M. Woods
University of California, Davis
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by M. Woods.
Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A-accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment | 2013
D. S. Akerib; X. Bai; S. Bedikian; E. Bernard; A. Bernstein; A. Bolozdynya; A. Bradley; D. Byram; S. B. Cahn; C. Camp; M.C. Carmona-Benitez; D. Carr; J.J. Chapman; A.A. Chiller; C. Chiller; K. Clark; T. Classen; T. Coffey; A. Curioni; E. Dahl; S. Dazeley; L. de Viveiros; A. Dobi; E. Dragowsky; E. Druszkiewicz; B. Edwards; C.H. Faham; S. Fiorucci; R.J. Gaitskell; K.R. Gibson
The Large Underground Xenon (LUX) collaboration has designed and constructed a dual-phase xenon detector, in order to conduct a search for Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs), a leading dark matter candidate. The goal of the LUX detector is to clearly detect (or exclude) WIMPS with a spin independent cross-section per nucleon of 2×10-46cm2, equivalent to ∼1event/100kg/month in the inner 100-kg fiducial volume (FV) of the 370-kg detector. The overall background goals are set to have <1 background events characterized as possible WIMPs in the FV in 300 days of running. This paper describes the design and construction of the LUX detector.
Journal of Instrumentation | 2011
M. Szydagis; N. Barry; K. Kazkaz; J. Mock; D. Stolp; M. Sweany; M. Tripathi; S. Uvarov; N. Walsh; M. Woods
A comprehensive model for explaining scintillation yield in liquid xenon is introduced. We unify various definitions of work function which abound in the literature and incorporate all available data on electron recoil scintillation yield. This results in a better understanding of electron recoil, and facilitates an improved description of nuclear recoil. An incident gamma energy range of O(1 keV) to O(1 MeV) and electric fields between 0 and O(10 kV/cm) are incorporated into this heuristic model. We show results from a Geant4 implementation, but because the model has a few free parameters, implementation in any simulation package should be simple. We use a quasi-empirical approach with an objective of improving detector calibrations and performance verification. The model will aid in the design and optimization of future detectors. This model is also easy to extend to other noble elements. In this paper we lay the foundation for an exhaustive simulation code which we call NEST (Noble Element Simulation Technique).
Journal of Physics: Conference Series | 2010
D. N. McKinsey; D. S. Akerib; S. Bedikian; A. Bernstein; A. Bolozdynya; A. Bradley; J.J. Chapman; K. Clark; T. Classen; A. Curioni; E Dahl; S. Dazeley; M. R. Dragowsky; L. de Viveiros; E. Druszkiewicz; S. Fiorucci; R.J. Gaitskell; C. Hall; C. Hernandez Faham; L. Kastens; K. Kazkaz; R. Lander; D.S. Leonard; D.C. Malling; R. Mannino; Dongming Mei; J. Mock; J.A. Nikkel; P. Phelps; T. Shutt
The Large Underground Xenon (LUX) experiment is a liquid xenon time projection chamber designed for extremely low levels of radioactive background in its fiducial volume. The overall liquid xenon mass is 300 kg, with a 100 kg fiducial mass. LUX is currently under construction, and integration of the full detector will begin in Fall 2009 at the Sanford Underground Science and Engineering Laboratory in South Dakota. The LUX sensitivity to the WIMP-nucleon spin-independent scattering cross-section will be 7 × 10-46 cm2 at 100 GeV after 300 days of low-background operation.
Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A-accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment | 2013
D. S. Akerib; X. Bai; E. Bernard; A. Bernstein; A. Bradley; D. Byram; S. B. Cahn; M.C. Carmona-Benitez; D. Carr; J.J. Chapman; K. Clark; T. Coffey; B. Edwards; L. de Viveiros; M. R. Dragowsky; E. Druszkiewicz; C.H. Faham; S. Fiorucci; R.J. Gaitskell; K.R. Gibson; C. Hall; M. Hanhardt; B. Holbrook; M. Ihm; R. G. Jacobsen; L. Kastens; K. Kazkaz; N.A. Larsen; C. Lee; A. Lindote
Results are presented from radioactivity screening of two models of photomultiplier tubes designed for use in current and future liquid xenon experiments. The Hamamatsu 5.6 cm diameter R8778 PMT, used in the LUX dark matter experiment, has yielded a positive detection of four common radioactive isotopes: 238U, 232Th, 40K, and 60Co. Screening of LUX materials has rendered backgrounds from other detector materials subdominant to the R8778 contribution. A prototype Hamamatsu 7.6 cm diameter R11410 MOD PMT has also been screened, with benchmark isotope counts measured at <0.4 238U/<0.3 232Th/<8.3 40K/2.0±0.2 60Co mBq/PMT. This represents a large reduction, equal to a change of ×124 238U/×19 232Th/×18 40K per PMT, between R8778 and R11410 MOD, concurrent with a doubling of the photocathode surface area (4.5–6.4 cm diameter). 60Co measurements are comparable between the PMTs, but can be significantly reduced in future R11410 MOD units through further material selection. Assuming PMT activity equal to the measured 90% upper limits, Monte Carlo estimates indicate that replacement of R8778 PMTs with R11410 MOD PMTs will change LUX PMT electron recoil background contributions by a factor of ×125 after further material selection for 60Co reduction, and nuclear recoil backgrounds by a factor of ×136. The strong reduction in backgrounds below the measured R8778 levels makes the R11410 MOD a very competitive technology for use in large-scale liquid xenon detectors.
Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A-accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment | 2012
D. S. Akerib; X. Bai; S. Bedikian; E. Bernard; A. Bernstein; A. Bradley; S. B. Cahn; M.C. Carmona-Benitez; D. Carr; J.J. Chapman; K. Clark; T. Classen; T. Coffey; S. Dazeley; L. de Viveiros; A. Dobi; M. R. Dragowsky; E. Druszkiewicz; C.H. Faham; S. Fiorucci; R.J. Gaitskell; K.R. Gibson; C. Hall; M. Hanhardt; B. Holbrook; M. Ihm; R. G. Jacobsen; L. Kastens; K. Kazkaz; R. Lander
Geant4 has been used throughout the nuclear and high-energy physics community to simulate energy depositions in various detectors and materials. These simulations have mostly been run with a source beam outside the detector. In the case of low-background physics, however, a primary concern is the effect on the detector from radioactivity inherent in the detector parts themselves. From this standpoint, there is no single source or beam, but rather a collection of sources with potentially complicated spatial extent. LUXSim is a simulation framework used by the LUX collaboration that takes a component-centric approach to event generation and recording. A new set of classes allows for multiple radioactive sources to be set within any number of components at run time, with the entire collection of sources handled within a single simulation run. Various levels of information can also be recorded from the individual components, with these record levels also being set at run time. This flexibility in both source generation and information recording is possible without the need to recompile, reducing the complexity of code management and the proliferation of versions. Within the code itself, casting geometry objects within this new set of classes rather than as the default Geant4 classes automatically extends this flexibility to every individual component. No additional work is required on the part of the developer, reducing development time and increasing confidence in the results. We describe the guiding principles behind LUXSim, detail some of its unique classes and methods, and give examples of usage.
arXiv: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics | 2010
S. Fiorucci; D. S. Akerib; S. Bedikian; A. Bernstein; A. Bolozdynya; A. Bradley; D. Carr; J.J. Chapman; K. Clark; T. Classen; A. Curioni; E. Dahl; S. Dazeley; L. de Viveiros; E. Druszkiewicz; R.J. Gaitskell; C. Hall; C. Hernandez Faham; B. Holbrook; L. Kastens; K. Kazkaz; R. Lander; K. Lesko; D.C. Malling; R. Mannino; D. N. McKinsey; Dongming Mei; J. Mock; J. Nikkel; P. Phelps
The Large Underground Xenon (LUX) dark matter search experiment is currently being deployed at the Homestake Laboratory in South Dakota. We will highlight the main elements of design which make the experiment a very strong competitor in the field of direct detection, as well as an easily scalable concept. We will also present its potential reach for supersymmetric dark matter detection, within various timeframes ranging from 1 year to 5 years or more.
Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A-accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment | 2012
D. S. Akerib; X. Bai; S. Bedikian; E. Bernard; A. Bernstein; A. Bradley; S. B. Cahn; M.C. Carmona-Benitez; D. Carr; J.J. Chapman; K. Clark; T. Classen; T. Coffey; A. Curioni; S. Dazeley; L. de Viveiros; M. R. Dragowsky; E. Druszkiewicz; C.H. Faham; S. Fiorucci; R.J. Gaitskell; K.R. Gibson; C. Hall; M. Hanhardt; B. Holbrook; M. Ihm; R. G. Jacobsen; L. Kastens; K. Kazkaz; R. Lander
LUX is a two-phase (liquid/gas) xenon time projection chamber designed to detect nuclear recoils from interactions with dark matter particles. Signals from the LUX detector are processed by custom-built analog electronics which provide properly shaped signals for the trigger and data acquisition (DAQ) systems. The DAQ is comprised of commercial digitizers with firmware customized for the LUX experiment. Data acquisition systems in rare-event searches must accommodate high rate and large dynamic range during precision calibrations involving radioactive sources, while also delivering low threshold for maximum sensitivity. The LUX DAQ meets these challenges using real-time baseline suppression that allows for a maximum event acquisition rate in excess of 1.5 kHz with virtually no deadtime. This paper describes the LUX DAQ and the novel acquisition techniques employed in the LUX experiment.
Journal of Instrumentation | 2014
J. Mock; N Barry; K. Kazkaz; D. Stolp; M. Szydagis; M. Tripathi; S. Uvarov; M. Woods; N. Walsh
A comprehensive model for describing the characteristics of pulsed signals, generated by particle interactions in xenon detectors, is presented. An emphasis is laid on two-phase time projection chambers, but the models presented are also applicable to single phase detectors. In order to simulate the pulse shape due to primary scintillation light, the effects of the ratio of singlet and triplet dimer state populations, as well as their corresponding decay times, and the recombination time are incorporated into the model. In a two phase time projection chamber, when simulating the pulse caused by electroluminescence light, the ionization electron mean free path in gas, the drift velocity, singlet and triplet decay times, diffusion constants, and the electron trapping time, have been implemented. This modeling has been incorporated into a complete software package, which realistically simulates the expected pulse shapes for these types of detectors.
Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A-accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment | 2013
D. S. Akerib; X. Bai; S. Bedikian; A. Bernstein; A. Bolozdynya; A. Bradley; S. B. Cahn; D. Carr; J.J. Chapman; K. Clark; T. Classen; A. Curioni; C.E. Dahl; S. Dazeley; L. de Viveiros; M. R. Dragowsky; E. Druszkiewicz; S. Fiorucci; R.J. Gaitskell; C. Hall; C.H. Faham; B. Holbrook; L. Kastens; K. Kazkaz; J. Kwong; R. Lander; D.S. Leonard; D.C. Malling; R. Mannino; D. N. McKinsey
The LUX (Large Underground Xenon) detector is a two-phase xenon Time Projection Chamber (TPC) designed to search for WIMP-nucleon dark mat
Journal of Instrumentation | 2012
Christian Neher; R. Lander; A. Moskaleva; J. Pasner; M. Tripathi; M. Woods
As silicon detectors in high energy physics experiments require increasingly complex assembly procedures, the availability of a wide variety of interconnect technologies provides more options for overcoming obstacles in generic R&D. Gold ball bonding has been a staple in the interconnect industry due to its ease of use and reliability. However, due to some limitations in the standard technique, alternate methods of gold-stud bonding are being developed. This paper presents recent progress and challenges faced in the development of double gold-stud bonding and 0.5 mil wire gold-stud bonding at the UC Davis Facility for Interconnect Technology. Advantages and limitations of each technique are analyzed to provide insight into potential applications for each method. Optimization of procedures and parameters is also presented.