M. Tardini

Effects of Coenzyme Q10 in Conjunction With Vitamin E on Retinal-evoked and Cortical-evoked Responses in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma

Purpose:To evaluate pattern-evoked retinal and cortical responses [pattern electroretinogram (PERG) and visual-evoked potential (VEP), respectively] after treatment with coenzyme Q10 in conjunction with vitamin E in open-angle glaucoma (OAG) patients. Methods:Forty-three OAG patients (mean age, 52.5±5.29 y; intraocular pressure <18 mm Hg with &bgr;-blocker monoterapy only) were enrolled. At baseline and after 6 and 12 months, simultaneous recordings of PERG and VEPs were obtained from 22 OAG patients who underwent treatment consisting of coenzyme Q10 and vitamin E (Coqun, 2 drops/d) in addition to &bgr;-blocker monoterapy (GC group), and from 21 OAG patients who were only treated with &bgr;-blockers (GP group). Results:At baseline, intraocular pressure, PERG, and VEP parameters were similar in both GC and GP groups (analysis of variance, P>0.05). After 6 and 12 months, PERG and VEP response parameters of GP patients were unchanged when compared to baseline. In GC patients, PERG P50 and VEP P100 implicit times were decreased, whereas PERG P50-N95 and VEP N75-P100 amplitudes were increased (P<0.01) when compared to baseline. In the GC group, the differences in implicit times and amplitudes with respect to baseline were significantly larger (P<0.01) than those recorded in the GP group. The improvement (12 mo minus baseline) of VEP implicit time was significantly correlated with the changes of PERG P50-N95 amplitude (r=−0.66171, P=0.0008) and P50 implicit time (r=0.68364, P=0.00045) over a period of 12 months. Conclusions:Coenzyme Q10 associated with vitamin E administration in OAG shows a beneficial effect on the inner retinal function (PERG improvement) with consequent enhancement of the visual cortical responses (VEP improvement).

Replacing maximum-tolerated medications with latanoprost versus adding latanoprost to maximum-tolerated medications: a two-center randomized prospective trial.

PURPOSE To compare the replacement of every drug with latanoprost 0.005% once a day in glaucomatous eyes with poorly controlled intraocular pressure upon combination therapy, versus addition of latanoprost to the pre-existing treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS STUDY DESIGN prospective, investigator-masked, two-center, randomized clinical trial lasting 3 months. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA open-angle glaucoma; IOP > or = 21 mm Hg upon the combination of a non-selective beta-blocker with pilocarpine or dorzolamide or both; no previous bulbar surgery; and prior glaucoma therapy lasting at least 2 years. Two treatment arms: (1) addition of latanoprost 0.005% QD to the pre-existing therapy [group A]; (2) substitution with latanoprost alone [group B]. RESULTS One hundred thirty-six eyes (68 eyes/treatment group) were randomized according to intraocular pressure level and the number of adjunctive medications to beta blocker. Both treatments provided a significant IOP decrease over baseline (from 23.5 +/- 1.4 to 19.7 +/- 1.9 mm Hg in group A, (P < 0.001); from 23.2 +/- 1.3 to 20.1 +/- 2.2 mm Hg in group B (P < 0.001), paired Student t test). At the end of the follow-up period, group A showed a higher number of intraocular readings less than or equal to 18 mm Hg than group B (42.6% vs. 30.8%; Fisher exact test: P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS In eyes showing an intraocular pressure greater than 21 mm Hg upon combination therapy, the substitution of the pre-existing treatment with latanoprost can provide a significant IOP decrease. However, adding latanoprost to the pre-existing therapy is more likely to achieve a target intraocular pressure less than or equal to 18 mm Hg.