Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Maartje Singendonk is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Maartje Singendonk.


Neurogastroenterology and Motility | 2014

Applying the Chicago Classification criteria of esophageal motility to a pediatric cohort: effects of patient age and size

Maartje Singendonk; Stamatiki Kritas; Charles Cock; Lara Ferris; Lisa McCall; Nathalie Rommel; M. P. van Wijk; Marc A. Benninga; David D. Moore; Taher Omari

Applying the 2012 Chicago Classification (CC) of esophageal motility disorders to pediatric patients is problematic as it relies upon adult‐derived criteria. As shorter esophageal length and smaller esophago‐gastric junction (EGJ) diameter may influence CC metrics, we explored the potential for age‐ and size‐adjustment of diagnostic criteria.


Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology | 2014

Upper gastrointestinal motility: prenatal development and problems in infancy

Maartje Singendonk; Nathalie Rommel; Taher Omari; Marc A. Benninga; Michiel P. van Wijk

Deglutition, or swallowing, refers to the process of propulsion of a food bolus from the mouth into the stomach and involves the highly coordinated interplay of swallowing and breathing. At 34 weeks gestational age most neonates are capable of successful oral feeding if born at this time; however, the maturation of respiration is still in progress at this stage. Infants can experience congenital and developmental pharyngeal and/or gastrointestinal motility disorders, which might manifest clinically as gastro-oesophageal reflux (GER) symptoms, feeding difficulties and/or refusal, choking episodes and airway changes secondary to micro or overt aspiration. These problems might lead to impaired nutritional intake and failure to thrive. These gastrointestinal motility disorders are mostly classified according to the phase of swallowing in which they occur, that is, the oral preparatory, oral, pharyngeal and oesophageal phases. GER is a common phenomenon in infancy and is referred to as GERD when it causes troublesome complications. GER is predominantly caused by transient relaxation of the lower oesophageal sphincter. In oesophageal atresia, oesophageal motility disorders develop in almost all patients after surgery; however, a congenital origin of disordered motility has also been proposed. This Review highlights the prenatal development of upper gastrointestinal motility and describes the most common motility disorders that occur in early infancy.


The Journal of Pediatrics | 2015

Pressure-flow characteristics of normal and disordered esophageal motor patterns.

Maartje Singendonk; Stamatiki Kritas; Charles Cock; Lara Ferris; Lisa McCall; Nathalie Rommel; Michiel P. van Wijk; Marc A. Benninga; David Moore; Taher Omari

OBJECTIVE To perform pressure-flow analysis (PFA) in a cohort of pediatric patients who were referred for diagnostic manometric investigation. STUDY DESIGN PFA was performed using purpose designed Matlab-based software. The pressure-flow index (PFI), a composite measure of bolus pressurization relative to flow and the impedance ratio, a measure of the extent of bolus clearance failure were calculated. RESULTS Tracings of 76 pediatric patients (32 males; 9.1 ± 0.7 years) and 25 healthy adult controls (7 males; 36.1 ± 2.2 years) were analyzed. Patients mostly had normal motility (50%) or a category 4 disorder and usually weak peristalsis (31.5%) according to the Chicago Classification. PFA of healthy controls defined reference ranges for PFI ≤142 and impedance ratio ≤0.49. Pediatric patients with pressure-flow (PF) characteristics within these limits had normal motility (62%), most patients with PF characteristics outside these limits also had an abnormal Chicago Classification (61%). Patients with high PFI and disordered motor patterns all had esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. CONCLUSIONS Disordered PF characteristics are associated with disordered esophageal motor patterns. By defining the degree of over-pressurization and/or extent of clearance failure, PFA may be a useful adjunct to esophageal pressure topography-based classification.


Neurogastroenterology and Motility | 2014

Inter- and intrarater reliability of the Chicago Classification in pediatric high-resolution esophageal manometry recordings

Maartje Singendonk; Marije J. Smits; Ilja Heijting; Michiel P. van Wijk; Samuel Nurko; Rachel Rosen; Pim W. Weijenborg; Rammy Abu-Assi; Daniël R. Hoekman; Grace Seiboth; Marc A. Benninga; Taher Omari; Stamatiki Kritas

The Chicago Classification (CC) facilitates interpretation of high‐resolution manometry (HRM) recordings. Application of this adult based algorithm to the pediatric population is unknown. We therefore assessed intra and interrater reliability of software‐based CC diagnosis in a pediatric cohort.


Neurogastroenterology and Motility | 2017

Objectively diagnosing rumination syndrome in children using esophageal pH-impedance and manometry

Maartje Singendonk; Jac Oors; A. J. Bredenoord; Taher Omari; R. J. van der Pol; Marije J. Smits; Marc A. Benninga; M. P. van Wijk

Rumination syndrome is characterized by recurrent regurgitation of recently ingested food into the mouth. Differentiation with other diagnoses and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in particular, is difficult. Recently, objective pH‐impedance (pH‐MII) and manometry criteria were proposed for adults. The aim of this study was to determine diagnostic ambulatory pH‐MII and manometry criteria for rumination syndrome in children.


Neurogastroenterology and Motility | 2018

Physiological augmentation of esophageal distension pressure and peristalsis during conditions of increased esophageal emptying resistance

G. J. Brink; Wei-Yi Lei; Taher Omari; Maartje Singendonk; Jui-Sheng Hung; T. T. Liu; Chih-Hsun Yi; C. L. Chen

Abdominal compression has been implemented as a provocative maneuver in high‐resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) to “challenge” normal esophageal physiology with the aim of revealing abnormal motor patterns which may explain symptoms. In this study, we measured the effects of abdominal compression on esophageal functioning utilizing novel pressure‐impedance parameters and attempted to identify differences between healthy controls and globus patients.


