Magali Rouyer
University of Bordeaux
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Magali Rouyer.
Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology | 2013
Denis Smith; Eric Terrebonne; Magali Rouyer; Jean-Frédéric Blanc; Dominique Breilh; Stéphane Pedeboscq; Alise Le Monies; Coralie Lecomte; R. Lassalle; Nicholas Moore; Annie Fourrier-Réglat
Introduction of new agents for the treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) has been accompanied by the publication of guidelines. The COLCHIC cohort was set up to evaluate CRC treatment practices and the use of these innovative and expensive agents. Patients initiating CRC treatment at the Bordeaux teaching hospital between 1 March 2005 and 1 March 2006 were identified, and treatment courses from 1 March 2005 to 31 December 2006 were studied; 192 patients were included, 188 with analysable data: 43 patients initiated 51 courses for non‐metastatic cancer, 153 initiated 366 courses for metastatic cancer, eight patients initiated courses for both non‐metastatic and metastatic cancer. Most treatments were used for indications found in guidelines published during the study (83.9%). Of the others, nearly half were approved in guidelines published subsequently. In this teaching hospital, prescribing practice was generally in line with recommendations, with an anticipation of future guidelines. This mostly concerned monoclonal antibodies, which were new at the time of the study.
Clinical Colorectal Cancer | 2018
Magali Rouyer; Eric Francois; Antonio Sa Cunha; Alain Monnereau; P. Noize; Philip Robinson; C. Droz-Perroteau; Alise Le Monies de Sagazan; Jérémy Jové; R. Lassalle; Nicholas Moore; Annie Fourrier-Réglat; Denis Smith
Introduction Few real‐life data are available on cetuximab benefit. The EREBUS cohort was performed to assess metastases resection rate, use, safety, and survival outcomes in wild‐type KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene) patients with initially unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated by cetuximab in real practice. Patients and Methods The study cohort comprised patients initiating cetuximab between January 2009 and December 2010 in 65 French centers, with initially unresectable mCRC and wild‐type KRAS. Kaplan‐Meier analysis estimated 24‐month probability of metastases resection and progression‐free survival, and 36‐month overall survival (OS). Cox proportional hazards models investigated factors associated with survival outcomes. Results Among the 389 patients included, median age was 64 years, 67.4% were male, 77.9% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 1, and hepatic metastases were most frequent at baseline (n = 146 exclusively, n = 149 not exclusively, n = 94 nonliver only). Median duration of cetuximab use was 4.8 months. Metastases resection was performed in 106 patients (27.2%) (n = 60 liver exclusively, n = 33 not exclusively, n = 13 nonliver only). The 24‐month probability (95% confidence interval) of metastases resection occurrence was 33.6% (28.5‐39.3). Median progression‐free survival was 9.2 (8.5‐9.8) months for the total cohort and 13.0 (11.6‐15.1) for those resected; median OS was 23.0 (20.6‐26.3) months for the total cohort and was not reached after 36 months for those who were resected. The strongest factor associated with higher OS was metastases resection with complete remission (hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.19‐0.88). Conclusion This cohort study highlights in French real‐life practice the benefit of cetuximab in first‐line mCRC therapy, notably in case of metastases resection with complete remission. Micro‐Abstract Cetuximab has demonstrated to improve survival outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but real‐life information is sparse. In the EREBUS cohort, effectiveness and safety were assessed in wild‐type KRAS mCRC patients with initially unresectable metastases and treated by cetuximab as first‐line therapy. Secondary metastases resection was observed in 27% of patients after first‐line cetuximab with chemotherapy, with significant benefit after complete remission.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2012
Denis Smith; Magali Rouyer; Emmanuel Mitry; Alain Monnereau; Antonio Sa Cunha; Emmanuelle Bignon; Alise Le Monies; Jérémy Jové; P. Noize; Nicholas Moore; Annie Fourrier-Réglat
621 Background: Cetuximab (CTX) has demonstrated to improve survival outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but little data for real-life use is available. METHODS EREBUS is a French multicentre (n=92) hospital-based cohort. Patients initiating CTX in 2009 and 2010 were identified retrospectively from registries of nominative drug dispensations. Those with wild-type KRAS gene receiving 1st-line treatment for mCRC were followed-up for 12 months. Data were collected from patient medical records and response based on physician assessments (CT-Scan). Presented here are preliminary results of the EREBUS cohort about administration regimen and according response rates for patients included in 2009. RESULTS Of the 190 patients included in the cohort, data has been collected for 160 (84.2%): median age at baseline 65.5 years, 70.6% male. Regarding cancer characteristics, 79.4% of patients had a colon cancer and 53.8% a primary tumor resection. Metastatic sites were liver in 73.1% of patients, peritoneum in 29.4%, lymph nodes in 26.3%, and lung in 25.6%. For patients for which the ECOG status was available (54.4%): 79.3% have an ECOG score between 0 and 1, 20.7% ≥2. Half the patients (48.8%) had only one metastatic site. CTX was given every three weeks to 2 patients (1.3%), every two weeks to 113 of patients (70.6%), and weekly to 45 (28.1%). For those receiving CTX every two weeks: 64.9% had irinotecan-based regimens (vs. 45.5% of those receiving CTX weekly, p=0.03), 31.5% had oxaliplatin-based regimens (vs. 47.7%, p=0.06), median duration of CTX use was 3.8 months (vs. 5.3 months, p=0.69) and that of 1st-line therapy 6.3 months (vs. 7.5 months, p=0.97), 69.0% discontinued 1st-line treatment (vs. 82.2%, p=0.09) - mainly for progression (71.8 vs. 75.7%, p=0.66) or toxicity (20.5 vs. 10.8%, p=0.20). Overall response evaluated for 100 patients receiving CTX every two weeks out of 113 was 46.0% (vs. 52.6%, p=0.49, evaluated for 38 receiving CTX weekly). CONCLUSIONS CTX administration every two weeks was the most frequent regimen. In this preliminary analysis, patients receiving weekly or every two weeks regimens had similar duration of treatment and response rate.
Targeted Oncology | 2014
Annie Fourrier-Réglat; Denis Smith; Magali Rouyer; Jacques Benichou; Rosine Guimbaud; Yves Bécouarn; Olivier Bernard; Pernelle Noize; Nicholas Moore; Alain Ravaud
Journal of Geriatric Oncology | 2016
Magali Rouyer; Annie Fourrier-Réglat; Denis Smith; Yves Bécouarn; Rosine Guimbaud; Nicole Tubiana-Mathieu; Philip J. Robinson; Jérémy Jové; Angela Grelaud; Pernelle Noize; Nicholas Moore; Alain Ravaud
Targeted Oncology | 2016
Magali Rouyer; D. Smith; Christophe Laurent; Yves Becouarn; Rosine Guimbaud; Pierre Michel; Nicole Tubiana-Mathieu; A. Balestra; Jérémy Jové; Philip Robinson; Pernelle Noize; Nicholas Moore; Alain Ravaud; Annie Fourrier-Réglat
Revue D Epidemiologie Et De Sante Publique | 2018
N. Thurin; P. Blin; Magali Rouyer; J. Jové; M. Gross–Goupil; T. Haaser; X. Rébillard; M.L. Soulié; C. Capone; C. Droz–Perroteau; Nicholas Moore
Revue D Epidemiologie Et De Sante Publique | 2018
Magali Rouyer; Annie Fourrier-Réglat; Florence Tubach; S. Oudard; Karim Fizazi; Florence Joly; S. Lamarque; E. Guiard; A. Balestra; C. Lacueille; J. Jové; C. Droz-Perroteau; Nicholas Moore
Revue D Epidemiologie Et De Sante Publique | 2017
P. Blin; Magali Rouyer; E. Guiard; F. Zerbib; B. Diquet; F. Mégraud; F. Tison; A. Abouelfath; R. Lassalle; C. Droz-Perroteau; Nicholas Moore
Revue D Epidemiologie Et De Sante Publique | 2017
Magali Rouyer; D. Smith; A. Sa Cunha; Eric Francois; Alain Monnereau; E. Yon; E. Bignon; A. Balestra; Pernelle Noize; C. Droz-Perroteau; Nicholas Moore; Annie Fourrier-Réglat