M. Timothy Nelson

Factors Associated With General Surgery Residents’ Desire to Leave Residency Programs: A Multi-institutional Study

IMPORTANCE General surgical residency continues to experience attrition. To date, work hour amendments have not changed the annual rate of attrition. OBJECTIVE To determine how often categorical general surgery residents seriously consider leaving residency. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS At 13 residency programs, an anonymous survey of 371 categorical general surgery residents and 10-year attrition rates for each program. Responses from those who seriously considered leaving surgical residency were compared with those who did not. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Factors associated with the desire to leave residency. RESULTS The survey response rate was 77.6%. Overall, 58.0% seriously considered leaving training. The most frequent reasons for wanting to leave were sleep deprivation on a specific rotation (50.0%), an undesirable future lifestyle (47.0%), and excessive work hours on a specific rotation (41.4%). Factors most often cited that kept residents from leaving were support from family or significant others (65.0%), support from other residents (63.5%), and perception of being better rested (58.9%). On univariate analysis, older age, female sex, postgraduate year, training in a university program, the presence of a faculty mentor, and lack of Alpha Omega Alpha status were associated with serious thoughts of leaving surgical residency. On multivariate analysis, only female sex was significantly associated with serious thoughts of leaving residency (odds ratio, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.3; P = .003). Eighty-six respondents were from historically high-attrition programs, and 202 respondents were from historically low-attrition programs (27.8% vs 8.4% 10-year attrition rate, P = .04). Residents from high-attrition programs were more likely to seriously consider leaving residency (odds ratio, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.0-3.0; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE A majority of categorical general surgery residents seriously consider leaving residency. Female residents are more likely to consider leaving. Thoughts of leaving seem to be associated with work conditions on specific rotations rather than with overall work hours and are more prevalent among programs with historically high attrition rates.

Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay inguinal herniorrhaphy.

BACKGROUND This study presents intermediate follow-up data on a randomized prospective series of patients undergoing either a modified laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh herniorrhaphy (IPOM) or conventional anterior inguinal herniorrhaphy (CH). METHODS All patients from two university affiliated hospitals with primary or recurrent inguinal hernias were recruited for randomization to either the IPOM technique utilizing a meshed expanded polytetrafluorethylene (ePTFE) soft tissue patch or CH. Follow-up data were gathered from postoperative clinic visits and telephone and mail surveys. RESULTS Previously reported early recurrence and complication rates at a mean follow-up of 8 months were 1 of 30 (3%) and 5 of 30 (17%) for IPOM, and 2 of 28 (7%) and 5 of 28 (18%) for CH. Intermediate follow-up with 50 (23 IPOM and 27 CH) of the original 58 patients (86%) at a mean of 41 months reveals a recurrence rate of 10 of 23 (43%) for the IPOM group and 4 of 27 (15%) for the CH group (P = 0.053). Five delayed complications occurred in 4 IPOM patients (port site hernia 4, painful neuroma 1), while 2 delayed complications (unilateral testicular atrophy 2) occurred in 2 patients in the CH group. One IPOM versus 5 CH patients subsequently developed previously unrecognized contralateral hernias. There was 1 death unrelated to previous herniorrhaphy in each group. CONCLUSIONS IPOM recurrence rates (43%) at a mean follow-up of 41 months are excessively high when compared with CH (15%) or with preliminary results of IPOM at 8 months of follow-up (3%). Despite reduced perioperative pain and disability and promising preliminary results in the IPOM group, these intermediate follow-up data strongly suggest that the IPOM technique should not be used for repair of inguinal hernias.

Reading Habits of General Surgery Residents and Association With American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination Performance

IMPORTANCE Few large-scale studies have quantified and characterized the study habits of surgery residents. However, studies have shown an association between American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) scores and subsequent success on the American Board of Surgery Qualifying and Certifying examinations. OBJECTIVES To identify the quantity of studying, the approach taken when studying, the role that ABSITE preparation plays in resident reading, and factors associated with ABSITE performance. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS An anonymous 39-item questionnaire including demographic information, past performance on standardized examinations, reading habits, and study sources during the time leading up to the 2014 ABSITE and opinions pertaining to the importance of the ABSITE was administered August 1, 2014, to August 25, 2014, to 371 surgery residents in 15 residency programs nationwide. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Scores from the 2014 ABSITE. RESULTS A total of 273 residents (73.6%) responded to the survey. Seven respondents did not provide their January 2014 ABSITE score, leaving 266 for statistical analysis. Most respondents were male (162 of 266 [60.9%]), with a mean (SD) age of 29.8 (2.6) years. The median number of minutes spent studying per month was 240 (interquartile range, 120-600 minutes) for patient care or clinical duties and 120 for the ABSITE (interquartile range, 30-360 minutes). One hundred sixty-four of 266 respondents (61.7%) reported reading consistently throughout the year for patient care or clinical duties. With respect to ABSITE preparation, 72 of 266 residents (27.1%) reported reading consistently throughout the year, while 247 of 266 residents (92.9%) reported preparing between 1 and 8 weeks prior to the examination. Univariate analysis (with results reported as effect on median ABSITE percentile scores [95% CIs]) identified the following factors as positively correlated with ABSITE scores: prior United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) 1 and 2 scores (per 1-point increase: USMLE 1, 0.1 [0.02-0.14], P = .03; USMLE 2, 0.3 [0.19-0.44], P < .001), prior Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) scores (per 1-point increase, 1.2 [1.3-2.0]; P = .002), high opinion of ABSITE significance (P < .001), surgical textbook use (11 [6-16]; P = .02), daily studying (13 [4-23]; P = .02), and high satisfaction with study materials (P < .001). On multivariable analysis, USMLE 2 score (per 1-point increase, 0.4 [0.2-0.6]; P < .001), MCAT score (0.6 [0.2-1.0]; P = .003), opinion of ABSITE significance (9.2 [6.9-11.6]; P < .001), and having an equal focus on patient care and ABSITE preparation during study (6.1 [0.6-11.5]; P = .03) were identified as positive predictors of ABSITE performance. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Most residents reported reading consistently for patient care throughout the year. Daily studying and textbook use were associated with higher ABSITE scores on univariate analysis. Scores on the USMLE 2 and MCAT, as well as resident attitude regarding the importance of the ABSITE results, were independent predictors of ABSITE performance.

