M. Vrablik

Cardiovascular Efficacy and Safety of Bococizumab in High-Risk Patients

BACKGROUND Bococizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits proprotein convertase subtilisin–kexin type 9 (PCSK9) and reduces levels of low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of bococizumab in patients at high cardiovascular risk. METHODS In two parallel, multinational trials with different entry criteria for LDL cholesterol levels, we randomly assigned the 27,438 patients in the combined trials to receive bococizumab (at a dose of 150 mg) subcutaneously every 2 weeks or placebo. The primary end point was nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina requiring urgent revascularization, or cardiovascular death; 93% of the patients were receiving statin therapy at baseline. The trials were stopped early after the sponsor elected to discontinue the development of bococizumab owing in part to the development of high rates of antidrug antibodies, as seen in data from other studies in the program. The median follow‐up was 10 months. RESULTS At 14 weeks, patients in the combined trials had a mean change from baseline in LDL cholesterol levels of ‐56.0% in the bococizumab group and +2.9% in the placebo group, for a between‐group difference of –59.0 percentage points (P<0.001) and a median reduction from baseline of 64.2% (P<0.001). In the lower‐risk, shorter‐duration trial (in which the patients had a baseline LDL cholesterol level of ≥70 mg per deciliter [1.8 mmol per liter] and the median follow‐up was 7 months), major cardiovascular events occurred in 173 patients each in the bococizumab group and the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 1.22; P=0.94). In the higher‐risk, longer‐duration trial (in which the patients had a baseline LDL cholesterol level of ≥100 mg per deciliter [2.6 mmol per liter] and the median follow‐up was 12 months), major cardiovascular events occurred in 179 and 224 patients, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.97; P=0.02). The hazard ratio for the primary end point in the combined trials was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.76 to 1.02; P=0.08). Injection‐site reactions were more common in the bococizumab group than in the placebo group (10.4% vs. 1.3%, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS In two randomized trials comparing the PCSK9 inhibitor bococizumab with placebo, bococizumab had no benefit with respect to major adverse cardiovascular events in the trial involving lower‐risk patients but did have a significant benefit in the trial involving higher‐risk patients. (Funded by Pfizer; SPIRE‐1 and SPIRE‐2 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01975376 and NCT01975389.)

Lipid lowering nutraceuticals in clinical practice: position paper from an International Lipid Expert Panel

Arrigo F.G. Cicero, University of Bologna Alessandro Colletti, University of Bologna Gani Bajraktari, University Clinical Centre of Kosovo Olivier Descamps, Centres Hospitaliers Jolimont Dragan M. Djuric, University of Belgrade Marat Ezhov, Russian Cardiology Research and Production Centre Zlatko Fras, University Medical Centre Ljubljana Niki Katsiki, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Michel Langlois, AZ Sint-Jan Hospital Gustavs Latkovskis, University of Latvia

Impact of apolipoprotein A5 variants on statin treatment efficacy

AIMS Despite the fact that statin treatment efficacy is very high, there are substantial differences in treatment effectiveness among individuals. It is supposed that genetic predisposition plays an important role in these differences, but the contribution of individual polymorphisms is poorly understood. So far, more than 30 genes have been examined with ambiguous results. Apolipoprotein A5 is an important determinant of plasma lipid concentrations and its genetic variation could account for some of the observed differences in the response to statin therapy. However, this has not been analyzed before. MATERIALS AND METHODS We examined the putative association between APOA5 SNPs (c.-1131T>C, c.56C>G and c.457G>A) and efficacy during 3 months of statin treatment in 187 adult Caucasians. Patients were treated with low-dose (10 or 20 mg per day) simvastatin (46.3%), atorvastatin (40.5%) and lovastatin (13.2%). RESULTS The decrease in cholesterol was not significantly associated with the type or dose of statin. Carriers of the APOA5 genotype TT-1131 (n = 154) benefited more from statin treatment when compared with the C-1131 allele carriers (n = 33) (Delta low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: -36.3 +/- 15.1% vs Delta low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: -29.9 +/- 12.5%; p < 0.005, Mann-Whitney test). This result was independent of sex, age, BMI and APOE polymorphism. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that the APOA5 gene variants may play an important role in the pharmacogenetics of statin treatment.