Neurogastroenterology and Motility | 2017

Intra- and interrater reliability of the Chicago Classification of achalasia subtypes in pediatric high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) recordings

Maartje Singendonk; Rachel Rosen; J. Oors; Nathalie Rommel; M. P. van Wijk; Marc A. Benninga; Samuel Nurko; Taher Omari

Subtyping achalasia by high‐resolution manometry (HRM) is clinically relevant as response to therapy and prognosis have shown to vary accordingly. The aim of this study was to assess inter‐ and intrarater reliability of diagnosing achalasia and achalasia subtyping in children using the Chicago Classification (CC) V3.0.


Neurogastroenterology and Motility | 2016

Reflux monitoring in children

Maartje Singendonk; Marc A. Benninga; M. P. van Wijk

Recently, multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) monitoring was added to the repertoire of tests to evaluate the (patho)physiology of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in children. Its advantage above the sole monitoring of the esophageal pH lies in the ability of the detection of both acid and nonacid GER and to discern between liquid and gas GER. Currently, combined 24 h pH‐MII monitoring is recommended for evaluation of gastro‐esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and its relation to symptoms in infants and children, despite the lack of reference values in these age groups. There is new evidence in the current issue of this Journal supporting the role of pH‐MII monitoring for the evaluation of children presenting with gastrointestinal symptoms suggestive of GERD and the prediction of the presence of reflux esophagitis. However, several issues should be taken into account when performing pH‐MII clinically.


Pediatrics | 2017

Variations in Definitions and Outcome Measures in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review

Maartje Singendonk; Anna J. Brink; Nina Steutel; Faridi S. van Etten-Jamaludin; Michiel P. van Wijk; Marc A. Benninga; Merit M. Tabbers

Through systematic review, this study provides an overview of the definitions and outcome measures used in randomized controlled trials in pediatric GERD. CONTEXT: Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is defined as GER disease (GERD) when it leads to troublesome symptoms and/or complications. We hypothesized that definitions and outcome measures in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on pediatric GERD would be heterogeneous. OBJECTIVES: Systematically assess definitions and outcome measures in RCTs in this population. DATA SOURCES: Data were obtained through Cochrane, Embase, Medline, and Pubmed databases. STUDY SELECTION: We selected English-written therapeutic RCTs concerning GERD in children 0 to 18 years old. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were tabulated and presented descriptively. Each individual parameter or set of parameters with unique criteria for interpretation was considered a single definition for GER(D). Quality was assessed by using the Delphi score. RESULTS: A total of 2410 unique articles were found; 46 articles were included. Twenty-six (57%) studies defined GER by using 25 different definitions and investigated 25 different interventions. GERD was defined in 21 (46%) studies, all using a unique definition and investigating a total of 23 interventions. Respectively 87 and 61 different primary outcome measures were reported by the studies in GER and GERD. Eight (17%) studies did not report on side effects. Of the remaining 38 (83%) studies that did report on side effects, 18 (47%) included this as predefined outcome measure of which 4 (22%) as a primary outcome measure. Sixteen studies (35%) were of good methodological quality. LIMITATIONS: Only English-written studies were included. CONCLUSIONS: Inconsistency and heterogeneity exist in definitions and outcome measures used in RCTs on pediatric GER and GERD; therefore, we recommend the development of a core outcome set.


Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition | 2018

Novel pressure-impedance parameters for evaluating esophageal function in pediatric achalasia

Maartje Singendonk; Taher Omari; Nathalie Rommel; Michiel P. van Wijk; Marc A. Benninga; Rachel Rosen; Samuel Nurko

Objective: In achalasia, absent peristalsis and reduced esophagogastric junction (EGJ) relaxation and compliance underlie dysphagia symptoms. Novel high-resolution impedance manometry variables, that is, bolus presence time (BPT) and trans-EGJ-bolus flow time (BFT) have been developed to estimate the duration of EGJ opening and trans-EGJ bolus flow. The aim of this study was to evaluate esophageal motor function and bolus flow in children diagnosed with achalasia using these variables. Methods: High-resolution impedance manometry recordings from 20 children who fulfilled the Chicago Classification (V3) criteria for achalasia were compared with recordings of 15 children with normal esophageal high-resolution manometry findings and no other evidence suggestive of achalasia. Matlab-based analysis software was used to calculate BPT and BFT. Results: Both BPT and BFT were significantly reduced in achalasia patients compared with children with normal esophageal motility (BPT 3.3 s vs 5.1 s P < 0.01; BFT 1.4 s vs 4.3 s P < 0.001). BFT was significantly lower than BPT (achalasia difference 1.9 s ± 1.3 s, P = 0.001 and normal difference 0.9 ± 0.3 s, P = 0.001). Overall, there was a significant correlation between BPT and BFT (r = 0.825, P < 0.001). We observed a 2-way differentiation of achalasia patients; those in whom the BPT and BFT were proportional, but significantly lower than in patients with normal peristalsis, and those in whom BFT was disproportionately lower than BPT. Conclusions: Calculation of BPT and BFT may help determine whether esophageal bolus transport to the EGJ and/or esophageal emptying through the EGJ are aberrant. For achalasia, this may detect flow resistance at the EGJ, potentially improving both diagnosis and objective assessment of therapeutic effects.

Collaboration


Dive into the Maartje Singendonk's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marc A. Benninga

Boston Children's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Taher Omari

University of Adelaide

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nathalie Rommel

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stamatiki Kritas

Boston Children's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Merit M. Tabbers

Boston Children's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rachel Rosen

Boston Children's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Samuel Nurko

Boston Children's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge