M. Wise

The effect of introducing an in-theatre intra-operative specimen radiography (IOSR) system on the management of palpable breast cancer within a single unit

INTRODUCTION Intra-operative specimen radiography (IOSR) is used to screen specimens during breast-conserving surgery and attempt to identify incompletely excised lesions. Universal use of IOSR during surgery for impalpable breast cancer is advocated by current guidelines. This study evaluates the role of IOSR during breast-conserving surgery for palpable breast cancer. METHODS Two cohorts of patients who underwent wide local excision for palpable breast cancer were identified. Retrospective analysis of histological margins, intra-operative cavity shaves, secondary re-excision rates and specimen weight was completed comparing performance prior to the introduction of IOSR (October 2003-April 2005) with that since its introduction (April 2006-October 2007). RESULTS 224 Patients were included, 111 in the pre-IOSR cohort (PF) and 113 in the IOSR cohort (F). Patient demographics, tumour size and histology were comparable. No difference in margin involvement prior to intra-operative cavity shaving was noted, PF-26, F-31 (p=0.60). Intra-operative cavity shaves were carried out more frequently in the IOSR group, PF-9, F-32 (p=0.001). When compared with histological findings, IOSR identified margin compromise with sensitivity=58.1%, specificity=80.8%, positive-predictive value=56.25% and negative predictive value=81.9%. Re-operation rate was similar between the 2 groups, PF-26, F-31 (p=0.65). Significantly less tissue was excised following use of IOSR; PF-110g, F-70g (p=0.001). CONCLUSION Introduction of IOSR significantly reduced specimen weights without increasing re-excision rates. As volume of breast tissue removed is the most significant determinant of cosmetic outcome following breast-conserving surgery, the use of IOSR should be advocated in the surgical management of palpable breast cancer.

Repeat surgery following breast conservation and intra-operative sentinel lymph node analysis for breast cancer

INTRODUCTION Intra-operative sentinel node analysis (IOA) for breast cancer reduces the need for a second operation by revealing metastasis intra-operatively, allowing immediate axillary clearance. Critics argue that the number of patients deriving benefit is limited, as further surgery is often required for reasons other than nodal status. AIM To identify the proportion of women avoiding further surgery by using IOA excluding those who require further surgery for reasons other than axillary node metastasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS All patients undergoing sentinel node biopsy with IOA over one year were reviewed. Patient demographics, margin positivity, sentinel node metastasis, requirement for further surgery, and cavity shave involvement were analysed. RESULTS 322 patients were analysed: 253 undergoing breast-conserving surgery [BCS] and 69 undergoing mastectomy). IOA revealed metastasis in 81 (25.2.%) patients [25 undergoing mastectomy and 56 undergoing BCS], who underwent immediate axillary clearance. 43 BCS patients (17%) did not require further surgery other than for sentinel node involvement. 39 patients required further oncological surgery: 16 excision of margins; 13 completion mastectomy; 6 excision of margins followed by mastectomy; 3 completion axillary clearance; and 1 excision of recurrence. 20.6% had involvement of any circumferential histological margin. Cavity shaves were performed in 28.5% patients at initial surgery, the majority of which were clear of malignancy. 20 mastectomy patients had concordant definitive histology, avoiding a second operation. In total, 19.6% of this cohort avoided a second operation through the use of IOA. DISCUSSION Approximately 15% of patients undergoing breast conservation surgery for breast cancer require further surgery. However, a further 17% were saved subsequent surgery by utilising IOA, since they had immediate axillary clearance. When also considering patients undergoing mastectomy, this proportion is even higher.

The Axillary Nodal Harvest in Breast Cancer Surgery Is Unchanged by Sentinel Node Biopsy or the Timing of Surgery

Introduction. Patients with a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy may undergo delayed completion axillary dissection. Where intraoperative analysis is available, immediate completion axillary dissection can be performed. Alternatively, patients may undergo primary axillary dissection for breast cancer, historically or when preoperative assessment suggests axillary metastases. This study aims to determine if there is a difference in the total number of lymph nodes or the number of metastatic nodes harvested between the 3 possible approaches. Methods. Three consecutive comparable groups of 50 consecutive patients who underwent axillary dissection in each of the above contexts were identified from the Portsmouth Breast Unit Database. Patient demographics, clinicopathological variables, and surgical treatment were recorded. The total pathological nodal count and the number of metastatic nodes were compared between the groups. Results. There were no differences in clinico-pathological features between the three groups for all features studied with the exception of breast surgical procedure (P < 0.001). There were no differences in total nodal harvest (P = 0.822) or in the number of positive nodes harvested (P = 0.157) between the three groups. Conclusion. The three approaches to axillary clearance yield equivalent nodal harvests, suggesting oncological equivalence and robustness of surgical technique.