Maciej Lesiak

Contemporary practice and technical aspects in coronary intervention with bioresorbable scaffolds: a European perspective

AIMS Next to patient characteristics, the lack of a standardised approach for bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation is perceived as a potential explanation for the heterogeneous results reported so far. To provide some guidance, we sought to find a consensus on the best practices for BVS implantation and management across a broad array of patient and lesion scenarios. METHODS AND RESULTS Fourteen European centres with a high volume of BVS procedures combined their efforts in an informal collaboration. To get the most objective snapshot of different practices among the participating centres, a survey with 45 multiple choice questions was prepared and conducted. The results of the survey represented a basis for the technical advice provided in the document, whereas areas of controversy are highlighted. CONCLUSIONS Consensus criteria for patient and lesion selection, BVS implantation and optimisation, use of intravascular imaging guidance, approach to multiple patient and lesion scenarios, and management of complications, were identified.

Influence of bone marrow stem cells on left ventricle perfusion and ejection fraction in patients with acute myocardial infarction of anterior wall: randomized clinical trial: Impact of bone marrow stem cell intracoronary infusion on improvement of microcirculation.

AIMS Randomized trial to assess change in left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) and myocardial perfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) of anterior wall treated with bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs), compared with control group-from baseline in the acute phase up to 12 months of follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS Forty-five patients were randomized 2:1 to BMSC group (n= 31) or to control group (n = 14). Bone marrow stem cells were administered into infarct-related artery (IRA) at 4-6 day after primary PCI. Groups were followed up with Tc-99m-MIBI SPECT, radionuclide ventriculography (EF-RNV), echocardiography (ECHO), and spiroergometric stress test. Coronary angiography was repeated after 6 months. EF-RNV did not differ significantly in both groups, but trend towards increase in EF at 6 months and its maintenance after 12 months was noticed in the BMSC group. At rest study, perfusion index (PI) of region supplied with blood by IRA distal to its previous occlusion (PI-IRA) improved significantly in the BMSC group at 6 months: PI-IRA at 4-6 days vs. PI-IRA at 6 months (3.00 +/- 0.97 vs. 2.65 +/- 0.64; P = 0.017). At 12 months, PI-IRA at rest was 2.66 +/- 0.55; P = 0.07. The difference between BMSC and control groups at rest study in PI-IRA was not observed. At dipyridamole study (PI-dip), perfusion in the BMSC group was better compared with controls at 6 months (2.26 +/- 0.44 vs. 2.47 +/- 0.40; P = 0.033) and at 12 months (2.34 +/- 0.55 vs. 2.52 +/- 0.42; P = 0.014), also for region supplied with blood by IRA (PI-IRA-dip; at 6 months 2.63 +/- 0.77 vs. 3.06 +/- 0.46; P = 0.021 and at 12 months 2.71 +/- 0.63 vs. 3.15 +/- 0.51; P = 0.001). Results of LVEF, LVEDV, LVESV in ECHO and results of spiroergometric stress test did not differ significantly between groups. Major adverse cardiac events occurred more often in the control group (P = 0.027). CONCLUSION In our study, BMSC intracoronary transplantation in patients with anterior AMI did not result in increase in EF. Slight improvement of myocardial perfusion was noticed in the BMSC group. This finding may indicate better microcirculation enhanced by BMSCs, but small number of patients allow for hypothesis rather than final statement.

A randomized trial of a dedicated bifurcation stent versus provisional stenting in the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions

BACKGROUND Bifurcation lesions are frequent among patients with symptomatic coronary disease treated by percutaneous coronary intervention. Current evidence recommends a conservative (provisional) approach when treating the side branch (SB). OBJECTIVES The TRYTON (Prospective, Single Blind, Randomized Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety & Effectiveness of the Tryton Side Branch Stent Used With DES in Treatment of de Novo Bifurcation Lesions in the Main Branch & Side Branch in Native Coronaries) bifurcation trial sought to compare treatment of de novo true bifurcation lesions using a dedicated bifurcation stent or SB balloon angioplasty. METHODS We randomly assigned patients with true bifurcation lesions to a main vessel stent plus provisional stenting or the bifurcation stent. The primary endpoint (powered for noninferiority) was target vessel failure (TVF) (cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization). The secondary angiographic endpoint (powered for superiority) was in-segment percent diameter stenosis of the SB at 9 months. RESULTS We randomized 704 patients with bifurcation coronary lesions at 58 centers (30 from Europe and 28 from the United States). At 9 months, TVF was 17.4% in the bifurcation stent group compared with 12.8% in the provisional group (p=0.11), mainly because of a higher periprocedural myocardial infarction rate (13.6% vs. 10.1%, p=0.19). The TVF difference of +4.6% (2-sided 95% confidence interval: -1.0 to 10.3; upper limit of the 1-sided 95% confidence interval: 10.3) was not within the pre-specified noninferiority margin of 5.5% (p=0.42 for noninferiority). The SB in-segment diameter stenosis among the angiographic cohort was lower in the bifurcation stent group compared with the provisional group (31.6% vs. 38.6%, p=0.002 for superiority), with no difference in binary restenosis rates (diameter stenosis≥50%) at 9 months follow-up (22.6% vs. 26.8%, p=0.44). CONCLUSIONS Provisional stenting should remain the preferred strategy for treatment of non-left main true coronary bifurcation lesions. (Prospective, Single Blind, Randomized Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety & Effectiveness of the Tryton Side Branch Stent Used With DES in Treatment of de Novo Bifurcation Lesions in the Main Branch & Side Branch in Native Coronaries [TRYTON]; NCT01258972).

Predilation, sizing and post-dilation scoring in patients undergoing everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold implantation for prediction of cardiac adverse events: development and internal validation of the PSP score

AIMS The aim of the study was to develop a scoring model to evaluate the quality of bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation and determine the models usefulness in predicting adverse cardiac events. METHODS AND RESULTS The implantation technique and clinical outcomes of 1,736 lesions treated with BVS were analysed using the GHOST-EU registry. Predilation, scaffold sizing, and post-dilation (PSP) were scored according to the hazard model derived from the weight of these variables. The primary endpoint was a one-year device-oriented composite endpoint (DoCE) composed of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target lesion revascularisation. Definite/probable scaffold thrombosis was also evaluated as defined by the Academic Research Consortium. The PSP model performance was evaluated by internal validation. Predilation, correct scaffold sizing, and post-dilation with a non-compliant balloon were performed in 95.7%, 50.2%, and 26.2% of the cases and scored 0.63, 1.96 and 1.93 points, respectively, in the PSP-1 model. PSP-1 was an independent predictor of one-year DoCE (HR 0.75, 95% CI: 0.61-0.93; p=0.007), but with poor calibration and discrimination (AUC 0.611, 95% CI: 0.545-0.677). No patient with a maximum PSP-1 score had scaffold thrombosis, compared to those with a non-maximum PSP-1 score (0% vs. 2.3%; p=0.095). CONCLUSIONS At one-year follow-up, the PSP-1 score was an independent predictor of DoCE. External validation and prospective studies are needed to determine the clinical usefulness of this score.

Clinical outcomes of state-of-the-art percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with de novo three vessel disease: 1-year results of the SYNTAX II study.

Abstract Aims To investigate if recent technical and procedural developments in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) significantly influence outcomes in appropriately selected patients with three-vessel (3VD) coronary artery disease. Methods and results The SYNTAX II study is a multicenter, all-comers, open-label, single arm study that investigated the impact of a contemporary PCI strategy on clinical outcomes in patients with 3VD in 22 centres from four European countries. The SYNTAX-II strategy includes: heart team decision-making utilizing the SYNTAX Score II (a clinical tool combining anatomical and clinical factors), coronary physiology guided revascularisation, implantation of thin strut bioresorbable-polymer drug-eluting stents, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guided stent implantation, contemporary chronic total occlusion revascularisation techniques and guideline-directed medical therapy. The rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE [composite of all-cause death, cerebrovascular event, any myocardial infarction and any revascularisation]) at one year was compared to a predefined PCI cohort from the original SYNTAX-I trial selected on the basis of equipoise 4-year mortality between CABG and PCI. As an exploratory endpoint, comparisons were made with the historical CABG cohort of the original SYNTAX-I trial. Overall 708 patients were screened and discussed within the heart team; 454 patients were deemed appropriate to undergo PCI. At one year, the SYNTAX-II strategy was superior to the equipoise-derived SYNTAX-I PCI cohort (MACCE SYNTAX-II 10.6% vs. SYNTAX-I 17.4%; HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.39–0.85, P = 0.006). This difference was driven by a significant reduction in the incidence of MI (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.11–0.70, P = 0.007) and revascularisation (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.37–0.9, P = 0.015). Rates of all-cause death (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.27–1.73, P = 0.43) and stroke (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.10–4.89, P = 0.71) were similar. The rate of definite stent thrombosis was significantly lower in SYNTAX-II (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.07–0.97, P = 0.045). Conclusion At one year, clinical outcomes with the SYNTAX-II strategy were associated with improved clinical results compared to the PCI performed in comparable patients from the original SYNTAX-I trial. Longer term follow-up is awaited and a randomized clinical trial with contemporary CABG is warranted. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02015832

New Method of Intracoronary Adenosine Injection to Prevent Microvascular Reperfusion Injury in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

The aim of our study was to examine the role of a new, simple protocol of intracoronary adenosine administration performed during primary angioplasty on the immediate angiographic results and clinical course. A prospective, single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 70 consecutive patients (64 ± 14 years, 54 men) with acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was conducted. Patients were randomized to 2 groups. Group 1 (n = 35) received intracoronary adenosine (1 to 2 mg) with a hand injection through the guiding catheter 2 times: immediately after crossing the lesion of the infarct-related artery with guidewire and then after the first balloon inflation. Group 2 (n = 35) received placebo. The baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics of the 2 groups were similar. Percutaneous coronary intervention resulted in Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow after PCI in 32 patients (91.4%) in the adenosine group and 27 patients (77.1%) in the placebo group (p = 0.059). Myocardial blush grade 3 was observed at the end of PCI in 23 patients (65.7%) in the adenosine group and 13 (37.1%) in the placebo group (p < 0.05). Resolution of ST-segment elevation (> 50%) was more frequently observed in the adenosine than in the placebo group: 27 (77%) versus 15 (43%), respectively (p < 0.01). In conclusion, intracoronary adenosine administration improved the angiographic and electrocardiographic results in patients with acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation undergoing PCI. Adenosine administration seemed to be associated with a more favorable clinical course.

Six-month clinical follow-up of the Tryton side branch stent for the treatment of bifurcation lesions: A two center registry analysis

Background: Treatment of bifurcation lesions with the Tryton Sidebranch stent has been shown to be feasible with an acceptable clinical outcome and low side branch late loss in the first in man trial. Objective: To report acute procedural and six month clinical follow‐up after the use of the Tryton Sidebranch stent in an “all comer” registry. Methods: The first 100 coronary bifurcation lesions assigned for treatment with the Tryton stent were included in a prospective registry. Procedural and angiographic success rates were determined from patient charts and pre‐ and postprocedural quantitative coronary angiography. Results: Totally, 96 patients with 100 lesions were included in the study. Seventy‐two percent presented with stable angina, 25% with unstable angina/NSTEMI, and 3% STEMI. The bifurcation was located in the left main in 8%. Two lesions were chronic total occlusions. Sixty‐nine percent were true bifurcation lesions. One failure of stent delivery occurred. Acute gain in SB was 0.76 ± 0.64mm and three patients had residual stenosis of >30%. Angiographic success rate was 95%; procedural success rate reached 94%. Peri‐procedural MI occurred in two and there was one cardiac death during hospitalization. At a median six months follow‐up, TLR rate was 4%, MI 3%, and cardiac death 1%. The percentage MACE‐free survival at six months was 94%. No cases of definite stent thrombosis occurred. Conclusions: In a real world the use of the Tryton Sidebranch stent is associated with good procedural safety and angiographic success rate and acceptable outcome at six months of follow‐up.

Twelve-month results of a Paclitaxel Releasing Balloon in Patients Presenting with In-stent Restenosis First-in-Man (PEPPER) trial

BACKGROUND Coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) continues to be a therapeutic challenge especially after drug eluting stent (DES) implantation. We studied patients with ISR to investigate safety and efficacy of a novel drug coated balloon (DCB) incorporating paclitaxel into a microcrystalline structure by applying the inert excipient butyryltri-n-hexyl citrate (BTHC) in a prospective First-in-Man trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS Eighty-one patients were enrolled at 9 European sites, thereof 43 (53.1%) presenting with bare metal stent (BMS)-ISR and 38 (46.9%) with DES-ISR. The primary study endpoint was in-stent late lumen loss (LLL) independently assessed by a quantitative coronary angiography laboratory at 6 months. A secondary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, clinically driven target vessel revascularization after 6 and 12 months. RESULTS At 6 months, overall LLL was 0.07±0.31 mm showing differences in BMS-ISR and DES-ISR treatment (-0.05±0.28 mm vs. 0.19±0.29 mm, respectively, P=.001). Overall MACE rates at 6 and 12 months were 6.5% and 11.8%. At the 12-month follow-up, one myocardial infarction, and no cardiac death nor stent thrombosis had occurred. CONCLUSION Application of a novel paclitaxel coated balloon using BTHC as an excipient in patients with ISR is safe and results in very low LLL, revascularization- and MACE-rates at follow-up. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00961181).

Six-month and one-year clinical outcomes after placement of a dedicated coronary bifurcation stent: A patient-level pooled analysis of eight registry studies

AIMS Smaller studies have previously shown promising results after Tryton Side Branch Stent™ (Tryton Medical, Durham, NC, USA) placement. However, these previous studies were limited by their small sample size and relatively short follow-up. We performed a patient-level pooled analysis to evaluate six-month and one year clinical outcomes of more than 900 patients who were enrolled in eight registries with the Tryton stent. METHODS AND RESULTS Data from eight Tryton registries, including 905 patients with 929 bifurcation lesions, were pooled on a patient level to form one dataset. The primary outcome was six-month target vessel failure (TVF), defined as the composite of cardiac death, any myocardial infarction, and clinically indicated target vessel revascularisation. Procedural success was defined as successful stent placement and no in-hospital major adverse cardiac events. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine independent predictors for one-year TVF. Follow-up data were available in 97%. Procedural success was 95% and TVF rate was 6.5% at six months and 8.5% at one year. Stent thrombosis occurred in 0.5% of patients. Left main coronary artery bifurcation lesion (HR 6.46) and main branch reference vessel diameter <3.0 mm (HR 2.62) were independent predictors for TVF. CONCLUSIONS In the real world setting of registries including more than 900 patients, the use of the Tryton stent is associated with procedural and mid-term clinical results that compare very favourably with historical studies. The primary endpoint of TVF was primarily determined by reference vessel diameter of the main branch and left main bifurcation lesion location.

Early and midterm outcomes of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for ostial coronary lesions: Insights from the GHOST-EU registry

AIMS We aimed to investigate the outcomes of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) in coronary ostial lesions. Ostial lesions represent a challenging angiographic subset, with higher event rates compared with non-ostial lesions. BVS might be associated with advantages over the long term, but their safety in this setting remains to be explored. METHODS AND RESULTS Procedural and 12-month follow-up data from consecutive patients treated with BVS for lesions located at the ostium of the right (RCA), left anterior (LAD) or circumflex (LCX) coronary in 11 European centres were collected. The primary device-oriented endpoint was defined as a combination of cardiovascular death, target vessel myocardial infarction or target lesion revascularisation. The database included a total of 1,549 lesions in 1,304 patients with a mean age of 62±11years. There were 90 ostial lesions (5.8%) in 84 patients (6.4%) located at the ostial RCA (14; 16%), LCX (29; 32%), or LAD (47; 52%). Patients presenting with ostial lesions did not differ from the remaining cohort except for a higher incidence of prior revascularisation. Predilation was performed in 97% of the lesions (vs. 96% in non-ostial, p=0.618), post-dilation in 43% (versus 58% in the non-ostial group, p=0.008). At quantitative coronary angiography, treatment of ostial lesions was associated with higher residual stenosis (30% [23-41] vs. 26% [20-37], p=0.035), but no difference in minimum lumen diameter existed (p=0.447). Follow-up data were available at 385 [362-465] days. The 12-month Kaplan-Meier estimated rates of scaffold thrombosis were 4.9% and 2.0% (ostial and non-ostial lesion groups, respectively, log-rank p=0.005). The device-oriented composite endpoint occurred, respectively, in 12.6% and 4.6% at 12 months (log-rank p=0.001). Treatment of ostial lesions was an independent predictor of this endpoint (p=0.0025, HR 2.65 [1.41-4.97]). CONCLUSIONS In combination with a suboptimal implantation technique, treatment of coronary ostial lesions was an independent predictor of clinical events in a cohort of patients treated with BVS.