Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where M. Zinninger is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by M. Zinninger.


CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians | 1997

Stereotactic core-needle biopsy of the breast: A report of the Joint Task Force of the American College of Radiology, American College of Surgeons, and College of American Pathologists

Lawrence W. Bassett; David P. Winchester; Robert B. Caplan; D. David Dershaw; Kambiz Dowlatshahi; W. Phil Evans; Laurie L. Fajardo; Patrick L. Fitzgibbons; Donald E. Henson; Robert V. P. Hutter; Monica Morrow; Jean Paquelet; S. Eva Singletary; John Curry; Pam Wilcox‐Buchalla; M. Zinninger

A national task force consisting of members from the American College of Radiology, the American College of Surgeons, and the College of American Pathologists examined the issues surrounding stereotactic core-needle biopsy for occult breast lesions. Their report includes indications and contraindications, informed consent, specimen handling, and management of indeterminate, atypical, or discordant lesions.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1987

Prognostic factors in carcinoma of the prostate— analysis of rtog study 75-06

Miljenko V. Pilepich; J.M. Krall; William T. Sause; R.J. Johnson; H.H. Russ; Gerald E. Hanks; Carlos A. Perez; M. Zinninger; K.L. Martz

A total of 566 evaluable patients were accessioned to a phase III RTOG study of extended field irradiation in carcinoma of the prostate from 1976 to 1983. Eligible patients were those with locally advanced disease, either clinical Stage C or clinical Stage A2 or B with pelvic lymph node involvement. The treatment consisted of irradiation of the regional lymphatics followed by a boost to the prostate. The data have been analyzed extensively to identify variables of potential prognostic significance. The assessed factors include tumor size, clinical stage, the degree of histological differentiation, nodal status, serum acid phosphatase status, hormonal management status, age, and race. These factors have been assessed as to their interdependence and correlation with the clinical course (study endpoints) using univariate analyses and Coxs Regression model. Significant interdependence of tumor size and Gleason score and tumor size and acid phosphatase was identified. The population receiving hormonal management either prior to or during radiotherapy had a significantly higher proportion of high grade tumors. Correlation of the assessed variables and the study endpoints (local control, incidence of distant metastases, NED survival, survival) singled out the degree of histological differentiation as the most powerful prognostic factor for all the endpoints. Age proved a useful predictor of local control (younger patients failed at a significantly higher rate), as did tumor size. Elevation of serum acid phosphatase correlated well with the incidence of metastatic disease but was not a useful predictor of survival. Tumor size and hormonal management status correlated well with the incidence of metastatic disease but only when analyzed separately from other factors. Their prognostic value was absent when Cox regression analysis was applied. Nodal status did not correlate well with any of the study endpoints, indicating then that in patients with clinical Stage C disease, treated with definitive radiotherapy to the prostate and regional lymphatics, this parameter may have limited prognostic usefulness. Although patients who received concomitant hormonal management had a significantly higher proportion of high grade lesions, their clinical course fared favorably in comparison with the population not receiving concomitant hormonal management. This may indicate a beneficial effect of adjuvant hormonal treatment which needs to be tested in a prospective study.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1987

Correlation of radiotherapeutic parameters and treatment related morbidity in carcinoma of the prostate--analysis of RTOG study 75-06.

Miljenko V. Pilepich; J.M. Krall; William T. Sause; R.J. Johnson; H.H. Russ; Gerald E. Hanks; Carlos A. Perez; M. Zinninger; K.L. Martz; P. Gardner

Treatment related morbidity, recorded in patients entered onto a RTOG phase III study (testing the value of periaortic irradiation in locally advanced carcinoma of the prostate), has been correlated with radiotherapeutic parameters to identify and quantify the relationship with treatment volumes, doses, and techniques. Between 1976 and 1983 a total of 526 analyzable cases were entered onto the study. The study design entailed randomization to either pelvic irradiation followed by a prostate boost or pelvic and periaortic irradiation followed by a prostate boost. Periaortic irradiation was not associated with a significantly increased incidence of bowel injuries manifested by diarrhea. No correlation between the total dose to the regional lymphatics (ranging from 4400 to 5100 cGy) and the incidence of bowel and bladder injuries could be established. Doses to the prostate in excess of 7000 cGy have not resulted in a significantly increased incidence of bladder injuries, but have been associated with a significant increase in the incidence of bowel injuries manifested by diarrhea. The techniques of pelvic irradiation did not seem to significantly influence the incidence of bowel or bladder complications. The technique of delivery of the prostatic boost did seem to influence the incidence of bowel injuries. This refers to the lateral boost technique and the perineal boost technique which have been associated with a higher incidence of diarrhea. All of the conclusions based on this analysis are applicable only to treatment volumes and dose ranges used in this study and to conventional fractionation of 180 to 200 cGy per day.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1986

Extended field (periaortic) irradiation in carcinoma of the prostate--analysis of RTOG 75-06.

Miljenko V. Pilepich; J.M. Krall; R.J. Johnson; William T. Sause; Carlos A. Perez; M. Zinninger; K.L. Martz

From 1976 to 1983 the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group conducted a study of extended field (periaortic) irradiation in carcinoma of the prostate. Eligible patients were those with clinical Stage C tumor with or without evidence of pelvic lymph node involvement and also those with Stage A-2 and B with evidence of pelvic lymph node involvement. The stratification criteria included histological grade, clinical stage, absence or presence of hormonal manipulation, and method of lymph node evaluation (lymphangiogram vs. laparotomy vs. no nodal evaluation). The patients were randomized to either receive pelvic irradiation followed by a boost to the prostate or pelvic and periaortic irradiation followed by a boost to the prostate. The prescribed daily dose was 180-200 rad to a total midplane dose to the regional lymphatics to 4000-4500 rad. The prostatic boost target volume was to receive additional 2000-2500 rad bringing the total dose to that area to a minimum of 6500 rad. A total of 523 analyzable patients have been accessioned to the protocol. Four hundred forty-eight of these are known to have received treatment per protocol. Median follow-up is 4 years and 3 months. The analyzable patients were evaluated for the incidence of distant metastases, NED survival and survival as a function of treatment arm. No statistically significant differences between the treatment arms could be documented. Similarly, no significant difference between treatment arms could be documented within a number of subpopulations such as those characterized by a particular grade, hormonal status, stage, age, acid phosphatase level, etc. The results of the study revealed no apparent benefit of elective periaortic irradiation in patients with detectable disease confined to the pelvis.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1987

Correlation of pre-treatment transurethral resection and prognosis in patients with stage C carcinoma of the prostate treated with definitive radiotherapy—rtog experience☆

Miljenko V. Pilepich; J.M. Krall; Gerald E. Hanks; William T. Sause; H. Baerwald; H.H. Russ; Carlos A. Perez; M. Zinninger; K.L. Martz

Four hundred and ninety-four patients with clinical Stage C carcinoma of the prostate, who were entered onto a phase III RTOG study, have been analyzed as to the potential effect of the pre-treatment transurethral resection (TUR) of the tumor. Treatment consisted of definitive irradiation to the prostate (6500-7000 cGy) and regional lymphatics (4500-5000 cGy). A total of 202 patients underwent pre-treatment TUR. This population was compared with the remaining 292 patients as to the rate of locoregional failure, incidence of distant metastases, disease-free survival, and survival. The TUR population fared significantly worse for all four end-points. To account for uneven distribution of recognized prognostic factors the results were then adjusted using stratified Mantel-Haenszel tests. The stratification process resulted in a reduced level of significance in the differences between the two populations. However, a trend toward a higher incidence of distant metastases could be observed within most strata. The trend was most pronounced in subpopulations characterized by Gleason score 6-7 and normal serum acid phosphatase (SAP). For the population characterized by Gleason score 6-10 and normal SAP, the differences in the incidence of distant metastases retained statistical significance. Whether these findings are secondary to tumor dissemination during TUR or are due to incompletely identified selection biases remains to be demonstrated in future (prospective) studies.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1987