Oral but not transdermal estrogen replacement therapy changes the composition of plasma lipoproteins

The role of hormone replacement therapy and estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) in cardiovascular disease prevention has not been unambiguously defined yet. The metabolic effects of estrogens may vary depending upon the route of administration. Therefore, we compared the impact of unopposed oral or transdermal ERT on plasma lipids and lipoproteins in 41 hysterectomized women. This was an open-label, randomized, crossover study (with 2 treatments and 2 periods). The 41 hysterectomized women were randomized to receive oral or transdermal 17beta-estradiol in the first or second of two 12-week study periods. Plasma lipid and lipoprotein levels were assayed before and after each treatment using standard automated methods. Lipid content of lipoprotein subclasses was assessed by sequential ultracentrifugation. The atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) was calculated as log(triglyceride [TG]/high-density lipoprotein [HDL] cholesterol). The difference between the 2 forms of administration was tested using a linear mixed model. The change from baseline for each of the forms was tested using paired t test. Oral ERT resulted in a significant increase in HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein A-I levels, whereas it significantly decreased total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and increased TG concentrations. Transdermal ERT had no such effect. Oral ERT led to a significant TG enrichment of HDL (0.19 +/- 0.06 vs 0.27 +/- 0.07 mmol/L, P < .001) and LDL particles (0.23 +/- 0.08 vs 0.26 +/- 0.10 mmol/L, P < .001) compared with baseline, whereas transdermal therapy did not have any effect on lipoprotein subclasses composition. The difference between the 2 treatments was statistically significant for HDL-TG and LDL-TG (0.27 +/- 0.07 vs 0.19 +/- 0.05 mmol/L, P < .001 and 0.26 +/- 0.10 vs 0.22 +/- 0.07 mmol/L, P< .001, respectively). The transdermal but not oral ERT significantly reduced the AIP compared with baseline (-0.17 +/- 0.26 vs -0.23 +/- 0.25, P = .023), making the difference between the therapies statistically significant (-0.23 +/- 0.25 vs -0.18 +/- 0.22, P = .017). Oral administration of ERT resulted in TG enrichment of LDL and HDL particles. Transdermal ERT did not change the composition of the lipoproteins and produced a significant improvement of AIP. Compared with transdermal ERT, orally administered ERT changes negatively the composition of plasma lipoproteins.

A review of the evidence on reducing macrovascular risk in patients with atherogenic dyslipidaemia: A report from an expert consensus meeting on the role of fenofibrate-statin combination therapy.

A meeting of European experts in cardiovascular (CV) disease and lipids was convened in Paris, France, on 10 November 2014 to discuss lipid profile, and in particular atherogenic dyslipidaemia (AD), and associated CV risk. Key points that were raised and discussed during the meeting are summarised in this paper, which also accounts for further discussion and agreement on these points by the group of experts. Elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) are commonly associated with a greater CV risk than low LDL-c levels, and are routinely managed with statins. However, even for patients controlled on statins and achieving low LDL-c levels, abnormal lipid profiles observed in some patients (i.e. elevated triglyceride levels, with/without low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-c]) have been linked to the presence of a residual CV risk. Therefore, it is recommended that both triglyceride and HDL-c levels be measured, to allow for the overall CV residual risk to be adequately managed. Favourable safety and clinical data support the combination of statins with other lipid-lowering agents, such as fenofibrate. Patients who have elevated triglyceride levels plus low levels of HDL-c are most likely to achieve clinical benefit from fenofibrate-statin combination therapy. In these patients with AD, achieving target non-HDL-c levels should be a key focus of CV risk management, and the use of non-HDL-c was advocated to provide a better measure of CV risk than LDL-c levels.

Ser19→Trp polymorphism within the apolipoprotein AV gene in hypertriglyceridaemic people

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the most common cause of death in industrialised countries. Raised plasma triglycerides (TGs) have been shown to be an independent risk factor for CVD.1 Recently, a new gene designated APOAV has been identified in the APOAI/APOCIII/APOAIV gene cluster by comparative sequencing by Pennacchio et al .2 The human APOAV gene consists of four exons and codes for a 369 amino acid protein, which is only expressed in the liver. Generation of transgenic and knockout mice assessed the importance of this gene for plasma TG determination. The transgenic mice show decreased and the knockout mice increased concentrations of plasma TGs, whereas the plasma cholesterol concentrations are not influenced significantly. In the human APOAV gene, T-1131C (originally referred to as SNP3) and Ser19→Trp polymorphisms have been detected.2–4 Associations between these polymorphisms and TG concentrations have been found in healthy, non-smoking subjects not receiving lipid lowering medication as well as in different population samples. The C allele of the T-1131C polymorphism was found to be associated with extreme concentrations of plasma TGs.5,6 The aim of this study was to evaluate the putative association of a common APOAV variation (Ser19→Trp) in those with extreme plasma TG concentrations. The patients were selected from the …

The Impact of Rapid Weight Loss on Oxidative Stress Markers and the Expression of the Metabolic Syndrome in Obese Individuals

Objective. Obesity is linked with a state of increased oxidative stress, which plays an important role in the etiology of atherosclerosis and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of rapid weight loss on oxidative stress markers in obese individuals with metabolic syndrome (MetS). Design and Methods. We measured oxidative stress markers in 40 obese subjects with metabolic syndrome (MetS+), 40 obese subjects without metabolic syndrome (MetS−), and 20 lean controls (LC) at baseline and after three months of very low caloric diet. Results. Oxidized low density lipoprotein (ox-LDL) levels decreased by 12% in MetS+ subjects, associated with a reduction in total cholesterol (TC), even after adjustment for age and sex. Lipoprotein associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) activity decreased by 4.7% in MetS+ subjects, associated with a drop in LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C), TC, and insulin levels. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that a model including ox-LDL, LpPLA2 activity, and myeloperoxidase (MPO) improved prediction of MetS status among obese individuals compared to each oxidative stress marker alone. Conclusions. Oxidative stress markers were predictive of MetS in obese subjects, suggesting a higher oxidative stress. Rapid weight loss resulted in a decline in oxidative stress markers, especially in MetS+ patients.

Effect of apolipoprotein E polymorphism on statin-induced decreases in plasma lipids and cardiovascular events.

Abstract Hypercholesterolemia or dyslipidemia is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and statins (inhibitors of a key enzyme of cholesterol synthesis, 3-hydroxymethyl glutaryl coenzyme A reductase) are the drugs of choice for decreasing plasma cholesterol. It has been estimated that genetic factors can explain 40%–60% of final cholesterol concentrations and approximately 70% of the efficacy of statin treatment. The gene most often analyzed in the context of statin efficacy is the gene for apolipoprotein E (APOE). This review summarizes evidence of the association between variations in the APOEgene locus and the response of plasma lipids to statin therapy. Although the results are not consistent, carriers of the APOE4allele seems to be less responsive to statins than carriers of APOE2and APOE3alleles. This effect is partially context-dependent (gene-gender interactions; gene-nutrition and gene-smoking interactions have not yet been studied) and the absolute differences vary between different population groups.

APOA5 Ala315>Val, identified in patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia, is a common mutation with no major effects on plasma lipid levels.

Abstract Background: The importance of the apolipoprotein A5 (APOA5) gene in determining plasma triglyceride (TG) levels has been demonstrated in transgenic and knockout mice and confirmed by human association studies in different ethnic groups. Methods: We screened for nonsynonymous APOA5 mutations in patients with plasma TG levels >10 mmol/L. The coding sequence and promoter region of the APOA5 gene were sequenced in 95 individuals with severe hypertriglyceridemia (HTG). A large population sample of 3202 individuals was screened by PCR and restriction analysis for presence of detected mutation. Results: In total, three heterozygous carriers of 944C>T (Ala315>Val) were identified in the severe HTG patients, while 22 carriers were identified in the population sample. The rare allele frequency of the Val315 was significantly higher in the HTG sample than in controls (0.016 vs. 0.003, p<0.01, respectively). Most of the control Ala315Val carriers, however, had plasma lipid levels (TGs, total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol) within the usual range detected in the population. Conclusions: APOA5 Ala315>Val does not play any dominant/important role in the genetic determination of plasma TG levels, but the increased frequency in HTG patients compared to controls suggests that it might interact with other gene variants to cause HTG. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008;46:773–7.

SLCO1B1 polymorphism is not associated with risk of statin-induced myalgia/myopathy in a Czech population.

Background Gene SLCO1B1, encoding solute organic anionic transport polypeptide OATP1B1, belongs to the group of candidates potentially influencing statin treatment safety. OATP1B1 regulates (not only) the hepatic uptake of statins. Its genetic variation was described as an important predictor of statin-associated myopathy in a cohort of patients treated with a maximum dose of simvastatin. However, the impact of SLCO1B1 gene polymorphism on this risk in patients treated with other statins or lower doses of simvastatin needs to be assessed. Therefore, we performed the present study. Material/Methods SLCO1B1 tagging rs4363657 polymorphism was analyzed in 2 groups of patients with dyslipidemia (treated with simvastatin or atorvastatin, 10 or 20 mg per day), subgroup with statin-induced myalgia (N=286), and subgroup (N=707) without myalgia/myopathy, and in 2301 population controls without lipid-lowering treatment. Results Frequency of the individual genotypes in patients with myalgia/myopathy (TT=62.3%, CT=34.5%, CC=2.8%) did not significantly differ (both P values over 0.19) from that in patients without muscle symptoms (TT=61.4%, CT=32.9%, CC=5.7%) or from the population controls (TT=63.9%, CT=32.5%, CC=3.6%). Null results were also obtained for the dominant and recessive models of the analysis. Conclusions In Czech patients treated with low statin doses, there is no association between SLCO1B1 gene polymorphism and risk of myalgia/myopathy.