Magnus Edner

Results of atrioventricular synchronous pacing with optimized delay in patients with severe congestive heart failure

To verify that atrioventricular (AV) synchronous pacing (DDD) with short AV delay improves the condition of patients with severe congestive heart failure, we implanted DDD pacemakers in 10 patients with severe heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class III to IV). One day after pacemaker implantation, the AV delay was optimized by Doppler echocardiographic measurements over the aortic outflow tract. Patients were evaluated regarding NYHA class, stroke volume, cardiac output, ejection fraction, and quality of life at 1, 3, and 6 months after pacemaker implantation. Although the optimized AV delay was associated with short-term improvement in stroke volume and cardiac output (baseline stroke volume = 22 +/- 7 ml, day 1 = 28 +/- 12 ml; p = 0.03: baseline cardiac output = 1.9 +/- 0.6 L/min, day 1 = 2.2 +/- 1.1 L/min; p = 0.10), the mean stroke volume, cardiac output, NYHA class, and ejection fraction did not change significantly after 1, 3, and 6 months of pacing compared with baseline values. Three patients improved in NYHA class during the follow-up. A consistent improvement in stroke volume, cardiac output, NYHA class, and ejection fraction was observed in only 1 patient. In conclusion, we found no beneficial effects of AV-synchronous pacing with optimized AV delay in patients with severe heart failure.

Effect of carvedilol on diastolic function in patients with diastolic heart failure and preserved systolic function. Results of the Swedish Doppler-echocardiographic study (SWEDIC)†

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of carvedilol on diastolic function (DF) in heart failure patients with preserved left ventricular (LV) systolic function and abnormal DF.

Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in human hypertension with irbesartan

Background The Swedish irbesartan left ventricular hypertrophy investigation versus atenolol (SILVHIA). Objective Angiotensin II induces myocardial hypertrophy. We hypothesized that blockade of angiotensin II subtype 1 (AT1) receptors by the AT1-receptor antagonist irbesartan would reduce left ventricular mass (as measured by echocardiography) more than conventional treatment with a beta blocker. Design and methods This double-blind study randomized 115 hypertensive men and women with left ventricular hypertrophy to receive either irbesartan 150 mg q.d. or atenolol 50 mg q.d. for 48 weeks. If diastolic blood pressure remained above 90 mmHg, doses were doubled, and additional medications (hydrochlorothiazide and felodipine) were prescribed as needed. Echocardiography was performed at weeks 0, 12, 24 and 48. Results Baseline mean blood pressure was 162/104 mmHg, and mean left ventricular mass index was 157 g/m2 for men and 133 g/m2 for women. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure reductions were similar in both treatment groups. Both irbesartan (P < 0.001) and atenolol (P < 0.001) progressively reduced left ventricular mass index, e.g. by 26 and 14 g/m2 (16 and 9%), respectively, at week 48, with a greater reduction in the irbesartan group (P = 0.024) . The proportion of patients who attained a normalized left ventricular mass (i.e. ⩽ 131 g/m2 for men and ⩽ 100 g/m2 for women) tended to be greater with irbesartan (47 versus 32%, P = 0.108). Conclusions Left ventricular mass was reduced more in the irbesartan group than in the atenolol group. These results suggest that blocking the action of angiotensin II at AT1-receptors may be an important mechanism, beyond that of lowering blood pressure, in the regulation of left ventricular mass and geometry in patients with hypertension.

Prospective study of left ventricular function after radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular junction in patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND--In patients with drug resistant incessant supraventricular tachycardia, radiofrequency induced ablation of the atrioventricular junction and pacemaker implantation have hitherto been considered a treatment of last resort. OBJECTIVE--To assess the short and long term effects of ablation of the atrioventricular junction on systolic and diastolic left ventricular function in patients with atrial fibrillation with and without impaired left ventricular function. PATIENTS--29 patients (19 men; mean age 65 (SD 7) years (range 50-76)) undergoing ablation of the atrioventricular junction for drug refractory atrial fibrillation were examined a mean of 2, 65, and 216 days after ablation of the bundle of His. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Left ventricular ejection fraction and early filling deceleration times (Edec) were assessed by Doppler echocardiography after 1 to 2 hours of ventricular pacing at a rate of 80 beats/minute. RESULTS--In 14 patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction < 50% left ventricular ejection fraction increased significantly from 32% (11%) to 39% (11%) (65 days) and 45% (11%) (216 days) (P < 0.001); Edec increased from 142 (46) ms to 169 (57) ms (65 days) and 167 (56) ms (216 days) (P < 0.05). In 15 patients with an ejection fraction > or = 50% at the initial examination no significant change in systolic function was observed. CONCLUSIONS--In patients with left ventricular dysfunction long term improvement of systolic and diastolic left ventricular function was seen after ablation of the atrioventricular junction for rate control of atrial fibrillation. This procedure had no adverse effects on normal left ventricular function.

Association Between Use of Renin-Angiotensin System Antagonists and Mortality in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction

CONTEXT Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) may be as common and as lethal as heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFREF). Three randomized trials of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ie, renin-angiotensin system [RAS] antagonists) did not reach primary end points but may have had selection bias or been underpowered. OBJECTIVE To test the hypothesis that use of RAS antagonists is associated with reduced all-cause mortality in an unselected population with HFPEF. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS Prospective study using the Swedish Heart Failure Registry of 41,791 unique patients registered from 64 hospitals and 84 outpatient clinics between 2000 and 2011. Of these, 16,216 patients with HFPEF (ejection fraction ≥40%; mean [SD] age, 75 [11] years; 46% women) were either treated (n = 12,543) or not treated (n = 3673) with RAS antagonists. Propensity scores for RAS antagonist use were derived from 43 variables. The association between use of RAS antagonists and all-cause mortality was assessed in a cohort matched 1:1 based on age and propensity score and in the overall cohort with adjustment for propensity score as a continuous covariate. To assess consistency, separate age and propensity score-matched analyses were performed according to RAS antagonist dose in patients with HFPEF and in 20,111 patients with HFREF (ejection fraction <40%) in the same registry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE All-cause mortality. RESULTS In the matched HFPEF cohort, 1-year survival was 77% (95% CI, 75%-78%) for treated patients vs 72% (95% CI, 70%-73%) for untreated patients, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.85-0.98; P = .008). In the overall HFPEF cohort, crude 1-year survival was 86% (95% CI, 86%-87%) for treated patients vs 69% (95% CI, 68%-71%) for untreated patients, with a propensity score-adjusted HR of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.85-0.96; P = .001). In the HFPEF dose analysis, the HR was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.78-0.83) for 50% or greater of target dose vs no treatment (P < .001) and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.87-1.02) for less than 50% of target dose vs no treatment (P = .14). In the age and propensity score-matched HFREF analysis, the HR was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.74-0.86; P < .001). CONCLUSION Among patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction, the use of RAS antagonists was associated with lower all-cause mortality.

Heart failure registry: a valuable tool for improving the management of patients with heart failure

Guidelines on how to diagnose and treat patients with heart failure (HF) are published regularly. However, many patients do not fulfil the diagnostic criteria and are not treated with recommended drugs. The Swedish Heart Failure Registry (S‐HFR) is an instrument which may help to optimize the handling of HF patients.

Association Between Use of β-Blockers and Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction

IMPORTANCE Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) may be as common and may have similar mortality as heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFREF). β-Blockers reduce mortality in HFREF but are inadequately studied in HFPEF. OBJECTIVE To test the hypothesis that β-blockers are associated with reduced all-cause mortality in HFPEF. DESIGN Propensity score-matched cohort study using the Swedish Heart Failure Registry. Propensity scores for β-blocker use were derived from 52 baseline clinical and socioeconomic variables. SETTING Nationwide registry of 67 hospitals with inpatient and outpatient units and 95 outpatient primary care clinics in Sweden with patients entered into the registry between July 1, 2005, and December 30, 2012, and followed up until December 31, 2012. PARTICIPANTS From a consecutive sample of 41,976 patients, 19,083 patients with HFPEF (mean [SD] age, 76 [12] years; 46% women). Of these, 8244 were matched 2:1 based on age and propensity score for β-blocker use, yielding 5496 treated and 2748 untreated patients with HFPEF. Also we conducted a positive-control consistency analysis involving 22,893 patients with HFREF, of whom 6081 were matched yielding 4054 treated and 2027 untreated patients. EXPOSURES β-Blockers prescribed at discharge from the hospital or during an outpatient visit, analyzed 2 ways: without consideration of crossover and per-protocol analysis with censoring at crossover, if applicable. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The prespecified primary outcome was all-cause mortality and the secondary outcome was combined all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization. RESULTS Median follow-up in HFPEF was 755 days, overall; 709 days in the matched cohort; no patients were lost to follow-up. In the matched HFPEF cohort, 1-year survival was 80% vs 79% for treated vs untreated patients, and 5-year survival was 45% vs 42%, with 2279 (41%) vs 1244 (45%) total deaths and 177 vs 191 deaths per 1000 patient-years (hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; 95% CI, 0.86-0.996; P = .04). β-Blockers were not associated with reduced combined mortality or heart failure hospitalizations: 3368 (61%) vs 1753 (64%) total for first events, with 371 vs 378 first events per 1000 patient-years (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.92-1.04; P = .46). In the matched HFREF cohort, β-blockers were associated with reduced mortality (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.97, P=.005) and also with reduced combined mortality or heart failure hospitalization (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.84-0.95; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In patients with HFPEF, use of β-blockers was associated with lower all-cause mortality but not with combined all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization. β-Blockers in HFPEF should be examined in a large randomized clinical trial.

Myocardial fibrosis and diastolic dysfunction in patients with hypertension: results from the Swedish Irbesartan Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Investigation versus Atenolol (SILVHIA).

Objectives Hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is associated with cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and an excess in myocardial collagen. Myocardial fibrosis may cause diastolic dysfunction and heart failure. Circulating levels of the carboxy-terminal propeptide of procollagen type I (PICP), an index of collagen type I synthesis, correlate with the extent of myocardial fibrosis. This study examines myocardial fibrosis in relation to blood pressure, left ventricular mass (LVM), and diastolic function. Methods We examined PICP levels in 115 patients with hypertensive LVH, 38 with hypertension but no hypertrophy, and 38 normotensive subjects. Patients with LVH were subsequently randomly assigned to the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker irbesartan or the beta1 receptor blocker atenolol for 48 weeks. Diastolic function was evaluated by tissue velocity echocardiography (n = 134). We measured basal septal wall velocities of early (Em) and late (Am) diastolic myocardial wall motion, Em velocity deceleration time (E-decm), and isovolumic relaxation time (IVRTm). Results Compared with the normotensive group, PICP was elevated and left ventricular diastolic function was impaired in the hypertensive groups, with little difference between patients with and without LVH. PICP related to blood pressure, IVRTm, Em, and E/Em, but not to LVM. Irbesartan and atenolol reduced PICP similarly. Only in the irbesartan group did changes in PICP relate to changes in IVRTm, and LVM. Conclusion Myocardial fibrosis and diastolic dysfunction are present in hypertension before LVH develops. The findings with irbesartan suggest a role for angiotensin II in the control of myocardial fibrosis and diastolic function in patients with hypertension with LVH.

Epidemiology of heart failure in Sweden--a national survey.

In Sweden heart failure is the most frequent discharge diagnosis within internal medicine. The prevalence of heart failure seems to be increasing, mainly due to an ageing population, but also because of improved survival in patients with cardiovascular diseases.

Prevalence, correlates, and prognostic significance of QRS prolongation in heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction

AIMS The independent clinical correlates and prognostic impact of QRS prolongation in heart failure (HF) with reduced and preserved ejection fraction (EF) are poorly understood. The rationale for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in preserved EF is unknown. The aim was to determine the prevalence of, correlates with, and prognostic impact of QRS prolongation in HF with reduced and preserved EF. METHODS AND RESULTS We studied 25,171 patients (age 74.6 ± 12.0 years, 39.9% women) in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry. We assessed QRS width and 40 other clinically relevant variables. Correlates with QRS width were assessed with multivariable logistic regression, and the association between QRS width and all-cause mortality with multivariable Cox regression. Pre-specified subgroup analyses by EF were performed. Thirty-one per cent had QRS ≥120 ms. Strong predictors of QRS ≥120 ms were higher age, male gender, dilated cardiomyopathy, longer duration of HF, and lower EF. One-year survival was 77% in QRS ≥120 vs. 82% in QRS <120 ms, and 5-year survival was 42 vs. 51%, respectively (P < 0.001). The adjusted hazard ratio for all-cause mortality was 1.11 (95% confidence interval 1.04-1.18, P = 0.001) for QRS ≥120 vs. <120 ms. There was no interaction between QRS width and EF. CONCLUSION QRS prolongation is associated with other markers of severity in HF but is also an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality. The risk associated with QRS prolongation may be similar regardless of EF. This provides a rationale for trials of CRT in HF with preserved EF.