M. Van Der Heijden
Netherlands Cancer Institute
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by M. Van Der Heijden.
Annals of Oncology | 2016
Damien Pouessel; Y. Neuzillet; Laura S. Mertens; M. Van Der Heijden; J. De Jong; Joyce Sanders; Dennis Peters; Karen Leroy; A. Manceau; P. Maille; Pascale Soyeux; Anissa Moktefi; Fannie Semprez; D. Vordos; A. De La Taille; Carolyn D. Hurst; Darren C. Tomlinson; Patricia Harnden; P. J. Bostrom; Tuomas Mirtti; Simon Horenblas; Y. Loriot; Nadine Houede; Christine Chevreau; Philippe Beuzeboc; S.F. Shariat; Arthur I. Sagalowsky; Raheela Ashfaq; Maximilian Burger; Michael A.S. Jewett
BACKGROUND Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) is an actionable target in bladder cancer. Preclinical studies show that anti-FGFR3 treatment slows down tumor growth, suggesting that this tyrosine kinase receptor is a candidate for personalized bladder cancer treatment, particularly in patients with mutated FGFR3. We addressed tumor heterogeneity in a large multicenter, multi-laboratory study, as this may have significant impact on therapeutic response. PATIENTS AND METHODS We evaluated possible FGFR3 heterogeneity by the PCR-SNaPshot method in the superficial and deep compartments of tumors obtained by transurethral resection (TUR, n = 61) and in radical cystectomy (RC, n = 614) specimens and corresponding cancer-positive lymph nodes (LN+, n = 201). RESULTS We found FGFR3 mutations in 13/34 (38%) T1 and 8/27 (30%) ≥T2-TUR samples, with 100% concordance between superficial and deeper parts in T1-TUR samples. Of eight FGFR3 mutant ≥T2-TUR samples, only 4 (50%) displayed the mutation in the deeper part. We found 67/614 (11%) FGFR3 mutations in RC specimens. FGFR3 mutation was associated with pN0 (P < 0.001) at RC. In 10/201 (5%) LN+, an FGFR3 mutation was found, all concordant with the corresponding RC specimen. In the remaining 191 cases, RC and LN+ were both wild type. CONCLUSIONS FGFR3 mutation status seems promising to guide decision-making on adjuvant anti-FGFR3 therapy as it appeared homogeneous in RC and LN+. Based on the results of TUR, the deep part of the tumor needs to be assessed if neoadjuvant anti-FGFR3 treatment is considered. We conclude that studies on the heterogeneity of actionable molecular targets should precede clinical trials with these drugs in the perioperative setting.
International Journal of Cancer | 2018
Tom J.N. Hermans; C. Voskuilen; Marc Deelen; Laura S. Mertens; Simon Horenblas; Richard P. Meijer; Joost L. Boormans; Katja K. Aben; M. Van Der Heijden; Floris J. Pos; R. de Wit; Laurens V. Beerepoot; Rob H.A. Verhoeven; B. Van Rhijn
In this study, we compared complete pathological downstaging (pCD, ≤(y)pT1N0) and overall survival (OS) in patients with cT2 versus cT3–4aN0M0 UC of the bladder undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) with or without neoadjuvant chemo‐ (NAC) or radiotherapy (NAR). A population‐based sample of 5,517 patients, who underwent upfront RC versus NAC + RC or NAR + RC for cT2‐4aN0M0 UC between 1995–2013, was identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Data were retrieved from individual patient files and pathology reports. pCD‐rates were compared using Chi‐square tests and OS was estimated by Kaplan–Meier analyses. Multivariable analyses were conducted to determine odds (OR) and hazard ratios (HR) for pCD‐status and OS, respectively. We included 4,504 (82%) patients with cT2 and 1,013 (18%) with cT3–4a UC. Median follow‐up was 9.2 years. In cT2 UC, pCD‐rate was 25% after upfront RC versus 43% (p < 0.001) and 33% (p = 0.130) after NAC + RC and NAR + RC, respectively. In cT3–4a UC, pCD‐rate was 8% after upfront RC versus 37% (p < 0.001) and 16% (p = 0.281) after NAC + RC and NAR + RC, respectively. In cT2 UC, 5‐year OS was 57% and 51% for NAC + RC and upfront RC, respectively (p = 0.135), whereas in cT3–4a UC, 5‐year OS was 55% for NAC + RC versus 36% for upfront RC (p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis for OS, NAC was beneficial in cT3–4a UC (HR: 0.67, 95%CI 0.51–0.89) but not in cT2 UC (HR: 0.91, 95%CI 0.72–1.15). NAR did not influence OS. In conclusion, NAC + RC was associated with superior pCD compared to RC alone and NAR + RC. Superior OS for NAC + RC compared to RC alone was especially evident in cT3–4a disease.
