Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Madhukar Rai is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Madhukar Rai.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2010

Single-Dose Liposomal Amphotericin B for Visceral Leishmaniasis in India

Shyam Sundar; Jaya Chakravarty; Dipti Agarwal; Madhukar Rai; Henry W. Murray

BACKGROUND Some 50% of patients with visceral leishmaniasis (kala-azar) worldwide live in the Indian state of Bihar. Liposomal amphotericin B is an effective treatment when administered in short courses. We wanted to determine whether the efficacy of a single infusion of liposomal amphotericin B was inferior to conventional parenteral therapy, consisting of 15 alternate-day infusions of amphotericin B deoxycholate. METHODS In this open-label study, we randomly assigned 412 patients in a 3:1 ratio to receive either liposomal amphotericin B (liposomal-therapy group) or amphotericin B deoxycholate (conventional-therapy group). Liposomal amphotericin B (at a dose of 10 mg per kilogram of body weight) was given once, and patients were discharged home 24 hours later. Amphotericin B deoxycholate, which was administered in 15 infusions of 1 mg per kilogram, was given every other day during a 29-day hospitalization. We determined the cure rate 6 months after treatment. RESULTS A total of 410 patients--304 of 304 patients (100%) in the liposomal-therapy group and 106 of 108 patients (98%) in the conventional-therapy group--had apparent cure responses at day 30. Cure rates at 6 months were similar in the two groups: 95.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93.4 to 97.9) in the liposomal-therapy group and 96.3% (95% CI, 92.6 to 99.9) in the conventional-therapy group. Adverse events in the liposomal-therapy group were infusion-related fever or rigors (in 40%) and increased anemia or thrombocytopenia (in 2%); such events in the conventional-therapy group were fever or rigors (in 64%), increased anemia (in 19%), and hypokalemia (in 2%). Nephrotoxicity or hepatotoxicity developed in no more than 1% of patients in each group. CONCLUSIONS A single infusion of liposomal amphotericin B was not inferior to and was less expensive than conventional therapy with amphotericin B deoxycholate. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00628719.)


The Lancet | 2011

Comparison of short-course multidrug treatment with standard therapy for visceral leishmaniasis in India: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial

Shyam Sundar; Prabhat Kumar Sinha; Madhukar Rai; Deepak Verma; Kumar Nawin; Shanawwaj Alam; Jaya Chakravarty; Michel Vaillant; Neena Verma; Krishna Pandey; Poonam Kumari; Chandra Shekhar Lal; Rakesh Arora; Bhawna Sharma; Sally Ellis; Nathalie Strub-Wourgaft; Manica Balasegaram; Piero Olliaro; Pradeep Das; Farrokh Modabber

BACKGROUND Improved treatment approaches are needed for visceral leishmaniasis. We assessed the efficacy and safety of three potential short-course combination treatments compared with the standard monotherapy in India. METHODS Standard treatment (1 mg/kg amphotericin B infusion on alternate days for 30 days, total dose 15 mg/kg) was compared with three drug combinations (single injection of 5 mg/kg liposomal amphotericin B and 7-day 50 mg oral miltefosine or single 10-day 11 mg/kg intramuscular paromomycin; or 10 days each of miltefosine and paromomycin) in an open-label, parallel-group, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial in two hospital sites in Bihar, India. Patients aged 5-60 years with parasitologically confirmed visceral leishmaniasis were randomly assigned one of the four treatments by the trial statistician by use of a computer-generated list. Clinical assessments were done at the end of treatment (15 days on combination treatment; 31 days for standard treatment) and after 45 days and 6 months. The primary endpoint was definitive cure (defined as no sign or symptom of visceral leishmaniasis and parasitologically cured to the last follow-up). Analyses were done both by intention to treat and per protocol. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00696969. FINDINGS Between June, 2008, and July, 2009, 634 patients were assigned amphotericin B (n=157), liposomal amphotericin B with miltefosine (n=160) or paromomycin (n=158), or miltefosine and paromomycin (n=159). 618 patients were in the per-protocol population. There were two relapses in each group. The numbers with definitive cure at 6 months for the intention-to-treat population were 146 (cure rate 93·0%; CI 87·5-96·3) for amphotericin B, 156 (97·5%; 93·3-99·2) for liposomal amphotericin B and miltefosine, 154 (97·5%; 93·24-99·2) for liposomal amphotericin B and paromomycin, and 157 (98·7%; 95·1-99·8) for miltefosine and paromomycin. All combinations were non-inferior to the standard treatment, in both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. Patients in the combination groups had fewer adverse events than did those assigned standard treatment. INTERPRETATION Combination treatments for visceral leishmaniasis are efficacious and safe, and decrease the duration of therapy, thereby encouraging adherence and reducing emergence of drug-resistant parasites. FUNDING Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative and the Indian Council of Medical Research.