Professionalism in the Twilight Zone: A Multicenter, Mixed-Methods Study of Shift Transition Dynamics in Surgical Residencies

Purpose Duty hours rules sparked debates about professionalism. This study explores whether and why general surgery residents delay departures at the end of a day shift in ways consistent with shift work, traditional professionalism, or a new professionalism. Method Questionnaires were administered to categorical residents in 13 general surgery programs in 2014 and 2015. The response rate was 76% (N = 291). The 18 items focused on end-of-shift behaviors and the frequency and source of delayed departures. Follow-up interviews (N = 39) examined motives for delayed departures. The results include means, percentages, and representative quotations from the interviews. Results A minority (33%) agreed that it is routine and acceptable to pass work to night teams, whereas a strong majority (81%) believed that residents exceed work hours in the name of professionalism. Delayed departures were ubiquitous: Only 2 of 291 residents were not delayed for any of 13 reasons during a typical week. The single most common source of delay involved a desire to avoid the appearance of dumping work on fellow residents. In the interviews, residents expressed a strong reluctance to pass work to an on-call resident or night team because of sparse night staffing, patient ownership, an aversion to dumping, and the fear of being seen as inefficient. Conclusions Resident behavior is shaped by organizational and cultural contexts that require attention and reform. The evidence points to the stunted development of a new professionalism, little role for shift-work mentalities, and uneven expression of traditional professionalism in resident behavior.

Commentary: the case for expanding general surgery residencies.

Despite the significant growth in population in the United States since 1980 and societal and demographic factors such as an aging population, there has been no increase in the number of graduating general surgery residents each year, which has created a worsening shortage of general surgeons. Other factors, such as stricter duty hours requirements and an increase in the number and variety of procedures general surgeons must perform, have also contributed to this shortage. Yet, applicant demand for general surgery positions is currently strong and will increase as new medical schools are created and current medical schools expand class size. The authors of this commentary propose an expansion of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-approved general surgery categorical resident positions as the necessary first step in addressing the current and projected shortage of general surgeons. Before this expansion of general surgery residencies can occur, impediments such as the availability of residency spots for both U.S. and international medical graduates, the availability of educational opportunities for residents in teaching hospitals, and inadequate financial resources, such as a lack of funding from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid, must be overcome.

Using Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment to Develop a Patient Safety Curriculum for Surgical Residents

OBJECTIVE The objective is to use qualitative and quantitative analysis to develop a patient safety curriculum for surgical residents. DESIGN A prospective study of surgical residents using both quantitative and qualitative methods to craft a patient safety curriculum. Both a survey and focus groups were held before and 4 months after delivery of the patient safety curriculum. SETTING The University of New Mexico Hospital, a tertiary academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS General surgery residents, postgraduate years 1 to 5 RESULTS: Qualitative and quantitative analysis revealed areas that required attention and thus helped to mold the curriculum. Qualitative analysis after delivery of the curriculum showed positive changes in attitudes and normative beliefs toward patient safety. Specifically, attitudes and approach to quality improvement and teamwork showed improvement. Survey analysis did not show any significant change in resident perception of the environment during the time frame of this study. CONCLUSIONS Using qualitative analysis to uncover attitudinal barriers to a safe patient environment can help to enhance the relevance and content of a patient safety curriculum for general surgery residents.

Resident Guideline Development to Standardize Intensive Care Unit Care Delivery: A Competency-Based Educational Method

PURPOSE We developed a system of resident-driven, evidence-based standardization of care in our trauma-surgical intensive care unit (TSICU). Our main purposes are to improve patient care and outcomes and to help the residents develop practical competency in practice-based learning and improvement and in systems-based practice. DEVELOPMENT OF THE ACTIVITY Since October 2006, each rotating TSICU resident has chosen a topic to research the available evidence and has developed a guideline, which the resident then presents to the TSICU faculty and residents for discussion, amendments, and acceptance or reevaluation. EVALUATION COMPONENT Evaluation of proposed guidelines is based on the quality of information presented in support of the recommendations. Ultimately, acceptance of a guideline requires consensus among the TSICU faculty. Immediate feedback is given to the presenting resident by the faculty. The residents evaluate the program via a Web-based evaluation tool. PROPOSED OUTCOME MEASURES We have qualitative data from residents that indicate this experience is positive. We are developing a tool to use both qualitative and quantitative means to evaluate resident, faculty, and nursing staff satisfaction with the process. We will use our clinical database to evaluate whether improved patient outcomes have resulted from standardization of care. IMPLEMENTATION DATES AND EXPERIENCE TO DATE We implemented this methodology in October 2006 and have thus far implemented 20 guidelines and 2 standardized order sets. CONCLUSION AND OR NEXT STEPS: We believe competency is achieved and demonstrated by actively participating in a process such as development of care guidelines. Researching and developing standardized guidelines for our TSICU seems to be an effective and practical way for residents to use multiple sources for practice-based learning and improvement. It also requires the resident to advocate for quality patient care and optimal patient care systems. We plan to use outcome and qualitative data to validate this method.