Tijdschrift voor Urologie | 2014
E. Fransen Van De Putte; Laura S. Mertens; R.P. Meijer; M. Van Der Heijden; J.M. Kerst; Andries M. Bergman; S. Horenblas; B. Van Rhijn
SamenvattingNeoadjuvante cisplatinehoudende chemotherapie voor spierinvasief blaascarcinoom resulteert bij 30- 40% van de patiënten tot complete pathologische respons (CPR) en een betere overleving dan cystectomie alleen.
European Journal of Cancer | 2014
Lorenza Mittempergher; C. Sun; Floris H. Groenendijk; Astrid Bosma; Stefan M. Willems; Tonći Šuštić; Ian Majewski; Wipawadee Grernrum; Nadia M Davidson; I. de Rink; Hugo M. Horlings; W. Theelen-Engelsman; S.F. Chin; Alicia Oshlack; B. Van Rhijn; M. van den Heuvel; M. Van Der Heijden; C. Caldas; Ren e Bernards
after anthracycline-based chemotherapy. AC induces lower levels of plasma miR-34a and doesn’t modify miR-122. The tumorectomy alone doesn’t deregulate miR-34a and miR-122. Circulating miR-34a and miR-122 are downregulated in NAC treated breast cancer patients compare to controls and normalized after treatments. Conclusion: This study demonstrates for the first time that NAC specifically induces expression of tumor suppressor miRNAs in plasma and tumor tissue that might be involved in the anti-tumor effect of the chemotherapy.
Annals of Oncology | 2016
Y. Loriot; Jonathan E. Rosenberg; T. Powles; Andrea Necchi; Syed A. Hussain; Rafael Morales; M. Retz; Günter Niegisch; Ignacio Duran; Christine Theodore; Jose Luis Perez-Gracia; E. Grande Pulido; Ann Christine Thastrom; B. Danner; Sanjeev Mariathasan; Oyewale O. Abidoye; M. Van Der Heijden
Annals of Oncology | 2016
Joaquim Bellmunt; Arjun Vasant Balar; Matthew D. Galsky; Y. Loriot; Christine Theodore; E. Grande Pulido; Daniel Castellano; M. Retz; Günter Niegisch; Sergio Bracarda; Andrea Necchi; Ulka N. Vaishampayan; Srikala S. Sridhar; Bernhard J. Eigl; Syed A. Hussain; M. Van Der Heijden; B. Danner; Sanjeev Mariathasan; Fatema Legrand; Jonathan E. Rosenberg
International Urology and Nephrology | 2017
E. Fransen Van De Putte; Erik Vegt; Laura S. Mertens; A. Bruining; Kees Hendricksen; M. Van Der Heijden; Simon Horenblas; B. Van Rhijn
Annals of Oncology | 2017
Daniel P. Petrylak; Kim N. Chi; Alexandra Drakaki; C.N. Sternberg; R. de Wit; Hiroyuki Nishiyama; Evan Y. Yu; Daniel Castellano; Syed A. Hussain; I.J. Percent; Aude Flechon; Aristotle Bamias; M. Van Der Heijden; Nobuaki Matsubara; B. Alekseev; Richard A. Walgren; Oday Hamid; Annamaria Zimmermann; Katherine M Bell-McGuinn; T. Powles
European Journal of Cancer | 2015
Jonathan E. Rosenberg; Daniel P. Petrylak; Oyewale O. Abidoye; M. Van Der Heijden; J. Hofman-Censits; Andrea Necchi; Peter H. O'Donnell; A. Balmanoukian; Y. Loriot; M. Retz; Jose Luis Perez-Gracia; Nancy A. Dawson; Arjun Vasant Balar; Matthew D. Galsky; Mark T. Fleming; T. Powles; Na Cui; Sanjeev Mariathasan; Gregg Fine; Robert Dreicer
European Urology Supplements | 2014
Laura S. Mertens; R.P. Meijer; W. Meinhardt; H. Van Der Poel; Axel Bex; J.M. Kerst; M. Van Der Heijden; Andries M. Bergman; S. Horenblas; B. Van Rhijn