M. Tasin
Edmund Mach Foundation
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by M. Tasin.
Journal of Economic Entomology | 2011
C. Ioriatti; Gianfranco Anfora; M. Tasin; A. De Cristofaro; Peter Witzgall; Andrea Lucchi
ABSTRACT The moth Lobesia botrana (Denis & Schiffermüller) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) feeds on grapes (Vitis vinifera L.), reducing yield and increasing susceptibility to fungal infections. L. botrana is among the most economically important insects in Europe and has recently been found in vineyards in Chile, Argentina, and California. Here, we review L. botrana biology and behavior in relation to its larval host (the grapevine) and its natural enemies. We also discuss current and future control strategies in light of our knowledge of chemical ecology, with an emphasis on the use of the sex pheromone-based strategies as an environmentally safe management approach. Pheromone-mediated mating disruption is the most promising technique available on grapes and is currently implemented on ≈140,000 ha in Europe. Experience from several growing areas confirms the importance of collaboration between research, extension, growers, and pheromone-supply companies for the successful implementation of the mating disruption technique. In the vineyards where mating disruption has been successfully applied as an areawide strategy, the reduction in insecticide use has improved the quality of life for growers, consumers, as well as the public living near wine-growing areas and has thereby reduced the conflict between agricultural and urban communities.
Chemical Senses | 2010
M. Tasin; Anna-Carin Bäckman; Gianfranco Anfora; Silvia Carlin; C. Ioriatti; Peter Witzgall
In herbivorous insects with more than 1 host plant, attraction to host odor could conceptually be mediated by common compounds, by specific compounds released by each plant or by combinations of common and specific compounds. We have compared the attraction of female grapevine moth, Lobesia botrana, with specific and common (shared) odors from 2 different plants: a wild host (Daphne gnidium) and a recently colonized host (Vitis vinifera). Odor blends eliciting female attraction to V. vinifera have previously been identified. In this study, olfactory cues from D. gnidium were identified by electroantennographic detection and chemical analysis. The attraction of mated females to synthetic odor blends was then tested in a wind tunnel bioassay. Female attraction was elicited by a blend of compounds released by both from D. gnidium and V. vinifera and by 2 blends with the compounds released specifically from each host. However, more complete odor blends of the 2 plants elicited stronger attraction. The common compounds in combination with the specific compounds of D. gnidium were the most attractive blend. This blend was tested with the common compounds presented both in the ratio emitted by D. gnidium and by V. vinifera, but there was no difference in female attraction. Our findings suggest that specific as well as common plant odor cues play a role in L. botrana host recognition and that there is plasticity in attraction to partial blends. The results are discussed in relation to mechanisms behind host odor recognition and the evolution of insect-plant associations.
Chemical Senses | 2011
M. Tasin; Andrea Lucchi; C. Ioriatti; Mohamed Mraihi; Antonio De Cristofaro; Zvi Boger; Gianfranco Anfora
The grapevine moth Lobesia botrana is a generalist insect herbivore and grapevine is one of its hosts. Previous studies have shown that insects use their olfactory abilities to locate hosts from a distance; whereas contact chemoreception mediates the stimulation of oviposition after landing. Little is known about the role of olfaction and its interactions with contact chemoreception and vision once the insect lands on the plant. Plant volatile compounds can be sensed by host-searching insects located some distance from the plant and insects sense both volatile and nonvolatile cues after landing on a plant. In the present study, we investigated the effects of these volatile and nonvolatile cues on the oviposition behavior of L. botrana. A behavioral bioassay with choice was developed in which insects were offered each sensory cue either alone or in combination with one or 2 other cues. Females were allowed to choose between a device with the stimulus and a blank device. Results were evaluated in terms of 2 parameters: quantity of eggs laid (egg counts) and preference for the stimulus (ODI: oviposition discrimination index). Our results suggest that olfaction significantly affects egg quantity and that there is significant synergism between olfaction and vision, in terms of their combined effect on egg quantity. In terms of preference (ODI), our results did not show a significant preference for any single cue; the highest ODI was measured for the full-cue stimulus (olfaction, vision, and contact). For ODI, a significant interaction was observed between olfaction and vision and a nearly significant interaction was observed between the olfactory and contact cues. The results are discussed in relation to the effects of plant sensory cues on the oviposition behavior of L. botrana.
Naturwissenschaften | 2006
M. Tasin; Anna-Carin Bäckman; Marie Bengtsson; C. Ioriatti; Peter Witzgall
IOBC/WPRS BULLETIN | 2005
S. Vitagliano; A Anfora; M. Tasin; G. S. Germinara; C. Ioriatti; G. Rotundo; A. De Cristofaro
Proceedings of the IOBC/WPRS Working Group "Pheromones and other Semiochemicals in Integrated Production", Lund, Sweden, 9-14 September 2007. | 2009
M. Tasin; Gianfranco Anfora; E. Leonardelli; C. Ioriatti; Andrea Lucchi; A. de Cristofaro; I. Pertot; Peter Witzgall
Silva Lusitana | 2011
Massimo Faccoli; Gianfranco Anfora; M. Tasin
IOBC/WPRS BULLETIN | 2008
M. Tasin; Gianfranco Anfora; Anna-Carin Bäckman; C. Ioriatti; A. De Cristofaro; E. Pozzolini; E. Leonardelli; Andrea Lucchi
IOBC/WPRS BULLETIN | 2008
A. De Cristofaro; S. Vitagliano; Gianfranco Anfora; G. S. Germinara; M. Tasin; Andrea Lucchi; C. Ioriatti; G. Rotundo
IOBC/WPRS BULLETIN | 2008
M. Tasin; Gianfranco Anfora; Bäckman A. C; C. Ioriatti; E Leonardelli; A De Cristofaro; Andrea Lucchi