Maggy Tomova
University of Iowa
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Maggy Tomova.
Geometry & Topology | 2006
Martin Scharlemann; Maggy Tomova
Suppose M is a compact orientable irreducible 3-manifold with Heegaard splitting surfaces P and Q. Then either Q is isotopic to a possibly stabilized or boundary-stabilized copy of P or the distance d(P)<= 2genus (Q). More generally, if P and Q are bicompressible but weakly incompressible connected closed separating surfaces in M then either P and Q can be well-separated or P and Q are isotopic or d(P)<= 2genus (Q).
arXiv: Geometric Topology | 2008
Martin Scharlemann; Maggy Tomova
Any 2-bridge knot in S3 has a bridge sphere from which any other bridge surface can be obtained by stabilization, meridional stabilization, perturbation and proper isotopy.
Algebraic & Geometric Topology | 2011
Jesse Johnson; Maggy Tomova
We show that if K is a knot in S 3 and U is a bridge sphere for K with high distance and 2n punctures, the number of perturbations of K required to interchange the two balls bounded by U via an isotopy is n. We also construct a knot with two different bridge spheres with 2n and 2n 1 bridges respectively for which any common perturbation has at least 3n 4 bridges. We generalize both of these results to bridge surfaces for knots in any 3‐manifold. 57M25, 57M27, 57M50
Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory | 2011
Paul Martinez; Juan Ortiz; Maggy Tomova; Cindy Wyels
A radio labeling is an assignment c : V (G) ! N such that every distinct pair of vertices u,v satisfies the inequality d(u,v )+ |c(u) c(v) |diam(G) + 1. The span of a radio labeling is the maximum value of c. The radio number of G, rn(G), is the minimum span over all radio labelings of G. Generalized prism graphs, denoted Zn,s, s 1, n s, have vertex set {(i,j)|i =1 ,2 and j =1 ,...,n} and edge set
Journal of Knot Theory and Its Ramifications | 2011
Ryan Blair; Maggy Tomova
It has been conjectured that for knots K and K′ in S3, w(K # K′) = w(K) + w(K′) - 2. In [7], Scharlemann and Thompson proposed potential counterexamples to this conjecture. For every n, they proposed a family of knots
Discrete Mathematics | 2009
Zsuzsanna Szaniszlo; Maggy Tomova; Cindy Wyels
\{K^n_i\}
Geometry & Topology | 2018
Scott A. Taylor; Maggy Tomova
for which they conjectured that
American Mathematical Monthly | 2017
Ryan Blair; Marion Campisi; Jesse Johnson; Scott A. Taylor; Maggy Tomova
w(B^n\, \#\, K^n_i) = w(K^n_i)
Algebraic & Geometric Topology | 2015
Ryan Blair; David Futer; Maggy Tomova
where Bn is a bridge number n knot. We show that for n > 2 none of the knots in
Journal of Knot Theory and Its Ramifications | 2018
Román Aranda; Seungwon Kim; Maggy Tomova
\{K^n_i\}