Large fraction irradiation with or without misonidazole in advanced non-oat cell carcinoma of the lung: a phase III randomized trial of the RTOG

Joseph R. Simpson; Madeline Bauer; Todd H. Wasserman; Carlos A. Perez; B. Emami; Irving Wiegensberg; M. Zinninger; Linda Martin Durbin

The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) investigated the use of misonidazole as an hypoxic cell sensitizer in a Phase III prospective randomized trial employing radiotherapy, 600 cGy twice weekly to a total of 3600 cGy with and without misonidazole in the treatment of locally advanced non-metastatic squamous cell, adeno, or large cell carcinoma of the lung. Between January 1980 and July 1983, 117 patients from 21 institutions were enrolled. One-hundred eight patients were evaluable; 53 in the combined treatment arm and 55 in the radiation alone arm. Grade 3 or worse complications associated with radiation occurred in 17% of patients. Esophageal toxicity accounted for the majority of complications. Two (4%) patients in the radiotherapy plus misonidazole group experienced grade 3 peripheral neurotoxicity. Complete or partial responses were produced in 58% of the patients with radiotherapy alone and 36% of those treated with radiotherapy plus misonidazole (p = 0.08). At the time of first progression, over 50% of the patients had persistent local disease. Median survival was 7 months regardless of treatment. Misonidazole in the dose and schedule employed did not enhance the effect of radiotherapy on either local tumor control or overall survival in patients with advanced lung cancer.


Breast Journal | 1997

Stereotactic Core-Needle Biopsy of the Breast: A Report of the Joint Task Force of the American College of Radiology, American College of Surgeons, and College of American Pathologists

Lawrence W. Bassett; David P. Winchester; Robert B. Caplan; D. David Dershaw; Kambiz Dowlatshahi; W. Phil Evans; Laurie L. Fajardo; Patrick L. Fitzgibbons; Donald E. Henson; Robert V. P. Hutter; Monica Morrow; Jean Paquelet; S. Eva Singletary; John Curry; Pam Wilcox‐Buchalla; M. Zinninger

A national task force consisting of members from the American College of Radiology, the American College of Surgeons, and the College of American Pathologists examined the issues surrounding stereotactic core-needle biopsy for occult breast lesions. Their report includes indications and contraindications, informed consent, specimen handling, and management of indeterminate, atypical, or discordant lesions.


American Journal of Roentgenology | 2002

American College of Radiology White Paper on MR Safety

Emanuel Kanal; James P. Borgstede; A. James Barkovich; Charlotte Bell; William G. Bradley; Joel P. Felmlee; Jerry W. Froelich; Ellisa M. Kaminski; Elaine K. Keeler; James W. Lester; Elizabeth A. Scoumis; Loren A. Zaremba; M. Zinninger


American Journal of Roentgenology | 2004

American College of Radiology White Paper on MR Safety: 2004 Update and Revisions

Emanuel Kanal; James P. Borgstede; A. James Barkovich; Charlotte Bell; William G. Bradley; Shawn Etheridge; Joel P. Felmlee; Jerry W. Froelich; Jeffrey Hayden; Ellisa M. Kaminski; James W. Lester; Elizabeth A. Scoumis; Loren A. Zaremba; M. Zinninger


American Journal of Roentgenology | 1998

American College of Radiology guidelines for breast cancer screening.

Stephen A. Feig; Carl J. D'Orsi; R E Hendrick; Valerie P. Jackson; Daniel B. Kopans; Barbara Monsees; Edward A. Sickles; Carol B. Stelling; M. Zinninger; P Wilcox-Buchalla

Collaboration


Dive into the M. Zinninger's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J.M. Krall

American College of Radiology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

K.L. Martz

American College of Radiology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

William T. Sause

Intermountain Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gerald E. Hanks

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James P. Borgstede

University of Colorado Denver

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. James Barkovich

American College of Radiology

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge