Maarten J. M. Christenhusz
Royal Botanic Gardens
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Maarten J. M. Christenhusz.
Annals of Botany | 2014
Maarten J. M. Christenhusz; Mark W. Chase
BACKGROUND AND AIMSnThroughout the history of fern classification, familial and generic concepts have been highly labile. Many classifications and evolutionary schemes have been proposed during the last two centuries, reflecting different interpretations of the available evidence. Knowledge of fern structure and life histories has increased through time, providing more evidence on which to base ideas of possible relationships, and classification has changed accordingly. This paper reviews previous classifications of ferns and presents ideas on how to achieve a more stable consensus.nnnSCOPEnAn historical overview is provided from the first to the most recent fern classifications, from which conclusions are drawn on past changes and future trends. The problematic concept of family in ferns is discussed, with a particular focus on how this has changed over time. The history of molecular studies and the most recent findings are also presented.nnnKEY RESULTSnFern classification generally shows a trend from highly artificial, based on an interpretation of a few extrinsic characters, via natural classifications derived from a multitude of intrinsic characters, towards more evolutionary circumscriptions of groups that do not in general align well with the distribution of these previously used characters. It also shows a progression from a few broad family concepts to systems that recognized many more narrowly and highly controversially circumscribed families; currently, the number of families recognized is stabilizing somewhere between these extremes. Placement of many genera was uncertain until the arrival of molecular phylogenetics, which has rapidly been improving our understanding of fern relationships. As a collective category, the so-called fern allies (e.g. Lycopodiales, Psilotaceae, Equisetaceae) were unsurprisingly found to be polyphyletic, and the term should be abandoned. Lycopodiaceae, Selaginellaceae and Isoëtaceae form a clade (the lycopods) that is sister to all other vascular plants, whereas the whisk ferns (Psilotaceae), often included in the lycopods or believed to be associated with the first vascular plants, are sister to Ophioglossaceae and thus belong to the fern clade. The horsetails (Equisetaceae) are also members of the fern clade (sometimes inappropriately called monilophytes), but, within that clade, their placement is still uncertain. Leptosporangiate ferns are better understood, although deep relationships within this group are still unresolved. Earlier, almost all leptosporangiate ferns were placed in a single family (Polypodiaceae or Dennstaedtiaceae), but these families have been redefined to narrower more natural entities.nnnCONCLUSIONSnConcluding this paper, a classification is presented based on our current understanding of relationships of fern and lycopod clades. Major changes in our understanding of these families are highlighted, illustrating issues of classification in relation to convergent evolution and false homologies. Problems with the current classification and groups that still need study are pointed out. A summary phylogenetic tree is also presented. A new classification in which Aspleniaceae, Cyatheaceae, Polypodiaceae and Schizaeaceae are expanded in comparison with the most recent classifications is presented, which is a modification of those proposed by Smith et al. (2006, 2008) and Christenhusz et al. (2011). These classifications are now finding a wider acceptance and use, and even though a few amendments are made based on recently published results from molecular analyses, we have aimed for a stable family and generic classification of ferns.
New Phytologist | 2016
James W. Clark; Oriane Hidalgo; Jaume Pellicer; Hong-Mei Liu; Jeannine Marquardt; Yannis Robert; Maarten J. M. Christenhusz; Shouzhou Zhang; Mary Gibby; Ilia J. Leitch; Harald Schneider
The genome evolution of ferns has been considered to be relatively static compared with angiosperms. In this study, we analyse genome size data and chromosome numbers in a phylogenetic framework to explore three hypotheses: the correlation of genome size and chromosome number, the origin of modern ferns from ancestors with high chromosome numbers, and the occurrence of several whole-genome duplications during the evolution of ferns. To achieve this, we generated new genome size data, increasing the percentage of fern species with genome sizes estimated to 2.8% of extant diversity, and ensuring a comprehensive phylogenetic coverage including at least three species from each fern order. Genome size was correlated with chromosome number across all ferns despite some substantial variation in both traits. We observed a trend towards conservation of the amount of DNA per chromosome, although Osmundaceae and Psilotaceae have substantially larger chromosomes. Reconstruction of the ancestral genome traits suggested that the earliest ferns were already characterized by possessing high chromosome numbers and that the earliest divergences in ferns were correlated with substantial karyological changes. Evidence for repeated whole-genome duplications was found across the phylogeny. Fern genomes tend to evolve slowly, albeit genome rearrangements occur in some clades.
Phytotaxa | 2016
Maarten J. M. Christenhusz; James W. Byng
Phytotaxa | 2014
Maarten J. M. Christenhusz; Samuel F. Brockington; Pascal-Antoine Christin; Rowan F. Sage
Phytotaxa | 2014
Fa-Guo Wang; Sam Barratt; Wilfredo Falcón; Michael F. Fay; Samuli Lehtonen; Hanna Tuomisto; Fu-Wu Xing; Maarten J. M. Christenhusz
Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society | 2015
Maarten J. M. Christenhusz; Maria S. Vorontsova; Michael F. Fay; Mark W. Chase
Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society | 2015
Scott Zona; Maarten J. M. Christenhusz
Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society | 2016
Samuli Lehtonen; Maarten J. M. Christenhusz; Daniel Falck
Archive | 2016
Berhaman Ahmad; Claudia Baider; Benedetta Bernardini; Edward Biffin; Fabian Brambach; David F. R. P. Burslem; James W. Byng; Maarten J. M. Christenhusz; F. B. Vincent Florens; Eve Lucas; Avik Ray; Rajasri Ray; Erik Smets; Neil Snow; Joeri Sergej Strijk; Peter G. Wilson
Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society | 2017
Jaume Pellicer; Oriane Hidalgo; James Walker; Mark W. Chase; Maarten J. M. Christenhusz; Gorm Shackelford; Ilia J. Leitch; Michael F. Fay