Magnus Arnell
Lund University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Magnus Arnell.
Science of The Total Environment | 2014
Xavier Flores-Alsina; Magnus Arnell; Youri Amerlinck; Lluís Corominas; Krist V. Gernaey; Lisha Guo; Erik Lindblom; Ingmar Nopens; Jose Porro; Andrew Shaw; Laura Snip; Peter Vanrolleghem; Ulf Jeppsson
The objective of this paper was to show the potential additional insight that result from adding greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to plant performance evaluation criteria, such as effluent quality (EQI) and operational cost (OCI) indices, when evaluating (plant-wide) control/operational strategies in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). The proposed GHG evaluation is based on a set of comprehensive dynamic models that estimate the most significant potential on-site and off-site sources of CO₂, CH₄ and N₂O. The study calculates and discusses the changes in EQI, OCI and the emission of GHGs as a consequence of varying the following four process variables: (i) the set point of aeration control in the activated sludge section; (ii) the removal efficiency of total suspended solids (TSS) in the primary clarifier; (iii) the temperature in the anaerobic digester; and (iv) the control of the flow of anaerobic digester supernatants coming from sludge treatment. Based upon the assumptions built into the model structures, simulation results highlight the potential undesirable effects of increased GHG production when carrying out local energy optimization of the aeration system in the activated sludge section and energy recovery from the AD. Although off-site CO₂ emissions may decrease, the effect is counterbalanced by increased N₂O emissions, especially since N₂O has a 300-fold stronger greenhouse effect than CO₂. The reported results emphasize the importance and usefulness of using multiple evaluation criteria to compare and evaluate (plant-wide) control strategies in a WWTP for more informed operational decision making.
Water Research | 2016
Magnus Arnell; S. Astals; Linda Åmand; Damien J. Batstone; Paul Jensen; Ulf Jeppsson
Anaerobic co-digestion is an emerging practice at wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) to improve the energy balance and integrate waste management. Modelling of co-digestion in a plant-wide WWTP model is a powerful tool to assess the impact of co-substrate selection and dose strategy on digester performance and plant-wide effects. A feasible procedure to characterise and fractionate co-substrates COD for the Benchmark Simulation Model No. 2 (BSM2) was developed. This procedure is also applicable for the Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 (ADM1). Long chain fatty acid inhibition was included in the ADM1 model to allow for realistic modelling of lipid rich co-substrates. Sensitivity analysis revealed that, apart from the biodegradable fraction of COD, protein and lipid fractions are the most important fractions for methane production and digester stability, with at least two major failure modes identified through principal component analysis (PCA). The model and procedure were tested on bio-methane potential (BMP) tests on three substrates, each rich on carbohydrates, proteins or lipids with good predictive capability in all three cases. This model was then applied to a plant-wide simulation study which confirmed the positive effects of co-digestion on methane production and total operational cost. Simulations also revealed the importance of limiting the protein load to the anaerobic digester to avoid ammonia inhibition in the digester and overloading of the nitrogen removal processes in the water train. In contrast, the digester can treat relatively high loads of lipid rich substrates without prolonged disturbances.
Water Science and Technology | 2015
Erik Lindblom; Magnus Arnell; Xavier Flores-Alsina; Fredrik Stenström; D J I Gustavsson; James Yang; Ulf Jeppsson
The objective of this paper is to model the dynamics and validate the results of nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from three Swedish nitrifying/denitrifying, nitritation and anammox systems treating real anaerobic digester sludge liquor. The Activated Sludge Model No. 1 is extended to describe N2O production by both heterotrophic and autotrophic denitrification. In addition, mass transfer equations are implemented to characterize the dynamics of N2O in the water and the gas phases. The biochemical model is simulated and validated for two hydraulic patterns: (1) a sequencing batch reactor; and (2) a moving-bed biofilm reactor. Results show that the calibrated model is partly capable of reproducing the behaviour of N2O as well as the nitritation/nitrification/denitrification dynamics. However, the results emphasize that additional work is required before N2O emissions from sludge liquor treatment plants can be generally predicted with high certainty by simulations. Continued efforts should focus on determining the switching conditions for different N2O formation pathways and, if full-scale data are used, more detailed modelling of the measurement devices might improve the conclusions that can be drawn.
IWA World Congress on Water, Climate and Energy (WCE2012) | 2012
Xavier Flores; Magnus Arnell; Youri Amerlinck; Lluís Corominas; Krist V. Gernaey; Lisha Guo; Erik Lindblom; Ingmar Nopens; Jose Porro; Andrew Shaw; Peter Vanrolleghem; Ulf Jeppsson
Journal of Water and Climate Change | 2017
Magnus Arnell; Magnus Rahmberg; Felipe Oliveira; Ulf Jeppsson
13th Nordic Wastewater Treatment Conference (NORDIWA2013) | 2013
Magnus Arnell; R. Sehlén; Ulf Jeppsson
Archive | 2016
Magnus Arnell
CODEN:LUTEDX/TEIE; 7246 (2014) | 2014
Magnus Arnell; Linda Åmand
11th IWA Conference on Instrumentation, Control and Automation (ICA2013) | 2013
K. Tjus; F. Stenström; Magnus Arnell; Erik Lindblom
publisher | None
author