals for their potential to interact with the estrogen, androgen, or thyroid pathways. A battery of 11 assays was completed for chlorpyrifos in accordance with test guidelines developed for EDSP Tier 1 screening. To determine potential endocrine activity, a weight-of-evidence (WoE) evaluation was completed for chlorpyrifos, which included the integration of EDSP assay results with data from regulatory guideline studies and the published literature. This WoE approach was based on the OECD conceptual framework for testing and assessment of potential endocrine-disrupting chemicals and consisted of a systematic evaluation of data, progressing from simple to complex across multiple levels of biological organization. The conclusion of the WoE evaluation is that chlorpyrifos demonstrates no potential to interact with the estrogen, androgen, or thyroid pathways at doses below the dose levels that inhibit cholinesterase. Therefore, regulatory exposure limits for chlorpyrifos, which are based on cholinesterase inhibition, are sufficient to protect against potential endocrine alterations. Based on the results of this WoE evaluation, there is no scientific justification for pursuing additional endocrine testing for chlorpyrifos.

An exposure:activity profiling method for interpreting high-throughput screening data for estrogenic activity—Proof of concept

Rapid high throughput in vitro screening (HTS) assays are now available for characterizing dose-responses in assays that have been selected for their sensitivity in detecting estrogen-related endpoints. For example, EPAs ToxCast™ program recently released endocrine assay results for more than 1800 substances and the interagency Tox21 consortium is in the process of releasing data for approximately 10,000 chemicals. But such activity measurements alone fall short for the purposes of priority setting or screening because the relevant exposure context is not considered. Here, we extend the method of exposure:activity profiling by calculating the exposure:activity ratios (EARs) using human exposure estimates and AC50 values for a range of chemicals tested in a suite of seven estrogenic assays in ToxCast™ and Tox21. To provide additional context, relative estrogenic exposure:activity quotients (REEAQ) were derived by comparing chemical-specific EARs to the EAR of the ubiquitous dietary phytoestrogen, genistein (GEN). Although the activity of a substance in HTS-endocrine assays is not a measure of health hazard or risk, understanding how such a dose compares to human exposures provides a valuable additional metric that can be used in decision-making; substances with small EARs and REEAQs would indicate low priority for further endocrine screening or testing.

Key Lessons from Performance of the U.S. EPA Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) Tier 1 Male and Female Pubertal Assays

The male and female pubertal assays, which are included in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agencys (EPA) Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) Tier 1 battery, can detect endocrine-active compounds operating by various modes of action. This article uses the collective experience of three laboratories to provide information on pubertal assay conduct, interlaboratory reproducibility, endpoint redundancy, and data interpretation. The various criteria used to select the maximum tolerated dose are described. A comparison of historical control data across laboratories confirmed reasonably good interlaboratory reproducibility. With a reliance on apical endpoints, interpretation of pubertal assay effects as specifically endocrine-mediated or secondary to other systemic effects can be problematic and mode of action may be difficult to discern. Across 21–23 data sets, relative liver weight, a nonspecific endocrine endpoint, was the most commonly affected endpoint in male and female assays. For endocrine endpoints, patterns of effects were generally seen; rarely was an endocrine-sensitive endpoint affected in isolation. In males, most frequently missed EPA-established performance criteria included mean weights for kidney and thyroid, and the coefficient of variation for age and body weight at preputial separation, seminal vesicle weight, and final body weight. In females, the frequently missed EPA-established performance criteria included mean adrenal weight and mean age at vaginal opening. To ensure specificity for endocrine effects, the pubertal assays should be interpreted using a weight-of-evidence approach as part of the entire EDSP battery. Based on the frequency with which certain performance criteria were missed, an EPA review of these criteria is warranted.

Initial Insights Regarding the Role of p53 in Maintaining Sperm DNA Integrity Following Treatment of Mice with Ethylnitrosourea or Cyclophosphamide

If p53 is essential to eliminate damaged spermatogenic cells, then mutagen exposure in the absence of p53 would increase sperm containing damaged DNA. p53 knockout (−/−, NULL) and wild-type (+/+, WT) mice (five/group) were exposed to ethylnitrosourea (ENU) or cyclophosphamide (CP). In phase I, mice were exposed by gavage to 0 or 60 mg/kg/day ENU or CP for four days and examined on test day (TD) 4, and in phase II, mice were exposed to 0, 6, 20, or 60 mg/kg/day ENU or CP for four days and evaluated on TD 36 when exposed spermatocytes matured. In phase I, mutagens were not directly cytotoxic to mature sperm. In phase II, WT mice were more sensitive to decreases in reproductive organ weights, whereas both genotypes had decreased sperm counts. Testicular histology revealed similar CP responses, but genotype-specific ENU responses (WT mice had depletion of elongating spermatids; NULL mice had late-stage spermatocyte/early stage spermatid loss). Ethylnitrosourea increased DNA strand breaks in WT mice. Thus, mice responded similarly to CP, suggesting a primarily p53-independent response, whereas the ENU response differed by zygosity, suggesting a role for p53. As DNA damage increased at higher ENU doses, compensatory repair pathways may operate in NULL mice.

A predictive data-driven framework for endocrine prioritization: a triazole fungicide case study

Abstract The US Environmental Protection Agency Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) is a tiered screening approach to determine the potential for a chemical to interact with estrogen, androgen, or thyroid hormone systems and/or perturb steroidogenesis. Use of high-throughput screening (HTS) to predict hazard and exposure is shifting the EDSP approach to (1) prioritization of chemicals for further screening; and (2) targeted use of EDSP Tier 1 assays to inform specific data needs. In this work, toxicology data for three triazole fungicides (triadimefon, propiconazole, and myclobutanil) were evaluated, including HTS results, EDSP Tier 1 screening (and other scientifically relevant information), and EPA guideline mammalian toxicology study data. The endocrine-related bioactivity predictions from HTS and information that satisfied the EDSP Tier 1 requirements were qualitatively concordant. Current limitations in the available HTS battery for thyroid and steroidogenesis pathways were mitigated by inclusion of guideline toxicology studies in this analysis. Similar margins (3–5 orders of magnitude) were observed between HTS-predicted human bioactivity and exposure values and between in vivo mammalian bioactivity and EPA chronic human exposure estimates for these products’ registered uses. Combined HTS hazard and human exposure predictions suggest low priority for higher-tiered endocrine testing of these triazoles. Comparison with the mammalian toxicology database indicated that this HTS-based prioritization would have been protective for any potential in vivo effects that form the basis of current risk assessment for these chemicals. This example demonstrates an effective, human health protective roadmap for EDSP evaluation of pesticide active ingredients via prioritization using HTS and guideline toxicology information.

Results of the negative control chemical allyl alcohol in the 15-day intact adult male rat screening assay for endocrine activity.

Development, standardization, and validation of methods to assess the potential of chemicals to disrupt hormonal homeostasis have been the focus of considerable research efforts over the past 10 years. As part of our validation effort, we evaluated the specificity of the 15-day intact adult male rat assay, using a negative control chemical, allyl alcohol, a known hepatotoxicant that was not expected to induce endocrine effects. Male rats were dosed for 15 days via oral gavage with 0, 10, 30, 40, or 50 mg/kg/day allyl alcohol. The endpoints evaluated included final body and organ weights, serum hormone concentrations, and a limited histopathology assessment. No mortality or adverse clinical signs were observed. Mean final body weight for rats in the 50-mg/kg/day dose group was decreased to 90% of control. Mean relative liver weights were increased at 40 and 50 mg/kg/day (115% and 117% of control, respectively). Serum testosterone and DHT concentrations were statistically significantly decreased at 50 mg/kg/day (72% of control). Serum prolactin concentrations were statistically significantly decreased at 40 mg/kg/day (58% of control), but not at 50 mg/kg/day. There were no effects on the other endpoints evaluated. Consistent with previous guidance for interpreting the 15-day intact adult male rat assay, histological and weight changes of target organs were given a higher weight-of-evidence than changes in serum hormone concentrations alone. Therefore, with only minimal changes in serum hormone concentrations and no effects on organ weights or microscopic alterations, the results of allyl alcohol in the 15-day intact adult male rat assay were considered negative and consistent with the predicted results.