Clinical Infectious Diseases | 2012

Efficacy of Miltefosine in the Treatment of Visceral Leishmaniasis in India After a Decade of Use

Shyam Sundar; Anup Singh; Madhukar Rai; Vijay Kumar Prajapati; Avinash Singh; Bart Ostyn; Marleen Boelaert; Jean-Claude Dujardin; Jaya Chakravarty

BACKGROUND Miltefosine is the only oral drug available for treatment of Indian visceral leishmaniasis (VL), which was shown to have an efficacy of 94% in a phase III trial in the Indian subcontinent. Its unrestricted use has raised concern about its continued effectiveness. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of miltefosine for the treatment of VL after a decade of use in India. METHODS An open-label, noncomparative study was performed in which 567 patients received oral miltefosine (50 mg for patients weighing <25 kg, 100 mg in divided doses for those weighing ≥25 kg, and 2.5 mg per kg for those aged <12 years, daily for 28 days) in a directly observed manner. Patients were followed up for 6 months to see the response to therapy. RESULTS At the end of treatment the initial cure rate was 97.5% (intention to treat), and 6 months after the end of treatment the final cure rate was 90.3%. The overall death rate was 0.9% (5 of 567), and 2 deaths were related to drug toxicity. Gastrointestinal intolerance was frequent (64.5%). The drug was interrupted in 9 patients (1.5%) because of drug-associated adverse events. CONCLUSIONS As compared to the phase III trial that led to registration of the drug a decade ago, there is a substantial increase in the failure rate of oral miltefosine for treatment of VL in India.


BMJ | 2001

Treatment of Indian visceral leishmaniasis with single or daily infusions of low dose liposomal amphotericin B: randomised trial

Shyam Sundar; G Agrawal; Madhukar Rai; Manoj Makharia; Henry W. Murray

OBJECTIVE To test short course, low dose liposomal amphotericin B as single or daily infusion treatment in Indian visceral leishmaniasis (kala-azar). DESIGN Randomised, open label study. SETTING Inpatient unit for leishmaniasis in Bihar, India. PARTICIPANTS 91 adults and children with splenic aspirate positive for infection. INTERVENTIONS Total dose of 5 mg/kg of liposomal amphotericin B given as a single infusion (n=46) or as once daily infusions of 1 mg/kg for five days (n=45). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Clinical and parasitological cure assessed 14 days after treatment and long term definitive cure (healthy, no relapse) at six months. RESULTS All but one person in each group had an initial apparent cure. During six months of follow up, three patients in the single dose group and two in the five dose group relapsed. Complete response (definitive cure) was therefore achieved in 84 of 91 subjects (92%): 42 of 46 patients in the single dose group (91%, 95% confidence interval 79% to 98%) and 42 of 45 in the five dose group (93%, 82% to 99%). Response rates in the two groups were not significantly different. CONCLUSION Low dose liposomal amphotericin B (5 mg/kg), given either as a five day course or as a single infusion, seems to be effective for visceral leishmaniasis and warrants further testing.


Tropical Medicine & International Health | 2006

Serious underreporting of visceral leishmaniasis through passive case reporting in Bihar, India

Sanjay Singh; Dandu Chandra Shekhar Reddy; Madhukar Rai; Shyam Sundar

Objectives  Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a major public health problem in Bihar, India. Unfortunately, accurate data on the incidence or prevalence of the disease are not available. This longitudinal study was undertaken to determine the incidence of VL in a Community Development Block area of the state of Bihar. Survey results were compared with official reports of the disease to assess the extent of underreporting by the Government health system.


The Journal of Infectious Diseases | 2011

IL-10 neutralization promotes parasite clearance in splenic aspirate cells from patients with visceral leishmaniasis.

Shalini Gautam; Rajiv Kumar; Radheshyam Maurya; Susanne Nylén; Nasim Ansari; Madhukar Rai; Shyam Sundar; David L. Sacks

The mechanisms underlying the failure to contain the growth of Leishmania parasites in human visceral leishmaniasis (VL) are not understood. L donovani amastigotes were quantified in cultured splenic aspirate cells to assess the function of IL-10 in lesional tissue ex vivo. In 67 patients with active VL, IL-10 neutralization promoted parasite killing in 73% and complete clearance in 30%, while 18% had more parasites and 9% did not change. The splenic cells secreted increased levels of both tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) and interferon γ (IFNγ) under IL-10-neutralizing conditions. These findings provide direct support for targeting IL-10 as an approach to therapy in human VL.


Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy | 2011

Targeted killing of Leishmania donovani in vivo and in vitro with amphotericin B attached to functionalized carbon nanotubes

Vijay Kumar Prajapati; Kalpana Awasthi; Shalini Gautam; T.P. Yadav; Madhukar Rai; O.N. Srivastava; Shyam Sundar

OBJECTIVES This study describes the antileishmanial efficacy of the novel drug formulation of amphotericin B (AmB) attached to functionalized carbon nanotubes (f-CNTs) and compares it with AmB. METHODS f-CNTs were prepared in a two-step chemical carboxylation and amidation process. The AmB was then attached to make f-CNT-AmB and its construction was confirmed by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The cytotoxicity of the constructed compound, f-CNT-AmB, was assessed in vitro using the J774A.1 macrophage cell line and in vivo using healthy BALB/c mice. Antileishmanial activity of AmB and f-CNT-AmB was assessed in vitro using a macrophage (J774A.1 cell line) model of Leishmania donovani infection. Antileishmanial activity was assessed in vivo by comparing the parasite load of hamsters treated with a 5 day course of AmB, f-CNTs or f-CNT-AmB initiated at 30 days after infection with L. donovani parasites. RESULTS The FTIR spectroscopy and TEM data demonstrate the successful attachment of AmB to f-CNTs. The in vitro cytotoxicity of AmB, f-CNTs and f-CNT-AmB was measured by the cytotoxic concentration required to kill 50% of the cells: 0.48±0.06 μg/mL; 7.31±1.16 μg/mL; 0.66±0.17 μg/mL, respectively, in the J774A.1 cell line. The in vivo toxicity assessment of the compounds in BALB/c mice revealed no hepatic or renal toxicity. Against intracellular amastigotes the in vitro antileishmanial efficacy of f-CNT-AmB was significantly higher than that of AmB (IC50 0.00234±0.00075 μg/mL versus 0.03263±0.00123 μg/mL; P≤0.0001). The percentage inhibition of amastigote replication in hamsters treated with f-CNT-AmB was significantly more than that with AmB (89.85%±2.93% versus 68.97%±1.84%; P=0.0004). CONCLUSIONS The results of these experiments clearly demonstrate that f-CNT-AmB has significantly greater antileishmanial efficacy than AmB and had no significant cytotoxic effects.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology | 2006

Rapid, Noninvasive Diagnosis of Visceral Leishmaniasis in India: Comparison of Two Immunochromatographic Strip Tests for Detection of Anti-K39 Antibody

Shyam Sundar; Radheshyam Maurya; Rakesh K. Singh; Kalpana Bharti; Jaya Chakravarty; Ashish Parekh; Madhukar Rai; Kailash Kumar; Henry W. Murray

ABSTRACT Used with blood or serum, a new anti-K39 antibody immunochromatographic strip test (IT-Leish; DiaMed AG) proved sensitive (range, 99 to 100%) and specific (range, 95 to 100%) for the noninvasive serodiagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis in India. Used with serum, the IT-Leish test and the existing Kalazar Detect test (InBios International, Inc.) yielded comparable results for symptomatic infection and identified apparent subclinical infection in 15 to 32% of healthy residents in a region where visceral leishmaniasis is highly endemic.


Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy | 2005

Treatment of visceral leishmaniasis.

Shyam Sundar; Madhukar Rai

The Leishmania donovani complex includes L. chagasi and L. infantum, and causes visceral leishmaniasis (VL), a disseminated and potentially fatal form of leishmaniasis. The treatment options for VL are limited. Pentavalent antimonials (Sbv) are the first-line treatment options worldwide except for in Europe and Sbv-unresponsive regions of India. Amphotericin B deoxycholate is the drug of choice in India, as are its lipid formulations in Europe. However, liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome®, Gilead Sciences, Inc.) is the best antileishmanial formulation, but its prohibitive cost limits its use in endemic countries. Preferential pricing of AmBisome for patients with VL may provide hope for these underprivileged patients. Oral miltefosine and paromomycin are the other drugs that have been recently developed. Limited therapeutic options, the potential for development of resistance and serious toxicity associated with antileishmanial drugs necessitates a change in the treatment policy. A shift from monotherapy to multi-drug combinations of short courses delivered at no or affordable cost, through directly observed therapy, seems to be the only way to develop the treatment of this disease.


Nature Genetics | 2013

Common variants in the HLA-DRB1-HLA-DQA1 HLA class II region are associated with susceptibility to visceral leishmaniasis

Michaela Fakiola; Amy Strange; Heather J. Cordell; E. Nancy Miller; Matti Pirinen; Zhan Su; Anshuman Mishra; Sanjana Mehrotra; Gloria R. Monteiro; Gavin Band; Céline Bellenguez; Serge Dronov; Sarah Edkins; Colin Freeman; Eleni Giannoulatou; Emma Gray; Sarah Hunt; Henio G. Lacerda; Cordelia Langford; Richard D. Pearson; Núbia N. Pontes; Madhukar Rai; Shri P Singh; Linda Smith; Olivia Sousa; Damjan Vukcevic; Elvira Bramon; Matthew A. Brown; Juan P. Casas; Aiden Corvin

To identify susceptibility loci for visceral leishmaniasis, we undertook genome-wide association studies in two populations: 989 cases and 1,089 controls from India and 357 cases in 308 Brazilian families (1,970 individuals). The HLA-DRB1–HLA-DQA1 locus was the only region to show strong evidence of association in both populations. Replication at this region was undertaken in a second Indian population comprising 941 cases and 990 controls, and combined analysis across the three cohorts for rs9271858 at this locus showed Pcombined = 2.76 × 10−17 and odds ratio (OR) = 1.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.30–1.52. A conditional analysis provided evidence for multiple associations within the HLA-DRB1–HLA-DQA1 region, and a model in which risk differed between three groups of haplotypes better explained the signal and was significant in the Indian discovery and replication cohorts. In conclusion, the HLA-DRB1–HLA-DQA1 HLA class II region contributes to visceral leishmaniasis susceptibility in India and Brazil, suggesting shared genetic risk factors for visceral leishmaniasis that cross the epidemiological divides of geography and parasite species.

Collaboration


Dive into the Madhukar Rai's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Shyam Sundar

Institute of Medical Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jaya Chakravarty

Institute of Medical Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anup Singh

Institute of Medical Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Vijay Kumar Prajapati

Institute of Medical Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Puja Tiwary

Institute of Medical Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Shalini Gautam

Institute of Medical Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anshuman Mishra

Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dinesh Kumar

Banaras Hindu University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge