M. Szot
National Institute for Medical Research
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by M. Szot.
Cytogenetic and Genome Research | 2003
A.L. Kierszenbaum; E. Rivkin; L.L. Tres; C. Duan; E. Goldberg; M. Szot; V. Grigoriev; Shantha K. Mahadevaiah; Obah A. Ojarikre; A. Touré; E. von Glasenapp; Á. Rattigan; James M. A. Turner; David J. Elliott; Paul S. Burgoyne
Translational regulation is a fundamental aspect of the atypical patterns of gene expression in mammalian meiotic and haploid spermatogenic cells. Every mRNA is at least partially translationally repressed in meiotic and haploid spermatogenic cells, but the extent of repression of individual mRNA species is regulated individually and varies greatly. Many mRNA species, such as protamine mRNAs, are stored in translationally repressed free-mRNPs in early haploid cells and translated actively in late haploid cells. However, translation does not regulate developmental expression of all mRNAs. Some mRNAs appear to be partially repressed for the entire period that the mRNA is expressed in meiotic and haploid cells, while other mRNAs, some of which are expressed at high levels, are almost totally inactivated in free-mRNPs and/or generate little or no protein. This distinctive phenomenon can be explained by the hypothesis that translational repression is used to prevent the potentionally deleterious effects of overproduction of proteins encoded by overexpressed mRNAs. Translational regulation also appears to be frequently altered by the widespread usage of alternative transcription start sites in spermatogenic cells. Many ubiquitously expressed genes generate novel transcripts in somatic spermatogenic cells containing elements, uORFs and secondary structure that are inhibitory to mRNA translation, while the ribosomal proten L32 mRNA lacks a repressive element that is present in somatic cells. Very little is known about the mechanisms that regulate mRNA translation in spermatogenic cells, largely because few labs have utilized in vivo genetic approaches, although there have been important insights into the repression and activation of protamine 1 mRNA, and the role of Y-box proteins and poly(A) lengthening in mRNA-specific translational activation mediated by the cytoplasmic poly(A) element binding protein and a testis-specific isoform of poly(A) polymerase. A very large literature by evolutionary biologists suggests that the atypical patterns of gene expression in spermatogenic cells are the consequence of the powerful and unusual selective pressures on male reproductive success.
Cytogenetic and Genome Research | 2003
A.L. Kierszenbaum; E. Rivkin; L.L. Tres; C. Duan; E. Goldberg; M. Szot; V. Grigoriev; Shantha K. Mahadevaiah; Obah A. Ojarikre; A. Touré; E. von Glasenapp; Á. Rattigan; James M. A. Turner; David J. Elliott; Paul S. Burgoyne
In naturally occurring mutant mice but also in mice genetically modified for the study of other organs, relatively often a spermatogenic arrest is seen. In a number of cases the arrests appear to be very specific causing apoptosis of germ cells at a particular step in their development, while before this step cells progress normally. These steps include: proliferation/migration of primordial germ cells, the production of differentiating spermatogonia by gonocytes, the regulation of stem cell renewal/differentiation, the differentiation of Aal into A1 spermatogonia, proliferation of A1-A4 spermatogonia, germ cell density regulation, start of meiosis, epithelial stage IV checkpoint of pachytene spermatocytes, the first meiotic division, the formation of the acrosomic vesicle in spermatids and several other steps in spermatid development. In addition, there are many mice that have not been studied in enough detail for a proper categorization. In this review an overview is given of the various mutations and genetically modified mice showing a direct effect on specific spermatogenic cell types. In addition, the relevance of these models to our understanding of the spermatogenic process is discussed.
Cytogenetic and Genome Research | 2003
A.L. Kierszenbaum; E. Rivkin; L.L. Tres; C. Duan; E. Goldberg; M. Szot; V. Grigoriev; Shantha K. Mahadevaiah; Obah A. Ojarikre; A. Touré; E. von Glasenapp; Á. Rattigan; James M. A. Turner; David J. Elliott; Paul S. Burgoyne
We quantitatively analyzed the spermatogenic process, including evaluation of seminiferous tubules with defective cycles, rates of germ cell death and sperm morphology, in adult male mice with standard telocentric chromosomes (2n = 40, CD1 strain), homozygous (2n = 24, Mil II population) and heterozygous (2n = 24 × 40) for Robertsonian (Rb) rearrangements. The animals were analyzed at three different ages: three, five and seven months after birth. The number and position of crossover events were also determined by chiasmata counting and immunostaining with an antibody against mouse MLH1 protein. Our analysis of spermatogenesis confirms the impairment of the spermatogenic process in multiple simple heterozygotes due to both germ cell and abnormal sperm morphology. The detrimental effects exerted by Rb heterozygosities were found to be at least partially buffered with time: the frequency of defective tubules was lower and germ cell survival and sperm morphology better in 7-month-old animals than in the 3- and 5-month-old mice. While there are previously published data on germ cell death in multiple simple heterozygotes, this is the first report of a partial rescue of spermatogenesis with time. The mean frequency of MLH1 foci was lower in Rb homozygous and heterozygous mice than in mice carrying all telocentric chromosomes. The lower number of foci in Rb mice can be ascribed to a decrease in the number of multiple chiasmata and the maintenance of single chiasmata preferentially located in the terminal region of both the telocentric and metacentric chromosomes.
Cytogenetic and Genome Research | 2003
A.L. Kierszenbaum; E. Rivkin; L.L. Tres; C. Duan; E. Goldberg; M. Szot; V. Grigoriev; Shantha K. Mahadevaiah; Obah A. Ojarikre; A. Touré; E. von Glasenapp; Á. Rattigan; James M. A. Turner; David J. Elliott; Paul S. Burgoyne
Male germ cell development is orchestrated by complex and disparate patterns of gene expression operating in different cell types. The mechanisms of gene expression underlying these have been dissected in the mouse because of its readily available genetics. These analyses have shown that as well as the traditional transcriptional mechanisms, post-transcriptional regulatory pathways of gene expression are essential for mouse spermatogenesis. Proteins essential for germ cell development have been identified which operate at different points throughout the life cycle of RNA from pre-mRNA splicing to translation and RNA decay in the cytoplasm. Recent data suggests that these post-transcriptional pathways respond to environmental cues via signalling pathways.
Cytogenetic and Genome Research | 2003
A.L. Kierszenbaum; E. Rivkin; L.L. Tres; C. Duan; E. Goldberg; M. Szot; V. Grigoriev; Shantha K. Mahadevaiah; Obah A. Ojarikre; A. Touré; E. von Glasenapp; Á. Rattigan; James M. A. Turner; David J. Elliott; Paul S. Burgoyne
The genetic hierarchy controlling mitosis and especially meiosis during gamete formation is not well understood, even in less complicated systems such as the yeasts. Meiotic divisions are obviously restricted to germ line cells and as such likely require mechanisms of cell cycle control that do not function and may not exist in somatic cells. While male and female germ cells have stages of cell cycle regulation in common, the timing of these events and the stage of development at which these events occur differ in the two sexes. Understanding the genetic program controlling the mitotic and meiotic divisions of the germ line represents a unique opportunity for providing insight into cell cycle control in vivo. Elucidating the key control points and proteins may also enhance our understanding of the etiology of infertility and provide new directions for contraception.
Cytogenetic and Genome Research | 2003
A.L. Kierszenbaum; E. Rivkin; L.L. Tres; C. Duan; E. Goldberg; M. Szot; V. Grigoriev; Shantha K. Mahadevaiah; Obah A. Ojarikre; A. Touré; E. von Glasenapp; Á. Rattigan; James M. A. Turner; David J. Elliott; Paul S. Burgoyne
Many proteins, in particular those in the plasma membranes, are glycosylated with carbohydrates, which are grouped into O-glycans and N-glycans. O-glycans are synthesized step by step by glycosyltransferases, whereas N-glycans are synthesized by en-bloc transfer of the so-called high-mannose-type oligosachharide from lipid-linked precursor to polypeptide. The high-mannose-type N-glycans are then modified by processing α-mannosidases. Alpha-mannosidase IIx (MX) was identified as the gene product of processing α-mannosidase II (MII)-related gene. MX apparently plays subsidiary role for MII in many cell types, as N-glycan patterns of MX null mouse tissues are not altered significantly. Surprisingly MX null male mice are infertile due to a failure of spermatogenesis. This review provides a brief overview of the in vivo role of N-glycans which are revealed by the gene knockout mouse approach, and introduce our studies on the MX gene knockout mouse. The MX gene knockout experiments unveiled a novel function of a specific N-glycan, which is N-acetylglucosamine-terminated and has a fucosylated triantennary structure, in the adhesion between germ cells and Sertoli cells. The study of MX is a good example of how the in vivo roles of an apparently redundant gene product are determined by the gene knockout approach.
Cytogenetic and Genome Research | 2003
A.L. Kierszenbaum; E. Rivkin; L.L. Tres; C. Duan; E. Goldberg; M. Szot; V. Grigoriev; Shantha K. Mahadevaiah; Obah A. Ojarikre; A. Touré; E. von Glasenapp; Á. Rattigan; James M. A. Turner; David J. Elliott; Paul S. Burgoyne
Peroxisomes are cell organelles that perform multiple functions in the metabolism of lipids and of reactive oxygen species. They are present in most eukaryotic cells. However, they are believed to be absent in spermatozoa and they have never been described in male germ cells. We have used the immortalized germ cell line GC1spg to investigate the expression of peroxisomal proteins in germ cells of mice. The GC1spg cells represent the differentiation state of type B spermatogonia or preleptotene spermatocytes. We could show that peroxisomal membrane proteins like Pmp70 and Pex14p as well as peroxisomal matrix proteins like catalase or acyl CoA oxidase are expressed in GC1spg cells. All these proteins were colocalized in the same structures within the cells. Furthermore, by electron microscopy we have identified subcellular particles with an ultrastructural appearance that is characteristic of peroxisomes. This is the first report demonstrating the peroxisomal compartment in male germ cells of mice.
Cytogenetic and Genome Research | 2003
M. Szot; V. Grigoriev; Shantha K. Mahadevaiah; Obah A. Ojarikre; A. Touré; E. von Glasenapp; Á. Rattigan; James M. A. Turner; David J. Elliott; Paul S. Burgoyne
The Yd1 deletion in mice removes most of the multi-copy Rbmy gene cluster that is located adjacent to the centromere on the Y short arm (Yp). XYd1 mice develop as females because Sry is inactivated, probably because it is now juxtaposed to centromeric heterochromatin. We have previously produced XYd1Sry transgenic males and found that they have a substantially increased frequency of abnormal sperm. Staining of testis sections with a polyclonal anti-RBMY antibody appeared to show a marked decrease of RBMY protein in the spermatids of XYd1Sry males compared to control males, which led us to suggest that this may be responsible for the increase in sperm anomalies. In the current study we sought to determine whether augmenting Rbmy expression specifically in the spermatids of XYd1Sry males would ameliorate the sperm defects. An expressing Rbmy transgene driven by the spermatid-specific mouse protamine 1 promotor (mP1Rbmy) was therefore introduced into XYd1Sry males. This failed to reduce the frequency of abnormal sperm. In the course of this study, a new RBMY antibody was generated that, in contrast to the original antibody, failed to detect RBMY in spermatid stages by immunostaining. The lack of RBMY was confirmed by western blotting of lysates from purified round spermatids and elongating spermatids. The implications of these results for the proposed role for RBMY in sperm development are discussed.
Cytogenetic and Genome Research | 2003
A.L. Kierszenbaum; E. Rivkin; L.L. Tres; C. Duan; E. Goldberg; M. Szot; V. Grigoriev; Shantha K. Mahadevaiah; Obah A. Ojarikre; A. Touré; E. von Glasenapp; Á. Rattigan; James M. A. Turner; David J. Elliott; Paul S. Burgoyne
The linker histone gene H1t is exclusively expressed in the mammalian testis. In former experiments we have shown that H1.1 and H1.2 histone gene expression is significantly enhanced in testis of adult H1t deficient mice. In this report we have quantified the mRNA of different H1 genes in 9-day- and 20-day-old wild type and H1t knock out mice. In addition, we have analysed the distribution of H1.1 and H1.2 protein by immunofluorescent staining in spread male germ cells. The aim of this work was to answer the question whether H1t can be replaced during spermatogenesis by H1.1 or H1.2. In our experiments we could not detect elevated levels of H1.1 or H1.2 in pachytene spermatocytes or haploid cells of H1t deficient testis. Therefore, in these cells, H1t seems not to be replaced by H1.1 or H1.2.
Cytogenetic and Genome Research | 2003
A.L. Kierszenbaum; E. Rivkin; L.L. Tres; C. Duan; E. Goldberg; M. Szot; V. Grigoriev; Shantha K. Mahadevaiah; Obah A. Ojarikre; A. Touré; E. von Glasenapp; Á. Rattigan; James M. A. Turner; David J. Elliott; Paul S. Burgoyne
Protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) is a critical serine/threonine phosphatase involved in the control of multiple cellular functions. Distinct regulatory subunits of this holoenzyme govern its intracellular localisation and substrate specificity. The regulatory B subunits target PP2A to the substrate. The B56δ subunit encoded by Pp2r5d is expressed in different tissues including testis. Its genomic structure shows a 3′ end region of 114 bp in reverse orientation complementary to the 3′ region of Mea1. In mouse seminiferous epithelium Mea1 is highly expressed in pachytene spermatocytes through to spermatid cells, while Pp2r5d shows under-expression. The potential co-regulation of both these genes was analysed. However, no potential transcriptional or post-transcriptional interference between them could be fully defined. A previously unreported subunit with testis-specific expression, B56γ-4, was characterised. This new subunit of the B56 family has no genomic structure related to Mea1, and might replace the functions of B56δ if B56δ expression were compromised by high expression of Mea1 during spermatogenesis.