Madeleine Kieny
Centre national de la recherche scientifique
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Madeleine Kieny.
Developmental Biology | 1981
Stuart A. Newman; Marie-Paule Pautou; Madeleine Kieny
Using chimeras consisting of chick embryos that had received substitution grafts of quail somites, we have determined the distalmost extension of the myogenic primordia in the outgrowing wing bud at 5 days of incubation. At Hamburger-Hamilton stage 25 the most distal premuscle cell is consistently 300 mum or more from the apex of the wing mesoblast. The stage 25 wing tip resembles very early whole limb buds in not having proceeded beyond the mesenchymal state or having expressed markers of terminal differentiation. However, unlike early whole limb buds it is free of a myogenic subpopulation. We therefore propose that the stage 25 wing tip is the appropriate system for in vitro and molecular studies of cartilage differentiation.
Development Genes and Evolution | 1982
Alain Chevallier; Madeleine Kieny
SummaryBy modifying the temporal relationship between connective tissue and myogenic cell invasion during early limb bud development new evidence of the organizing role of the connective tissue was obtained.Muscle cell-deprived wing buds were allowed to grow up to stages 22 to 27 of Hamburger and Hamilton, when they received a transplant of quail myogenic cells (somitic mesoderm or wing premuscular mass) into the dorsal face of their presumptive upper arm. Muscular arrangement in forearm and hand was analyzed 4 days later. In 8 out of 14 of those cases which had received a graft of premuscular mass before stage 25 of Hamburger and Hamilton, muscle development took place distally to the graft-site in accordance with the wing segment.
Development Genes and Evolution | 1980
Annick Mauger; Madeleine Kieny
SummaryThe migratory and organogenetic capacities of muscle cells at different stages of differentiation were tested in heterospecific chick/quail recombinants. Grafts containing muscle cells were taken from the premuscular masses from 4- to 5-day quail embryos, from the limb or trunk muscles of 12-day embryonic and 4-day post-natal quails, and from experimentally produced bispecific premuscular masses in which the myoblasts are of quail origin and the connective tissue cells of chick origin. Grafts were implanted into 2-day chick embryos in place of the somitic mesoderm at the limb level. Hosts were examined 4 to 7 days after operation.After implantation of a piece of premuscular mass, quail cells were found at and around the site of the graft in the truncal region and within the limb as far as the autopod. Quail cells participated predominantly in the trunk and limb musculature, which contained a number of quail myotubes and of bispecific quail/chick myotubes. Apart from skeletal muscles, quail cells contributed sporadically to nerve envelopes and blood vessel walls in the limb.When the graft was of bispecific constitution, quail nuclei in the limb and the trunk were found exclusively in monospecific and bispecific myotubes.After implantation of differentiated embryonic or post-natal muscle tissue, quail cells in the limb contributed only sporadically to nerve envelopes and blood vessel walls, while in the trunk they also participated in the formation of muscles and tendons.It is concluded that the myogenic cells in 4 to 5-day quail premuscular masses are still able to undergo an extensive migration into the limb buds and there participate in the formation of myotubes and anatomically normal muscles. They display developmental potentialities equivalent to those of the somitic myogenic stem cells. These capacities are lost in 12-day embryonic muscles.
Development Genes and Evolution | 1977
Madeleine Kieny; Marie-Paule Pautou
SummaryDeficient limb buds composed of prospective stylopod and autopod are able to regulate the missing intercalary zeugopod, the origin of which was investigated by heterospecific quail/chick recombinants. The associations of quail prospective autopod and chick prospective stylopod failed to regulate. The reverse combination of chick prospective autopod grafted onto a quail prospective stylopod gave rise to a three-segmented limb. In 13 out of 16 cases the regulated zeugopod was made up of both chick and quail cells. Chick cells were located predominantly along the postaxial half of the zeugopod, while the quail cells made up most of its preaxial half. In two cases, the intercalary zeugopod consisted exclusively of chick cells originating from the tip and in one case of quail cells originating from the base.These results demonstrate that during the regulative processes, the prospective values of some of the original stylopodial and autopodial cells have been shifted along the proximo-distal axis, towards the expression of more distal as well as of more proximal structures.Heteropolar stylo-autopodial or zeugo-autopodial recombinants, in which the proximo-distal axis of the base was reversed with respect to that of the tip, were unable to regulate the pattern defects and thus revealed the importance of concordant p-d polarity for regulative processes to take place between abutted tissues.
Development Genes and Evolution | 1976
Madeleine Kieny; Marie-Paule Pautou
SummaryIn order to support the demonstration of the regulative capacity of the chick limb bud, already stressed by one of us (Kieny, 1964, 1967), heterospecific combinations were made between chick and quail tissues, the cells of the latter bearing a distinctive nuclear marker. A Japanese quail whole limb bud (stage-18 to 21 of H. H., wing or leg) was grafted distally onto the prospective zeugopod of a chick (stage-22) wing bud sectioned at the prospective wrist level. Thus, from a heterospecific surplus recombinant containing five prospective limb segments (stylopod and zeugopod from the chick host; stylopod, zeugopod and autopod from the quail graft), it was possible to obtain a normally shaped appendage that comprised either upper arm, lower arm and hand in the case of a wing bud graft, or heteromorphic upper arm, lower leg and foot in the case of a hind-limb bud graft. In these cases, regulation for excess appeared to take place mainly within the host tissues. The three proximal segments of the recombinant, namely the chick stylopod and zeugopod of the hosts stump and the quail stylopod of the graft, became reorganized and gave rise to a single stylopodial segment, which usually contained a double stylopodial bone element, one of chick, the other of quail origin.The absence of development of the squeezed prospective zeugopod can be interpreted as follows: owing to an interaction with the stylopodial graft tissues, the zeugopodial cells of the juxtaposed stump boundary have shifted proximally their originally more distal positional values, so that they changed their prospective pattern of differentiation to that of stylopod. These reset zeugopodial cells combine with the stylopodial cells of host and graft and form a huge composite stylopod, in which, due to an asynchronous determination in the two species, chick and quail tissues do not cooperate fully for the development of a single bone.In order to support the demonstration of the regulative capacity of the chick limb bud, already stressed by one of us (Kieny, 1964, 1967), heterospecific combinations were made between chick and quail tissues, the cells of the latter bearing a distinctive nuclear marker. A Japanese quail whole limb bud (stage-18 to 21 of H. H., wing or leg) was grafted distally onto the prospective zeugopod of a chick (stage-22) wing bud sectioned at the prospective wrist level. Thus, from a heterospecific surplus recombinant containing five prospective limb segments (stylopod and zeugopod from the chick host; stylopod, zeugopod and autopod from the quail graft), it was possible to obtain a normally shaped appendage that comprised either upper arm, lower arm and hand in the case of a wing bud graft, or heteromorphic upper arm, lower leg and foot in the case of a hind-limb bud graft. In these cases, regulation for excess appeared to take place mainly within the host tissues. The three proximal segments of the recombinant, namely the chick stylopod and zeugopod of the hosts stump and the quail stylopod of the graft, became reorganized and gave rise to a single stylopodial segment, which usually contained a double stylopodial bone element, one of chick, the other of quail origin.The absence of development of the squeezed prospective zeugopod can be interpreted as follows: owing to an interaction with the stylopodial graft tissues, the zeugopodial cells of the juxtaposed stump boundary have shifted proximally their originally more distal positional values, so that they changed their prospective pattern of differentiation to that of stylopod. These reset zeugopodial cells combine with the stylopodial cells of host and graft and form a huge composite stylopod, in which, due to an asynchronous determination in the two species, chick and quail tissues do not cooperate fully for the development of a single bone.
Development | 1977
Alain Chevallier; Madeleine Kieny; Annick Mauger
Development | 1981
Julian Lewis; Alain Chevallier; Madeleine Kieny; Lewis Wolpert
Development | 1979
Madeleine Kieny; Alain Chevallier
Development | 1978
Alain Chevallier; Madeleine Kieny; Annick Mauger
Journal of Experimental Zoology | 1984
Madeleine Kieny; Annick Mauger